Spotlight On Windows-Powered Gadgets And Gizmos 321
An anonymous reader writes "WindowsForDevices has published a big article showcasing seventy-three consumer devices that were on display in Microsoft's device expo at the recent Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. Each device runs Windows CE, Windows Mobile (Pocket PC, Smartphone, etc.), or Windows XP Embedded. A photo and brief description are provided for each. Some cool stuff!"
But the important question is... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:But the important question is... (Score:5, Informative)
Actually, the Intrinsyc MicroPDA does. RTFA!
Interesting, eh?
Re:i.MX Reference Design PDA (Score:2)
I take these as examples of the marketing departments being either staffed by insurgents, or need-cluestick-beating types.
Obligatory questions (Score:2)
I doubt it, but it can probably play Ogg. Performance in a cluster has not been reported.
Re:But the important question is... (Score:2, Funny)
or
LOOK OUT! Kitchen Windows!
Coincidence? (Score:5, Funny)
Coincidence, don't know. (Score:5, Funny)
max uptime... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:max uptime... (Score:5, Interesting)
One of the contributors over at The Register uses (or did) a Psion. He did an upgrade which required a reboot. Even though he'd had the device for years, and is tech savvy, he did not even know about the little recessed reset switch.
I recently spoke with someone doing fieldwork using an ipaq. They were working in streams etc so decided to use one of those waterproof pods to protect the device. Whenever the unit crashed they'd need to pop the ipaq out of the case to reboot it. Eventually this became such a chore that they tossed the waterproof pod and just took their chances with splashes etc.
Re:max uptime... (Score:2)
You'd think the makers of the waterproof pod would have taken that into consideration and made it so you could reset the ipaq without opening it. Assuming that MS would make their OS so it would crash less seems naive.
Welcome to just about every PDA on the planet. (Score:2)
Re:max uptime... (Score:2)
The write cycle limit (100k writes to block) is unlikely to be reached in a read product, when using a reasonable file system. eg. I did some stress testing recently that wrote over 130Gbytes of data to a NAND file system. This allocated over a
Re:max uptime... (Score:2)
Ugly Stuff (Score:2)
XP Enabled Advertisement at my school (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, I'm glad the money I'm paying for my education is going somewhere useful. Though this Windows-based LCD advertisement probably cost thousands of dollars, it's worth every penny in its ability to cause me to ignore the dining halls and make my own food.
Somehow, an advertisement running Windows seems to enhance my ability to ignore it - I'm ignoring two birds with one stone!
Re:XP Enabled Advertisement at my school (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:XP Enabled Advertisement at my school (Score:2)
How about an Epods One (a.k.a. Ezex Polaris)? Nice little CE box, color LCD touchscreen, decent battery life, even CF and PCMCIA slots. Available for less than a $100 barely used from lots of us who thought there might one day be Linux or BSD for it. If there was a candidate worth pursuing, you'd think this wo
How about Windows-based lifts? (Score:2, Funny)
Found out that these displays were running windows.
How I found out - got into a lift and saw 'this program has executed an invalid instruction'.
The Blue Screen of Death does not inspire confidence when stepping into a metal cage hundreds of feet above the ground!
Re:XP Enabled Advertisement at my school (Score:2)
Re:XP Enabled Advertisement at my school (Score:3, Interesting)
How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:5, Interesting)
My wife has a Samsung SPH-i700 wireless phone from Verizon Wireless [verizonwireless.com] (motto: I am your father, Luke), and while it is a great tool to retrieve email remotely, it is an absolute JOKE as a wireless phone. To make a call, you must tap the start menu, then select "Phone" from the menu. My wife, a relatively small woman, finds the handset clunky and impossible to hold for more than a few minutes, so she uses speakerphone for almost every single conversation. The thing also loves to be tethered to an electrical outlet at every opportunity, battery life is dismal.
People who want to create features for wireless phones need to realize that ringtones in the workplace or in the presence of anyone over 14 make the owner of a ringing phone look asinine [reference.com], camera phones are for perverts [mobog.com], and that anything that chews batteries generally makes my phone less useful.
Give me a phone that is lightweight, gets decent talk time off a single charge (I'd LOVE to be able to carry my phone an entire work week without charging), and that has features I'll actually use, and I'll be a customer for life.
Give me a PDA with a sorry excuse for a phone built-in, and I'll go find another vendor.
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:3, Informative)
There are many ways to make a call and that's probably the most complicated. Have you tried pressing the green call button? Or just start dialing a phone using the keypad?
If you are going to bash some product it's best to spend more than two minutes with it.
