Dell To Enter PDA Market 82
soundsop writes "CNET News.com reports that Dell is poised to enter the PDA market. Michael Dell states that announcements for US PDA products are coming "really soon". Will I have 50 configuration options on my Dell PDA?"
Re:Why bother (Score:1, Offtopic)
Link to Available Specs (Score:1)
Shape looks familar.
Accounts (Score:5, Insightful)
This move by DELL shows that the PDA market has grown, and become more mature. That is, PDAs are not only geek toys, but today they can be quite useful (even though I still use mine for vrally!).
In the future I imagine almost everyone carrying PDAs that can be wirelessly conneced to a screen (or a projector) to show stuff, or terminals with proper kbds and mice to do real work. The PDA will be the phone, computer, wallet and calendar of today, and hopefully not running Palladium!
Options? (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, this could be simply another way to push WindowsCE through some backdoor agreement with Bill and Co. But we can only wait and see.
I just hope that Dell's PDA doesn't turn into another Palm clone (Handspring, et. al)
Re:Options? (Score:1)
The WinCE market, rather like the Windows market, isn't a very exciting place. I'm no expert, but besides architecture differences, I don't see much variation in the world of WinCE devices. They're all basically the same with different form factors. (Heck, look at desktop PCs. The only ones that are vaguely different are Sony Vaios and they aren't all that revolutionary.)
So I don't expect this to be anything other than a PDA with a little higher dude-factor, and maybe a deal if bought with a new laptop.
Re:Options? (Score:5, Insightful)
End Of Story.
People end up paying for their machines before Dell has to pay for the components -- a nice way to finance things.
They're going to put out a solid (?) WinPDA and price folks out of the market as only they can.
Don't go looking for a revolution -- you'll just be disappointed.
Cheers,
JAKD
Re:Options? (Score:1)
Hmmmm... (Score:4, Interesting)
Now, they'll have a hard-time against Sony, HP(aq), Palm and also Sharp whose Zaurus is really the kind of programmable gadget one may look for.
Hoo-freakin'-rah. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Hoo-freakin'-rah. (Score:3, Insightful)
At the risk of sounding stupid, of course it does.
The larger the number of people in the market, the greater the competition. Given that the software specifications are pretty much the same (helped by Microsofts specifications) you've got only a few things that companies can compete on such as hardware specs (including dimensions and weight), battery life, upgradability and best of all price.
So if more players in the market causes others to start making strides to produce a better product, then it can only be seen as a good thing.
Will they make them themselves? (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally I hope they make them themselves. While I don't want to get into an argument of white-box versus brand name computers (damn, I mentioned it, here come the flames
Plus like the story says, being able to customize my PDA a million billion ways (if only my iPaq could have 512MB RAM) is just plain cool
Re:Will they make them themselves? (Score:5, Informative)
Well, they already sell Palm PDA's. They actually gave us some M105's (bottom barrel, but my manager likes his for keeping contacts and golf scores) when we bought some laptops a while back.
At their website [dell.com] they've got Palm, Sony, Handspring...
Isn't Dell climbing into the printer business as well, and the router business?
I thought Cisco wasn't allowing them to resell anymore because Dell has the PowerConnect line out...
Re:Will they make them themselves? (Score:1)
Re:Will they make them themselves? (Score:2, Informative)
I thought Cisco wasn't allowing them to resell anymore because Dell has the PowerConnect line out...
No, Dell is getting into the switch business. And, yes, Cisco has cut them off from reselling Cisco switches as a result. Dell offers a full line of managed switches competing with Cisco's Catalyst 2950 and 3500 series as well as an inexpensive unmanaged line.
Dell does currently resell other manufacturers' PDAs, but now they are announcing their intention to sell their own branded line based on the MS PocketPC (WinCE) OS.
The thing about Dell is that they do not enter a new market lightly. They have waited until the PDA market matured enough that they could take commonly used technology and win market share by selling it for less. I think other PDA manufacturers should be very concerned. And PDA consumers should be excited about the competition.
Re:Will they make them themselves? (Score:1)
Re:Will they make them themselves? (Score:1)
Re:No Specialization (Score:1)
What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:5, Interesting)
If they're just going to offer handsprings, their revenue stream will be severely limited, since their main business model is to sell hardware fairly cheaply. If they put enough of a markup on the handheld hardware, people won't want to buy them (I hope) because they'll be able to purchase them elsewhere for less.
If they put out their own piece of hardware, it's a major departure from what Dell already does. It has massive potential, if it's a good piece of kit, but it will be coming into a saturated market no matter what. Right now, Dell is a value added reseller. I'm not sure they would want to try to be something else.
