Terapin Mine Review 174
Ian Bell writes: "Designtechnica has just posted a review of the Terapin Mine. This handheld device has a 10gb hard drive, ethernet port, PCMCIA port, USB 2.0 and a front display. On top of all this it has a Linux OS installed complete with scandisk and defrag. You can hook this unit up to your television to view pictures as well. I know that the stats on this unit sound great, but you would be surprised by just how usable it is. Click Here for the full review." Whether it's 10 or 20 gigs (the review mentions both figures) doesn't really affect the reviewer's conclusion.
what? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:what? (Score:2, Funny)
Defrag (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Defrag (Score:3, Informative)
Quite right, the majority of people using linux are using the ext2 or ext3 filesystems. Ext2 and ext3 are self-defragmenting [antipope.org] filesystems.
This is unlike the majority of windows users. Their operating system uses a filesystem prone to self-fragmentation. This may change in the future should Microsoft drop support for the MSDOS filesystem (unfortunately, many windows XP machines are still installed with non-NTFS filesystems).
Here's a quote:
"Disk defragmenters are an endangered species on Linux. They exist because the MSDOS and HFS filesystems were badly designed -- relics of the floppy disk era, they weren't intended to support multi-user machines with millions of files and large hard disks. ext2, in contrast, is descended from a lineage of server filesystems. It is largely self- defragmenting; the ext2 drivers try to allocate sequential runs of blocks to each inode and spread use across the disk, avoiding the problem. If you really do need to defragment an ext2 filesystem, uhere's something's very weird about your setup! e2defrag is available, but you probably won't need it. "
Could I suggest you take a grade 3 english class, though? While your ideas appear cognizant, your spelling makes you appear uneducated and uninformed.
Re:what? (Score:1, Offtopic)
Hey, it was supposed to be a joke - but don't ponder on the idea for too long, or you will start seeing green men and corporate conspiracy in here too.
Re:what? (Score:1)
Re:Huh? (Score:1)
Good platform for opensource project (Score:3, Interesting)
"its inconsistent performance coupled with its hulkish dimensions make it seem quite undesirable to those of us who can only afford to invest in a technology once."
They have the things needed stuffed in there, but did not have the budget to get it work, maybe it could work as opensource?
Re:Good platform for opensource project (Score:1)
Sweet! A linux handheld... (Score:1)
Re:Sweet! A linux handheld... (Score:2)
I've been one of the people who complain about the slashdot effect, lack of cached content, etc. etc.
But in this case, the guy did it to himself. With a database backed site no less... oh well....
Here's the havok that has been thrust upon his server if anyone is interested...
Warning: Too many connections in
Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in
Warning: MySQL: A link to the server could not be established in
Warning: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in
Warning: Supplied argument is not a valid MySQL result resource in
Re:Sweet! A linux handheld... (Score:5, Informative)
Here [terapin-mine.com] is the user's manual, which has some good screen shots...
wizzy
Re:Sweet! A linux handheld... (Score:2)
Re:Sweet! A linux handheld... (Score:1, Informative)
That was my fealing when I got it almost a year ago. It is a really neat gadget, with good batery life, that technically does everything it says. You should look closely at the manual before purchase. With decent User Interface this would kick A**. However I haven't used it for anything but transfering files from work to home for the last 3 months.
The MP3 playing capabiltys appear as a after thought (does sound good, more later.) It runs like a single task OS. You can either use it as a ftp server, or as a MP3 player, or connect it wirelessly, or USB connect it to your PC, or copy from flash card... You must navigate through menus, to turn each on. Then you must quit that task, and navigate again through the menus to do something else. It doesn't rember where you were when you powered down, or powers it's self down (only after battery is dead, no other settings.) So if you plan to use this as a MP3 player in your car (as I did) You need to hold down power button for several seconds when you leave your car. Then when you return you must hit 5 different keys, no key buffer so don't go too fast, to get it to play a song again. And forget about the random play, it is not very random. If you put all your songs in this, and just start the random play each time, you'll never hear 50% of your collection, because it always selects a song near the beginning of your list, then jumps in a manner that you'll never hear the song at the end unless you listen to every other mp3 file first.
