Archos PMA400 Linux Based Media Portable 132
freitasm writes "The new Archos PMA400 is a Linux based portable- entertainment/PDA/DVR/Internet device. It comes with wireless and ethernet LAN connections, plays Mophun and Qtopia and supports Microsoft DRM protected files (WMV, WMA).
The company will release a SDK on its dedicated website sometime before the end of January 2005. The device will retail for around US$800."
I recommend getting an Archos... (Score:4, Informative)
I have an 80GB Archos AV400 that I received for a Christmas present this year. A couple of things annoy me about the unit but that would happen with anything... The UI takes about 15 minutes to get used to as I really haven't encountered anything like it. Even after having it for three weeks I still find myself fumbling with the keys. The player display is very simple and tells me what I need to know but I would really prefer options to repeat one track/all tracks/etc right on the player screen itself rather than having to go into the setup each time to change these options.
The AV400 doesn't seem to have a removable battery which is worrisome as in my experience batteries start losing their charge after a year and if I am not able to replace it that would suck, bad. As far as length of play... The AV400 seems to easily get 15+ hours to a charge for music. I haven't been able to give it thorough testing on video playback and battery life yet though.
I love the fact that you can record *and* playback to TV. I am currently waiting for Tivo2Go's Tivo update to come down to my unit but until then I use the "Record to VCR" option on my Tivo to play the episodes and I use the Archos to record them. It's nice because I can watch the Tivo'd episodes anywhere in the house or bring them along with me.
It does play WMV DRM media and that's what it uses when you record a DVD to it. It's a bit annoying that you can't record a DVD and play it back elsewhere (it physically disabled the TV-out when you try) but other than ripping to AVI you really have little choice.
I haven't tried to use it to connect to my satellite receiver but knowing the issues I had trying to use the IR channel changer from Tivo I could only imagine the Archos wouldn't interface well either.
The LCD screen is nice on mine but it gets finger smudges all the time. I'd really like to see how well this Archos unit handles being a touchscreen. It might get ugly. I have one bad pixel (which is common) and I only notice it when playing movies but for the screen size it's pretty annoying. Maybe Toshiba can back these units too?
The AV400 comes with a CF expansion slot, currently used for picture retrieval, but I really wish they would allow for some wireless CF card integration. It would be VERY cool to be able to network via wifi instead of USB and surf the web and check email as the newer unit allows
All in all, I'm impressed with my Archos and I would recommend it to anyone that's looking into a portable media player that does more than just play music and display photos.
Re:I recommend getting an Archos... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I recommend getting an Archos... (Score:2)
I was looking to get one soley for bringing my DVD collection with me to Hotels.
Oh well, I still have rentals and a portable DVD player.
Well if it's anything... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Well if it's anything... (Score:1)
Well considering that the more recent units (I can only speak of the AV400 series) handle AVI just fine I can't see them moving back to any "bizarre" format for future models.
Not to mention that I get 15+ hours of MP3 playback. I guess it takes you 15 hours to turn on
Re:Well if it's anything... (Score:1)
Re:Well if it's anything... (Score:2)
AVI is a container format, not a media format.
To play video reliably on a recent-generation Archos, you need to make sure all of the following are true about your AVI file:
1. The video is encoded in a DivX-compatible dialect of MPEG-4
2. The video must not be encoded using bi-directional filtering
3. The video resolution is no more than 702x480 (for AV400 series) or 640x400 (for Gmini 400)
4. The video framerate is no more than 30fps
5. The audio is encoded in IMA ADPCM o
Re:Well if it's anything... (Score:2)
The downside of all t
Re:Well if it's anything... (Score:1)
Re:No Thanks (Score:2)
Re:No Thanks (Score:3, Interesting)
So? You weren't going to play wma files anyway, were you?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Sigh... another ad (Score:1)
more and more ... (Score:2)
Re:more and more ... (Score:2)
Re:more and more ... (Score:1)
Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:2, Interesting)
It kind of figures that one of the major product features of a Linux-based handheld is that it supports a media standard championed by MS, doesn't it? I mean why not support open-source standards like OGG?
Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:3, Insightful)
Archos is making its decisions for commercial reasons.
Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:2)
Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:1)
Apple doesn't license their DRM scheme to anyone.
Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:2)
It will. There will be a Qtopia SDK and surely it won't be long before OGG is playable.
