Microsoft Fueling HD Wars For Own Benefit? 359
DaveyJJ writes "According to Transformers' director Michael Bay, in a story over on Electronista, Microsoft is deliberately feeding into the HD disc format wars to ensure that its own downloads succeed where physical copies fail, he says in a response to a question posed through his official forums. The producer contends that Microsoft is writing "$100 million dollar checks" to movie studios to ensure HD DVD exclusives that hurt the overall market regardless of the format's actual merit or its popularity, preventing any one format from gaining a clear upper hand."
Doesn't sound like Microsoft. (Score:2, Insightful)
No I couldn't write this with a straight face.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Blu-Ray and HD DVD basically offer the same thing, a way to watch movies.
The different ways of playing games however, offer different means of playing a game. Very different ways of controlling the game for example.
The different ways of playing games will attract different types of players, and different types of games will be made, some which can be ported to different devices, some that can't.
Blu
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Or what I think is more likely: format-agnostic players will become commonplace, and some studios will release solely on hd-dvd, others on blu-ray, and essentially the customer won't have to care.
Not only are both formats very similar technologically, th
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Europe has already decided on the BR format as well. An estimated 75% of HD movie sales have been BR discs. Person
Re: (Score:3)
So basically, I see the format war as a bust and not a repeat of VHS/Betamax.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm inclined to believe that this format war really doesn't matter all that much. The age of physical media for distributing entertainment works (music, videos, etc.) is coming to an end. In a few years DOCSIS 3.0 and Fiber are going to make ultra high speed connections ubiquitous. When it only takes an hour to download 50GB of data, I simply see no point in purchasing an (overpriced) disc, particularly when the DRM on the disc is as bad as or worse than what you'll find attached to any mainstream downlo
Alternative explanations (Score:5, Insightful)
...Or maybe it's because Microsoft has been a strong backer of the format since the very beginning, and doesn't want it to end up like all of Sony's other consumer device formats. (Betamax, MiniDisc, Memory Stick, SACD, UMD...)
...Or maybe it's because HD-DVD is the format that its cash cow video game console system supports, whereas they have nothing to do with Blu-ray.
Of course, I could just be grasping at straws.
At any rate, I do think he is right in that neither format will be the choice for obtaining and playing hi-def content, online distribution ultimately will win.
Before you post a correction... (Score:2)
Strike that word "other." I'm well aware that HD-DVD isn't a Sony format. What I said and what I was thinking when I typed that (Sony's consumer device formats other than the competing Blu-ray...) obviously wasn't quite in sync.
Re:Alternative explanations (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
A company, that has made lots and lots of money, whever even a guy who owns barely 10% of the stock is richer than God himself, and you think they do that by making good financial decisions???
You must be new here.
Re:Alternative explanations (Score:4, Insightful)
Online distribution is only feasible if you have an Internet-enabled device connected to your HDTV. Sure, media center PCs are getting more common (and more affordable), and the numbers [vgchartz.com] on HD-ready game consoles are steadily rising, but the vast majority of HDTV owners do not possess either (a fact that will likely remain, as the magnitude of the HDTV sales figures [parksassociates.com] indicates).
Maybe in 10 years the tide will have turned and most people will be using online distribution. However, there's serious money to be made in the meantime, and that requires physical media.
Re: (Score:2)
Still, that could be fixed in well under a year.
Seriously, a gigabit ethernet chip costs how much to add onto a device? A buck or so? A DVD player can be had from walmart for $25. Get rid of the drive, use the cost savings to go to a more advanced decoding chip and HDTV output.
Discounting development costs, I could see it costing a 'mere' $50 for a device dedica
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Some Sony formats such as compact disc, 3.5" floppy and miniDV can hardly be described as failures.
But that's beside the point. Microsoft doesn't want any physical HD format to dominate.
Re: (Score:2)
You conveniently forget that Sony was a co-developer and strong backer of the CD format.
Re:Alternative explanations (Score:5, Insightful)
Really? So right now in the lo-def world we cant get this stuff to work and Joe Sixpack isnt goign anywhere near it and when he does the quality is shit (netflicks) but next year or two we'll have the extra bandwidth and marketshare and the equipment and joe sixpack's trust and a pricing scheme that works and and
Right.
