China Develops Their Own CPU: The "Dragon Chip" 908
vaxzilla writes "China's People's Daily
Online is reporting in
this article that the Computer Institution of the Chinese Academy of
Science have developed a new CPU, which they're calling the Dragon Chip.
The report isn't clear on the technical details of the chip, though it
does state, somewhat confusingly, that it, `is based on the RISC
structure, a totally another standard. Therefore, it will not fall into
the intellectual property right trap.' They're running Linux on the chip
and have built a server around it, Soaring Dragon. It looks like China is
starting to tell both Microsoft and Intel to take a hike. Interesting
times are ahead."
Very cool (Score:2, Interesting)
Infowar (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Very cool (Score:2, Insightful)
i wonder why (Score:3, Funny)
Re:i wonder why (Score:2, Funny)
Re:As a matter of fact... (Score:4, Informative)
The Naval Academy is a real university, and it's better than most.
Jimmy Carter was trained as an engineer probably moreso and better than the average Slashdot reader who self-identifies as "engineer".
Sheesh. "I hoped this has helped a little." Yeah, right.
You're correct only insofar as it's true that the American public doesn't think much of anyone that smacks of intellectualism and rarely do contemporary candidates emphasize their academic credentials. Carter's status as a real engineer, in fact, worked against him as it was used to validate the view that he was a hopelessly naive scientist/engineer type out of his depth in big-time politics. And, honestly, there was probably truth to that at the time.
Re:i wonder why (Score:2)
Re:i wonder why (Score:5, Funny)
Wouldn't it be ironic for Americans to have to use Chinese products to remain free?
There is precedent (Score:4, Funny)
Vik
dragon references.. (Score:2)
Re:dragon references.. (Score:2, Informative)
Ancient Chinese legends explained that the mineral jade was actually petrified dragon semen [heysuburbia.com].(Sorry about the quality of the reference link, I can't find a better one.)
Almost certainly more than you wanted to know.
Re:dragon references.. (Score:2)
Re:History of Eastern Dragons (Score:3, Funny)
I think China got the long end of the stick on this one.
Great... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Pot, kettle, black. (Score:3, Insightful)
A serious curiousity question (Score:5, Interesting)
It would be interesting to figure out the CPU details from the code they release...
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:2)
They can barely contain all the piracy of commercial software (ie. Microsoft), I highly doubt they're going to care about some "communist" license.
Microsoft has the money to politic the government to pressure China, but Joe Blow GPL developer is probably screwed.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:2)
Piracy or not, that's not really their concern anymore (at least from a gov. standpoint). The Chinese gov adopted Linux as their OS of choice awhile back. Seems to me like they know what they're doing and doing it well.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Interesting)
So actually "free trade" inside the country was one of the problems that happened before USSR was dissolved. Ex-Communist politicians adopted libertarian-like doctrine that was heavily pushed by US propaganda (even though it has little to do with how US economy operates), and the combination of massive deregulation, formerly state-owned monopolies, and money in the hand of organized crime and corrupt bureaucracy was the deadly mix for the economy.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:2, Insightful)
I work with a lot of Taiwanese engineers. They don't consider forwarding stolen information to China to be stealing. They all believe that helping the Motherland is their duty.
It's funny that the U.S. is so vociferous about protecting Taiwan when the Taiwanese are already helping China out. Once Taiwan is folded back in to China, all those fancy weapons and huge investments in Taiwanese industry will benefit their biggest enemy.
Gotta love US foreign policy. It's so forward thinking.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:2)
Actually, I think we're getting rather good at ranking China with "powerful countries that were but aren't now our enemies."
Besides, there's probably some secret government plan to bomb the shit out of Taiwan if it becomes Chineese and China becomes hostile.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Interesting)
It's easy to imagine the intellectual property concerns in the west reaching such a fevered pitch that the worlds intellectual resources actually flee to a situation that dosen't bother as much with the red tape of copyrights and beurauchracy. A "brain-drain", if you will. Perhaps this disregard for intellectual property concerns -does- stem from a basis on stolen technology, but if the end result is a focus more on creative output than on "who gets paid", the people -really- interested in creating will simply go where they can do what they want to do.
Having become accustomed to a certain way of life, those of us insistant upon our rights to download mp3s and try out the latest games before we buy them may find ourselves developing a strong interest in learning chinese.
