Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Handhelds Hardware Science

Cell Phones May Spread Infections 286

CHaN_316 writes "Yahoo is running an article talking about how cell phones from health workers are helping spread dangerous infections in hospitals. 'They found that 12 percent of healthcare providers' cell phones were contaminated with [Acinetobacter baumannii]. The results are disturbing because [it] has the propensity to develop resistance to almost all available antibiotics ... Cell phones provide a large dry surface that allows survival of A. baumannii--it requires no nutrients ... [it] is found in intensive care units, and the mortality rate among infected patients is very high -- between 50 and 60 percent.' The hospital that conducted this research no longer allows the use of cell phones, and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers." So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cell Phones May Spread Infections

Comments Filter:
  • by mfarah ( 231411 ) <{miguel} {at} {farah.cl}> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:21AM (#6993664) Homepage
    Douglas Adams was, once again, an incredible visionary (even if he didn't intend to be one).
  • by grub ( 11606 ) <slashdot@grub.net> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:21AM (#6993665) Homepage Journal

    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol

    Samsung already has. They may not have intended it but mine has been accidently soaked in booze more times than I care to (or can) remember.
    • My brother had a ruggedized Nokia; it got dunked in alcohol several times on nights out, apparently, as people tested its waterproof status.
  • by Firehawke ( 50498 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:22AM (#6993680) Journal
    Alright, but how many consumer phones are also a breeding ground for this sort of thing now? I'm sure the bacteria spread fairly quickly, so I have to wonder. Also, how would a consumer clean such an infected phone without destroying it?
    • I know in alot of grocery stores the little hand baskets and the plastic on the carts are using some plastic called Microbiotic (or something like that) Couldn't they use the same stuff on cel phones? Anyone know more about this?
    • Isn't wood alcohol (the non-drinkable kind used to sterilize) non-conductive? It should be usable, provided it doesn't melt any of the plastic or other parts.
    • by aswang ( 92825 )
      This "news" is unnecessarily alarmist. Acinetobacter baumannii usually doesn't cause infection in healthy individuals. Notice that they did this study in the intensive care unit, where they've known for a while that patients get this sort of infection. The patients might have open wounds or burns. Their immune systems tend to be shot to hell, from, for example, chemotherapy, HIV, some other illness, or just from the high levels of cortisol in their blood because of stress from, e.g., the extreme amounts
  • by eviltypeguy ( 521224 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:22AM (#6993685)
    EVIL Verizon Guy calls the hospital ICU...

    Ring...
    "Can you hear me now?"
    "Good!"

    EVIL Verizon Guy hangs up, cackles madly...
  • Bugs... (Score:2, Funny)

    by johnwyles ( 704259 )
    So now I have to worry about two kind's of bugs on my cell phone... The diseased bug and the FBI...
  • Ya (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Darkman, Walkin Dude ( 707389 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:24AM (#6993701) Homepage
    And while we're at it, we should sterilise the healthcare workers too. Honestly, this is just another knee-jerk pogrom against a new technology, wasting money that could have been better spent elsewhere.
    • Re:Ya (Score:2, Insightful)

      by sniser2 ( 624542 )
      WTF? They simply concluded that 12% of the phones they looked at where infected with that thing - what you make of it is your choice. How is this "just another knee-jerk pogrom against a new technology, wasting money that could have been better spent elsewhere"?? Nuts.
    • Re:Ya (Score:3, Informative)

      by glesga_kiss ( 596639 )
      This is a waste of time. All it is saying that germs pass through physical contact. A water pump in London proved that a hundred years ago.

      Other things that will have the same problem:

      • Jewelery
      • Watches
      • Makeup/lipstick
      • Any damn object in the hospital

      Banning the offending object isn't the way ahead. Increasing awareness of the problem is much better.

      • Re:Ya (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Black Rabbit ( 236299 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:00AM (#6994069)
        Doesn't even have to be something in/from a hospital!

        Some of the biggest spreaders of disease, even as simple as the common cold or the flu, right on up to SARS, are everyday items such as computer keyboards, regular twisted pair phones, (especially payphones!), and even coinage!