Discs are going to be the delivery mechanism for the forseeable future. MS is backing HDDVD. Sony is with Bluray. This is just a slashdot trolling hit and run page. Enjoy the ad impressions.
Not to mention if anyone pushes online distribution it'll be soaking in DRM. Enough to make bluray and hddvd look like Richard Stallman. This crowd will go apeshit and will never use it.
How is Microsoft a strong backer? (Score:2)
That's exactly why it seems like Microsoft is backing HD-DVD ONLY to the degree that they keep the format war in play, to keep consumers away from either HD-DVD or, more importantly, Blu-Ray. And why behind the scenes they help fund payola to get companies to go format specific when it looked like Blu-Ray was winning too handily with a 70+% weekly market share of media sa
If comments like these had any merit.... (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't believe it... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are all you Microsoft execs "morons", as Bob says? [angryflower.com] That would tend to explain some of the things I find maddening about the software ("error [n] there is no message for this error"; the fact that no two menu items are ever in the same place when an "upgrade" is obtained; the fact that an OS "upgrade" makes your computer run slower; etc. etc. etc.)
Because heaven knows.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Both Sony and MS throw money into supporting the horse that their respective wagon is tied to. That's how it is.
And I agree that in the long term on line distribution will win, but before it can the internet as we know it needs some substantial upgrading. Not to support the concept (it already does), but to support what happens when the masses start using it.
Re:Because heaven knows.... (Score:5, Interesting)
Bingo! MS isn't trying to destroy physical media anymore than Verizon is trying to destroy the POTS. While both know that the future doesn't lay in these technologies both also know that for now they're pulling down a reasonable profit with them because of mass usage.
By the time the internet is seriously up to the task of delivering HD styled content to the masses both HD DVD and Blu Ray will have gone the way of the laser disc. The lifespan of these new formats will not be longer than that of the traditional DVD. We've been DVD for what now? 10 or 12 years? Do people here honestly think that technologies like FIOS are going to be nation wide (let alone world wide) in the next decade? I think people are fooling themselves into the ultra futuristic world of downloadable content being just around the corner. We have communities within 20 miles of a somewhat major city (if you can call Pittsburgh a major city) that still don't have DSL or Cable internet. This doesn't even bring the frail backbone of the internet into question.
Online content as a mass market is still a long ways off and it's ability to replace physical media won't be a reality in the next 10 years.
Re: (Score:2)
I personally think in the longer run it will be something along the lines of WiMax that wins out because it isn't tied
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I think that the limitations of bandwidth inherent in broadcast transmissions will be the downfall of the idea of doing everything wirelessly.
I mean, here we are talking about streaming HDTV to, say, 10% of households. If a particular wimax cell has 2k households in
Re:Because heaven knows.... (Score:4, Insightful)
I agree. However, it is very clear why Sony is willing to dump a ton of money into Blu-Ray. It's pretty much their format. They'll make a killing if it becomes dominant, and they'll loose a ton if it looses.
Microsoft, on the other hand, isn't as heavily invested. For example, their console supports HD-DVD only as an add-on. If HD-DVD becomes dominant, they get some licensing fees on each unit sold, which is no doubt nice, but not that big a deal.
I think Microsoft wants to kill Blu-ray, but they don't care if HD-DVD succeeds or not. They don't want to be at the mercy of Sony for two reasons:
1. If Blu-Ray becomes dominant, they'll be forced to licence it for their next console, (and possibly a XBOX360 add-on). What if Sony denies them? What if the fees put them at too much of a disadvantage.
2. Microsoft envisions some soft of computerized media center in each home. They need some control of the format to do this.
Re:Because heaven knows.... (Score:5, Informative)
What Microsoft does NOT like about Blu Ray is that it requires a java VM.
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for pointing this out, and correcting me. It sounds like Sony would still get the benefit of licensing fees, if Blu-Ray succeeds over HD-DVD, but that's about it. It doesn't sound like it should be a big deal to Microsoft.
What Microsoft does NOT like about Blu Ray is that it requires a java VM.