The only other option that I could imagine them thinking is that they will be able to 'guarantee' that whatever handheld they sell will work with whatever desktop they sell, due to software they pre-load on both.
Er... wait. Actually that's a great idea. Dell, do that. They won't get the hardware geek market, but then, they never have. They'll get the home family market, and rake in money for software that pretty much already exists. It's good sense on their part.
Re:What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:2)
My guess is that hurts them, that people don't get the Dell name when they look at other people's handhelds.
Probably also part of that "me too" mentality.
Re:What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:2)
Look at it this way: in the PC market in the US, there are just a few big manufacturers. But IBM loses money on its PC line, so that's only going to continue as long as IBM feels that loss creates a greater profit for its consulting business down the line. HP and Compaq just merged, so those two competitors just become one, and Dell has been stealing market share from them anyway. Gateway is slowly dying. Apple is not a real threat. Sony is only one doing decently.
Dell's long term strategy is to outprice as many of their competitors as they can for a long time, until they take a huge market share and push those competitors out of the market. And at that point, many businesses and consumers would look to Dell as their one place to get all their computer needs. If that happens - with competition significantly limited - Dell can raise their prices, not just on PCs, but on other products too - like PDAs and printers, the two new markets they are entering in 2003.
So, to sum, Dell's strategy is two-pronged:
Gain market share/push competitors out of the PC market so that eventually they can raise prices (profit margins).
Attack every aspect of the PC business, with the idea that once you become the major player in the PC business, people will prefer to buy all products from you, not just their PCs from you and their PDA from vendor 2 and their printers from vendor 3.
It's a smart strategy. Dell's been run very, very well so far, I wouldn't bet against them.
Re:What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:3, Insightful)
I just don't see a huge ammount of brand loyalty in the beige box business. I see loyalty for servers, I see people get worked up into a slather over operating systems, but very rarely do you see Dell and Gateway fans having it out. I think it's a bit like Intel - they thought they had near monopoly powers, and they certainly had near monopoly size... but the moment they let their guard down, AMD jumped in down their throats. Intel had raised prices, and AMD slashed them. Things are only just now getting back to what used to be 'normal'. It'll be interesting to see what happens when each company rolls out it's line of 64 bit processors.
What does this have to do with Dell? I just think a Dell isn't like a Ford, or McDonalds. People compare the (meaningless) numbers, and come up with some not entirely usefull $/MHz comparison, and then buy whatever seems best to them. Apple has brand loyalty because they have some kind of soul lurking in each machine. Dell has... a kid who's very excited about getting one on TV.
I like Dell, I do. They revolutionized quite a few things by building to order, rather than keeping stock. But I think things like bundled printers have been giving other bundled devices bad names. (You know these printers. They come with no ink, cost more than the printer to refill, and then break conveniently.)
By the way, what makes you say Gateway is slowly dying? I think things like their Profile [gateway.com] line offer them more than bundling a PDA. They seem fairly unique. (To the non-apple world.)
Re:What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:2)
As for whether marketing is important in computers, I think you underestimate its importance. If marketing were unimportant in computers in general, then we'd all be using Amigas today, or perhaps Macintoshes, or BeOS. And if marketing were unimportant in the PC world, then more users would buy white box PCs, since as you put it, "People compare the (meaningless) numbers, and come up with some not entirely usefull $/MHz comparison, and then buy whatever seems best to them." On $/MHz, white box retailers don't have marketing costs and thus normally win that comparison.
But users are swayed to a great degree by marketing. And for many people, when they think of buying a PC today, they think of Dell first. And if Dell's more efficient business model can push a couple more competitors out of business, it could come to the point where when people think of buying a PC, when the average user thinks of buying a PC, he'll think of Dell, IBM, or HP (when the rich user thinks of buying a computer, he'll think of Apple or Sony, the upscale computer brands). And in that circumstance, you can easily see how it makes sense for Dell to sell peripherals too.
Re:What's the motivation for Dell? (Score:1)
Brand loyalty matters in the corporate IT world, where the real money in desktops is. Most shops, even small shops, tend to standardize on one brand of PC. Increasingly, that brand is Dell. Personally, I prefer IBM, the laptops are the best on the market and the desktops are outstanding, though slightly overpriced.
By the way, what makes you say Gateway is slowly dying? I think things like their Profile [gateway.com] line offer them more than bundling a PDA. They seem fairly unique. (To the non-apple world.)
Gateway has bee hemmoraging cash, they're closing a buch of the "Gateway Country" stores, and they've always tried to compete in the comsumer space where the real mone ISN'T. Gateway has a lousy rep among corporate IT departments. And the Profile is hardly unique, IBM, Compaq, and Dell have all offered similar products (I think IBM still is), but sales have been lackluster due to low demand. Most consumers aren't willing to spen more on a "stylish" PC, particularly those all-important corporate IT departments.