        This is why properly washing your hands often is so important in stopping the spread of contagious diseases.
        • Re:Ya (Score:5, Funny)

          by bhima ( 46039 ) <(Bhima.Pandava) (at) (gmail.com)> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:08AM (#6994144) Journal
          The biggest spreaders of disease are my co-workers small children.
        • Re:Ya (Score:2, Interesting)

          by Afty0r ( 263037 )

          This is why properly washing your hands often is so important in stopping the spread of contagious diseases.

          For some people this is very true - for others we just don't care.
          Having been the kid who always bit his fingers+nails, put his hands in his mouth and ate stuff that was a little too old/spilled on the floor etc. I've probably had very low doses of just about everything going.

          By ensuring that you don't do things STUPIDLY dirty you can effectively vaccinate yourself against many things early in life

      • Re:Ya (Score:3, Insightful)

        by Sgt York ( 591446 )
        I think the problem is less technical than psychological. Many MD's aren't going to think of their phone/pager as a vector. They wash their hands after each patient, but can contaminate their hands when they touch their phone or pager to turn it off (an unconscious move for most MD's).

        If the risk is brought to their attention, they wil react. Most are actuely aware of the special vector issues in a hospital. The banning of phones in the hospital was probably a little severe; just the knowledge of the risk

  • by Cap'n Canuck ( 622106 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:24AM (#6993702)
    They always said that they didn't want you to use your phone in the hospital, as it would interfere with hospital equipment. Turns out it interferes with your own equipment. Heart, lungs, etc...
    • As a doctor, I can say that the evidence for this is weak, at best.

      People with permanent pacemakers use cell phones without problems. The signal dissipates by the inverse cube of the distance from the device. If they can't use the most minimal of shielding of equipment, cell phones are the least of their problems. (MRI and CAT scan machines, portable X-Ray machines, and wireless computers come to mind)
  • ericson phone (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:24AM (#6993710)
    I own an ericson R310 Waterproof shockproof phone (antenae that looks like a sharks fin). I noticed that during the recent sars outbreak they seemed to be the phone of choice for the men in bunny suits!
  • Hand Contact? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Musashi Miyamoto ( 662091 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:24AM (#6993711)
    Why wouldn't a pager require hand contact? I bet what he really meant to say was _head_ contact.

    That would make a lot more sense.
    • When a pager beeps or vibrates, you can (depending on the model) just look at the top screen as its clipped to your waist to see the number, your hand doesn't have to touch the pager.
      • Re:No Hand Contact (Score:2, Interesting)

        by zaphodbblx ( 705015 )
        to me the point is that cell phones are used in non controlled, non-sterile enviroments. if the pager was a doctors personal one it would cause the same problem. you'd have to have "hospital only" units kept at work and sanitised daily to be safe(r).
    • Re:Hand Contact? (Score:3, Interesting)

      by afniv ( 10789 )
      Maybe for skinny people. I always had to adjust the pager to read the little screen. This was a few years ago when I had a pager with a small screen for some months. Of course, then I had to touch a phone that everyone else touches to return the page.

      What is it about mobile phones in a hospital that they get infected, when all the other wall phones in the hospital that doctors will use to return pages won't get infected? Too me, as long as the bacteria is on the health care worker's hands, it will be e
      • Instead of everyone using thier own phones, they all use pagers and use the same phone on the floor. How is this better? Just need to clean your cellphone just like you do your watch and glasses when your a health care worker.
  • by big_groo ( 237634 ) <groovis AT gmail DOT com> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:26AM (#6993728) Homepage
    ...and are switching to devices that don't require hand contact like pagers.

    I keep my pager in my desk drawer. When I'm not in the office, I set it to the most annoying ring/beep, and stick it up in a ceiling tile. Hilarity ensues for co-workers in office.

  • Actually... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by MoeMoe ( 659154 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:27AM (#6993739)
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    Actually, you can dunk your phone in alcohol right now if you wanted (minus the screen)... I was a part-time cell phone dealer about 2 years ago, whenever a phone had water damage or got dirty internally, all we did was take the phone apart, get a toothbrush and rubbing alcohol (isopropyl) and start scrubbing away at the corrosion.
  • by Progman3K ( 515744 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:28AM (#6993741)
    Wouldn't simply irradiating the cel phone do the trick?

    Maybe some internal parts would need to be shielded to withstand it, but the external surface could be sterilized that way.
    • Maybe some internal parts would need to be shielded to withstand it, but the external surface could be sterilized that way.