I do plan to connect it full time to the battery of my car. That way I can leave it on and just hit pause (my cigarete lighter turns off with the key.) Also mp3 is ver susceptable to power line noise. Make sure you don't connect this guy to the same power that gets any noise from your amp's...
Poor Seller In Third World Countries (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:4, Informative)
No, you should have seen it before you claim that it's too heavy and too big.
I just went to CompUSA during lunch break, and had it on my hand. It's very ligh, and fit into my hand very nicely. It's slick too.
Unfortunately, like all display model, it does not work. No battery, no shit. So I don't know about the sound quality.
An advice for retail store managers: Please have your floor models work properly (put in the god danm battery, if needed), and loaded up a couple of mp3 so people can test it. It would be a quick sale for gadget afficionado, like me, who tend to jump on this kind of things impulsively.
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:1)
How can you make an accurate assessment of its weight without the battery?
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:3)
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:1)
Exactly. How can someone tell how a device feels weight-wise if it's just the case? You can't. A lot of portable devices have half the weight in the battery.
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:1)
--Buzz [livejournal.com]
M$ makes it look like garbage. (Score:2)
able watching the images, a blue screen of death appeared indicating that the image to be displayed was corrupt. After several minutes of troubleshooting and several attempts at downloading the images onto the Mine, I eventually gave up without resolving the situation. The images seemed fine on my PC but simply would not display correctly when viewed via the Mine.
I've run into image problems from MicroShit lately. Specifically, their imaging softwar produces broken bit-map and tif format images. I would not have used said software had the TWAIN interface to my parallel scanner worked with any other software as it once did ... antother story. The images produced would not open in Paint Shop Pro under Doze, nor would their tif files. The GIMP was equally puzzled with the images under Debian, but Electric Eyes pulled through by ignoring the errors. From there the images could be ported over to reasonable formats like jpeg and portable net graphics. Needless to say, the format errors must be intentional as there has been NO IMPROVEMENT or real change in these ancient image formats.
Simarlly, I expect M$ to play Digital Rights Denial tricks on portable devices. Look forward to this happening to CD burners as the fools think they own the world.
As for the camera control problem, no new here. All those damn USB devices are different and painful to configure. How could it be any different with M$ threatening to silently retaliate against anyone friendly to Linux?
There you have it folks. It will be difficult indeed for any company to overcome these problems universally, even with 10 gigs of disk space for drivers. M$ will continue to change formats, and this will continue to make others, including themselves look bad.
Show me a WinCE device that does half of what this one can. Microsoft's backers will fight to the death to keep people from being able to create, move and share their movies and music. Microsoft will go along with it, as long as they keep getting to resell paintbrush on a yearly basis.
Re:M$ makes it look like garbage. (Score:1)
Re:Looks like garbage (Score:1)
" Way too big, way too heavy, too much extra crap that's not needed for a portable storage device."
The reviewer agrees with you on every point there, and also adds that it lacked one thing it really should have had - a Firewire connection.
Only Windows Boxes should be called Mines .. (Score:2, Funny)
sorry, you have to admit, it was a pretty obligatory offtopic/troll/bait post. and its getting boring always having 50 karma.
Re:Only Windows Boxes should be called Mines .. (Score:2, Funny)
oh man, I'm turning into the
Motherload of turtles? (Score:2, Funny)
So if you get one of these you will become rich with turtles?
Re:Motherload of turtles? (Score:1)
So if you get one of these you will become rich with turtles?
That's the optimistic version. Now, here's my take:
A mine is something that blows up if you get near it. And a turtle is legendary for being slow.
What kind of PR department do these people have?!
Re:Motherload of turtles? (Score:2)
>
> That's the optimistic version. Now, here's my take:
>
> A mine is something that blows up if you get near it. And a turtle is legendary for being slow.
>
> What kind of PR department do these people have?!
Hah! Your version is still too optimistic!
Airline Screener: "Sir, what's that thing in your carry-on luggage?"
Passenger: "Oh, just my terrapin mine..."