Do you know whay this a
Wrong on two counts (Score:4, Informative)
No, a neutral Blu-Ray forum gets the licensing fees [blu-raydisc.info]. Sony makes money the old fashioned way, selling hardware and software (media).
Do you know why this (Java support) a big deal to Microsoft? It doesn't sound like there's any practical reason to me
Why don't know why but we know it's a big deal to Microsoft, because the only thing that stopped HD-DVD and Blu-Ray combining a few years back was the refusial of the Blu-Ray consortium to add iHD (Microsofts menuing format) into the Blu-Ray standard.
Claims made about BD-J that bear scrutiny (Score:4, Informative)
I can't speak to the speed of BD-J, though clearly this smacks of the "Java is slow" FUD that Java proponents have been dealing with for years now. Java VMs aren't really "slow" anymore, unless you're dealing with memory-constrained devices. Most Blu-Ray players are going to have plenty enough RAM, so I don't think constrained memory footprint is going to be an issue.
As for the "ill-specced" claim, I'm puzzled. I know that BD-J is based on an already existing standard for embedding interactive Java content in terrestrial television broadcasts and European cable transmissions; this technology is used, for example, in the German version of "Who Wants to be a Millionaire?" (or maybe it was "Deal or No Deal") -- it allows viewers to play along at home using their remote control. BD-J is just an extension of this already existing and deployed standard, so how is it poorly specified?
I attended JavaOne in 2006, and attended a couple sessions on BD-J and related technologies, so that's where I got my information from.
Re: (Score:2)
BTW
"I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore"
Have you looked at Ron Paul [ronpaul2008.com]?
proof? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Now, I have no idea whether similar deals are in place for Blu-ray. Sony, of course, is a major studio on its own, so it clearly has a vested interest in releasing exclusively on Blu-ray.
[disclaimer: I'm a bit of a Blu-ray fan, I like the higher capacities]
It is likely tha
Re: (Score:2)
They wrote the HD content software. (Score:5, Interesting)
What's a few $100M here and there when you have the potential to collect so many licenses from consumer boxes?
Plus, the Blu-Ray content software is written in Java. What better reason for MS to hate it?
Strategically consistent (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Strategically consistent (Score:4, Insightful)
FUD (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe since they're offering their set top game box in HD DVD it's a business interest?
What's the problem here and why is this news?
They have real interest in seeing HD get the upper hand. Yes. Would they like to see downloadable content as a better business prospective? Yes. Who doesn't. MS has invested billions into their 360 product, throwing in a bit more money to give it the edge in home movies isn't unthinkable and certainly isn't unheard of.
I seriously do not understand why people are in such a twist over this. Oh, that's right, it's because it's big bad Microsoft and we all need to focus our attention for our daily two minutes of hate.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a ridiculous notion that there should be "Rule X" and it should apply universally across all entities. If an adult starts crying whenever he's hungry, that's going to be frowned upon. Babies do the same thing, and it's fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you're a gullible fool.
No seriously. Microsoft doesn't do anything to benefit anyone other than itself. We know that. We've seen that time and time again. Micheal Bay is just illustrating another reason that Microsoft has to back HD-DVD. Essentially if HD-DVD wins, Microsoft wins because it will hurt Sony who is a competitor, and get Microsoft some license money on their HD-DVD technology. If both formats loose then Microsoft still wins because they'll be peddling an HD download service to fi
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly? What to Blu-Ray and Betamax have in common? What are the parallels between the formats? What is it about Betamax that the market didn't like that's also true of Blu-Ray?
Maybe you're just repeating Microsoft PR talking points as if they were information?
Am I the only one who is tired of this 3rd-grade playground taunting that folks use when they can't put a coherent argument together? Why not just say "Sony's mom is a slut" instead?
Maybe since they're o
The Real Betamax (Score:2)
Blu-Ray is the standard where a truly diverse group of co
No Mercy (Score:2)
Responsibility (Score:2, Insightful)
I don't care for the why. (Score:3, Insightful)
The HD-DVD format whilst not perfect is much more consumer friendly in that it's cheaper, it's region free and it's backwards compatible to an extent.