Re:Public opinion on Taiwan (Score:3, Informative)
As a resident of Taiwan, I can tell you that you definitely need to get your vision checked.
Pro-China sentiment increasing in Taiwan? Not in this universe, sir. As the old Mainlander population passes on, the Taiwanese are becoming progressively less interested in the Mainland -- except as a business opportunity -- not more. The only reason 70% of Taiwanese favor maintaining the current status quo is because of Beijing's continued military threats. Absent that, I guarantee you pro-independence numbers would easily top 80%. This is not surprising, considering that less than 15 percent of Taiwanese even consider themselves Chinese, and most of those are the old mainlanders who came over with the KMT.
You may have also have overlooked the fact that the ruling political party happens to be the one with the pro-independence platform (while conversely, the only officially pro-unification party, the New Party, has been tottering on the brink of political extinction for at least the last two years); that the last two Taiwanese presidents have openly advocated Taiwanese independence (are are immensely popular); or that in the most recent national elections, the KMT's bid for a return to power was significantly hindered -- not helped -- by accusations of secret collusions with Beijing. Far from increasing, pro-unification sentiment in Taiwan has in fact found itself increasingly politically isolated in recent years.
And your suggestion that pro-unificationists in Taiwan are increasingly pro-PRC is especially entertaining. It is precisely amongst the most strongly pro-unification Taiwanese -- the old Mainlanders -- that anti-PRC sentiment is the highest.
Pro-PRC sentiment increasing.... {chuckle}
Lee Kai Wen
Taiwan, ROC
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:2)
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:4, Interesting)
Even if they don't feel bound to the license, they still might desire code release- either to take some worldwide market-share from Microsoft (and hurt a leading symbol of US capitalism), or more likely, to benefit from improvements made by generous hackers in Japan, Europe, and America.
And then, if the government STILL doesn't want to release the code, it might filter out anyhow. Its a big country, and even the most draconian restrictions would have trouble intercepting 2 megabytes of nondescript patches. Sure, they might restrict source code access to a small group of closely monitored developers, but then they'd lose much of benefits of Open Source development. (Like the ability to require each of 1 million native computer science students to create a useful kernel improvement to graduate...)
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:5, Insightful)
More importantly the Chinese who don't share will find themselves increasingly maintaining patched versions of software that are incompatible with the main branch (and therefore much more expensive to maintain).
Heck, I made some modifications to a GPLed project at one point, and I thought it was too much of a hassle to share. Next thing I knew the software package in question had changed enough that my patches no longer applied cleanly, one of the libraries that my software relied on adopted a new API. To make matters even worse the old version of the library was very tricky to compile by hand.
In short, the next thing I knew it was almost impossible to upgrade the boxes that this software was installed on. If I had shared my work might very well have become part of the mainstream distribution. New installations would have been as easy as installing the RPMs off of the CD.
The Chinese might have enough people working on Linux that they don't need to collaborate with the rest of the world, but my guess is that they would be far better off collaborating with the rest of us than trying to do everything themselves.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:5, Interesting)
This is how the BSD licensed projects try to subtly encourage people to share their code changes. People or companies that use BSD code without sharing have a lot more maintenance to do themselves. So instead of using paranoid legal force like the GPL, the BSD projects politely encourage code sharing.
some people are not polite (Score:3)
This is all fine and good until some big fat corp takes that code, decides they own it or key modifications and blocks you out. China is just another big fat corp, except they get to make their own laws.
We shall see if China's lip service to information freedom is real. It's hard to imagine a country that openly practices censorship as commited to any kind of freedom. Chineese companies are infamous for patent infrigement, so all this railing against the "intelectual property trap" looks like a practical measure based on fear of trade reprisals. Looks and sounds like "Yankee inginuity" of a century ago, when the US ignored European patents. The US kept it up until it had enough "intelectual property" of its own.
The original question was if the US would lean on China for GPL violations. The answer, given the history above, is NO. Nor will they bother to enforce BSD. The US will only bother to limit imports if sufficient loss of royalty income is seen. Software that comes "for free" with a widget? Forget about it. That's going to include computers like the Dragon Whatnot.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Funny)
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Interesting)
Ironically, MSFT's condemnation of the GPL as being 'communist' might have gotten the Chinese thinking about it. For them, this condemnation must have sounded as a recommendation.