Screener: *presses Big Red Button, sirens go off, and auto-targeting lasers immediately render passenger into a smudge on the checkpoint floor*
Re:Motherload of turtles? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Motherload of turtles? (Score:2, Funny)
"Hard drive in a half-shell"
Re:Motherload of turtles? (Score:2)
No wonder they offered to buy my domain
more and more (Score:1)
Ummm (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Ummm (Score:1)
With Journalling, you don't have that interoperability.
Re:Ummm (Score:1)
Then again, you could use EXT3 or XFS, which cost nothing.
USB and 10 Mbit LAN only? (Score:1)
Moving 10Gb thru USB at 12Mbit/s or LAN at 10Mbit/s takes a loooooong time indeed!
Re:USB and 10 Mbit LAN only? (Score:1)
Re:USB and 10 Mbit LAN only? (Score:2)
Thats nice and all, but my laptop has usb1 and firewire, and doesn't have usb2, so I'm still stuck at that 12MBit/sec (and even that is a theoretical max I'll likely never get close to).
Has usb2 really been adopted very widely yet?!
In any case, I'll take a firewired Apple iPod over one of these any day.
The big selling point for the slashdot crowd seems to be that it runs linux, but with a proprietary front end running on that 4-lines-of-text screen, and fat32 for the filesystem, I hardly think thats very cool. The instructions don't even mention how you'd connect it to anything besides windows; this isn't really a linux (or mac) user targeted product at all. Methinks they went with linux not for the "love of the game" but rather because it makes for a good cheap embedded OS.
btw, anyone know anything about hacking these things?
ie actually getting a shell on it?
(on your pc, of course, on it's own screen would be a joke)
Connectivity help. (Score:2)
Ummm, it's got an ftp server. Plug it into your local network and go to town. Does iPod do that for you? WinCE, ha ha ha! You might also try a shell escape on the ftp prompt like:
! ls -lh
to see what comes up. Sounds more portable than a key fob, and yeah hacking it would be cool.
Sadly, I'm not buying any $500 devices anytime soon. My poor man's answer to this has been to take plastic Quick (the drink) boxes and cram hard disks in them with some packing foam. Yeah, it's ugly and I have to open the target computer's case, but the hard disks are spare. It works great with older laptop hard disks which fit into the smaller boxes. My wife laughted at me for not knowing my quick drive was acutally in a Quick box. Eh, so what. Mounted media custom Debian installs, here I come. Perhaps I should call it the Quick Liberator?
Re:USB and 10 Mbit LAN only? (Score:2)
Firewire would have been great for interoperability, but there is one option, anyway. They are probably MAC users who use built-in firewire.
Just my assumption since the slash effect is still running rampant.
Re:USB and 10 Mbit LAN only? (Score:1)
It must inhale the battery (Score:3, Interesting)
Needless to say, I have not read the review, but the battery life on this sucker must be horrible! Either that, or you wear around a battery on your belt.
The features mentioned in the slashdot summary sound great, but I don't believe current battery technology can power such a package for any reasonable amount of time. I may be wrong, as I said, I havn't read the review, but I bet battery is what will make this unit suck.
-Pete
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:1)
Re:It must inhale the battery (cf. iPod) (Score:1)
So it depends on the current draw for the USB port, the Ethernet and so forth.
Re:It must inhale the battery (cf. iPod) (Score:1)
CNET ran a review. They got less than two hours on a set of AA batteries.
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:2)
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:1)
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:1)
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:1)
The whats the point of filling the PDA with gasoline?
Re:It must inhale the battery (Score:1)
Oh no! (Score:2, Funny)
Student 1: Why didn't you take a free PDA? Student 2: Ummm.... I.... I'M NOT GAY!!! Student 1: Sure thing.
The hybrid device everyone needs... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:The hybrid device everyone needs... (Score:1)
Interesting design, poor filesystem? (Score:1, Offtopic)
(I muse at the difficulty of hacking this and converting this to ReiserFS or EXT3)...
