New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid 267
Clarinase writes "101reviews is running an article about a new type of camera lens called Fluidlens. This patented lens made of liquid is no bigger than a contact lens, but can still achieve up to 10 times optical zoom by changing its shape similar to the human eye."
f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:5, Informative)
BTW, I checked, all the links in the original article still work.
Re:f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:5, Interesting)
frozen camera (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:frozen camera (Score:2, Interesting)
Most digital cameras are current hungry, the necessary chemistry to take place to produce that current is likely constrained by the cold.
IIRC the wisdom of several years ago was that you could extend the shelflife of batteries by keeping them in your fridge.
Re:frozen camera (Score:2)
I did alright with my Nikon D100 in Alaska by using an external battery and keeping it inside my coat, next to my chest. That worked until the temperature got down to about -23F, where the electronics themselves started to have trouble.
Re:f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:5, Funny)
My Guess, a ferro-fluid (Score:4, Interesting)
I was actually using this to move a laser to boost radio signals. I kind of gave up on the whole thing because I didn't have a job and didn't have any idea how to get the ball rolling. I'm an idea synthesizer-- not a lawyer. Anyway, I could have had about five patents out of this.
So, in short, this lense may possibly be as simple as mineral oil and rust surrounded by water between two pieces of glass (I haven't been able to read the article due to the "slashdot effect"). Inside the small area of water, surface tension works to hold the shape and relax the effects of gravity--It's best to have an oil of the same specific gravity as water (most are lighter) so that motion will not pull one liquid more than another. Still, unless you used a strong magnetic field on the ferro-fluid, motion would change its shape-- so no long exposures. The difference in light distortion between the water and the oil will allow for your lense to focus. My idea was to use two lasers--one as a reference beam to calculate unwanted distortions. I'm guessing there is going to have to be some feedback mechanism to determine what the spherical abberation of the resulting liquid lense would be. I wouldn't want to say anymore because it would then be easy to guess the tricks I figured out. Since I have nothing but a love of science and no degrees in the material sciences, the actual fabrication of this device would not be my forte.
On an aside, I still think it would be a nice idea to spin water in space to create a large lense for telescopic or sunlight collection purposes. About 30 years ago, when fiber optics first came out, I played with a lot of ideas for uses-- things like piping sunlight into the house, using it to peer inside the body and lase out blockages (I used a parasol design to stop blood flow and expand arteries--rather than a more obvious and more elegant balloon). It amazes me that things as obvious as a liquid lense can still find patentable uses.
I actually submitted this as an idea to a company that says it helps people with Inventions. When I got a follow call asking for $1200 more than the original $500 I realized it was a scam (sigh). If these scumbags realize they have prior art--I'm guessing they won't, since they are about scamming more than actually understanding any technology that people submit. Well, lessons learned. Nobody is going to "discover" your brilliance in life--everyone has to do their own leg work.
One of these days, I'd love to get back to inventing.
Re:f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:vodka (Score:4, Informative)
Re:f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:3, Funny)
Re:f1r5t p05t3d Dec. 2, 2004 (Score:2)
changing shape (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:changing shape (Score:5, Funny)
Re:changing shape (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
Re:changing shape (Score:3, Funny)
Well that's no surprise since they are UFOS - Unidentified Floating Objects - in your eyeball.
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
If they suddenly increase in number, get yourself to a doctor.
Re:changing shape (Score:2, Insightful)
Currently there is no practical alternative to compensate for the fixed focus lens system where a camera lens, for example, is moved along a linear axis until the image comes into focus.
So, they're not talking about how your eye zooms, which it obviously doesn't. They're talking about how the lens changes shape to focus while zooming, like your eye changes shape to focus. Of course, I aint no optician.
Squinting (Score:2)
Re:Squinting (Score:5, Interesting)
There was a guy a number of years back who sold "sunglasses guarenteed to improve your sight!" and all it was was a opaque plastic lens with hundreds of tiny holes in it.
To do any kind of zooming, you need 2 lenses, I believe, otherwise it's just a shift in focal points.