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:5, Informative)
Even if there is a shortcut to the phone functionality, I know for a fact that the people at my wife's company who use this phone daily (and have for over four months) don't know where it is. I've watched people with multiple college degrees pull this device out, tap the start menu, and tap phone every time they want to make a call, then put the call on speakerphone, because they don't like holding the damned thing to their heads (especially in the convenient leatherette binder thingy that comes with it).
Windows-based "smartphones" have serious usability issues. They're too complicated, and they don't do their #1 job (that is, be a phone) very well. Hell, while you're in a call, if you do hold the phone up to your head, your ear keeps tapping the screen, and the person you're calling wonders why you keep punching out touch tones.
The issues I raise are real, and they're legitimate concerns. It's easy to bash me, since, yes, I pointed out that it is my wife's phone, and I don't use it every day. But the fact of the matter is that I *listen* to my wife every single day, and she and her co-workers complain about these phones constantly. It would be foolish of a phone manufacturer to ignore these issues if they want to succeed in the marketplace.
Ultimately, however, I think smartphones solve a problem that no one asked for a solution to. I'll steal a line from "The Daily Show" and ask, who really wants a device that combines the battery life of a digital camera with the image processing capability of a cell phone?
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:2)
- Has no touch-screen
- Has hard buttons like a regular phone
- Operates similarly to other phones
Some Pocket PC Phones:
- Do have hard buttons
- Have a door that covers the screen to prevent unwanted taps
Has your wife considered:
- Assigning a hard-button to launch the phone application? Most Pocket PC Phones (e.g. the XDA) have a button specifically for this purpose; on other phones you can assign one of the a
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:2)
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:2)
-B
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:4, Informative)
How about the right tool for the job? (Score:4, Insightful)
Treo 600 (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Treo 600 (Score:2)
I have used my friends' i500, and it rocks - he is alwa
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:2, Funny)
ringtones...make the owner of a ringing phone look asinine
Or dead. [kill-bill.com]Verizon ad... (Score:2)
Re:How about a phone that is a phone first... (Score:2)
How about a phone that is a phone first and a computer second?
If you wanted that why did you purchase a Pocket PC based phone then?
If you'd have done your research, you'd have discovered there are Microsoft "phone first" devices, based on Windows Smartphone. They're only just coming out in the US, us backward Europeans have had a couple of a few years now. I got an E200 [orange.co.uk] a few months back.
They are, by no means, perfect. Battery life still sucks, bluetooth is crippled (no DUN profile support), S/SMTP
oh my god.. (Score:4, Funny)
"They also wanted to reduce the footprint of their OS image to further harden their OS image from viruses & hackers, just another reason they chose Windows XP Embedded for their device. "
Re:oh my god.. (Score:2)
Has anyone used this (Score:3, Insightful)
Description: The Personal Optical Mobile Assistant (POMA) Wearable PC is a small wearable PC in a headset form factor for browsing the Internet. There is no boot time and gives the wearer the ability to privately view websites and access information...
I would like to see a review of this and any similar device posted on
Re:Has anyone used this (Score:2)
Personal Optical... what?
xbox? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:xbox? (Score:2, Informative)
I'm not suprised... (Score:5, Insightful)
While everyone (here at least) would rather see *nix running on these devices, I'm none too suprised that Microsoft is pushing embeded Windows.
Their basic strategy from their inception has been to throw money at a problem untill someone finds a fix. Look at the X-Box (the lack of a Japanese market) or any number of their other projects.
Since Microsoft already has strong ties with most of the vendors, and plenty of money to throw at promoting embeded Windows, it only follows that they will continue to grow in that market.
Re:I'm not suprised... (Score:2)
Re:I'm not suprised... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm not suprised... (Score:2)
I think its more a from product name recognition for customers than vendors. AFAIK, most vendors would not prefer to deal with M$ because its a slippery slope.
Also, the term "Windows" does not mean anything specific as far as a product that comes from M$. Its just a generic term for a generic OS from Microsoft (using a generic term for one aspect of a GUI). For example, I used to
Mod this up interesting (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Bullshit??? (Score:5, Interesting)
Some products (eg the XPDA-9) must be real sincve they appear on the list more than once.
Many of these are more development/experimental devices than real products. Quite a few, eg. Cerfcube run WinCE or Linux.
What is most interesting with WinCE is to see the number of "design losses", rather than design wins. Many products went first generation on WinCE and then were redone on Linux. I have not heard of the reverse, but I expect there might be a few cases.
