Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking Hardware

Comparing Wireless Internet Services 162

Carl Oppedahl writes "AT&T has released its new "Edge" wireless Internet access service, claiming it is twice as fast (100-130K) as Sprint's "PCS Vision" wireless service (50-70K). I have written up a few comments on my experiences with the services. What data rates are others getting with Edge? I rarely get the advertised faster speeds."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Comparing Wireless Internet Services

Comments Filter:
  • But how.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by grub ( 11606 ) <slashdot@grub.net> on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:47AM (#7577243) Homepage Journal

    Ok... I put the AOL CD in my computer but they didn't include a wireless wire. How do I connect to teh intarweb?
  • I don't live on the edge :-(
  • VPN (Score:5, Insightful)

    by That's Unpossible! ( 722232 ) * on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:49AM (#7577253)
    What I'd like is a reasonably fast wireless service that is good enough to let VPN work over it. My boss has had a terrible time getting that working on his Sprint PCS connection.

    I almost feel bad when he calls from Hawaii and he can't get access to our database from the beach chair.
    • Methinks the problem is your VPN, not the
      network. You can VPN over much lower b/w
      links than PCS offers.
      • Re:VPN (Score:3, Informative)

        by nstrom ( 152310 )
        The problem isn't bandwidth, it's latency. Cellular links have a minimum of 300ms pings and a fair amount of packet loss. Interactive applications like VPN and VNC are more affected by this than simple downloads, unrelated to bandwidth requirements.
    • What you want is Ricochet. I used it for about 6 months to "telecommute" from my patio, the park, or any other place I felt like. I used VPN and it was reasonably fast.
    • We've been able to successfully run our VPN and Citrix clients over both the Edge and Sprint PCS networks. I've never seen download speeds less than 100K on the Edge network, but we've only had the modem for a week.
    • Try SSH (layer 3) instead of a VPN (layer 2); it appears to be more resilient to drops than VPN services, and is just as secure. At least your connection will stay up.
    • Re:VPN (Score:3, Insightful)

      by jpostel ( 114922 )
      I use Sprint PCS Vision through a USB cable connected to my Treo 600 with a neat little app called PDAnet. I use the Cisco VPN client with no real problems. Most of my work is done through Term Services or PCAnywhere (which is a bandwidth hog).

      I have to say that most of the people that I have showed it to thought it was quite fast. The people that thought it was slow were indeed talking about latency and not throughput.
  • by aminorex ( 141494 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:51AM (#7577262) Homepage Journal
    T-Mobile is the only one that offers unlimited
    service, to my knowledge, in the U.S.

    I need to go to Kunming. Anybody recommend
    mobile Internet service that works in
    all major Chinese cities?
    • by aminorex ( 141494 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:57AM (#7577288) Homepage Journal
      Looks like Sprint offers unlimited data for
      $80 now. That's twice as much as T-Mobile.
      AT&T does not appear to offer unmetered
      service.

      Things change fast in this market.
    • by conan_albrecht ( 446296 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:08PM (#7577343)
      I pay an extra $10 for unlimited data services through my cell phone on Sprint. It's called "Vision" and it has been around for several years. The data minutes don't count against your regular cell minutes.

      Overall, it works really well. It's not as slick as the PCMCIA card Sprint offers, but it works just as well, uses the exact same network & speeds, and even turns heads when they seem me surfing my laptop over my cell phone.
      • Well... yes and no.

        BEWARE - Some of those plans (presumably the cheaper one's) are meant for use only inside the phone itself (Camera phone/Cell Phone "Web"). *not* for driving an laptop or whatever. An number of people have gotten burned because they have done this and used an "large" amount of bandwidth, to make themselves show up to their radar.

        If your quiet enough, you can probably get away with it.
    • Cingular's wireless internet express [cingular.com] offers unlimited data for $75/month, and that can be hooked to a computer or used from a phone.
      • I have had wireless internet service from Cingular for nearly a year. Two things you should know before you buy this:

        1) It's about 9 kbaud. Barely acceptable for checking a low-volume email account.
        2) I have had consistent billing problems with this service for the past 3 months. Seems they think each connect is a "directory assistance" call, for which they want to charge an extra $2 a pop. I have had to call them up to get these charges deleted each of the last 3 months (one month, it was over $150 fo
    • T-Mobile is the only one that offers unlimited
      service, to my knowledge, in the U.S.