Re:Squinting (Score:5, Informative)
Note that the opposite is true, as well. When your iris is at its largerst aperture (at night, in dim lighting), your vision will be at its worst.
Re:Squinting (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Squinting (Score:2, Informative)
Plenty of details here:
http://www.ccmr.cornell.edu/education/ask/?quid=7
Chris
Re:Squinting (Score:3, Informative)
Squinting also decreases the amount of light that enters the eye. Go ahead and squint right now - notice that you can start to see your bottom and top eyelid. When a lens is misshapen (due to age, damage or genetics) the light that passes through the lens is deflected incorrectly and misses the focal point; the farther the light rays are from the center of the lens, the m
Re:Squinting (Score:2)
Re:changing shape (Score:5, Funny)
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
Not to mention your eyes have to fight all sorts of organisms wanting to have it for lunch. Making an lense or lense components that you do not have to grow with one where you control the manu
Re:changing shape (Score:3, Funny)
Re:changing shape (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Species with zoom lens (Score:3, Informative)
The first is the dragonfly. The configuration of this insect's compound lens is such that the upward facing facets operate like a telephoto lens and the bulk of the rest of the eye is wide-angle. This gives the dragonfly near 360 vision but with a high resolution zoom on the airspace above to enable seeing (and catching) small flying insects.
The second are spiders which have 4 pairs of eyes of
Neat (Score:2, Interesting)
Pardon the ignorance... (Score:3, Insightful)
Since it seems the lens size is necessarily very small, will the maximum resolutions of the resulting picture be limited in any way? Or is lens size correlated with the maximum resolution of a camera?
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:2)
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:5, Informative)
In fact, for a long time hobbyists have played around with "pin-hole" cameras, cameras that, well, have a pin hole in the place of a lens. The light diffracts throught the small hole, spreading out and thus blowing up the image.
Really expensive lenses such as you'd see in telescopes are big so they can get the maximum amount of light.
For a neat demonstration of this principle, take some binoculars and cover half of one lens. You'll notice that-- surprise, surprise-- you still see the entire image!
So, in the end, the lens diameter will allow you to take pictures in lower light situations. Which might well equate to better picture quality if you're not in bright, shiny daylight since the picture will be acquired faster with less chance for motion blur.
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:2)
The resolution of a lens, according to optical theory is measured in lines per milimiters resolved , this is purely an optical concept (not photographical), this resolution does not depend on the size or the amount of light that passes through the lens, but rather depends on the quality of the glass , the other parameters that is measured when testing the lens is contrast . Often the characteristics of a lens are displayed as MTF graphs (resolution v/s contrast).
The s
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:2)
As far as resolution goes--it's harder to maintain quality the bigger the lens gets (hence the big bucks you have to put out for a good quality lens with good light gathering power).
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:2)
It's called a 'flash'
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:2)
I find in my own consumer photography I only use a flash a tiny fraction of the time and wish the lens could get more light naturally because most of the situations I want to photograph a flash won't help.
Bigger lens does mean better resolution (Score:2)
Re:Pardon the ignorance... (Score:5, Interesting)
Maximum resolution has quite a lot to do with the size of the lens.
Sure, you can make a sensor with 50 million pixels on it, but if the resolution of the image coming through the lens only carries an equivalent of 1,000 or so lines horizontally and vertically, you're just going to be getting a very large file, not a high-resolution one.
(This is the scam already happening with a lot of 7mp and up consumer-level digicams - they just do not have the optics required to pass that level of detail.)
The larger a lens is, the more light it can let through. And that's all an image is to a camera - light. On film, that light hits the crystals contained in the celluloid and chemically excites them, whereas on a digital sensor the light is converted to binary data representing the image. In both cases, though, light is all that matters.
Bigger lenses can obviously gather more light, which means they can be used in lower-light situations or at longer focal lengths (longer focal lengths involve more light fall-off inside the lens, so it helps for extreme telephoto lenses to have massive front elements). It also means the sensor does not need to have its gain cranked up so high to compensate for a smaller lens. And it means the sensor itself can be larger, which in itself will allow greater resolution.