      The problem with this is that any radiation (UV, X-ray, hard gammas) that you might choose to use to sterilize the telephone will also likely degrade the plastic from which it is constructed.

      Depending on the particular composition of the telephone, radiation may cause either brittleness or softening of the plastic case and buttons. The clear display window will probably yellow or c

  • It makes sense that in hospitals, there should be some sterilizable version of everything. They don't use operating equipment that can't be sterilized, so why not cellphones? The only problem is, Excess sterilization leads to super-bugs, so maybe just administering an immunization for this bug would be a better idea. :)
    • You would think it'd be pretty easy to make some kind of plastic bag that would act like a thin sleeve for the phones, like disposable gloves and whatnot.

      It could just be thin cellophane in the shape of a tube sock, maybe even with a zip lock on one end. Even a flip-open phone could be put in flipped open, then shut (plastic would fold over inside it).

      That way, you could dispose of the bag and not worry about getting a special phone or banning them in hospitals altogether.

      Chris
      • such cases and bags aren't that uncommon(theres hard cases and some bags made of fairly durable material).

        but you still see rarely people using them, except when hiking&etc(doh).

        i don't smoke but those bags are excellent place to store cigs too if you're camping(or on some stinky army prac camp).

  • by pubjames ( 468013 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:29AM (#6993760)
    More interesing recent story on cell phones:

    Mobiles 'betray' cheating Italians [bbc.co.uk].
    • A couple of months ago I overheard someone say: I 'll never get one of those camera phones. Just think of when my girlfriend asks, where are you? She will want me to send a picture. I'll never be able to go out again!
  • News Flash! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by superdan2k ( 135614 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:30AM (#6993769) Homepage Journal
    NEWS FLASH: If you have bacteria on your skin and that spot touches an object, other people touching that object can pick up the bacteria! What can you do to protect your children? Are you safe? Watch Channel 14 KSLSHDOT tonight at 10 and find out!

    This isn't news. This is fear-based ratings pandering by the source.
  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:31AM (#6993778)
    If cell phones harbor nasty germs, what about those PDA and Tablet PC medical terminals? The construction is equivalent -- lots of plastic, elastomeric buttons, touch screens, stylus, etc. Worse, medical terminals are more likely than are cell phones to be handled by multiple people.
  • Sterile cell phones (Score:5, Interesting)

    by DdJ ( 10790 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:31AM (#6993784) Homepage Journal
    So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?
    Not necessary. Get a bluetooth cell phone, and seal it in a sterile plastic bag while at work. Then develop a bluetooth headset that can be sterilized. You can push the buttons on the phone through the plastic bag.

    Heck, come to think of it, the plastic bag would let sound through without a problem. Just get a cell phone that you don't need to fold or unfold to use, and heat-seal it in a fresh sterile plastic bag every time you enter the hospital, and remove the plastic bag every time you leave. That would do the trick, wouldn't it?
    • Then we'd see the /. headline "Plastic Bags May Spread Infections." The infections aren't coming from the cellphone itself, but from whoever touches it, therefore the same problem will exist however the cellphone is covered.

      (Duh. I can't believe I have to explain that one. Still, it was modded +5 Interesting so I suppose some folks just haven't got the ability to think about things for a microsecond or two.)

      Dunking the user in alcohol has a number of merits though...:-)
      • by DdJ ( 10790 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:41AM (#6994443) Homepage Journal
        Then we'd see the /. headline "Plastic Bags May Spread Infections." The infections aren't coming from the cellphone itself, but from whoever touches it, therefore the same problem will exist however the cellphone is covered.
        But you're not getting what the problem is. The same plastic surface is used constantly, so stuff gets on it one day, and grows, and is still there the next day, and grows, and that's the problem. Plastic bags that are replaced every day would indeed be at least a partial solution to the problem.
    • Better yet, develop a plastic bag large enough to go completely over the head of the next person I see on a Cell phone.