I wonder... (Score:5, Interesting)
any thoughts?
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
PDAs are getting to the point where just about everyone has one because they're so damn cheap, you can get an effective PDA for $99 now and almost anyone can afford that. I mean, it's half the price (or less) of a console game system, right?
Re:I wonder... (Score:2)
And think about it: isn't that the REAL reason Dell's version of Ellen Feiss is called Steve? (Yes, I know the Dell Dude predates Ellen, but's a joke. Relax.)
speaking as an owner of dell desktops ... (Score:5, Interesting)
that said, i'm a skeptic, and with Palm and Clie and Zaurus out there, Dell is going to have to be damn near perfect in their first offering, otherwise it's just a foray into a fashion trend like the Web PC [com.com].
Re:speaking as an owner of dell desktops ... (Score:1, Flamebait)
You mean like asking Dell support for some information regarding my Dell laptop which does not run Linux properly and being told: Sorry we do not support Linux?
Re:speaking as an owner of dell desktops ... (Score:1)
Well... (Score:5, Informative)
Pictures included in the link.
Re:Well... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Well... (Score:2)
It looks oddly similar to the Compaq PDA, no? I wonder who builds the Compaq ones, and if Dell will simply outsource to the same place?
Corporate (Score:5, Interesting)
Dell may be going for the bulk computer/PDA sales. Imagine companies and government agencies buying PDAs like they buy (and probably at the same time they buy) computers from Dell. Maybe they believe IT departments disburse these like they disburse computers. Imagine if Dell included better support for their PDAs in their desktop support contracts that they would for standard Palms/PocketPCs.
build to order?? (Score:1, Interesting)
Dell stretching themselves? (Score:1)
ipaq on top? (Score:1)
where are the efficiencies for Dell in a PDA (Score:5, Insightful)
For this to work in a PDA, they only thing they can realistically do is co-brand someone else's device. If that happens they won't be much more than a sales force for the other person's technology.
If they decide to actually design and build one themselves, I think it would be a major shift in corporate strategy.
Re:where are the efficiencies for Dell in a PDA (Score:1)
This is where they'll bring back ... (Score:2, Funny)
brain damaged 'Steven'
I can see it now, "Dude, you're getting a P Dell A"
Dell to only OEM device (Score:2, Interesting)
Dell is seeking an ODM [216.239.37.100] [google cahce] like Compal or HTC to make a device for their entry to the handheld market.
The good: The Dell handhelds will be similar to iPaq and the T-Mobile PocketPC Smartphone.
The bad: Nothing really new or different but a sticker on the devicel
The ugly: Steve..."Dude, is that a Dell in your pocket, or are you just happy to get one?"
Re:Dell to only OEM device (Score:3, Interesting)
If you're a fan of the PocketPC devices, Dell's entry is nothing but a good thing as they'll drive down prices across the board. If you're a Palm fan however, this is yet another blow since at this price-point, a mid-tier Palm OS device will have trouble competing with a flashy, full-featured Pocket PC device in the mainstream markets.
Re:Dell to only OEM device (Score:1)
I think "or are you just hoping to get some?" would be more appropriate for that dude.
--
What microsoft wants (Score:1)
--This isn't FUD, just a wake up call.
Corporate Consumption (Score:4, Insightful)
I can imagine that they would be rather interested in the Dell product simply because it is Dell.
And the big thing there is that it would displace everything else (Palm, Linux based PDA) with Win CE, virtually assuring MS dominance in the PDA field as other large companies also standardize on Dell.
They're already in the switch business (Score:3, Insightful)
Dell Rep just told me (Score:3, Interesting)
MS Strongarming This, Too? (Score:1)
PDAs suffer from OEM Syndrome, since it's rather difficult to go out and nab up parts to build your own, unlike PCs. We PC users can go get what hardware we want, what OS we want, and go to town. PDAs aren't that easy. They're pretty much factory only, unless you're an UberGeek with connections beyond that of mortal geeks.
Dell does Hollywood (Score:3, Interesting)
PDAs need marketing. The only ones I've seen in use are by my teammates and other nerdy types. They need to be more mainstream, like telephones. Marketing will help increase the installed base, lower production/consumer costs, and increase application.
Dell may piggyback the PDA marketing with thier highly sucessful computer ads. I'd love to see a PDA for under $100. Marketing can do this.
Re:Dell does Hollywood (Score:3, Interesting)
- Ordered 3 notebooks from Dell Switzerland's online store
- Received two, got confirmation for third but PC never arrives
- Called my "customer representative" after two weeks, got a "I'm sick, please call XYZ at extension N"
- Called XYZ, she tells me (in not-really-German) that she doesn't know, and Mr. Representative is out of office for the week. Okay.