      Not true. Sprint PCS Vision has several "all you can eat" data plans. It's only about $5 extra a month for unlimited data.
    • I use T-Mobile's unlimited GPRS service out in California. (they overlay on Cingular's switches and towers) It works quite well, I connect via Bluetooth on a Nokia 3650 from my G4 and my Compaq Evo laptop. Worked great when I moved into my new house with no Internet access.

      However, The Nokia 3650 bluetooth stack is buggy as hell and my phone will randomly reboot or I will see an error that said "Unspecified error in Main.cpp" and drop my GPRS call. I average around 3-5k/s. They have multiple GPRS a

      • Latency on the connection is about 80-200ms.

        I use T-Mobile's service over bluetooth with my T610. Its bluetooth stack is good for GPRS but seems to have problems syncing over the virtual serial port (I sometimes have to reboot the phone). My latency is 800-1400ms in Austin, TX. I have no idea why the lag is so high.

        • Latency is always around 600ms and up for Wireless.

          I was trouble shooting a customer out in NY, trying to figure out why he was moving around, and jumping from cellsite 2 cellsite so quickly. The guy was out on the water on a boat, and the signal was bouncing off the water. They didnt tell me that untill later. (LOL) I was able to ping his phone for over 2 hours without a problem.

          BTW, I vpn over GPRS with good results, Im really wanting that dual edge/wifi card, that will be perfect.
  • Wrong "K" (Score:5, Informative)

    by dirkdidit ( 550955 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:51AM (#7577263) Homepage
    Just to clarify things, those speeds should be in Kilobits per second, not Kilobytes.
    • Sure, it's the wrong k. But that doesn't mean anything for whether it's bits or bytes, although since we speak about networking, yes, they measure bits, and kilo is actually 1000 and not 1024 for once.
    • Of course you are right. Sorry about that. I corrected my web page about this. Thanks.
  • Disclaimer (Score:5, Funny)

    by heironymouscoward ( 683461 ) <heironymouscoward@yah3.14oo.com minus pi> on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:52AM (#7577264) Journal
    "K" refers to kilobits, not kilobytes. Speed measured in optimal circumstances, not all users may achieve similar results. Figures may include sum of up/download speeds. Weather may impact throughput. Excess ozone or solar flare activity may impact throughput. Figures are provided for information purposes only and do not constitite a contractual obligation or guarantee of any kind. User equipment may impact network throughput. Compatible with all compatible equipment, non-compatible equipment may cause performance degredation. Not for use outdoors. Not for use by minors. Not end-user serviceable: any attempt to reverse-engineer software or hardware internals is contrary to the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DCMA) of 1999, sections 2b and 3a. May cause fatal electrocution. Not for indoor use. May not be exported to the following countries: Afghanistan through Zimbabwe. Not for use in Canada.
    • Not for use outdoors.

      ...

      Not for indoor use.

      I can sell a worldwide 10Gbps wireless internet access with NO HARDWARE REQUIRED for 1/year to anyone interested here on slashdot.

      (Same disclaimer applies to my service.)

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • It should actually be written Kbps or Kb/s.
      The K is always written uppercase. A capital "B" stands for Bytes and a lowercase "b" stands for bits.

      Just writing "K" does not specify a unit. It just tells you that it's x thousand of something, in this case bits per second.
  • PCS Lack of Vision (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Maradine ( 194191 ) * on Thursday November 27, 2003 @11:54AM (#7577273) Homepage
    My love affair with Vision ended about two weeks into the service. It's never been fast, its never worked reliably, and most important, I've never found it particularly useful.

    Like a lot of products I have an early-adoptor's love affair with, it solves a problem I don't have. About the most useful thing I ever did with it was write a wap frontend for the nessus batch commandline so I could really impress the ladies. Turns out most ladies don't even know what nessus is. In a college town, I tell you!

    For those of you that read Gartner, you'll note where Sprint falls on the fabled magic quadrent. Its a special quadrent reserved for those who had a great idea and then blew it. Can you guess which?
    • For those of you that read Gartner, you'll note where Sprint falls on the fabled magic quadrent. Its a special quadrent reserved for those who had a great idea and then blew it. Can you guess which?