Re:Bullshit??? (Score:2)
Not to mention that this was submitted by an AC, which just screams "Astroturf". Although if MSFT has gotten desperate enough that they have started trying to astroturf
Runs windows or will run Windows? (Score:5, Informative)
/. works for MS! (Score:3, Offtopic)
Intervideo is the company that makes WinDVD, InterVideo Home Theater, and a bunch of others. The story is at New Scientist [newscientist.com]. Basically it is an "InstantOn" PC with LinDVD (which is developed by InterVideo) that fits on a read-only memory chip. Linux handles TV, DVD, CD, MP3, radio. The twist to this product is that it also has a bootable MS Windows XP OS so you can run any of the MS Windows app that you still want/need.
Re:/. works for MS! (Score:2)
arrggghhh... the worst of both worlds... Linux on read only chip so you can't add anything to it or improve it and XP... I just hope the default accounts aren't admin level and the admin account has a passwor
Phantom? Oh, sure... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Phantom? Oh, sure... (Score:2)
(No, the above was not a transcription error -- the original article does actually refer to 800MHz P4s and 333MHz Athlon XPs)
Incorrect description of InFocus LiteShow (Score:2)
LiteShow is a wireless projection system that attaches to any InFocus projector with an M1 adapter (i.e. any recent model they make). It allows you to use an 802.11b/g card in your computer to wirelessly project (i.e. no cable). You don't have to attach anything to your computer. The thing in the picture attach
Apparently this is a tough market for Microsoft (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Apparently this is a tough market for Microsoft (Score:2)
Seventy-Three... (Score:2)
- new reasons to hate Bill Gates.
- new songs to watch Steve Ballmer dance to on stage.
- new areas of significant exploit vulnerability.
hmm (Score:3, Funny)
Licence costs for these devices... (Score:2)
Quotes that stuck out for me;
Priceless!!! (Score:2)
Credit cards to skim
Holidays in the Caribean, paid for by some unsuspecting dupe
Re:Priceless!!! (Score:2)
Some things money can't buy. For everything else there's Microsoft, used in financial institutions nationwide.
You must be new here (Score:3, Funny)
Okay now mod me up
heh, Motorola pulled a fast one on MS (Score:2)
Or, the (crappy) picture can be found here [windowsfordevices.com].
A mobile device, from time to time (Score:2)
Re:A mobile device, from time to time (Score:2)
"Reports have speculated that the famously glitchy BMW 745i car, and its Windows CE-powered iDrive car computer, may have been the vehicle in the incident.
But when contacted by CNETAsia, a spokeswoman from BMW Thailand said the car at fault was a 10-year old BMW 520i that had suffered a simple electronic failure. She declined to reveal if the firm received identical reports from other users in the country. "
Windows CE on X86 (Score:2, Funny)
Picture a Steam Locomotive. Its big, robust, kind of ugly, but purely functional. It requires a lot of finesse to operate one, and if you are not careful, you can blow yourself up. On the other hand, it has a rugged, simple design, being mostly a network of pipes. As such, anyone with a pipe wrench and a basic understand
They must be doing something right... (Score:2)
However, it seems that embedded Windows CE is winning the embedded devices race - by quite a good margin. Now, there is no big reason for embedded devices to share a common operating system (as 95% of the PCs in the world now do), but Windows still comes out on top.
Let this be a lesson. There is a
Pentium IV 4 GHz? (Score:2)
Sewing machines? Yikes. (Score:2)
Phhbt. Get real, mine's been playing(not just downloading) video for years.
Oh, and nominee for "worst named product" of the bunch: "Beetle iPOS." Visions of a mid 60's beetle in a junkyard...
I don't know if this is Windows powered, per se (Score:2)
I gave in to impulse and bought one ($199 plus $59 per year MSNDirect service).
It's actually pretty cool (and I'm no Mircosoft fan). If I could have found one that didn't rely on MSN for the content it would have been better, but it works pretty well. I only wonder if it will turn out to be the bomber that was Fossil's Wris
Re:I don't know if this is Windows powered, per se (Score:2)
That being said, I don't know how any of the flight crew would know the difference... it looks like any other LCD watch.
But does it run Linux? (Score:2)
How can Slashdot tolerate this? (Score:2)
Nothing to see here...move along.
Re:what about... (Score:3, Funny)
Here ya go: http://www.linuxdevices.com [linuxdevices.com]
(humming the tune "Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better...")