Probably the most important thing, though, is that larger lenses can more easily achieve perfect focus. It is possible for a lens to be simply unable to achieve perfect focus - the light beams will just never converge properly. This is not an exact science - every lens is slightly different in this (even among the same model), but larger lenses can come closer because they're dealing with the same projected image size but have more incoming light with which to deal and larger elements that can be built to stricter relative tolerances. This has the greatest effect on real resolution, and it's why some lenses appear tack-sharp and others look a bit soft.
Relatedly, the larger the lens, the less effect manufacturing tolerances are going to have on quality. For example, say an element can be ground to within 0.001mm of spec and still be within that spec. If you shrink the lens down by 100 times and you can still only manage a 0.001mm tolerance, you will not have any real consistency in quality. You would have to similarly up your manufacturing tolerances by 100 times just to maintain the quality of the larger lens.
This is even ignoring all the image defects you get from smaller lenses. Photographic lenses usually have 6 or more elements inside them to correct for various distortions that the curved glass introduces; obviously this is going to be a lot more difficult to do the smaller you go, and I can't see how a lens with liquid inside is really going to be able to simulate this. It might be able to replicate one or two interior elements (even though liquid is infinitely maleable, it can still only be one shape at a time) but I would imagine there will always be distortions left over.
You may ask how our eyes work so well, then, given how small they are. Well, for one thing, our eyes are "prime" lenses - they don't have an optical zoom function. For another, we have a big, powerful brain sitting behind them to interpret what we're looking at and correct any oddities (the image your eyes are actually seeing and the image you interpret are not even close to being the same thing). The fact that we've got two of them doesn't hurt either - it's not just about depth perception, just close one eye and see how good your vision is for a while. Peripheral vision will be cut, it is harder to focus, etc. Your brain does a good job of taking these two images and combining them, making it easier to see. Having two eyes also means we have double the light gathering ability.
Also, many people's eyes *don't* work so well.
Like a contact lens (Score:5, Funny)
That would be fatal (Score:2)
Camera lens had a great fall
And all the king's horses and all the king's men
Couldn't put all the splatters together again
Improvements for the smallest cameras (Score:5, Insightful)
Blecky photography (Score:2)
Re:Improvements for the smallest cameras (Score:3, Funny)
Those women passing you on the street don't want you to take their picture anyway.
It'd be cool (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:It'd be cool (Score:3, Informative)
It'll never happen. Telephoto or "zoom" lenses require a pair of lenses with some amount of separation between them. There's no practical way to mount additional lensing in front of your eye with enough separation to get a zoom effect and not interfere with normal eye function.
Re:It'd be cool (Score:2)
Glad to see a real invention for a change (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Glad to see a real invention for a change (Score:3, Funny)
I'm glad to see someone patenting an actual invention instead of just claim-jumping someone's idea for a website layout.
Actually, God already invented this. These guys just took advantage of the fact that God did not file a patent for the human eye with the USPTO.
Re:Glad to see a real invention for a change (Score:5, Informative)
I coudln't find any info on google but I'm fairly sure they were invented by the wind up radio guy.
or if your really after pior art, it looks like the Greeks may have beaten them to it [mlahanas.de] by 3000 years.
Here's an encarta [msn.com] link too
Details? (Score:2, Interesting)
Is the real innovation in the material of the lens or the method to make it deform to specification?
the question is... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:the question is... (Score:5, Funny)
Nobody knows. Liquid lens.
Does this mean... (Score:3, Funny)
Another successful SF prediction... (Score:5, Interesting)
This is right up there with those relatively small, sealed nuclear reactors, IMHO. Neat.
haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004? (Score:2)
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:4, Informative)
THIS article says it has no moving parts, and does not use electricity to deform the lens - a valuable attribute in things like camera phones.
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:2)
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:2)
Yes, _something_ has to be doing it -- which is why I started reading the comments here, in hopes of somebody in the know dishing out more details.