If China proves it can do without Wintel, it will be a huge example for other parts of the world. In a way, MSFT's 'condemnation' of the GPL might have been the beginning of their end.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Interesting)
I can't see why not. After all, if we in the Western world can run Linux on these chips, we might want to import some.
TuxTank! (Score:2)
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:5, Interesting)
Even if the Chinese authorities decide that it is in their best interests to comply with the GPL, they could still create a de-facto fork of Linux simply by reverting from english to simplified chinese characters. NIH syndrome is a significant factor in the chinese psyche and even a slightly divergent codebase would allow the Chinese authorities to better control the evolution of their official homegrown version of Linux with chinese charasteristics.
The Dragon Chip is the last missing piece in their road to total national self-sufficiency in IT. Some may find it ironic that the Chinese CPU mission may have gained a sense of urgency and impetus due to the ultra-capitalistic, cronyistic and Big Brotheresque developments in the USA.
Re:A serious curiousity question (Score:3, Insightful)
No, if the Chinese government chooses to violate the GPL there is nothing anybody can do about it, nor should there be. It's an independant country that makes laws it feels are best for it's own people. [At least in theory - in practice many counties, even the most "democratic", are full of corruption like "The Senator from Disney" in the U.S. - that's a side issue and has nothing to do with this.] If they choose to do this then it's not theft - they make the laws and they can make it legal.
So the question, then, is whey would they possibly want to do this? Is there some advantage to forking the code and keeping your changes private? I can't think of any.
The underlying assumption in the question seems to be that the Chinese are rabidly and irrationally anti-social and would keep the code just out of spite. What a sad, lonely, world-view.
China isn't communist (Score:5, Informative)
Re:If that does happen... (Score:2)
Oh, by the way, if you meant Richard Stallman, he is not a communist either. Just ask him. If that isn't enough, examine his beliefs (and while some of them may be similar to communism (as most people have some beliefs similar to communism, otherwise it would never have been popular), many are not).
RMS is not a communist... (Score:4, Funny)
He's also not a luddite; if he were, he would have written a "Manifesto", like Theodore "Ted, The Unibomber" Kazinsky did.
Uh... Oh... Er... Wait...
-- Terry
Blammo! (Score:2, Informative)
The semi-conductor market in China's mainland will see an annual growth rate of 35 percent and a requirement of 17 billion chips before 2005. By the year of 2010, China is going to be the second large semi-conductor market of the world.
The semi-conductor market in China's mainland will see an annual growth rate of 35 percent and a requirement of 17 billion chips before 2005. By the year of 2010, China is going to be the second large semi-conductor market of the world.
Sept. 26, Shuguang Tianyan Information Technology Ltd. announced that China's first Server "Soaring Dragon" of its own intellectual property rights came into the world. The Sever was brought out by using the universally-applied CPU "Dragon Chip" just developed and turned out by the Computer Institution of the Chinese Academy of Science.
Aside from that, used in the manufacture of the "Soaring Dragon" Sever is a kind of specific mainboard with the "Dragon Chip" CPU jointly developed by Shuguang Co. and the Computer Institution of the CAS and the Shuguang LINUX operational system developed by Shuguang Co. alone. According to the analysis of persons from the business circle, the debut of the "Soaring Dragon" Sever marks that China has set out on the marketization of its "Dragon Chip".
The "Dragon Chip", as a product of China's own intellectual property rights, has attracted the attention of the people in China ever since it came into the world. Undergoing many a strict examination and test by the Computer Institution of the CAS and other authoritative organizations in China, the Dragon Chip is proved to be very sound in performance, steady and reliable in operation and utterly sufficient to meet the working requirement of the server and website.
The Shuguang Co. says, the brought-out of the "Soaring Dragon" Sever has not only turned over a leaf in Chinese history that there was "no chip" in China's server trade but also strengthened greatly the national defence, national security and actual strength in many sectors of crucial importance. It has made China's computer industry to follow its own and independent track of development.
The person also made a further explanation, saying that China used the US chip in the past. Information security constitutes the first and foremost line in national defence. However, the line was built on the foreign technology and completed with materials from a foreign country, and so we cannot but be worried about it.