      I think I'll call it Cell-O-Phone. Won't turn off those annoying rings, but it does dramatically reduce the volume of the speaker.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:31AM (#6993792)
    Actually, you can sterilize just about anything but the cost and time are prohibitive. There is a sterilization process that uses gas where I have sterilized entire computers, monitors, mouse and keyboards that were placed in operating rooms. Also I have sterlized sensitive electronics that could not take either pressure or temperature that survived gas sterilization just fine. It is a trade off between cost of the sterilization process, the time it takes the equipment to be done, and the usefullness of the equipment.
  • by quinkin ( 601839 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:32AM (#6993798)
    Next week we discover that healthcare workers keys are infected, then pens, then wallets/purses, then healthcare workers...

    Well lets see here, send all the sick to one place, get the same subset of the population to treat them all and wierdly enough you get concentrations in infections (including all these wonderful antibiotic resistant/immune strains we are breeding with our idiotic farming and medical practices... but that's another rant for another day). Especially in and around those brave enough to be on the frontline as it were.

    If you aren't sick, stay the hell away from hospitals or you will be.

    Q.

  • by mgs1000 ( 583340 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:32AM (#6993804) Journal
    I thought people were not supposed to use cell phones in hospitals. Why are they even there?
    • I thought people were not supposed to use cell phones in hospitals. Why are they even there?

      There was some panic over this early on, but it turned out to be a minimal issue.

      When I was working at a hospital, we did some testing of cellular devices and medical equipment. See, medical equipment gets an exemption from the regular FCC shielding requirements for some historical reason, and we all know if you're broadcasting interference you're an antenna too, and you don't have to accept interference if you'
  • by Fratz ( 630746 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:32AM (#6993808)
    Well, you can't autoclave it. They usually only do this with certain metals, since they can withstand the heat involved.

    You could theoretically dip it in a biocide of some sort (they use stuff tougher than alcohol in operating rooms and on used surgical tools) but there's a "nook & cranny" problem. When designing non-metal surgical tools, you have to make sure you don't make any tiny cracks, holes, or grooves where stuff can cling and avoid the biocide. The last cell phone I saw had a lot of nooks and crannies. You'd possibly need to redesign one to be completely sealed, which is getting more feasible because of wireless battery charging technologies and wireless connectivity technologies.

    Another alternative is that you could stick it in a sterile container and use it wirelessly, but then your wireless headset would still need to be sterilizable.
    • My fiancee works in a research facility that requires disinfection of all items brought in. To bring her cell phone in she puts it in a zip lock bag and dips it in whatever they use as a disinfectant solution. The phone works fine through the bag without a headset.
    • I couldn't agree more. When I did my alternative civilian service [Zivildienst] in a sheltered workshop [Werkstatt fr Behinderte], the handicapped people built the wiring harnesses for medical autoclaves from wire and crimp contacts. We had to rework the wiring harnesses several times, because the wires (mainly their electric insulation) and the contacts did not stand the conditions (heat and humidity) inside the autoclaves. The contacts corroded, the insulation melted or broke and caused short circuits, an

    • Well, he's right about not being able to autoclave the phone, since the plastic might melt, electronics get wet.

      As far as METALS not being able to withstand the heat? WTF? autoclaves only get to around 120 deg C and 10-15 atmospheres - pretty much ANY metal can withstand that - except I guess mercury ;-)

      As far as sterilizing non-heat safe stuff, there is ethylene-oxide sterilization available - it's how most of our delicate electronic stuff (arthroscopy cameras, lenses, etc) is sterilized - lots o' nook

  • Why switch back to pagers, as the article suggests? Wire up with an earbud, get voice-activated dialing, and you're off and running without having to touch it all the time.

  • Sure, cell phones can spread disease. But so can any other dry surface. Like skin, clothing, stethoscopes, etc.

    The nasal passages of more than half the health care workers that work in a hospital for more than a year are colonized with MRSA (methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus).

    Banning cell phones is not the answer. Universal precautions is. Universal precautions includes cleaning your hands and instruments after every single patient contact. How many health care workers do that, do you suppo
    • Problem is that people forget that they phone is an instrument that they use during care. As an EMT I regularly call the hospital while treating a patient in the ambulance. The fact is people know to clean up there medical equipement, but often forget about the other equipment they use in the course of a call. Radios, pagers and cell phones and such should all be sanitized after any call they are used on.
  • Cars, movie theaters, gas stations, airplanes, and now hospitals. Perhaps the list of where you CAN use your cellphone would be shorter?
  • All hospital staff should sanitize their hands using soap or gel before and after contact with patients. Multiple studies [healthsentinel.com] have shown that hospital staff practice poor hygiene, putting themselves and us all at risk.

