Homemade Hypercube Case 115
blkmagic writes "I have to say this is probably the most amazing homemade case I've seen. The HyperCube^2 was inspired by Vincenzo Natali's first film, Cube. This is a long article, so here's a link to the gallery of images of the final product. I read about this on CubeOwner.com, a Cube site with a slightly different focus."
Movies (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Movies (Score:2)
Hypercube was crap.
Re:Movies (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Movies (Score:2)
Re:The sequel was as good as the first . . . (Score:2)
Re:The sequel was as good as the first . . . (Score:2, Interesting)
I saw the first Cube during the early arthouse circuit in 1997, and even sans any kind of underground "cult movie" hype it still sucked.
But at least the inexplicable popularity of the movie answered one question for me: Who the hell were the people responsible for continuing the drawn-out death of the X-Files after
Trailer? (Score:2)
Thank you in advance.
Re:amazing case (Score:2, Funny)
Seriously, isn't there a mathematical projection, i.e. a 3D "shadow" that a hypercube would cast if it existed that's pretty cool looking? I recall seeing a drawing long, long ago. Uh, I think the shadow is infinitly large so they only draw a segment, but it was neat anyway.
Re:amazing case (Score:1, Informative)
Best part... (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:Best part... (Score:2, Funny)
(Ten minutes later...)
I was searching for an artical I read somewhere about a porn star that regularly features on some TGPs. She's got a club foot that she hides pretty well most of the time. Sadly, I've found more free porn and must go now...
Re:Best part... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Best part... (Score:5, Funny)
This seems to be the perfect Microsoft case (Score:1)
Re:This seems to be the perfect Microsoft case (Score:1)
Re:This seems to be the perfect Microsoft case (Score:1)
Re:This seems to be the perfect Microsoft case (Score:2)
Nor does it resemble anything borg-ish...
Re:Gone already (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gone already (Score:2)
Re:Gone already (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Gone already (Score:2)
Obligatory (Score:2, Funny)
The website has been slashdotted into the fourth dimension.
Projectlog (Score:1)
http://users.telenet.be.nyud.net:8090/hypercube/ [nyud.net]
Coral links (Score:1, Informative)
http://www.bit-tech.net.nyud.net:8090/arti
link to image gallery
http://www.bit-tech.net.nyud.net:8090/ar
Most impressive (Score:5, Funny)
Everytime I try something like that, it is eligible for the trash bin.
Jerry
http://www.syslog.org/ [syslog.org]
Re:Most impressive (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Most impressive (Score:2)
Aluminum is really hard to cut right unless you have the proper tools, and most shop tools (in a woodshop) are essentially useless and will make a mess of the aluminum. T1-4 can be cut with a die grinder with a carbon blade or a 20-tooth(per inch) hacksaw blade. Even doing that will take a few hours of extra burnishing to get the edges stra
Let's get these two out of the way. (Score:2)
You must be new here... Let's get these two out of the way.
Mirrordot links: (Score:5, Informative)
http://mirrordot.org/stories/acdd5fb24bf7d200d50f
http://mirrordot.org/stories/735e561773e4ab255155
The guy is an architect? Cool! (Score:2)
That explains it ... (Score:5, Funny)
If I had 3 extra dimensions to hide all the duct tape and string in I'm sure I could make a pretty cool case too
-S
Re:That explains it ... (Score:2)
Neat however (Score:3, Interesting)
The aesthetic challenge of computer cases (Score:2)
First, cars. Cars have quite a few constraints on their external shape. Designs we appreciate integrate well with these constraints - for example, smooth lines between and around features that absolutely have to be there, like wheels and windshield glass. Alternatively, some good designs may defy convention, by having deliberately boxy or unstreamlined shapes.
Similarly, in building architec
Just be sure... (Score:2)
He figured out the trick (Score:2)
Re:He figured out the trick (Score:1)
Re:He figured out the trick (Score:1)
If it is twice as high, wide and deep then it's actually eight times the size.
Shame about the movie, though (Score:2)
It's easily the worst movie I have ever seen.
I watched it in a marathon with Sphere, and Sphere was the good one!
Re:Shame about the movie, though (Score:1)
Wow (Score:1)
Disappointed! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Disappointed! (Score:1)
I don't know.... (Score:1)
Re:Boring... (Score:1)
Too bad about the Maxtor... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Too bad about the Maxtor... (Score:1)
Slashdotted again (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:1)
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:1)
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:1)
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:2)
So were yours.