The birth of "Dragon Chip" is considered a landmark on the road for the development of national sci-tech industry. Nevertheless, people are worried about it, thinking that though the "Dragon Chip" is designed on our own it will fall into the trap of foreign intellectual property rights provided it is compatible with that of the others. Dr Sun of the VIA Tech., the only chip-maker in the world able to match with the Intel was ever worried, since the old-brand manufacturers of the Intel CPU entered early into the market, applied and acquired many patent rights it was very difficult for the newcomers to make a detour away from these patents. Moreover, the Intel's monopoly of the market has made it to turn out an actual standard-maker in the market.
But according to the analyses of the experts present at the meeting, the VIA is different from the "Dragon Chip" of China for the competition between the Intel and the VIA is mainly focused in the PC market while the "Dragon Chip" is basically used on severs in the service of businesses and trades, such as banking business and information industry. What's more important is that the CPU of the PC market is based on the Intel's framework of X86 and so it's quite easy to fall into the intellectual property right trap the Intel laid out, whereas the Shuguang "Soaring Dragon" Sever is based on the RISC structure, a totally another standard. Therefore, it will not fall into the intellectual property right trap.
According to the estimation of the Ministry of Information Industry the semi-conductor market in China's mainland will witness an annual growth rate of 35 percent before 2005 to reach a scale of 40 billion US dollars with the chips needed to amount to 17 billion pieces. By the year of 2010 China is going to turn out the second large semi-conductor market in the world.
In correspondence to this, 2001 saw the semi-conductor market in China's mainland reach 13 billion US dollars but that produced by it fell short of 10 percent. Experts come to conclusion that China has to develop chips of its own intellectual property rights so long as it wants to stand out a giant in the world of semi-conductor industry.
By People's Daily Online
Cheap Chinese chips called "Dragon"... (Score:2)
Taklamakan (Score:2)
Re:Taklamakan (Score:2)
IIRC, In the local language taklamakan means "you go in you don't come out".
dual chip boards (Score:5, Funny)
Re:dual chip boards (Score:3, Funny)
Re:dual chip boards (Score:3, Funny)
Soaring Dragon... (Score:2, Funny)
MIRROR SITE AVAILABLE (Score:3, Informative)
Article here:
This server is not slashdotted...yet.
dude, where's my cpu? (Score:5, Funny)
(if you haven't seen "dude, where's my car" this will make no sense. so go watch the movie
not to be confused (Score:2)
Sparc? (Score:2)
Re:Sparc? (Score:3, Informative)
If someone wanted to manufacture their own CPU, this makes it pretty easy. SPARC V9 is the 64-bit version.
Intelectual property (Score:2)
There are a few open source chip designs though, I think sun may have done that with one of their SPARC designs (or perhaps community sourced it). And there may be some free MIPS cores out there.
Re:Intelectual property (Score:3, Informative)
Important question: who will fab these chips? (Score:2, Interesting)
However, this seems to be a project very dear to the Chinese govt., and I don't suppose they would want to outsource it to Taiwan with whom they could be at war any moment.
What other options would China have? Honk Kong? Russia? Perhaps Malaysia (they have some big fabs, too, although not as advanced as the Taiwanese).
Re:Important question: who will fab these chips? (Score:3, Interesting)
2 8-inch/0.18um production lines will be completed in the near future. It may be part of the reason why they want to fast track their first MCU design.
AFAIK, Russia still lacks behind in consumer electronics. Hong Kong... All my friends in HK motorola, which is the only major HK semiconductor, got sacked. They (the semi dept) just do chip testing in recent years while most of the chips are from a Motorola fab in mainland China.
Re:Important question: who will fab these chips? (Score:2, Informative)
UMC and TSMC have started investment heavily in China. There are severeal 12" wafer fab contstructed jointly by Japanese and Chinese companies. There will be no lack of fab capable of producing this chip when it become commercially available.
Taiwan's government is having trouble stopping the Taiwanese semiconductors to move to China.
Best quote ever: (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Best quote ever: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Best quote ever: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Best quote ever: (Score:5, Insightful)
So you see by buying chips from intel they are helping the US economy. By building their own chips they are helping their own economy.
The same goes for windows. Everytime a chinese (or any other nationality for that matter) buys a copy of windows money flows out of their country and into the US where we can use it to build bombs so we can bomb the shit out of them when the tehir turn comes around.
The chinese are apparently wise to this scheme. They want to develop their own chips and use linux on it thereby keeping the money inside china helping the chinese companies and people as opposed to sending their money to the US.