    • Yeah, but that doesn't make headlines, attract viewers, OR scare the general public.

      We used to take calculators into quarantine areas by sealing them in a plastic bag and discarding the bag along with our protective gear when we left. I could put my phone in a zip-lock, punch through it with the headset connector, and have most of the system inside protective gear. My headset has a "push to answer" doodad, so I don't have to even find the phone.

      And the desk phones in the nurses stations are CESSPOOLS!

  • My new product, "Safone", is an adapted rubber preservative, designed to fit snugly over your mobile phone. There are two models, one for the standard vertical phone, and one for the flip-phones popular in Asia.

    Safone(tm) comes in handy 5-packs, in a choice of colours and flavours, and for only $19.50 you can get three packets now.

    It's time to roll on your Safone now!!

    Don't phonome, Safone!
  • So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    Do you mean something like Nokia 6250 [nokia.com]? Anyways, at least Finnish hospitals don't allow GSM phones on their premises. Worry about mixing radio transmitters and heart monitors, I guess.

  • I would think this would be obvious. Anything that you put directly against your skin, and in this case right next to your ear, no less, is going to pick up organic matter from you. And that organic matter may include pathogens. It isn't a surprise that you can spread them to others.

    It's just like using other people's keyboards. You have NO idea where it has been or what it has been through ;)
  • by *weasel ( 174362 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:38AM (#6993868)
    so I'm not surprised/affected in the least by this.

    c'mon people, any object that is carried -everywhere- or used daily (potentially used by or in the immediate proximity of sick people) provides an opportunity for disease to spread. particularly when it's something that people never clean.

    i honestly hope no-one is surprised by this.

    it's reminicent of the studies that surprised you all a few years back, that showed the average computer workstation is dirtier (bacteria) than the average bathroom.

    primarily because: how often do you clean around your PC? actually picking it up, moving it around, and wiping it all down with sanitizing pads? (particularly keyboard,mouse,wrist pads,power buttons,etc)

    ok, now how often do you wipe down your cell phone with a sanitizing pad? exactly.
    your phone is almost certainly more filthy than your toilet. think about that.

    and while you do your reactionary one time cleaning, don't forget your pager, pda, land-lines, av remotes, video gaming controllers, camera, keys, wallet, laptop, and car interior (radio, steering wheel,shifter,beltbuckler,door handles,etc).

    me? my neuroses keeps me well protected from you damned dirty apes.
  • Hospitals (Score:2, Informative)

    by thorgil ( 455385 )

    Simple... Do not use cellphones in hospitals.

    All radio (send) devices in hospitals should be (and are in some hospitals) banned due to possible interferrence with sensative medical equipment.

  • In many countries in Europe, cell phones are simply forbidden in hospitals. They must be turned off, and (in the most extreme case) left at the entrance counter.

    I fail to see why some people (nurses, health care workers) are allowed to use cell phones in a hospital, while most others are not.

    Ban cell phones in hospitals, or at least require personnel to leave them switched off in their lockers, and the problem is solved... isn't it?
  • That'll sterillize it AND make it look Ghetto too....

  • Oh? (Score:5, Funny)

    by cybermace5 ( 446439 ) <g.ryan@macetech.com> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:44AM (#6993916) Homepage Journal
    You can alcohol- or autoclave-sterilize any cell phone today! It just won't work afterwards.

    Seriously though...*doodeedooeeannoyingpolyphonicringTONE* "Hello? Yeah. Uh huh. Well I'm just working on a patient right now. Uh huh. A gallon of milk and some laundry detergent? Ok. Yes I'll remember. I said I'd remember! Last time? But... Yeah last time there was a big traffic jam and I just wanted to get home. Hold on for a sec, I need to install this catheter. Ok, I'm back. What do you mean I don't love you? What? That's not true! I'm sorry? When did I... No that's not what I meant. Ok I'm sorry. What? No, my patients are not more important than you. Uh huh. Yeah. Hmm. Well I'll try harder from now on. Yeah? Ok. All right. Yes I'll remember: milk and detergent. Ok. I love you too. What? Oh. Buh-bye. Yes I love you too. Ok. Bye then."
  • So how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it?

