BBC's h2g2 Goes Mobile - Again 80
zaktheduck writes "According to a recent press release, in anticipation of the new movie and the h2g2 website's sixth birthday, the BBC have relaunched the long-shelved h2g2 Mobile service. The new version of the popular community website allows access to the 7000+ and growing edited guide entries from PDAs, and smartphones. H2g2 had a WAP service back in 2001, aptly named "h2g2 on the Move", but was cancelled when the company faced financial trouble and was purchased by the BBC. Here's a copy of the old promotion page for the service."
7000+ entries?! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:7000+ entries?! (Score:5, Insightful)
That's before the dolphins brought it back from the alternate universe. All of Ford's entries got re-inserted on the next update.
you are wrong! Sit! Bad doggie! (Score:4, Informative)
So, (Score:3, Funny)
Re:So, (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So, (Score:1)
Re:So, (Score:2)
Heh. "Arthur clearly said 'its' not 'his' in the book! THIS MOVIE SUCKS!!"
Re:So, (Score:1)
Re:So, (Score:1)
Re:So, (Score:1)
(It took me a long time to realize that the Encyclopedia Galactica thing was a reference to the Foundation Trilogy.)
Re:So, (Score:1)
Re:So, (Score:2, Funny)
Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:5, Interesting)
So should I throw away all my reference books and keep just one encyclopaedia?
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Informative)
The page you linked to is a wiki page edited to have no images inside.
Clicking any of the links takes you to the normal wiki page which may or may not include images.
Besides, the bloody big wikipedia logo image and other page images are still displayed.
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:2)
My bet is that they did that page in order to work with mobile devices like Palms and Smartphones (Symbian based or similar).
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Informative)
I don't know if Wikipedia does this, but it is quite simple. Having a specific "text only" version is 1990s thinking. I think if someone sent a patch to Wikipedia for their CSS styles that did this they would happily adopt it.
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:1)
Most mobile devices don't support full-on CSS, and for the ones that do, Wikipedia uses the media attribute on their CSS include to exclude them from the web-formatted version.
Basically, disable CSS in your browser and look at the page -- hardly any graphics are displayed and the structural formatting is perfect for mobile devices (and text browsers, screen readers, etc).
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:2, Interesting)
Answers.com queries wikipedia. I don't know if you get full article text, but it's great for quick lookups.
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:2)
Start with the page that lists starting pages for different devices [wapedia.org]
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:5, Insightful)
I think Wikipedia has grown into what Douglas had envisioned.
A Free encyclopedia, updated by almost anyone who wants to update it.
In many of the more relaxed civilizations on the Outer Eastern Rim of the Galaxy, The Hitchhiker's Guide has already supplanted the great Encyclopedia Galactica as the standard repository of all knowledge and wisdom, for though it has many omissions and contains much that is apocryphal, or at least wildly inaccurate, it scores over the older, more pedestrian work in two important respects.
First, it is slightly cheaper; and second, it has the words DON'T PANIC inscribed in large friendly letters on its cover.
Sounds a lot like the guide to me.
eehm... (Score:1)
And as for comparision with Wikipedia - HHg2g was based on secretaries and legal departament drones, so, of course, the rather colourfull and occasionally politically incorrect (i.e. claiming that Republicans are a political party, while, in fact, everyone knows that they are just Voldemort bystanders) and potentially insulting entries couldn't be possible there.
For example - take a look at
Re:eehm... (Score:1, Interesting)
Actually, I believe Douglas Adams would have really liked what the Wiki has become. His books were meant to be funny, but in no way were they an indication that he did not have a very intelligent and serious side. This would be evident to anyone who had ever read anything he wrote that wasn't fiction.
Re:eehm... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:1)
But I can only imagine how great it would be if content could be added by users. Just like a wiki, an always on, digital guide to everything around you. Although if that were ever implemented it would probably be raped by spam.
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:2)
envisioned? (Score:1, Interesting)
Unlike Wikipedia, the HHG was edited by professionals. The lowest-level of professional, to be sure, but people who were paid at least slightly for doing it. And it was edited (poorly) before it was published.
On a more practical note, the HHG seemed to have more specific info than Wikipedia, probably because the HHG is mor
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Sorry, but no one cares (Score:2)
I recently installed Wikipedia on my Psion 5mx. It's only a snapshot, omits pictures and other multimedia files, and takes up nearly half a GB of CompactFlash, but it's complete and unedited, and perfectly usable. (As the significant reduction in my free time shows...)
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Informative)
Having said that, I started out with h2g2, but much prefer Wikipedia, because collaborating on articles with h2g2 is (or at least was) difficult, while with wiki it is easy.
Re:Sorry, but no one cares (Score:3, Insightful)
Useful for hhgg2xml (Score:5, Interesting)
I'll have to look more closely at this new version to see if it can be parsed more easily.
hg2g has always been mobile (Score:5, Funny)
Re:hg2g has always been mobile (Score:1, Offtopic)
Dare I say that might be a good idea, so much as it's not the USSR past 1925 or so. All power to the Soviets! This time, for real! Not just to the Politburo or General Secretary/Chairman of the Presidium.
Re:hg2g has always been mobile (Score:1)
mobile ? sure ? (Score:1)
remote, portable information access w/ easy input (Score:2, Insightful)
iPaq hx4700 (Score:1)
With the new breed of VGA PDAs, do we not already have THGTTG in our pockets?
Surfing in true VGA mode on the 4700 means you can look at things like wikipedia on the move anyway as long as you have access to a local wireless LAN and/or a bluetooth phone.
There are ways in which PDAs and the 4700 suck. However in my experience one thing that VGA on the 4700 *does* offer is genuine desktop-like anywhere internet reference.
Re:iPaq hx4700 (Score:1)
If you have a 1GB memory card and a Palm or PocketPC, you can fit the whole text of the Wikipedia on there, and can view it wherever you go. If you have wifi access, you can just get at it (and the whole wealth of the internet) that way. The grandparent post's idea seems already to exist, to an extent.
The original H2G2 (Score:4, Informative)
May 03 New Radio HHGTTG series begins (Score:3, Informative)
Radio 4 to broadcast final Hitchhiker's series.
The eight-part series, produced by Above the Title, will be broadcast from Tuesday 3rd May at 6.30pm.
Following on from last year's radio smash hit, Life, the Universe and Everything, the original cast - Simon Jones, Geoffrey McGivern, Stephen Moore, Mark Wing-Davey and Susan Sheridan - were again reunited to record the series alongside William Franklyn as the Voice of the Book.
Several actors connected with the Hitchhiker's Guide from its other incarnations, both on stage and television, take lead and supporting roles, including Bill Paterson, Sandra Dickinson, Jonathan Pryce, Rula Lenska and David Dixon. Supporting stars include Jane Horrocks, Jackie Mason, June Whitfield, Stephen Fry, Arthur Smith, Saeed Jaffrey, Miriam Margolyes and a surprise Hollywood star guest appearance
Re:May 03 New Radio HHGTTG series begins (Score:1)
always surprised (Score:2)
Those copyright issues would likely come more into play with the movie coming out, though. The interested parties have more of a stake in protecting their material now that it's going super-m
Re:always surprised (Score:2)
o_0
Communication and Wikitravel (Score:2, Interesting)
Wikipedia mobile? (Score:2)
I agree with the masses, (Score:1)
Yeah, new Ringtones (Score:2)
Slightly Cheaper (Score:2)
PR (Score:2, Insightful)