It makes perfect sense I am surprised that other countries don't get it. I suspect the reason for that is the influence companies like MS and Intel have in democracies where they can buy politicians to act against the interests of their own countrymen. In a dictatorial communist regime that tactic is not very effective.
I have always wondered why very lucrative industries like operating systems and micro chips are not being actively pursued by other countries. It's not like they are not smart enough considering the some of the best and brightest engineers in this country are chinese, hindu, arab or whatever. Every dollar spent on windows or intel is one less dollar in their country and one more dollar in ours.
"And to think that my neighbors call me crazy! At least my data isn't being uploaded to a secret government satellite!"
I remember during the gulf war of Bush Sr. reading that the US had modified the chips of printers and computers going to Iraq to carry viruses and trojans. Why don't you do a search on google about it. The chinese are not stupid enough to presume that the computers going to china will have the exact same pentiums that you have.
I have no doubt half the computers in iraq, iran saudi arabia, china etc have rigged chips nor do I have any doubt half the software sent to those countries have trojans. It's an easy way to spy.
from the article (Score:4, Funny)
'utterly sufficient'? is that like 'majestically plain'?
More details from a magazine article (Score:5, Informative)
project leader (Dr Hu) a few months ago in a magazine. It gives a lot more details if I can
still recall correctly.
The reporter interviewed him after their team booted into Linux successfully with their prototype chip (or I should say FPGA implementation). Follow the common practice, they have written a C simulator for the chip, followed by hardware logic verification with FPGAs. I think the latest news is refering to
the completion of the initial silicon design.
The team focuses on the hardware design. The proposed chip is compatible with the MIPS instruction, IIRC. For the floating point
arithmatic, it follows the IEEE 754 standard. That's why they can boot to Linux to verify their
design quite early on without too much tweaking.
The targeted performance is close to PII. Not too bad for an embedded microprocessor at this moment... But, maybe a bit old when they commerically release it. But, as long as they can find applications into consumer electronics, the chip may get a good life like our good old Z80, HC11... Nevertheless, it is a good achievement consider the fact that the bulk of the team has no previous MCU design experience.
Re:More details from a magazine article (Score:5, Insightful)
Not too bad for an embedded processor? I guess the chip makers do spend so much money on marketing, conditioning people to believe that we need ridiculously fast processes to do useful computing, I shouldn't be surprised by this attitude. For 90% of useful computer work-- including things like web browsing, word processing, spreadsheets, programming, e-mail--a processor equivalent to a PII is overkill. In the mid-1990s, the Western world's technology sector was doing just fine with 486s and Pentiums in their desktops. So I'd say that if China's initial attempt at a processor is close to a PII in performance, that's something very noteworthy. They may be starting on the road to their own technological revolution quite a few years behind everyone else, but they're starting it on a lot better footing than we did.
And if China, as I'd imagine they're intending to do, shuts out the likes of Microsoft and Intel from their consumer PC market, that's both a huge blow to those companies and an amazing boon to the Chinese. China has a vast and untapped market, if China chooses to keep that market for itself, their own technology companies will end up very well off--maybe even rivaling in size the Intels and Microsofts of the West.
[]
My VAX 6420 will crush all of your PCs--literally.
Re:More details from a magazine article (Score:2)
Ah yes, they can use Motorola's success in doing just that as an example. (OK, I know that the PPC/Power ISA is a lot less RISCy than others, but I couldn't let that statement slide
RISC and CISC speed scaling. (Score:5, Insightful)
Linewidth scaling makes *any* CPU design faster. CISC was abandoned because it was very hard to pipeline, not because of some magical barrier to linewidth stepping.
Even the pipelining limit is a soft one, because with enough translation stages you can map any CISC set on to a RISC core - which is exactly what every x86 since the Pentium Pro has done.
Sorry if I'm venting, but you were the lucky post that finally made the "uninformed comment" bucket overflow
Re:RISC and CISC speed scaling. (Score:3, Insightful)
A possible explanation for this is that processors in the past 5 years or so have been scaling their clock speeds faster than linewidth shrinks alone would allow, by adding stages to the pipeline (and reducing the amount of work done at each stage).
For a design that's easily broken down, this works decently enough.
For a design with stages that are already broken down as far as is practical, or for a design (like MIPS) where you have a philosophy of having a relatively short pipeline, you reach a point where you have to do a major redesign before being able to increase the clock speed.