In comparison Bluray suffers from being region locked, having much more unfriendly, more problematic DRM and doesn't support backwards compat. in DVD players.
A lot of people don't want HD-DVD to win because Microsoft are backing it, but I think Microsoft is the lesser of two evils in this case, the biggest bonus for me is the region free part, whilst this is probably largely useless for North American consumers who get films earlier and cheaper anyway for those of us in Europe this is immensly important, rather than paying £23.99 for a film we can import it for about £15 and often get it 6 months earlier. With Bluray you're stuck with your £23.99 cost and the 6 month delay between North American and European releases.
Sadly it may be too late, HD-DVD isn't holding up that well right now it would seem, for me personally if HD-DVD won I would buy an HD-DVD player because of the cheap import HD-DVDs I can buy but if Bluray won I'd go for online purchases of HD content for no other reason than I refuse to pay over £15 for a movie.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Of those, only one is true and one is partially true. HD DVD is region free and its the one great feature it has. It is only partially true to say HD DVD is cheaper since it is only because Toshiba is subsidizing it. The technology for Blu Ray and HD DVD is virtually analogous and therefore incurs similar costs. It's just the Blu Ray camp doesn't have the lu
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
In terms of backwards compatibility I refer to the fact that HD-DVDs can use a layer of the disc for DVD such that you can buy HD-DVDs now and use them in your existing DVD player and have them play standard def. then when you do make the switch to HD-DVD you've already got a library of HD films meaning you don't have
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Tell me a standard which you believe to have been implemented perfectly by all supporters of it, especially one that remotely approaches the complexity of Blu Ray standard.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
This allows, in the future, for a studio to release only one product, a Twin DVD/HD-DVD combo disc that plays in both DVD players and H
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The DRM is not more problematic.
This is very much untrue. HD-DVD "only" supports AACS, while blu-ray additionally supports BD+. This runs some code in a virtual machine to ensure the player integrity. Now some discs are supporting this, and apparently older players have a lot of problems with these discs (that is, they don't work at all without a firmware upgrade). And if it works, it seems to cause longer load times and other performance issues. Now, it may be true that this is the fault of the players, but BD+ inherently is another "fe
Blu-Ray region free - after a year. And cheaper (Score:2)
Combo discs cost $5 more than Blu-Ray discs, otherwise they are the same price. Silly consumer, when have prices ever been set by media costs?
it's region free
Blu-Ray titles are after a year. This is the only advantage... however the US and Japan being in the same Blu-Ray region, pretty much negates this concern for me.
and it's backwards compatible to an extent
You mean to the same extent Blu-Ray is? Blu-Ray players pla
Re: (Score:2)
The costs of disc production are not significantly different for either format and sometimes Blu is cheaper by virtue of only requiring a single layer disc vs dual for HD DVD. You can see a fair
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluray#Region_codes [wikipedia.org]
vs.
"There is no Region Coding in the existing HD DVD specification, which means that titles from any country can be played in players in any other country."
From the DRM section of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_DVD [wikipedia.org]
Which has no region coding section as Bluray does.
DVD/HD hybrid discs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluray#DVD_.2F_Blu-Ray_hybrid_discs [wikipedia.org] (The section is empty)
vs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HD_DVD#DVD_.2F_HD_DVD_hybrid_discs [wikipedia.org]
DRM problems
Maintaining competition... (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft really can't do anything right, can they? First they got into a ton of trouble for attempting to help on HTML-browser implementation (their own) win — and the web-masters are still forced to maintain compatibility with completely different programs.
And now Microsoft is blasted for maintaining competition — between multiple formats, because forcing the DVD-authoring teams to make versions for various players is somehow "totally different".
Yes, I know, you'll claim, that "there should be one standard and multiple implementations". Well, if the standard is the high-quality TV-picture/sound (and who really cares for anything else?), than the BlueRay and HD-DVD can be considered just different implementations that should compete in perpetuity...
Re: (Score:2)
DRM (Score:2)
Once they start getting people to download movies instead of buying physical copies they will then ensure that they're the ones supplying the DRM encryption that will only work with their software.