      The Delta Quadrant? ie: ST: Voyager?
    • by Anonymous Coward
      Yeah, I've never been impressed by Vision. I've only used it to send text messages, but it takes a ridiculous amount of time to download the form from their servers, their servers frequently timeout when sending messages, and it seems to automatically log you out after a certain time. It's very frustrating to spend 10 minutes writing an e-mail using a phone's keypad and having the server tell you that you need to log in again (especially since Sprint never told me my account's password).

      The phone also seem
      • especially since Sprint never told me my account's password

        It's the last 4 digits of your SS#. Consider calling their support line - *2, which is a free call. Regarding failure to ring if the phone's in your pocket - that's likely a result of poor coverage, or you have a shitty phone. Verizon is the devil, please don't give them extra money. Pick any of the other cell providers - Cingular, AT&T, T-Mobile, Nextel, etc. Cingular's even got the cool thing that makes regular phones ring, maybe then

    • by Wah ( 30840 )
      My love affair keeps expanding with PCS.

      I read google news on my cigarette breaks. check 7 email accounts contstantly, IM, yadda, yadda, yadda, pr0n...

      Of course, the device is a big part of this. The understand the love, you need a Treo and PDANet, for starters. I don't know what combinations other people use, but this one is the bee's knees.

      I dunno, maybe you are trying to use it instead of broadband, but for a near 95% traveler by myself, it is incredibly useful to get real internet service in prett
  • If they give you 4 time slots, and there are a total of 8 time slots per channel, what happens when you have more than 2 users in the same area trying to download a large file simultaneously? Sassan
    • Well, that's 8 time slots per frequency. A base station in a busy area will normally have multiple radios in, so it can work on multiple frequencies. It's obviously up to the network operator to install enough base stations with enough radios to support a reasonable data rate.

      Being cynical, it's not in the operator's interest to make EDGE too good, at least in Europe, since most of them paid a fortune for W-CDMA (3G) licenses.
  • by FreeLinux ( 555387 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:00PM (#7577306)
    Perhaps this report [fool.com] may be of interest. Certainly worth considering before plunging into AT&T's more expensive services.
    • The article isnt correct, there was a problem, its fixed now.
      For details check Forbes.com [forbes.com] Siebel is the largest activations provider in the USA. Dell and others use the same software. The CEO of Siebel is stepping down Jan 1 due to these types of issues.

      before plunging into AT&T's more expensive services.

      Unlimited Verizon is 199 a month, Unlimited ATTWS is 149. Really, a quick google search will show price plans. Check out Inphonic [inphonic.com] click check rate plans. Some good information on coverage and prices
  • by FreeLinux ( 555387 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:05PM (#7577324)
    Is this surprising? Have you EVER gotten the advertised specs from your high tech products? Have you ever gotten 56K from a 56K modem? Have you ever gotten 2Mbps from a DSL provider? Have you ever gotten 17" viewable from your 17" monitor? Have you ever gotten 20GB from your 20GB hard drive?

    The advertised specs are almost always inflated and unattainable. But, the sad thing is that consumers continue to allow the vendors to get away with it.

    • You got to read closer. For as long as I can remember monitors always advertised the viewable area and dot pitch. If you buy monitors from Kanka or something than that's your problem.

      As for 20GB disks to be fair there is space "wasted" by sector encodings and other data [ecc]. So really you do have 20GB [or more] of data on disk, just not 20GB usable by the FS.

      As for the modems, again same thing. Sure it's called 56K but they've put "the 53.3K cap" on the boxes forever now. Why they don't just call t
      • "As for 20GB disks to be fair there is space "wasted" by sector encodings and other data [ecc]. So really you do have 20GB [or more] of data on disk, just not 20GB usable by the FS. "

        Well, partially, I think it's more along the lines that 1000MB = 1GB = 1GiB = 1024MB since marketing is hardly going to use GiB...

        I know the sector encoding, etc took up a lot of space on a 2MB floppy, but somehow I don't think it's taking up around 10GB on a 160GB drive.