In principle, you might not need to, as the _performance_ you get would be comparable (and maybe higher, as you have less pipelining overhead) [witness the whole Athlon vs. P4 debate]. However, there will always be pathological cases where you're instruction rate is limited by the clock speed, and these cases can actually be pretty common. So, low clock speed will be a bottleneck even if your logic is just as fast as anyone else's.
Linewidth shrinks still speed things up just fine.
No Chinese Palladium? (Score:5, Insightful)
I dread the day when Chinese citizens talk amongst themselves about the funny things Americans can't do with their computers.
Re:No Chinese Palladium? (Score:2)
Western style DRM and Palladium are not the only restricting concepts which can be handled through silicon.
When China supports freedom, I will support China.
Re:No Chinese Palladium? (Score:2)
Re:No Chinese Palladium? (Score:3, Insightful)
GPL without copyright (Score:3, Interesting)
From the perspective of free software, losing copyright isn't such a disaster. You couldn't compel people to cough up modified source code anymore (causing the GPL to behave more like BSD), but you'd simultaneously gain the right to freely distribute and/or plagiarize anything you wanted-- including proprietary source code that some disgruntled employee posted to usenet.
One of the fundamental reasons to use the GPL vs. straight public domain is to prevent someone from just making a few changes to your free code, then using copyright law to prevent you from using the new work. This is why the GPL was first invented. In a society without copyright, that's not such a concern.
I'm not saying that a world without copyright would be a perfect place, but I certainly don't think it would be a disaster for projects that currently use the GPL. They'd probably be better for it. While Microsoft might be able to plagiarize a little bit of free code, their business model would basically collapse. Linux, on the other hand, would get along at least as well as BSD does now.
intelectual property? (Score:3, Insightful)
A Cure for the prices of Chinese computers? (Score:5, Informative)
The Chinese RMB, on the other hand, is worth a lot less. It's worth 1/8 of a dollar, and average people earn only about 1,000 RMB a month, if they even have a job. A halfway decent, probably barely usable computer costs well over 8,000 RMB, making it out of reach for most workers because they spend most of that money on food and housing anyway.
One reason for the high prices is because of the fact that much of the parts are imported, and only assembled in China under the brands Legend, iBuddie, etc... If this archetecture of chip gets popular in China, more of it will be produced within the nation, making it less expensive, then soon after will come cheaper motherboards, the cases are already made in China anyway... This would mean lower prices, making personal computers within the reach of a lot more Chinese. So, this chip, I say, is a Good Thing(TM), and a step in the right direction.
Cool! (Score:2)
Oops, I've said too much. Pretty soon they are gonna start rounding up supposed communists again.
Everybody can develop a CPU (Score:2)
Speed is made up of roughly 2 components - clock speed and IPC (instructions per cycle).
Clock speed comes from 2 factors - technology and pipelining. Technology implies high level, extremely expensive fabs. Pipelining is a well that has run dry (today's processors do very little in a pipe stage, and it's simply not worth it to make them do less).
IPC you get from a complex core (you usually add more microarchitectural features to the processor to allow it to retire more instructions per cycle). Complexity however implies longer design and (even more important) longer testing. It's no wonder there are so few players left in the microprocessor area (the costs are huge).
A small retail price, obviously, comes from mass production. China is indeed a huge market, but more in terms of population size, not income. China's GNIPC (gross national income per capita) in 2000, as reported by worldbank, is ~ 750$ per annum.
Allow me to be skeptical :))
(as always
The Raven.
Re:Everybody can develop a CPU (Score:2)
China is indeed a huge market, but not in terms of income, or population size. Their export oriented consumer electronics industry needs to import more than 80% of the high end components, IIRC. That's the market drive for fab investiment.
not a big deal (Score:2, Flamebait)
There is no way that this chip is completly original anyway. All the know-how on developing it probably came from the U.S. or Europe. All you would need is a few textbooks, datasheets, and a few good engineers for development. With enough time/money any company or government could develop their own CPU.
Re:not a big deal (Score:5, Insightful)
Because, you know the Chinese or any of those other Asian countries have no originality. Only Westerners are creative.
Whereas all those damned Chinese ever. . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Just who is standing on who's shoulders? Why on earth do you think people bothered the risk of the "Silk Road?"
Not to mention the fact that in modern times Chinese researchers have walked off with genuine Nobel Prizes.