Re:Interesting design, poor filesystem? (Score:1)
Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:5, Informative)
Terapin Mine Review
In the last year or so we have seen a practical onslaught of hand held storage devices. The Terapin Mine is one of many such devices currently on the market. Boasting the Linux operating system, a 20 gig hard drive, and an impressive array of connectivity options, the Mine appears to be a unique entry in this extremely competitive industry. Practically a Swiss Army Knife of file sharing options, this Linux based behemoth would appear to be the clear front-runner on anyone's hand held wish list. With all that being said let us get down to the nitty gritty. Does this bad boy deliver or not?
Looks and First Impressions
Upon first opening the box, I was surprised to see what appeared to be an oversized protective carrying case for the Mine. It wasn't til I removed the item that I realized that in fact it was the Mine itself. To put it frankly, the Mine is huge. Weighing in at an impressive 1 lb and measuring 7" x 3.5" x 1" it will undoubtedly give your notebook computer a run for its money. The actual ergonomics of the Mine seemed quite fine with its various controls and ports located in a logical and intuitive manner. The sheer amount of connectivity options is staggering. Located on top is a 16 bit Type II PCMCIA card slot. The bottom contains a LAN port, a USB master port, and a USB slave port. Rounding it off is a standard head phone jack and Video Out. The absence of Firewire is a legitimate complaint though.
Specifications and Features
Size (HDD) 10GB
Dimensions 180mm (Height) x 90mm (Width) x 27mm (Thickness)
Weight 375gms
480gms (with 4AA Alkaline batteries)
Operation System Linux
Video Composite video out for still images (JPEG, BMP, GIF, TIFF, CRW, NEF)
Video Format PAL and NTSC
Audio Stereo Playback
Mono Recording (with external microphone, in WAV format only)
Audio Format MP3 and WAV
USB Master 1
USB Slave 1
10 Mbps Ethernet 1
16-Bit PCMCIA Type II Slot 1
Screen 16 Characters x 4 lines high contrast LCD
panel with back lighting
Power 4 x AA Alkaline batteries
Internal Rechargeable Lithium-Ion battery (Optional)
External Rechargeable Lithium-Ion battery (Optional)
Simple 3 front-panel buttons and 3 side buttons for all device controls
Upload and download from Digital Cameras (via USB or via PCMCIA Memory Card Adapter)
Display photographs and graphic files on a TV or projector
Rotate photographs
Upload and download MP3 Players (via USB or via PCMCIA Memory Card Adapter)
Removable HDD (Compatible with Windows 98, 2000 and ME)
Share via Local Area Network (LAN)
Receive attachments and send email
Auto online backup, download and upload
Online and FTP sharing
Online upgrading and diagnostic features
Setup and Use
Given the fact that the Mine is running the Linux OS, I was curious as to how fast the boot up sequence would be. The average boot up time was a mere 10 seconds....I wish my Windows box could do the same. The user interface for the Mine consisted of simple text options laid out in a no nonsense fashion. I suppose that the Mine's interface emphasizes readability and clarity but I found it to be rather plain and much of the precious LCD real estate was wasted. Navigating the menu's proved to be extremely easy. After a few minutes of playing around I felt confident that I had a complete run down of the Mine's basic features.
As far as configuration is concerned this is handled through your PC as opposed to through the Mine itself. Using the USB slave port, I proceeded to hook the Mine up to my PC, which at the time was running Windows 2000 Professional. As expected, Windows immediately detected the presence of the Mine and assigned it a drive letter. Located on the Mine was an executable that allowed me to configure its various and plentiful capabilities. The configuration process was relatively painless although I did resort to the manual.
Testing
So far my experience with the Mine had been all smooth sailing. Installation and configuration was a breeze and the impressive feature set was begging me to put it to the test. Unfortunately, this is where the Mine truly distinguished itself from the rest of the pack. Here's what I found.
With the Mine still hooked up to my PC, I copied onto it a collection of MP3's and some images I took with my digital camera. For comparison sake I burned onto CD the same MP3's that I had placed on the Mine. The MP3's on CD sounded fantastic when played on my dedicated stereo but upon connecting the Mine, I was simply shocked at how mush the sound quality had degraded. I can only assume that in the D/A conversion process the Mine simply cannot compete with my dedicated CD player. I'm not talking a difference that only an Audiophile would notice, I'm talking a substantial decrease in the overall clarity and imaging of the music. This seemed pretty unfortunate since one of the main selling points of hand held storage devices is their ability to transport large volumes of digital music.