        In how this is relevant to anything to do with m
        • You are correct in that the main source of "misrepresentation" is GiB vs GB, but there is still a large amount of space taken up by internal hard disk functions.

          There's telemetry data, to tell the heads where they are at any given time, and there also spare sectors for when some live ones go bad. Modern hard disks can tolerate a number of bad sectors without the user ever seeing it, by moving the data that's getting hard to read to these spare sectors.

          That's generally the reason why when the user actuall
    • Yes, why yes I have. When downloading from sites like yahoo or akamai hosted things, I usually get the best speeds.

      And I do get 20GB hd's.

      It's not the advertising spec's that are wrong. It's the wording of the specs that are fooked.

      What ISP's don't tell you is, you get high speeds TO the isp. Not to what the ISP connects to, so if the backbone is bad, so is your connection. That is usually the case.

      HD manufacturererers, don't usually tell you that there is a conversion error from 1billion bytes to 2
    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Ironically, I DO get advertised speeds on my Time Warner Cablemodem.

      I feel so dirty saying that.
    • Have you EVER gotten the advertised specs from your high tech products?

      eh, yeah.

      My SBC/Pacific Bell DSL line is advertised as 384/128, down/up speeds. I routinely see something more like 1500/320.

      I'm right now downloading Fedora Core 1 at > 1 Mbit.

      -Ben
  • Mucho expensive (Score:5, Interesting)

    by SuperBanana ( 662181 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:07PM (#7577332)

    I'm paying $8/mo for 1MB of GMRS data transfer. That's barely a few web pages these days. Each extra KILOBYTE is something like EIGHT cents.

    Frankly, GMRS is plenty fast enough for me; it's just way, way, WAY too expensive. It's stupid, because the data rates pale in comparison to a voice call, and they're come+go...you'd think much cheaper for them to handle.

    Of course, this is all because AT&T and every other provider seems obsessed with cameraphones. I don't know a single person in my office who has a cameraphone, nor a single person that wants one. They're useless toys, but because the wireless companies are fixated on 'em, and they're giving 'em away, they've jacked up the costs on data transfer to the point that anyone trying to actually use the phone for real work can't afford it unless they're a billionaire.

    When I talk with friends, they don't say "oh, i want a phone with a camera!" They say things like: a)better reception b)fits in pocket(the camera phones are pretty damn big) c)easy to hold+use d)good battery life(and a battery that will NOT be gone within a year), and so on. Bluetooth is getting up there among my coworkers. Anyone at the phone companies listening?

    • Re:Mucho expensive (Score:4, Insightful)

      by jmcneill ( 256391 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:23PM (#7577402) Homepage
      Funny you should bring this up -- I just got my cell phone bill in the mail this morning, and on my $20 CDN/month GPRS plan (1.5MB) through Rogers/AT&T, I had a $16 roaming charge for doing 560KB worth of transfers in the US.

      I'm left with no choice but to cancel my GPRS service -- the only time it's ever useful is when I'm out of town, but the roaming charges are too high for me to think about doing the roaming GPRS thing again.
      • Re:Mucho expensive (Score:2, Insightful)

        by Oopsz ( 127422 )
        Funny, using GPRS on microcell [www.fido.ca] when in the states doesn't incur any additional roaming charges.. 3 cents a kb, or flat rates for x megs of transfer, or unlimited use for $50, anywhere in north america. and voice roaming in the states is only 20 cents a minute. If you travel a lot you might want to switch, the international roaming is amazingly cheap

        (I used to have a cingular line just for use in the US, because telus roaming was so high. Not anymore.)
        • Was just looking at Fido's coverage -- doesn't look like they have any digital coverage in Atlantic Canada. Furthermore, my GSM Palm Tungsten/W won't work on their network. Looks like I'm stuck with Rogers/AT&T for now :(
    • gmrs? are you sure you don't mean gprs?

      for gprs the standard price here (in finland) seems to be around 20 for 100mb which is plenty for irc/email/whatnot for regular user(i don't know if unlimited is still available for ~50). 100mb has proved to be plenty for me for my 3650(mainly irc and web browsing, slashdot for one also great for checking the non-nerd news while i walk to see some stupid lecture and also great diversion while i sit in the lecture, granted a wlan laptop would be even better but i would
      • I just got back from Germany where I was using my moms GSM phone. I have a AT&T GSM phone here in the states, I must say that I agree with you. GSM in the states is like a tin can on a string. It works sometimes and other times you can forget about it. While in Germany I was doing some hiking in the Apls and had very good reception all the time.