Don't mistake China with China's government of the mere last 50 years or so.
KFG
Re:not a big deal (Score:3, Interesting)
It's just that this Dragon CPU doesn't sound like it is being designed as something competative to be placed on the global market but to be only internally used in China. I would be interested in seeing a datasheet on it when it's available (any links to that?).
Open Source makes this possible (Score:4, Insightful)
So let's ponder that open source not only makes the software more available, but also the hardware choice. The source was in front of them. They have all the labor they could want and I'm guessing they pay just as much for the programming expertise as they do for rice field workers (next to nothing). Now we can run anything we like and still get the Linux that the world is just beginning to become comfortable with.
Hardware independance. Software vendor independance. If I didn't know any better, I'd say those were a bunch of damned capitalist pigs taking advantage of the free labor of others to their own advantage. (Did they release the source code of their changes?)
Congratulations to the Chinese -- they aren't the enemy that the Soviets were and the women are hotter too.
Interesting verbage from the article .... (Score:2)
The Dragon Chip is proved to be very sound in performance, steady and reliable in operation and utterly sufficient to meet the working requirement of the server and website.
"Sound", "steady and reliable", "utterly sufficient". Huh? Sounds like Sparc market speak for "yeah our performance sucks, but it runs lots of software and you don't need that much performance anyway. Oh and just in case you do, you can get the 512 processor version when we ship it next quarter, or maybe the quarter after that
CPU stats (Score:3, Funny)
* Automatically reallocates all system devices to have equal priority, bringing your system to a slow crawl.
* Chip will spend all of its spare cycles figuring out how to stop you from using productive applications and networking with other computers.
* Keystroke logging functionality integrated with automatic emailing capabilities to the state police.
* If running linux with sendmail, makes sure that the service runs as an open-relay for spammers
my concerns (Score:3, Interesting)
Nor am I worried that the Chinese will develop a private version of Linux and not release it under GPL, because as many other posters have pointed out, a private tree would be hard for them to maintain, and would reduce their general compatibility.
What worries me about this is that China isn't exactly known for its pioneering efforts on behalf of minimizing the impact of the technology industry on the environment. I am worried that, in their efforts to introduce this into a world marketplace, they won't follow the minimum environmental requirements that the rest of the industry deals with. I think we should be prepared to ask any company that announces they're looking at using this chip whether they've ensured that those standards will be met, and that we are prepared to hold them accountable for the actions of their suppliers.
I'm all for more chips in the marketplace. I might even buy these if I get in the market and there is an English-language Linux distro (or, better yet, maybe OSX? Wouldn't that be Steve Jobs' best coup, porting that BSD-based OS to it? (Can I say coup when talking about Communist China without being shot?)). But the environmental standards must be followed.
Re:so the REALLY designed their own chip? (Score:5, Informative)
This being not a for-profit fly-by-night sweatshop, but a research institute, rumour has it that they cloned Alpha.
I hope they did, because there is no microprocessor architecture that holds more promise then the Alpha, and it is a shame on the US supposedly pro-competitive, efficient culture that it has been cancelled due to Digital being inefficient in marketing it and then Intel not wanting the competition.
Re:so the REALLY designed their own chip? (Score:3, Informative)
Too bad because RISC is, in fact, the better technology and it had a formidable start, back in the 80's.
RISC vs. CISC (Score:5, Informative)
Now what does slow things down is the hardware having to deal with parallelizing code in the pipeline and avoiding all the variou ssorts of problems that can cause. Both RISC and CISC chips generally do this in hardware. The Itanium is the first to abandon that approach, and say "it's up to the compiler to make sure stuff doesn't mess up when we pipeline." Speeds things up a lot, but makes writing compilers damn near impossible, and writing hand-coded assembler completely impossible.
Re:RISC vs. CISC (Score:2)
A pure RISC chip will generate less heat than a CISC / RISC hybrid.
Maybe someday we will actually have quiet and fast computers....
Re:so the REALLY designed their own chip? (Score:2)
Well not really Digital. They were bought by a company that had already given in to Intel. Well, not actually given in, since the big Q was built on Intel to begin with.
Also, don't forget ARM, not used in "computers" but lots of pda's and whatnot. Unless of course your omission and your statement about "decent RISC architectures" are related
Re:so the REALLY designed their own chip? (Score:2)
The article states RISC, so I would guess it's fair to say it's not a pentium clone of any type.