Re:Wowee! Windows Media files! (Score:2)
You don't think that the 10's of millions of Windows computers out there that can readily play the format aren't a compelling reason?
If you're saying support both, fine, great, but if you're saying don't support WMV... what business sense would that make? That'd be sorta like designing an American ca
Catch up with the times Archos... (Score:5, Interesting)
First, it's $800. Second, it has a 320x240 screen. Who wants a screen that small anymore? You get better resolution on any $100 Palm now...
Re:Catch up with the times Archos... (Score:2)
While it isn't pocket sized, but I bought a used 14" SXGA+ laptop for less than that, with over a year left on the warranty. Heck, there are a few new laptops that are cheaper than that if you look.
Not that I'm trying to rain in Archos' parade, a very compact hard drive media player, I personally wouldn't put up with video from a screen small enough to fit in any of my pockets.
Re:Catch up with the times Archos... (Score:1)
Re:Catch up with the times Archos... (Score:2)
I can think of a few reasons:
1.) It's $800, like you said. Do you really want to spend $900?
2.) The nice thing about 320 by 240 is that it's half of 640 by 480, which nearly all videos run at. (Not sure what it captures at, so bear with me...) 640 by 480 screens in that size are still quite rare. At 480 by 320 (correction please?) that Palm runs at is a little more common, but the resizing artifacts would be a
Re:Catch up with the times Archos... (Score:2)
I was thinking this is basically a Zaurus with a hard drive and video-in, but actually it is inferior due to the display. And the SL-6000's can be found for under $500 now, and were $700 new rather than $800. If it had the same marvelous screen as the 6000 it would perhaps be worth the price.
They should not have left out the camera either. Big, big mistake. I talked t
Look at the Price!! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Look at the Price!! (Score:1)
IMHO, these mmedia portables are really just overblown mp3 players, you've had to be pretty desperate to watch whole movies on such a tiny screen (I guess regular long distance flyers might disagree, but then you're crazy anyway!)
A brand new zaurus 6000L go for less th
Re:Look at the Price!! (Score:2)
Re:Look at the Price!! (Score:1)
--
Here's a smiley I prepared earlier
$800? (Score:4, Insightful)
Is there a market for a device that's more capable than a $100-200 PDA and less capable than a $1000 laptop? Of course I want one, but does anyone need one of these?
An $800 ultraportable? I'd like to see that! (Score:1)
Ok, so it's not perfect, but if it's capable enough, it might be a great travel device. Plays lots of tunes, edits text, goes wireless for email in coffee shops and fits in a pocket.
Seriously, I'd love a small, cheap, underpowered laptop, just enough to fire up mozilla, xmms and thunderbird. Even my 800MHz P3M can't handle video on battery (speed stepped down to 700 + funky vide
Re:$800? (Score:1)
Maybe it's better to compare it to a high-end PDA that also has DVR capability? Maybe if the apps are there.
I think I'm with you, though, I'd probably buy the laptop.
Re:$800? (Score:1)
And I don't want to compromise laptop specs for convenience, ie; get one with a teensy screen just so it'll be easier to watch video. Plus this has no clamshell, etc, it's designed to be easy, quick and private.
I wouldnt buy one for the price, but give them a few years to get these under 200 bucks, and they'll have something.
Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:3, Interesting)
The fine print on the product page is interesting:
So no sneaky using your new Linux gadget with Linux. Of course I'd imagine you could make it connect to the storage just fine, especially if it does USB Mass Storage.
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:1)
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:1)
YOu don't engineer hardware for linux, you silly gooose. You re-engineer linux for new hardware.
If it isn't supported at launch, someone will buy one and write support for it, and then we'll all be happy. That's how it's supposed to work, right?
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:2)
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:1)
Do you really care what they say it supports? Get it close, copy the file, and you're done. They're shipping virtual dub and whatever with it, with windows configurations, but if you've got Linux running, you most likely don't need a poorly written front end to set up virtual dub for you.
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:1)
Being a mass storage device, all Archos hard drive players are compatible with Linux. I have mounted my Jukebox Multimedia 20GB player many times to a Fedora Core 2 system.
Any non-compatibility is with the software that comes included with the player, but who cares. Any serious Linux user is savvy enough to know how to find and use the any open source tools needed to convert both CDs and DVDs for playback on the device.