    • Yeah, I really can't understand the obsession with camera phones. I recently decided to purchase a cell phone, and pretty much *every* decent phone AT&T had included a camera, which definitely added extra bulk. I ended up purchasing a Nokia 3650 (it has Bluetooth), and not once have I used the built-in camera. There's just no point to it. Cameras and cell phones should be kept separate.

      T-Mobile, however, does have the right idea with their Sidekick phone. The Sidekick by default does not include a came
      • I'm actually working seasonal part time at a Radio Shack, where we sell the Sprint PCS Vision phones. While you can't get a free cameraphone, they're way down in price--the basic VGA-quality phone is $79.99.

        I personally have the $99.99 Sanyo 8100, which does occasionally get me the advertised 50k/sec rate. The camera's really basic, the phone is tiny, and the battery life is just fine. A few days ago, I picked up the data link cable and software, and this morning I installed it, no sweat. It's definite
    • I love the idea of a camera phone. I rarely want a camera, but once in a while it is nice to have a functional camera. Then I got one, which would be nice, but it is a seperate attachment. So I lose in that it isn't always with me, and it when I do think to carry it, it is always times when I would want a better camera. The camera in my phone is for times when a camera would be nice, but I didn't expect to need it so I didn't have the big camera. Bluetooth seems like a better idea now. Of course that wo

  • by Nosher ( 574322 ) <simon@nosher.net> on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:10PM (#7577352) Homepage
    Wireless data rates are not unlike modem data rates, in that you're fairly unlikely to get the maximum speed unless conditions are optimal. In the case of a modem with, say, a maximum potential speed of 56k, that normally means being within a mile of your exchange on a good line (most of the time I get connect rates of 40-48kbps). In the case of packet data on a mobile network, your base station provides a fixed number of data "slots". Your phone can negotiate for up to the maximum number of slots it can handle at once (for example, in GPRS the Nokia 7650 handles 4 "down" slots and 1 "up" (or maybe 3/1). If your cell is busy, you may only get 3, 2 or even 1 "down" slot (this direction is the one which sends data to you, and so directly influences your experience of network "speed"). Also, data rates fall off as a reciprocal of the distance to the base-station. Combine these two factors and it's easy to see that you're fairly unlikely to achieve the maximum theoretical rate, no matter what the operator tells you :-) EDGE may work slightly differently (the previous relates to GPRS) but I suspect that the principal's the same.
    • In GPRS and EGPRS (the GPRS extension in EDGE), you almost never get the slots exclusively. I.e., you may get 4 slots on the downlink, but you share them with other connections, so called TPFs or temporary block flows. Thus, the maximum throughput not only depends on your CIR (carrier to interference ratio, which determines the modulation and coding scheme (MCS) used and sets your maximum data rate on the air interface) and the number of PDCHs ('slots') you get allocated, but also on how many others in th
  • I blogged about this a few weeks ago...

    http://www.peerfear.org/rss/permalink/2003/09/23 /S printPCSDataServices/

    It turns out that most Sprint PCS Vision phones support wireless over USB... that and it works just fine over Linux.

    All and all this means you can get wireless on your Linux box for only a few bucks a month (if you have an existing sprint phone and account).

    Edge might amazing but it's hard to beat this price...
  • perhaps of interest (Score:3, Interesting)

    by linuxpng ( 314861 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:16PM (#7577376)
    Verizon offers low bandwidth (14.4) service for free. (just ticks away from your plan's minutes). It's suprisingly fast for websites although you don't want to download anything.
    • Verizon offers low bandwidth (14.4) service for free. (just ticks away from your plan's minutes).

      Verizon also offers Express Network (their name for 1X-RTT) service for free with America's Choice plans that's also MOU (minutes of use). They don't really advertize this fact at all and a lot of their CS reps are clueless about it, but, when I called to get Express Network added to my plan, they did it.