Re:what about... (Score:3, Insightful)
BTW, I'm pretty much pissed at MS for the fact that I'm 3 hours into a cleaning of my employer dictated development platform right now because of MSIE vulnerabilities. But at least I can look at another engineers work and appreciate the appeal of their product without belittling it
Probably? (Score:2, Funny)
It already did! [axley.net]
Re:Probably? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:That's quite a list. (Score:2)
Some kind of record (Score:2)
Re:Some kind of record (Score:2)
Re:Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better (Score:2)
Re:Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better (Score:2)
now that is cool
Re:Windows Drip Feed Campaign? (Score:2)
No, not the boys....
Some of us like to find out about new Windows devices. That way we have something else to put Linux on (yeah I know, -1 Redundant / Flamebait...)
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)
I dual booted and installed Redhat 7.1 a few years back and got 2 kernel dumps in 2 days... sure, I probably did something wrong, but the machine was running windows fine.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's a fact that 99% (possibly more) of BSOD's in modern day Windows operating systems are caused by bad hardware or bad drivers. Third party drivers. Now, the zealots would no doubt argue that a faulty driver shouldn't be able to bring the whole operating system down. Well, this is not a characteristic unique to Windows. Linux cries like a stuck pig over bad drivers, too. At least for Windows, I can find drivers for _all_ my hardware. For that, I'm willing to stand having to dodge a few BSOD's, just like most Linux users have nothing against spending hours tweaking text-based config files getting their systems running properly.
I've never received an unfair metamod for modding down an anti-MS troll, btw, so most Slashdotters (the ones dedicated enough to metamod, anyway) probably agree that BSOD jokes no longer have a place here.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
Perhaps the new OS is ok, but 98SE and ME with all updates are still BSOD jokes worthy. And look at statistics about running windows systems. Perhaps for you, it is ok, but I'm sure more than 50% peoples use still system where BSOD is a reality.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
I also know of lots of folks that run Win9x with "no instabil
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
No knowledgeable Windows user actually gets BSOD's on a regular basis anymore.
That is so funny! I was walking down to the railwaystation in Oslo sometime this fall, and what did I see on the newspaper Aftenposten newsscreen? You guessed it! A BSOD on the huge 40 m2 screen. So, not only do the BSODs appear, they appear in places where persons take extra care to not have them there. Like this newsscreen.
It's a fact that 99% (possibly more) of BSOD's in modern day Wind
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:3, Informative)
Microsofts bluetooth stack was completed after Windows XP shipped, It was supposed to have been included in XP SP1 but was delayed due to a lack of hardware support. It will probably be included in XP SP2.
The only way to get hold of the stack at the moment is with a MS Bluetooth keyboard/mouse or direct from MS if you are a Bluetooth hardware device manufacturer.
Mac OSX 10.2 includes support for HID devices but it was s
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:3, Insightful)
Honestly (Score:3, Insightful)
It's the same with Clippy jokes, even though I haven't seen Clippy in close to six years in ANY Office installation, and he never installs by default anyway. Never mind that telling him to "Hide" always got rid of him anyway.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
Most people's computers are so loaded down with spyware, crapware, and general garbage that I'm surprised they can run 2-3 minutes. The NT kernel is actually pretty stable, especially compared to DOS/Win9x. Although I prefer *nix on servers, most of my desktops run Win2K or XP, and BSODs are rare. Every time it's happened, I've been able to trace it to a bad driver or something else that's not part of the OS.
The default of rebooting after a BSOD is dumb on a desktop IMHO, but it can be turned off (S
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
That's 2-3 times for the OPERATING SYSTEM. That doesn't include application crashes.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
That is called a lockup (even that doesn't mean that no portion of the system is responding, merely that user input isn't responding and possibly the display isn't refreshing.).
A kernel32.dll crash would qualify in MY OWN definition of an OS crash. But by MICROSOFT's definition of OS, so does an explorer crash, iexplorer (same thing), messenger, media pl
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:2)
Talk to the hand.
I'd have trouble naming a home user other than a technician who DOESN'T have xp crash at LEAST once every 2 days.
Now, begone AC Troll.
Re:Some help anyone? (Score:3, Insightful)
I am beginning to think that some of the trouble is not just windows, but also tied to poor hardware. All said, I am glad that my machine is more stable.
Re:So what... (Score:2)
Re:Touch screen ATMs (Score:2)
Re:MicroSuck not good at anything - official (Score:2)
Really.
For all the bitching I hear about WinCE/Palm being awful environments to develop, I don't see much work for the Embedded Linux side. I can assure you your work would be appreciated. And we'd pay for good, solid apps.
Re:MicroSuck not good at anything - official (Score:2)