I personally recommend GordianKnot available on sourceforge.net [sourceforge.net] for decrypting, rip
Re:Disclaimer: Linux not compatible with Linux (Score:1)
Editorial Content i.e. advertising (Score:2, Interesting)
As a tech, when I talk about certain products, it kind of carries some weight...like I prefer that product over its competitors.
On a somewhat related topic, I used to post web pages for a place that offered
Ahhh... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Ahhh... (Score:1)
Its what they DON'T say... (Score:2)
Internet access allows users to browse web sites and use services like POP3/SMTP and IMAP4 e-mail.
Ever notice how none of these network-enable gadgets ever say, "Internet access allows users to browse gopher sites and use services like IRC,Unsenet and FTP?
it may run on linux but it doesn't work with linux (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li (Score:2)
For example, my digital camera has that same list of supported OSes, but guess what? I can use it in Linux. Same with my USB stick, my mouse, my keyboard, the wireless card, and the DVD burner. H
Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li (Score:1)
My SyncMaster 710N (LCD panel) from Samsung came with some half-baked instructions for configuring X11. Hey, at least they tried..
(FWIW, I plugged it in, pressed "autosync", and it worked perfectly from day one. No xorg.conf hacking necessary.)
Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li (Score:1)
Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li (Score:1)
A lot like the requirements for USB flash drives, which are all USB mass storage devices. They work fine with any newish OS with USB support, but you need to install a driver for 98. If the only thing you connect this thing to your PC for is to copy files back and forward then it probably will work (as a usb storage device).
Re:it may run on linux but it doesn't work with li (Score:2)
Sharp Zaurus anyone ? (Score:2)
Ok... (Score:2, Flamebait)
They killed off the hi-res screen (Score:3, Informative)
Look at the proto's screen res - 704x480. Could be used as a notebook replacement easily enough.
This version is not worth $800.
JH
you don't need high res on a 3-4" screen (Score:2)
The screens on these things are so small that QVGA is more than ample. I've been watching anime fansubs lately, which ever since the process went digital have been using these tiny font size subtitles (more suited to monitors than TVs), but even they read fine at 320x240 at the si
Re:you don't need high res on a 3-4" screen (Score:1)
JH
A misunderstanding (Score:2)
Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA (Score:2, Insightful)
I am more than happy with my $90 Palm. It syncs with my address book and iCal on my Mac....and fits in my pocket. And, if something bad happens to it during my travels, I am out $90...not $800. I just think these PDA's are getting crazy.
I am also confused why it is a linux PDA, yet you have to have windoze or a mac to sync with the thing. That sucks. If I am a linux guy I want a linux PDA that will work with my computer...
Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA (Score:2)
I'm not saying the price is worth it. I certainly won't buy one. But it costs more than your Palm because it does a heck of a lot more.
Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA (Score:2)
Re:Who wants to shell out $800 for a PDA (Score:2)
hmm (Score:2)
Re:hmm (Score:2)
By the way, which ipaq can you get for $150?
Re:hmm (Score:2)
Re:hmm (Score:2)
Ugh (Score:2)
If the quality is anything like previous Archos products,
I bought an Archos Gmini 400 last fall, just about as soon as it was available in the US. For the first few months, it worked great. Then it started having problems where during music playback, the controls would go unresponsive and the hard disk would seek for a minute or more before I could do anything again. Ultimately, the drive click-of-death'ed on me and the device won't even completely boot up any more.
I suspect it's just a faulty hard dri
Re:Ugh (Score:2)
I've been thinking of purchasing an Archos Gmini 220 [archos.com] not for playing music, but for it's small size and for the ability to unload photos off my CF card while in the field. Should I avoid everything archos, or is the 220 a quality product?
Thanks.
For the misinformed masses (Score:2)
Aside form the fact that this thing is about 1/8 the size of any laptop, your claim is totally bogus. Show me where I can buy a new laptop with the Archos specs (30 GB, 802.11B, everything) that also has a TV input (can't be external, that'd make it useless) for $800. I can't even find a used one on ebay for anywhere near that price.
For these people posting "Why would I want a $800 PDA?" / "iPod is Better"
This thing is not an iPod
Re:For the misinformed masses (Score:2)
OK, you got me on the TV input. Otherwise, Gateway is selling a Celeron-D 2.8MHz laptop crammed with shit for $650 after mail-in rebates. Add cardbus wifi from newegg for ~$25 (802.11g, even). Comes with a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive.