      I don't have a need to use it much except, say, when I visit my parents who have nothing but a land pho

      • Hmm, according to this thread [pdaphonehome.com] it seems that it's accidental, and you might even get charged for it. In any case, do you need a special phone to use it? I have the serial cable adapter, but it only seems to work at 14.4 when I connect. Is there a different number you need to dial? I use #777, I think.
        • In any case, do you need a special phone to use it?
          You need a phone that can do 1X-RTT (obviously).
          I have the serial cable adapter, but it only seems to work at 14.4 when I connect. Is there a different number you need to dial? I use #777, I think.
          Not a different number, but a different account name: your-mobile-number @vzw3g.com.
  • You can also just sign up for the regular Vision service on your Sprint PCS phone for $10-$15. Then get a USB-datacable (I bought the one for my Sanyo 4900 directly from Sanyo as Sprint doesn't sell them anymore (http://www.sanyo.com/wireless/)). The next thing is to setup a PPP-connection and you'll have everything you need to connect your Linux (or Windoze) box to the Internet.

    Be warned though Sprint may frown upon too heavy use of Vision with an attached computer to the PCS phone. They intended the serv
  • AT&T Will Pay (Score:5, Informative)

    by Bruha ( 412869 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:23PM (#7577401) Homepage Journal
    Facts:

    AT&T 100-130 Max 200 Kbps avail to 215 Million Customers.

    Sprint 50-70 Max 144 Kbps avail to 230 Million Customers.

    Verizon Wireless 60-80 Max 144 avail to 230 Million Customers.

    Verizon Wireless' NationalAccess has average speeds of 60 - 80 kbps, peaks at 144 kbps and is available to nearly 230 million. BroadbandAccess,

    Verizon Wireless's faster EVDO service at 300 - 500 kbps on average (2 Mb peak), is offered in the San Diego and Washington D.C. markets.

    EDGE makes its debut after nearly two years' delay due to technology issues. With no evolution path, EDGE is seen as a stop gap before AT&T has to invest in yet another technology like WCDMA. In addition, EDGE does not improve voice capacity and due to deteriorating data speeds over great distances from the base station, requires greater base station density thus adding to AT&T network costs.

    Neither Sprint or At&T wireless is in position to provide any broadband services past their initial offerings. Vzw will be expanding the market for EVDO in 2004 to other major cities (I hope Dallas) Also sprint and verizon's speeds are slower due to technology limits with the initial offerings but compared to CDPD which was most times at best 14.4 speeds it's a leap ahead. I would expect to see 10-100Mbit wireless within the next 5 years in larger cities to compete with landline DSL and Cable which both have limits well under 40Mbit.
    • EDGE does not improve voice capacity...

      There's a standard on the way for quarter rate speech over EDGE. This should allow networks to carry close to twice the number of voice calls compared to the (currently popular) half rate.

      ...requires greater base station density...

      WCDMA will need that anyway, so an increase in base station numbers will just happen sooner with EDGE.

      • Base station density increases will cost them billions in network expansion costs.. Most Lucent upgrades just require a few changes to a base station which saves companies money.

        WCDMA you'll have to have the extra base stations but at the same time you'll be using several base stations to maintain a acceptable signal therefore increasing bandwidth costs on each of those basestations. Nobody's piping DS3's to cell towers yet so you're really using more resources per cell than if you developed something tha
    • While CDMA2000 offers slightly faster data rates than EDGE, don't forget that EDGE has an "edge" in that while you're on a data call with EDGE, you can be interrupted with a voice call, have your data session suspended, take the call, hang up and go right back to the data session.

      Until 1xEVDV, you won't be able to do that with CDMA. With current CDMA solutions, your voice calls will go to voice mail directly until you conclude your data session.

  • If a client sends me a Microsoft Word file and I need to read it to do my work, the Blackberry can't read it, nor can a cell phone, no matter how spiffy it is.

    From the Blackberry website:

    In addition to your email, corporate data and calendar events, you require access to email attachments when you're away from your computer. BlackBerry provides an attachment service that lets you open and view email attachments on your BlackBerry handheld.