- Called the next week, no one picks up the phone. Getting rerouted to the main number after a couple dozen rings. Giving up for now.
Then the third notebook suddenly arrived! Well, great, so I get to configure it for its future owner. Part of that is setting up wireless networking (we ordered a Dell card with the notebook).
- Win XP finds wireless network card, initializes, finds valid access point -- but doesn't get an IP address?
- Linux does the same, but gets an IP address?
- Calling Dell tech support after updating the network card's Win XP drivers, checking the DHCP server for DHCPDISCOVERs from the card's MAC and the other obvious stuff.
- Get put on hold for 15 minutes after explaining problem.
- Guy comes back, asks whether I have Win XP Home Edition or Pro. I say Home. He says "Well, networking is not included with Win XP Home Edition, you need Pro for that". I tell him that's not true.
- Guy asks what access points we use. I say Cisco Aironet 1200. He says "Oooh, in that case I can't help you, we only support our own access points, you need to call Cisco". I say "but it works on Linux". He says "I'm sorry to tell you that if you install Linux on a Dell notebook, you void your warranty."
So he flat out lied at least twice? Yeah, great support, that. And we're not just a mom & dad store, we're registered as 1500 - 3000 employee shop with Dell so I guess this is "premium" support.
The next batch of notebooks we'll get will be from Toshiba
Palm or Win? (Score:2)
But will these Dell PDAs be Palm OS-based or Windows CE-based?
News.com is a bit late with this story... (Score:2, Interesting)
Wish list (Score:2)
Re:Wish list (Score:2)
Dells niche (Score:2)
I don't think Dell is gonna offer 100 flavours of handheld, simply because of manufacturing constraints; it would cost too much for any vendor to offer a widely diverse range of PDAs like most do for desktop machines.
So I see Dell making PDAs standard, across their PC / Notebook computer product line. You purchase any PC from Dell, and it comes with a PDA.
The PC is preconfigured to talk to the PDA as it comes out of the box. No sw to install on either device (my iPaq came with a big sticker on the screen cover that told me to install ActiveSynch before I did what comes naturally - hook it up to my PC and play!).
And the PDA can talk to the PC out of the box. Just plug 'em in and go!
In one, maybe two quarters Dell is the number one vendor of handhelds, simply because they bundle PDAs with the PCs.
Corporate customers will love it since they are by far and large the biggest purchasers of PocketPC handheld devices. This strategy will play in a major way in most vertical markets that already distribute handhelds to employees (Insurance companies, etc), and consumers will love it as well since with one purchase they get two devices.
Why Dell wants to do this + more info on this PDA! (Score:1)
Interesting insight into Michael Dell (Score:1)
While switches and storage make sense to the CEO, other hardware markets don't fit the plan. PDAs, for instance, are a nonstarter. (Interestingly, Dell and Steve Jobs see eye to eye on this one.) According to one Dell employee, Michael goes around dissing PDAs with a simple query: "Question: What is the biggest button on a PDA? Answer: The button that syncs it to your PC." Simply put, they aren't big enough or profitable enough for Dell. To wit: Palm just reported second-quarter revenues of $ 290 million, down from $ 522 million the previous year. As for the bottom line: It lost $ 36 million.
To me, this says that when Mike D is too eager to make strong, forceful statements that may not stick.
Palm OS or Windows CE? (Score:1)
1. Palm OS or Winodws CE. Definitely a hard one. With tons of devices operating on Palm OS (not to even mention all the palmware and free source code), it's hard to avoid it. But with the speed-demanding high-end device like the iPAQs, DELL will need the new strongARM (or the X-scale?)processors to fit in the Windows CE's RAM/ROM eating calculations.
2. Expansion: SD/MMC? CompactFlash? Or another one they're going to make up? Here's an interesting article on VisorCentral, they were debating which one is better: http://www.visorcentral.com/content/Stories/1279-
3. Is DELL aiming at the general public? Is it something that most people can afford? (I won't expect it to be something like the Palm Zire) Lot's of handhelds has left the mainstream neighborhood to the high-end heaven. Making devices up to $600-7000 (one of the HP Jornadas).
I hope there isn't gonna be any "E-value" code the devices this time...(like they won't make it until we order it...lol)
Last Post! (Score:1)
-- Sir George Bidell Airy, KCB, MA, LLD, DCL, FRS, FRAS
(Astronomer Royal of Great Britain), estimating for the
Chancellor of the Exchequer the potential value of the
"analytical engine" invented by Charles Babbage, September
15, 1842.
- this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...