HD-DVD and Blu-Ray both will fail (Score:2)
We've downloaded qu
If you believe this, I have a bridge I want to... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:If you believe this, I have a bridge I want to. (Score:2)
This "director" was responsible for this summer's #1 hit which became #1 best selling HD DVD title. Therefore I think he's in a slightly better position to know more about the background shenanigans behind why his movie is on one format and not another than you are.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:If you believe this, I have a bridge I want to. (Score:2)
HD DVD Paid $150 million to Studios for "Promotional Consideration" [gizmodo.com]
This payoff for Paramount exclusive support of HD-DVD (instead of Paramount's previous support of both HD formats) directly affected the release of Micheal Bay's big movie: Transformers.
Not a PR guy? No, of course not.
Tricky Choice.. (Score:2)
In this case, we've got Microsoft, universally derided on slashdot and elsewhere...so you might think the choice is clear.
But... against Michael Bay ?
My employment biases aside.. I'm going to have to support MS on this one. Whatever Michael Bay says he doesn't like must be a gem in an otherwise steaming pile.
The "Team America" movie didn't include a song about how awful Microsoft is.. but DID have several Michael Bay sucks
Faulty premise. (Score:3, Informative)
This rant from Bay is about as logical as the plots to his movies.
They can write all the $100 Million checks they .. (Score:2)
I think online is the way to go. One it keeps telcom folks employed (good for geeks). It is also way better for the environment. Why should I have to drive to a big box store to buy a disk that was produced in another state and shipped 100's or 1000's of miles to my city? What a waste of energy and recourses. I'd rather have the high paying telcom jobs than the sales drone jobs at Big Box Inc.
However I'm likely to buy my video from Apple or Google
MS vs. Michael Bay (Score:2)
But hey... (Score:2)
After reading all the comments... (Score:2)
After putting forth a lot of effort (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
How is this open? (Score:5, Informative)
I'm sorry, but at least, say, OOXML pretends to be open. Google for "OOXML Specification dowload" and the very first result has PDFs, linked to directly, not even so much as a free registration required.
I develop HD-DVD applications for a living. On my desk are four volumes of "DVD Specifications for High Definition VIDEO (HD DVD-Video)", totaling almost three inches thick. (I'd tell you how many pages, but the pages are not numbered.) There's probably another three and a half inches worth of updates, which someone else here has read and memorized, that I don't really look at.
We do not have these in electronic form. As far as I know, you cannot get them in electronic form, and they do not come with an index, which makes them a bitch to search until you start to memorize enough of it to have a vague idea of where to start randomly flipping through to find what you need.
This is because on every single page, at the bottom of the page, is the following notice:
"Open" and "public" my ass.
Re:I call bullshit on this one... (Score:5, Interesting)
True, Downloadable video is nice, as is stuff like Video on demand. I can picture telling my kids that "In my day, if you wanted to watch a show? You just had to wait until it was on." However, I don't think that downloadable movies will ever overtake actually having the disk in hand. If I want to watch Army Of Darkness, I don't want to wait 20 minutes for it to stream, then hope that my connection stays steady enough to prevent it from freezing. Just pop in the disk, no problem. The more steps you take from wanting to watch a movie, and pressing play, the worse off it is, in my opinion.
Re:I call bullshit on this one... (Score:5, Interesting)
Throw in the added benefit of taking some of the wind out of the PS3 and it seems like a very cheap way for Microsoft to purchase marketshare in several different markets (Console, DVD Downloads, Home Electronics).
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think its related to increasing the usefulness of downloads. I think actually that if a friend of microsoft were making Blu ray they'd be all over it. It's superior technology, but has the disadvantage that it requires major infrastructure upgrades for most companies to utilise it (well, to build the discs, this is my simple understanding). Hell, th
Re:I call bullshit on this one... (Score:4, Insightful)
That's already the case with Tivos and Tivo-like devices.
You just wait until it's "been released" and then decide
when you're going to get around to watching it after that.
The more storage space you have in your PVR, the more it
starts to look like your own personal VOD system. You
just need to give it a little time to accumulate stuff.