    Microsoft Word
    Microsoft Excel
    Microsoft PowerPoint(R)
    Corel(R) W
  • I'd be a lot less uninclined to use their service if the web site worked. I'm sticking with t-mobile as my choice for the switch.
  • by smd4985 ( 203677 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:28PM (#7577424) Homepage
    I'm a little confused by the article - I just got the Treo 600 with the $15 a month PCS Vision service and I love it. The Treo is amazing (as has been described [wsj.com]). The blazer web browser renders webpages great (I was /.'ing on it the other day) and at VERY acceptable transfer speeds. AIM is already enabled and SMS/POP3 service is forthcoming.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:29PM (#7577433)
    The person mentions a few technical details that aren't quite correct. From the article, "The Edge service works by giving up to four time slots of GPRS service to a single user. The four time slots, each good for about 30K of bandwidth, thus can add up to around 120K or so."

    This isn't quite accurate. GPRS itself ranges from using 2-8 timeslots based on the class of the device. Classes 10-12 typically have 4 timeslots for download which gives you about 32-48Kbps (you can effectively get 8-12Kpbs per timeslot with GPRS). See here [gsmworld.com] for some specifics.

    EDGE is, more or less, an upgrade to GPRS just to push more bits of data through. A quote from Ericsson's info page about EDGE [ericsson.com]: "EDGE uses the same TDMA (Time Division Multiple Access) frame structure, logic channel and 200kHz carrier bandwidth as today's GSM networks, which allows existing cell plans to remain intact." Of course, there is a white paper linked off of that page that gives more technical details for eany who are interested. Note: It's not about using any more time slots than GPRS.

    For carriers choosing the GSM route, the upgrade path is GSM -> Add GPRS -> Upgrade to EDGE -> Upgrade to WCDMA (aka UMTS). It is a little ironic that the eventual 3G network of GSM carriers will be a CDMA type technology (though with a massively huge spectrum requirement compared to CDMA2000). Only time will tell which turns out to be the better technology, though the CDMA carriers seem to be jumping ahead of the GSM ones. Of course, some might argue that almost the rest of the world uses GSM so it should be the logical choice. But then again, most /.ers should know that everyone [microsoft.com] is not always right. ^_-
  • by El ( 94934 )
    Lies, damn lies, statistics, ISP bandwidth claims, and SCO legal arguments.
  • I have a Handspring Treo 300 with Sprint PCS Vision service. When I connect to my laptop with the USB cable I consistently get 140kbps. I'm not sure why AT&T is spreading lies about the service, but I have no problem opening up Shoutcast and listening to 128kbps MP3 radio streams over my cellphone. It works great and never stutters unless I try to browse the web at the same time.

    The latency, however, is pretty bad. It's about 500 ms. latency, but you can't get everything perfect. I'm just amazed th
  • I use Sprint's unlimited vision plan (professional pack) fopr $15 extra in addition to calling plan. It works great, I have used VPN software to connect to the PPTP VPN at work, even access the server using terminal emulation software and of course, in the included Sprint's business connection software, I can real my work emails, documents on my PC at work etc... and speed is fairly good.

  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:56PM (#7577565)
    Why not use a booster to ensure the best data rate.? An number of vendors offer a range of fixed directional antennas [cellantenna.com] and repeaters [jl-site3.com] and phone booster antennas.

    Unless you are driving in a car or reading email as you walk, "mobile" users are stationary during actual use (a car-top cellphone antenna might be the answer for truly mobile use). For semi-mobile use, a little stand and a Yagi antenna would help improve transmission/reception to the local cell tower. A simple signal strength app would help you point the antenna (for extra credit it could even help you find a tower in an adjacent, less used cell for access to more slots). For boosted use in a hotel room, cafe, or client office, a directional antenna or repeater would be quite useful.
  • I am a full time RVer and we have found Verizon is way better than Sprint. They let you use phones with real antennas instead of Sprint's limit of using cards. And Verizon coverage is now better than sprint on 1X data (not the case until recently).

    Yahoo Groups: InternetByCellPhone [yahoo.com]
  • by NitroWolf ( 72977 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @12:59PM (#7577583)
    It's easy... and sort of touched on in the article itself.

    Instead of installing the Connection Manager from Sprint, call you need to do in is make a new PPP connection, and for the phone number, put in the #777.

    This directs the base station at the cell site to direct the call to the PDSN and make a data connection. Then your phone acts just like a 70k modem. This will work in any OS that can make a PPP connection, no proprietary software needed.