    You can today!

    I tried dunking mine in alcohol and it worked. The phone successfully entered the liquid and there was enough alcohol to completely submerge the phone.

    I tried the autoclave too, and that worked too. The phone was placed in the autoclave and the autoclave was turned on then it ran through a full 10 minute sterilization cycle.

    No more bacteria on my phone!

  • With current technology, cell phones have voice/speech recognition, decent battery life, and have decreased in size approximately equal to a pager. There is no reason a small cell phone-like device a little larger than a Star Trek Communicator could not be manufactured. All the technology is there, and with low power embedded AltiVec'd-PowerPC chips, intelligent voice (user) command recognition should not be a problem to engineer into such a small device. The problem is there must be a market for such a
  • Surely we can just crank up the transmission power of the phones and fry the little beggars!? Die Die Die!
  • A new Paper Tiger (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rdewald ( 229443 ) * <rdewald@gCURIEmail.com minus physicist> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:54AM (#6994010) Homepage Journal
    I am a nurse. Cell phones aren't the problem, people are the problem.

    Want to stop the spread of the pathogens on your cell phone or _______ ? It's easy.

    1. Wash your fscking hands before and after you examine any patient.

    2. Don't use the device during an examination.

    Problem solved.

    You don't have to kill the little germies on the phone, just wash them off your hands, for %#^$&! sake.
    • I am a nurse. Cell phones aren't the problem, people are the problem.

      Possibly, but what the hell are medical staff doing with cell phones on them in the first place while they're on the job, working with patients? "Hi, sorry, I'm smack in the middle of cracking open someone's ribcage, can I call you back?"

      People seem to think they have a god-given right to carry a fucking cell phone with them at work. Everyone in healthcare is always talking about how goddamn busy they are, but they have time to answ

      • Re:A new Paper Tiger (Score:4, Informative)

        by rdewald ( 229443 ) * <rdewald@gCURIEmail.com minus physicist> on Thursday September 18, 2003 @11:21AM (#6994852) Homepage Journal
        "Possibly, but what the hell are medical staff doing with cell phones on them in the first place while they're on the job, working with patients? "Hi, sorry, I'm smack in the middle of cracking open someone's ribcage, can I call you back?""

        There are a lot of different answers to this question because the term "medical staff" covers a lot of different people with different functions.

        Surgeons take calls during procedures. They always have, long before there were even cordless phones, much less cell phones. Medical treatment is sometimes dependent upon the rapid dispersal of information and an equally rapid decision being made in response to said information. I've talked to more than a few chest surgeons on the phone while they had their hands in someone else's chest. This was accomplished (aseptically) by speaker phone.

        With the advent of cell phones, many health care providers who care for patients dependent upon rapid decision-making carry cell phones with them 24/7/365. This easy access to decision-making resources has saved lives and reduced suffering, but these people represent a tiny, tiny fraction of the health care workers carrying cell phones today.

        Having said that, health care workers are people first, and there exists roughly the same proportion of stupid, thoughtless people in the industry as exist in the world at large. So, many health care workers use phones thoughtlessly. Should they stop? Sure.

        Wedding rings are virtual cesspools of virulent bacteria, particularly if they are engraved and/or contain a complex setting. Do you have any idea how difficult it is to get people to take off their wedding rings while working in ICU's even though we have reams of good, hard science demonstrating that rings are a very efficient way to infect patients with all kinds of deadly bugs? Forget cell phones, it's just another surface, just another pathogen vehicle. It's just a particularly powerful vehicle because people touch it with their hands.

        I despise cell phones only slightly more than I despise strollers. They are both a menace to civility in public space. But, there's nothing new here. My point is the cell phone problem discussed in this story, and all other similar hand-contamination vectors (past, present and future) can be stopped dead with 15 seconds of hand-washing. Just using running water , i.e., without soap, is almost as effective. It's not hard, it's just inconvenient.

    • It really comes down to hand-washing.

      If you wash your hands between patients (and especially before going to see someone who's immune system has taken a hit... chemo, HIV, SCID, etc, etc), you'll cut down dramatically on the spread of disease.

      The nosocomial, or hospital-acquired infections are the worst actors... multiply-resistant, and prevelant in the one location where sick and vulnerable people are gathered in one place.