But wait, there's more... (Score:1)
*sigh* Another day, another "iPod Killer." Honestly, how many people, walking down the street, would honestly say, "I sure cou
Re:But wait, there's more... (Score:1)
No i until i realized that in mass population centers mass trasit is teh way to got and for peopel to find afforable living they must live 1 to 2 hours of mass transit time away from their respective jobs, so if i was sitting ona seat waiting to get to work i could catch up on the tv shows i missed from the previous day (mainly becasue i cannot watch these shows as they are on as i am on the mass transit ride home)downloaded form my media center (insert f
If you travel a lot, it's useful. (Score:2)
I have the 80 gig model, so I can cram a lot of video onto it.
I already have a cool media player (Score:1)
I can even stream them from my PC over WI FI, and it was only around $500.00.
PSP looks like it will be the killer media player (Score:1)
Sony did something like this with DVD's in Japan. Before the PS2 DVD held a low market share now DVD are perfered over what they had before
I Like My Archos MMJ 20 (Score:2, Informative)
I looked at an iPod a
US$799.95 in the U.S. and EUR 799.9 (Score:2, Insightful)
At todays rate [x-rates.com]
$799.95 = EUR606.61
EUR 799.99 = $1054
Re:US$799.95 in the U.S. and EUR 799.9 (Score:1)
Looks more like a Zaurus, than an iPod... (Score:1)
The main Pro to adding the Zaurus-like Qtopia here is that it will probably (or hopefully) be easy to port all the software over from
sounds much better than PC palmtops (Score:2)
hmmm (Score:2)
About the only other complaint I have about Archos is their GUI. It's just not very pretty nor is it very user friendly. Takes some getting used to.
With that said, this device looks to be awesome! I mean, having wireless access, being able to connect to the net. Nice!
Left handers (Score:2)
Re:Left handers (Score:2)
Message from the manufacturers:
We don't care about your 10% of the population until we've saturated the market and need your money.
That goes double for you color blind people.
Nevermind people with disabilities.
-Adam
Qtopia (Score:4, Informative)
Sure, HOURS after I buy an iRiver! (Score:2)
Ok, nevermind.
MPEG4-ASP? (Score:1)
Dooh, this was the reason I waited for AV500 (now this unit).
I feel somewhat betrayed.
Supports Microsoft DRM? (Score:1)
Just wonder, does Archos do it with the blessing of Microsoft (and does it bare the PlaysForSure [playsforsure.com] logo)? Will it become incompatible when MS tweaked the implementation?
If it's done via reverse-engineering, wouldn't that put Archos up for DMCA lawsuits? Also, what it means for MS that its DRM system is publicly hacked?
I've heard some companies have licensed to port Windows Media to Linux but couldn't remember MS approving the DRM stuff.
Archos durability (Score:1)
I like the idea (Score:1)
Here is the reply:
"Dear Sir,
This is the operating system Linux Qtopia(TM) with embedded ARCHOS multimedia applications , I am sorry but we do not have specific specification of the processor or the board."
That information would be nice.
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:2)
He's like Roland in more than one way. His "review" reads more like an advertisement. Why am I not surprised?
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:3, Insightful)
<rant>
I don't give a damn who posts what, or who makes money from something.
If something interests me, I'll have a look.
Its not like I have to get my credit card and sign my life away.
Adverts are all around you, do you spend time cutting evil adverts out of newspapers before you read them?
Do you close your eyes whilst driving past billboards?
Your just an arrogant tosser who can't see the wood for the trees. Slashdot is built JUST like Roland or anyone elses "advert supp
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:2)
That said, at least he didn't get slashdotted, thanks in part to the granparent poster.
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:2)
As per the content, as someone else pointed out, the site is presenting the news. Most time the PR are sent out a day or so before
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:2)
It is news and this would seem the only way for me to retract my statement. I don't have a problem with what your site posted.
My mistake.
Re:Full text, no ad revenue for me! (Score:2)
If something interests me, I'll have a look.
Its not like I have to get my credit card and sign my life away."
Glad somebody was finally modded up for this point. The whole reason advertising is such a big business is that a lot of businesses come up with interesting products and services, but they can't sell them if people don't know that they even exist.
I really don't care if Slashdot actually does use articles for advertising. If
Re:Does anyone care about these.... (Score:2)
Get back to work, Johnson!!
Re:Zaurus Compatible (Score:2)