Instead, it seems that most people are assuming it's one of the many other liquid lens stories, likely as a result of it bei
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:2)
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:3, Informative)
--**--
Named Fluidlens, this lens is made of liquid and is no bigger than a contact lens, but can achieve an optical zoom of up to 10 times, matching the zoom capabilities of lenses found on mid-range and high-end digital cameras and superior than most cellphone cameras which use digital zoom that relies on software rather than the lens to zoom in on an object.
This liquid lens system achieves optical zooming through altering its focal length by changing it
Re:haven't we seen this before, back, back in 2004 (Score:2)
10x zoom + focus vs. just focus (Score:3, Informative)
The diagram shows how it gets pushed or pulled in two sections, a top and a bottom, which mimics a 2-element 1-group lens. It may focus with the "front" half and change focal length with the back, or use a combination of both to get the right focal length and focal plane for a given situation.
The lens in a vertebrate eye (and many invertebrates too) is flexible and is focused at "infinity" when in the relaxed state. When pulled by little muscles that surround it, it flattens, and that changes the focal plane so that it focuses on near objects. The focal length is fixed, so there can be no change in angle of view (zooming).
Normal myopia (nearsightedness), hypermetropia (farsightedness) and astigmatism come from the whole eye being the wrong shape, usually a function of the eye being squished one way or the other during childhood growth, and the lens tries to focus where it can't.
Low cost glasses (Score:2, Interesting)
See there webpage here [adaptive-eyecare.com].
Dupe (Score:2)
So thanks a lot for the 6 month old news.
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Tripe! (Score:2)
So thanks a lot for the 6 month old news.
It's not a dupe, it's a tripe (at least - it was posted in December, too.)
And the pedant in me has to point out that the link you posted was from March 2004 - which makes it 18 months old, not 6
Re:Tripe! (Score:2)
I recalled seeing this appear more than once before but I could only find the one instance in the searches I performed.
You know, this is the problem with blog style "journamalism." If this was a real news organization, there would be one guy who covered the Optics beat, who would remember he'd already published this story before.
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
A pretty handy difference, for things like cell phones.
Uh... (Score:2)
Liquid Lenses (Score:2)
Jeez stop the all the glass is a liquid posts (Score:4, Informative)
What amazes me (Score:2)
Consider that geometrical optics is a very old science, and some sort of plastic/elastic material has probably existed for the better part of last century.
Yet another thing foreseen by sci-fi... (Score:2)
Re:Yet another thing foreseen by sci-fi... (Score:2)
Old news (Score:2)
He's got Stevie Austin eyes (Score:2)
I see.... (Score:2)
Now *THAT*... (Score:2, Insightful)
What? (Score:3, Funny)
I've got to figure out how to do that... hell I could fix my nearsightedness!
Already used in nature by Killer Whales (Score:2)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:3, Informative)
BZZZZT! Thanks for playing! Here's your consolation prize:
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/General/Gla
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:4, Insightful)
Thanks for playing!
The bottom? (Score:3, Insightful)
Most people would not call glass a liquid if they knew how it worked.
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
But if you talk to somebody who really knows what they are talking about (a chemist or materials scientist), they'll call it bunk. As somebody provided a link above, it it believed to be an artifact of mistranslation of early scientific papers.
--
Evan
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Which sounds a lot like a liquid, albeit a very slow one, to the average Joe on the street.
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:5, Informative)
Glass has a viscosity (at room temp) of aproximately 10 to the 20th power poises while water (to give you a reference point) is about 0.01 poise.
Oh and if you think that because you can use the term viscosity when refering to glass that it is a liquid I should let you know that lead has an estimated viscosity of 10 to the 11th power poises.
Take a look at some of the oldest glass structures we have, Stained glass windows in some of the worlds ancient cathederals. If your 100 year old house shows much distortion do to flow imagine what an 800 year old stained glass window should look like, except it doesn't.
Glass does not flow at room temperature.
Re:New Digital Camera Lens Made of Liquid? (Score:2)
Re:Dupe (Score:2)
Re:Dupe (Score:3, Informative)