      This doesn't leave out healthcare workers. Your own commensal organisms that li
      • The problem with antibiotic abuse in health care workers is particularly troubling, as you describe. I'm like you, I don't take them unless my clinical situation indicates it--meaning I have the right drug for the right bug and I'm getting worse instead of better.

        Don't even get me started on anti-bacterial soaps.... Not only does their misuse compound the problems we've discussed above, but these soaps only kill off the same flora that our antibiotics (particularly the cheap and safe ones) do, leaving th
  • by CaptainZapp ( 182233 ) * on Thursday September 18, 2003 @09:59AM (#6994062) Homepage
    Maybe I live in a strange part of the world on the edge of civilisation so to speak; but

    Every damn hospital I've ever set foot in outright forbids the use of cell phones on hospital premises. (Use as defined in having it switched on)

    Apparently they can lead to nasty interactions with some of the delicate electronics they have running in hospitals and kill patients in the process.

  • by upstateguy ( 90019 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:00AM (#6994072)
    Certainly the cell phone is a conveinent place to pick up bugs. But so are doorknobs, restrooms, etc.

    The real problem...and working in public health I know this hasn't changed even since the advent of germ theory...is just getting the damn workers (I *include* physicians) in hospitals to wash their hands corrrectly before working with a patient. I still see plenty of infectious disease workers more than happy to walk out of a bathroom without washing their hands.

    And even if you do, when you touch just about anything (or just wait, as the stuff as you left on your hand grows) you could be putting patients...esp immunosuppresed patients (HIV/chemo/elderly) at great danger.

    I always shudder seeing hospital staff walking outside on the streets in their scrubs, shoe covers and hair covers like they are some magical shield that will never pick up pathogens harmful to the patients.
  • Good!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by moehoward ( 668736 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:03AM (#6994092)
    I, for one, welcome our new toxic wireless overlords.

    Now, I can kill my enemies with a simple "Here, it's for you..."

    In the past, I had to pass them a tin can connected to a string that previously contained bad salmon.
  • by G4from128k ( 686170 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @10:03AM (#6994094)
    Studies of cutting boards show that wooden cutting boards are safer than plastic ones. The research shows that you can find bacteria on plastic cutting boards (even ones that where hand-scrubbed), but that even unwashed wooden boards have no bacteria on the surface after they dry. Apparently capilliary action pulls bacteria into the wood's pores and away from the surface of the wood, leaving the surface sterile.

    Wooden cellphone skins would make a nice retro-fashion statement. For extended use, the wooden phone skins could be removed and autoclaved.
  • First hand knowledge: Folks in the ICU constantly wash hands. Each station has a sink and *everyone* washes with soap and water before and after going to a patient's bed. Infection is the biggest risk in ICU.

    The phones, I'm sure aren't the biggest problem. I was surprised I could go in there with my feet and hair uncovered. I'm sure even one "clean" human hair or dandruff (sic) flake has more germs on it than a cell-phone.
  • autoclave (Score:2, Funny)

    by Luveno ( 575425 )
    I'll gladly volunteer my pager for autoclave survival testing.
  • by Anonymous Coward
    I'm staggered that you can use mobile phones in American hospitals. They aren't allowed in the UK and from what I remember most of europe - they interfere with all the monitoring equipment.

  • My ex is a doctor. During her junior doctor days in hospital medicine ( Intern type thing ) they had a pair of Gameboys sealed in sterile plastic bags for the theater staff to use during long operations.
  • this is what you get for sending off all the telephone sanitizers in a space ship to crash on another planet, just because they're a bunch of useless bloody loonies. [sadgeezer.com]

    though i guess it's better than being eaten by a giant mutant space goat.

    (anyway, that's the first thing that came to mind when i read this.)

  • Wait a minute... every time I step foot in the hospital, they tell me to turn off my cell phone because it interferes with their equipment. If the phones have to be turned off, why are the doctors and nurses even carrying them?

    -- Gun
  • Microban [microban.com] Antimicrobial Product Protection is the global leader in built-in antimicrobial solutions and can be found in consumer, industrial, building and medical products around the world. From toothbrushes to humidifiers, foodservice equipment to building materials and dental trays to surgical drapes, Microban technology is your promise of antimicrobial protection that will inhibit the growth of bacteria and mold that can cause stains, odors and product deterioration. And because Microban protection is bui
  • by xA40D ( 180522 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @11:09AM (#6994696) Homepage
    how long before someone develops a cell phone that can be dunked in alcohol or run through the autoclave to sterilize it

    Yeah, then people will forget clean them.