(That sarcasm is free of charge, by the way.)
Honestly, though, did you ever take the time to read the FAQ? [slashdot.org]
p
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:2)
> Your stuff is what they're making money off.
If the banners never get shown, they aren't making more money. So you steal their content without getting them paid for the content they took the time to post (or in most cases, created). Not to mention the copyright liability of copying an article from another site.
That's one of those things that sounds great at first, but wh
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:2)
No. You must be new here.
p
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:2)
You must be. I mean, if anyone else had ever thought about it in the history of the site, I bet it would be in the FAQ [slashdot.org] or something.
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:2)
Basically the core issue is copyright. Mirroring stuff is a form of publishing, and all forms of copyright I know of requires permission from the copyright holder in order to publish their material. Do the math.
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:1)
This is easily taken care of. When a story is submitted, include an option that reads:
Original content can be mirrored for 24 hours upon story approval? Yes [ ] No [ ]
There are some mechanics involved with this. Such as notification of story approval to original content provider. click rate data capturing and forwarding.
As long as the option exists for automatic approved mirroring, then there is nobody to blame but the story submitter. Besides, it would finally give some accountabi
Re:Slashdotted again (Score:1)
who cares? (Score:2, Insightful)
It's all about function and substance, not form.
Chrome don't get ya home.
Re:who cares? (Score:2)
You know, some of us aren't too involved to look at art from time to time. Regardless of the function (in this case (NPI), a computer), it is a work of art. If the guy had used a dremel to cut out a bunch of strip of metal & riveted them together around their head, it may look stupid (and I would have no desire to see it, probably), but it might be art to someone else. If you wasted your time going to the site... you were already wasting your time on
3d renders... (Score:2)
Re:3d renders... (Score:2)
HyperZZzzzz... (Score:2, Interesting)
OK, so you can't make a friggin' hypercube... But then don't call it that! Sheesh! And if you *must* use the name, can't you make it more interesting than just some white lights shining through plexiglass? How about some mirrors or something inside to a
Re:HyperZZzzzz... (Score:2)
Re:HyperZZzzzz... (Score:1)
Well, chalk that up to my (apparently beneficial, if the posts here are to be taken seriously) ignorance of the movie, then!
I do, however, maintain that this sort of thing doesn't really qualify for its own article. (Must get that last word in, dammit.)
Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:2)
On the subject of the case it's beautiful. He should see if Lian Li or Coolermaster would be willing to license his design and produce these for the rest of us. I'd love to have one of these, it's cool looking and lots of fun.
Of course if it were truly four dimensional that would be even better, perhaps if he could get some mono-isotopic unobtainium
Re:Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:2)
That's like saying "if you have a cube what's the length of its edges". Probably a more relevant question is "what's the surface volume of a hypercube".
Re:Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:1)
You'd only be able to market something like this to VERY high-end customers -- and those people probably could pay somebody to use a computer for them.
Attempts to fab a case with anything less than this guys attention-to-detail would make the effort worthless.
Re:Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:1)
On the topic of finding the area of its surface, I would guess that it comes down to what you mean by "surface." Personally, I'd argue that surface is always two-dimensional. Perimeter would be the 1D equivalent, and volume the 3D equivalent. After that we get to make things up.
I think it comes out to 36L^2, where L is the length of any given edge of the hypercube. That's assuming I counted the number of sides correctly, of course. So I guess a hypercube has six times the area of a regular cube (as well a
Re:Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:2)
Re:Off-topic but remotely relevant (Score:1)
You may also refer to three-dimensional area (or volume! -- same thing) of a hyper-dimensional figure.
Holy SH-------- (Score:1)
Mad amount of effort put into it but damn that shit's gorgeous. I want one
Maybe this guy could help me build my IIDX ASC
The only promblem with it. (Score:4, Funny)
The Cube (Score:2)
I have The Cube and Hypercube(2) on DVD and am glad I bought them... Although the first, older one looks more "realistically" in effects it's still a fascinating sci-fi/mystery/thriller with certain horror effects ; the second one is more sf and advanced
Imagine... (Score:5, Funny)
With nodes changing location within the cluster according to some obscure formula... and killing unsuspecting operators
But does it prove that time is cubic? (Score:1)
Re:But does it prove that time is cubic? (Score:1)
Nice case, crap movie (Score:2)
Re:FragBOX is better... (Score:1)
Re:ug (Score:2, Informative)