    • Konppix has a sprint pppd scripts (/etc/ppp/peers/sprint and /etc/chatscripts/sprint) ready to go. I use the following login script:

      /#!bin/bash
      /bin/setserial /dev/modem baud_base 460800
      /usr/sbin/pppd call sprint
      /usr/bin/tail -f /var/log/messages

      The uploads on Sprint go faster than the downloads. I can get 20KB which is actually above their 140Kbit speed claims. Downloads range in the 12 to 14KB range. When I lived in Silicon Valley (Redwood City) I couldn't get DSL/cable so Sprint wound up being my pr
  • It's frustrating to read this article, for one, there is just one measure of performance - 'k'. This 'k' is what, kB, kb? OK, let's assume it's the same 'k' as in a 56k modem, what's the latency then? Can I expect to work as if I was on a slow landline modem, or is it going to remind me of the 'world wide wait' days? I expect the latency to be pretty high, the link latency plus that of the internet. The most efficient strategy is still probably to search for a Starbucks.
  • by phoxix ( 161744 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @01:10PM (#7577634)
    If you're the type that doesn't care for speed, and only cares for such things as SSH, mail, etc. then you definately want to look into Sprint's older Wireless Web [sprintpcs.com].

    Its pretty slow, actually its pretty damn slow, its about 19.2kbps. BUT .... its also only 5 dollars a month. AND, you do not get charged for how much data you transfer. Your wireless internet time comes out of your normal cell phone plan. So you can use it during the night and weekend for free. (NOTE: you need a standard dialup company to dial into). Also Sprint has some phones that act as standard AT modems (a whole bunch actually), so linux users need to worry about such.

    Verizon also has a great offer. They have Mobile Office [verizonwireless.com] which is pretty much the same as Sprint's service. However verizon provides you with a virtual ISP to dial up into. (*No extra* cost to anyone either)

    For a little more info, take a gander at this tread [nylug.org]

    Sunny Dubey
  • T-mobile (Score:3, Informative)

    by weave ( 48069 ) on Thursday November 27, 2003 @01:49PM (#7577809) Journal
    I'm a bit confused about the T-mobile claims. I have unlimited internet access (GPRS) through t-mobile for an extra $20/month -- unlimited access. At least that is what it is in the U.S. It's $30/month if you don't have a voice plan with them.

    It's not the fastest in the world, but it works fairly well and I usually use it while moving (bus, train, passenger in a car).

    Fortunately for me, the mail.app client on OS X works fairly well with net connections going up and down.

    • T-Mobile now offers free unlimited WAP over GPRS with all their calling plans. It does not use your plan minutes. The only restriction is that only ports 80, 110, and 25 are open., o no secure web sites can be accessed. I can connect my Powerbook through my cellphone using bluetooth, and get free web surfing and mail.
  • We have a local wireless company Skynet Broadband [skynetbb.com] in NW washington that has been hacked twice in what seems like less than that 60 days. As a result its subscribers are out of internet for 3-4 days while they rebuild everything.

    I'm willing to give them a chance though I'm not entirely confident in their services.
  • Odd... (Score:3, Informative)

    by fo0bar ( 261207 ) * on Thursday November 27, 2003 @02:55PM (#7578119)
    Sprint's specs list a maximum of 128kbps on the Vision service, and I get very close to that. But you must remember that speed and latency are completely different. I've seen an average or 300-800ms latency on Vision. If you start a large download, I'll see close to the the full 128kbps. However, the latency makes the average web surfing or ssh session (send a little, receive a little, repeat) feels as slow as a 28.8k modem.

    If AT&T can decrease the latency rather than increase the speed, I'm there!
  • I dumped Sprint because of billing disputes, but it was a tough choice, because I had become addicted to the Vision service. (I switched to Qwest, who is about to switch from their own network to Sprint's, so I figure I'll be back on Sprint's 3G network soon enough, only with someone else doing the billing.)

    I hooked up my PowerBook to my Sanyo 4900, and it was very simple. Just plug it in, OS X showed it as a 'SANYO USB PHONE' modem, and I had it dial #777 (as has been mentioned elsewhere.) Instant 70-1

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein

Working...