Re:Yay China! (Score:2, Funny)
Wonder what they think is going on @ People's Daily Online as they get
No, Grendel! (Score:2)
Impressive (Score:4, Funny)
You've geat mojo.
The Big Picture (Score:5, Insightful)
I believe that this is a very short-sighted and narrow-minded view of what's happenning here. This is not about being able to spy or citizens or having control of citizens' computers. This is about having economic freedom. It's about building an technologically based governmental system and economy built from the ground up in a way which is not regulated by Western governments and corporations. It is similar to the Linux movement and that's why they're getting Linux to run on it.
By building computer systems from the ground up on their own hardware, own chips, own Linux builds with their own applications, they are no longer on the leash represented by terms of service agreements with intel, microsoft, and any other company and have the freedom to do their business their way.
And I greatly admire this sentiment because it represents a 100% swing away from being controlled by anyone and anything.
And don't just think of this in the context of China! The scope of this is much bigger. For example, why do we use Linux? It's because we want to achieve freedom from the requirements, restrictions, fallacies, and roadblocks imposed by using solutions owned by big companies with who knows what code in them. We use Linux because we control it and it represents freedom from the restrictions of some other software maker. China has taken this one step further and has built their own architecture so they can do exactly what they want with no silly restrictions designed to channel money so some exective in a Western office tower. Wouldn't you like to do that?
I give TWO BIG THUMBS UP to China and their initiative in making a non-half-assed attempt to build their system their way. They have the long-term vision to realise that they need true economic freedom from the West to achieve modern-day economic greatness and I admire their initiative. I wish we were all so lucky.
Re:The Big Picture (Score:4, Insightful)
In rosey hued glasses maybe. I bet most people use it because it's more stable, more secure and less expensive. If it were made by some mega-corporation, but still free as in cost and still a quality OS, I believe almost as many people would still use it. Face it, most Linux users are not those free thinkers who carefully weigh the pros and cons of a tool they use to get a job done based on what philosophies it represents. Sure, most may not admit it, some may characterize themselves as holy crusaders against Microsoft seeking to save civilization, but most, I think, use Linux because it's good. Of course I don't mean to say that no Linux users care about things such as software freedom, but I don't think it'd be accurate to say that that is the reason why all use it.
Flame on...
Wrong--it makes spying easier (Score:3, Interesting)
By developing their own CPU and operating system through official government sanction, it gives the government a way to effectively spy on Internet users because the government knows how everything works and will very likely use this knowledge to attempt such control. You are forgetting that mainland China is still in many ways an authoritarian state and the government is more than willing to spy on its own people to stamp out enemies of the state such as the Fulan Gong movement.
Does the book 1984 have any meaning to you? Mainland China is headed in that direction if government control of hardware and software technology has its way.
When you consider North American Indians... (Score:2)
Still, it is a valid point that you make.
END COMMUNICATION
Re:Bah (Score:2, Insightful)
Remember, the united states is an exremely oppressive government that uses whatever it can get its hands on to harm people. I hope we fail.
Re:no one has made this joke yet... (Score:2, Informative)
How long until we have extensive trade barriers... (Score:4, Insightful)
To benefit workers in industries in which American companies can't compete due to very expensive regulation (minimum wage; workplace environment standards; disability; collective bargaining; parental leave; health care; etc.), some dumbnut president is bound to suggest that we try to keep foreign goods out with tariffs or quotas.
Witness W.'s protective tariffs for steel.
The natural impulse for government will be to protect special interests (in this case, unionized voters) against the evils of the free market, instead of telling them what they don't want to hear: that they should find a new profession, since the one they're in can't make them the amount of money they are used to making without artificially inflating prices for the rest of the public.
I don't know about you, but I am simply not willing to pay more than I absolutely need to in order to get the goods and services I want, just to subsidize the ability of someone to continue working in a job that would be better sent overseas. If the quality of the Chinese-made goods is the same as or similar to the quality of the USA-made goods, and the price is lower, then I'm going to buy Chinese; done and done.
Free trade increases efficiency and, in the long run, will raise standards of living for all people. Pat Buchanan and the Jurassic-era conservatives are living with leftist union shills in a fantasy world of 50's America. Libertarians and the 80's-90's conservatives are the ones who truly understand what makes America great, and it isn't artificial trade barriers. =)