    The basic problem is that antibiotics has made us all blase about the dangers of Bacteria. So even basic hygene measures, like washing your hands, are being ignored. Every doctor I've had has washed their hands AFTER examining me. But I remember as a child they also did so BEFORE examining me... not seen them do that for years.

    But not to worry, soon our lazy approach to the use of antibiotics will make most bacteria resistant in a decade or two... so we'll soon get the knack again one day.

    Sarcasm aside, I'm sure I read something to back this up... 10% of patients in UK hospitals catch somthing whilst in hospital owing to poor hygene (and it can't be mobiles as they've always been banned).

  • by Rai ( 524476 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @11:16AM (#6994794) Homepage
    I used to work for a hospital's IT dept and part of the job was maintaining Nortel companion phones for one of the nursing depts. Every couple of months, they would bring a non-working phone to us saying it fell in a bucket of water. We always wonder why the nursing dept would keep a bucket of water at their station. Eventually, we learned that "bucket of water" was their term for "toilet." How's that for sanitary? :)
  • UV irradiation (Score:3, Insightful)

    by saikou ( 211301 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @12:23PM (#6995507) Homepage
    So, why would not they make a desk with UV lamp, where people can put their phones/PDAs/whatever else. Hard UV radiation is quite effective as a decontamination mechanism. In some countries (Russia, for example), UV lamp is used daily in examination rooms (while no humans are present, of course ;) ), to reduce amount of airborne contaminants in the air and on irradiated surfaces.

    Not sure if it would harm the screen of cellphone (a simple UV protective transparent sticker would help) but all other surfaces would be clensed without problems. No?
    • Re:UV irradiation (Score:3, Informative)

      by Idarubicin ( 579475 )
      Not sure if it would harm the screen of cellphone (a simple UV protective transparent sticker would help) but all other surfaces would be clensed without problems. No?

      Unless specifically designed with UV irradiation in mind, the plastic of the phone would probably become brittle.

      Also, UV is extremely vulnerable to nook-and-cranny failures. Any part of the phone that is potentially shaded--around buttons, holes in the speaker or microphone grille--can protect bacteria from UV exposure. Actually, just a

  • by retro128 ( 318602 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @01:59PM (#6996401)
    See everyone? Your cell phone CAN spread viruses!
  • Pay phones are worse (Score:3, Interesting)

    by yintercept ( 517362 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @02:28PM (#6996615) Homepage Journal
    Phones only spread infections when people share the phones. So a pay phone or other public phone would do more to spread infection than a cell phone.

    The fact that we are all running around with our private little phones means that we are exposing ourselves to fewer phone carried bugs than we would get by using a common phone.

    I really can't remember the last time I handed my phone to a stranger. In fact, its been several month since anyone other than myself has touched my cell phone.

    As for companies that have use a common phone for people on call...they really should just get forwardable 800 number...that way they could swith duties by pointing to different phones...it is much more convenient.
  • Ah, yes. I suppose it would be, since almost all available antibiotics promote resistant strains.

    Except, however, the one form of antibiotic that is frowned upon by professionals. Let me introduce you to colloidal silver. [utopiasilver.com] It's a suspension of silver particles in water... and guess what? It has been shown to kill germs including bacteria, viruses, yeast, mold, fungus and parasites, many of which are resistant to antibiotics.

    I know many of you are saying "snake oil" right now, but I've used the stuff to cure ear infections, and it works a lot faster and at a much lower price than antibiotics.

    You can even make your own. [cassia.org]

  • by Le Marteau ( 206396 ) on Thursday September 18, 2003 @03:46PM (#6997275) Journal
    I gave up my cell phone years ago when I realized that 75% of the time I saw a cell phone, I saw it attached to the ear of a jackass, and I'm not taking any chances... I quit the things cold turkey.

    Not sure if the cell phone causes its user to become a jackass, or if jackasses use cell phones, but why take the chance unnecessarily?

All seems condemned in the long run to approximate a state akin to Gaussian noise. -- James Martin

Working...