Streaming is always open to problems. Whereas whole files are
a lot more reliable to deal with. It doesn't really matter if
they were downloaded from a torrent or recorded off of some
TV broadcast channel.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I get your point that right
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
So yes, it will take a decade for downloaded videos to kill DVDs and high definition alternatives
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
And his post was "insightful?" The RIAA lawyers must have mod points [slashdot.org] today!
-mcgrew
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It also doesn't make much logical sense. Bay claims that MS is prolonging the format war until they can get downloadable video working right, then swoop in and be declared "A winner is you!" Seems to me that Bay as been watching too many of his own movies.
One of their largest competitors in a huge emerging market has financially backed the other format(Sony). If Sony dominates with blu-ray then it becomes a more attractive feature to potential buyers. If there in uncertainty over the format then it blunts the attractiveness of such a feature. Remember MS real goal, to place a MS controlled media system format into out living rooms.
True, Downloadable video is nice, as is stuff like Video on demand. I can picture telling my kids that "In my day, if you wanted to watch a show? You just had to wait until it was on." However, I don't think that downloadable movies will ever overtake actually having the disk in hand. If I want to watch Army Of Darkness, I don't want to wait 20 minutes for it to stream, then hope that my connection stays steady enough to prevent it from freezing. Just pop in the disk, no problem. The more steps you take from wanting to watch a movie, and pressing play, the worse off it is, in my opinion.
The idea would be DRM'ed download files. So you want Army of Darkness, well you could spend $9.95 and go to the mall for the DV
Re: (Score:2)
Yea the first fight at the military base was good the film quickly went downhill and very very fast. It quickly became a movie of bad dialog, poor lighting and boring action. And that comes from someone who like The Rock and Armageddon.
Re: (Score:2)
This reaction is easy to grok: the choice is between two closed/proprietary and patented-all-to-Hell formats.... the result is that consumers either get the Scylla format (HD-DVD), or the Charybdis format (Blu-Ray).
Either way you'll be paying through the nose. Some 'choice'...
Wait, there are two of them?! (Score:2)
When it comes to Blu-ray and HD-DVD they're _exactly_ the same once you get past the different specs.
Hi-def video? Check
Hi-def/Lossless audio? Check
Media price? Same
Player price? Almost the same
Onerous DRM? Check
Sure, there are some differenc
Re: (Score:2)
HD-DVD's DRM is about as onerous as DVDs. Less so, in fact, since they dropped the pesky region codes out of HD-DVD. (This fact alone often delays HD-DVD releases of movies - after all, one could import an HD-DVD while the movie is just coming into the theatres). HD-DVD even makes AACS optional (like how CSS is optional on DVD). Blu-Ray mandates CSS as mandatory, region codes are present still (no doubt engineered to bypass the current DVD region-free laws), and now everyone's moving to BD
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, I'm waiting for my current SDTV to die before I replace it with a HDTV.
Re:Wait a minute (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
When Microsoft doesn't control the market, Microsoft always encourages a choice.
It'll be a choice that's incompatible with the dominant one, possibly in subtle ways that Microsoft can widen into a wedge over time. Like they tried to do to Java.
Then when Microsoft gets control of the market, only the Microsoft choice is left.
You got that backwards (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I already have: neither!
Now, of course, that could very well be because I have no extra money for a hi-def player, or HD movies, or the required HD television... but even if I did, I'd still be sitting out this upgrade cycle. Sure, HD is nice (really nice) looking, but not good enough to warrant upgrading all the equipment and titles unless the cost is trivial (and it isn't). Add to the fact that format-shifting DVD content is drop-dead easy
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
-mcgrew [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft has a lot invested in HD-DVD right now, and it's going to be many years until there's enough fibre direct to the home to support that level of bandwidth to transfer HD-DVD-quality movies. Yes, MS is also positio
Re: (Score:2)
As am I; I don't own an HDTV and as I just shelled out a thousand bucks for a 42 inch flatscreen analog three years ago, I doubt it will matter much to me for quite some time.
My stake in this is that I hate Sony [mcgrew.info] for installing a rootkit on my computer, and I don't like Microsoft very much, either (because I have to use their shitty buggy poorly designed software).
-mcgrew [slashdot.org]