A little disapointed, I proceeded to hook the Mine up to my TV via the provided RCA connector. Taking into consideration the resolution restrictions of a composite connection, I was very satisfied with the image quality. Without any configuration on the users behalf, the Mine will automatically display your stored images in a slideshow manner. Just as I had gotten comfortable watching the images, a blue screen of death appeared indicating that the image to be displayed was corrupt. After several minutes of troubleshooting and several attempts at downloading the images onto the Mine, I eventually gave up without resolving the situation. The images seemed fine on my PC but simply would not display correctly when viewed via the Mine.
At this point, I was feeling a bit let down so I decided to try out one of the Mine's features that would be of most use to me. Via the USB master port, the Mine should in theory be able to connect and control a USB compliant device. This would be a fantastic option for anyone who has a digital camera and has felt the wrath of storage limitations. For the sake of this I broke out my Olympus C-3020 Zoom camera. Like the old saying goes "3 strikes and your out". For the life of me, I could not get the Mine to connect to my camera. Although it detected the fact that my camera was an Olympus, it failed to properly recognize its model.
Up until this point, the Mine had behaved flawlessly via USB. Every time I connected it to my PC it was detected immediately and mapped as a local drive. The same was not true when I tried to access it via my LAN. I followed the directions to the letter but I was never able to access it. Its FTP capabilities seemed attractive but failed to materialize during my test. If this process proves difficult for me I can't imagine the frustration that would be experienced by a less technology savvy owner.
Conclusion and Final thoughts
At this point in time it's hard for me to recommend the Terapine Mine to anyone but those whom are willing to invest in bleeding edge technology. On paper it boasts an impressive feature set and seems to offer more than any of its competition. But its inconsistent performance coupled with its hulkish dimensions make it seem quite undesirable to those of us who can only afford to invest in a technology once.
Re:Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:3, Informative)
well, the website says it supports the C-3040, not the C-3020... of course it isn't going to work.
network connectivity problems can almost conclusively be blamed on the network setup and not the device in general. probably duped IPs or a router issue.
blue screen of death on the images can probably be blamed to a
i have never used the device, but i don't think the review is very fair, those were his 3 strikes why he wouldn't recommend it, and as far as i'm concerned they were right on the corner of the plate.
Re:Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:1)
Anyhoo, what seems to be the trouble? Is there any hope of the site coming back? Will slashdot ever get private messaging so I don't have to post this in a story?
Re:Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:1)
You bet this is needed. Think of all these posts which could be slapped (-1, Offtopic)
Btw your fans list has grown quite a bit lately. Neat! Check mine out, too :)
Re:Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:2)
Good work on your friends. Almost 800 already. Congrats on that.
In other news, you seem to follow my every move on slashdot. Thank you for your interest. My AIM name is recursiv.
That is all. Good day.
Re:Review - since it's slashdotted (Score:1)
Gosh I hadn't realised that I'm already up to 800 friends. Am I really that far away ? I thought I might have 100 or 200 or something. I haven't been adding scores like you have ! How many do you have anyway ? Well over 1000 or 2000 I suppose. Perhaps more, I could be very wrong.
I don't use any IM system unfortunately; but my /. username is forged ;)
Regarding private messages: this would be beneficial, or we could just use each other's journal to allow fellow users to communicate in a semi-public way (like on BBS).
For the moment, my techique of writing was inspired by sllort's Modbombing Disable HOWTO [slashdot.org]. I like finding old and obscure comments to some story in which the /. mob has lost interest for, and using these to reply to and post "private" messages to friends. It's less risky to so so because
a) I choose to stay very close to the archival event horizon (under section 2.1), and,
b) it lessens the number of people who care to read old comments.
I consider other Slashdot users like heroes, such as sllort [slashdot.org] (activist) or Klerck [slashdot.org] (troll/crapflooder) but not for the same reasons :) In the latter case, for researching exploits and bugs in the system, which is a quest in itself, and too bad if some people abuse it. It'll make the system better eventually..
However I don't talk quite as much as with the other users as we do. I'm normally a quiet person. So, for the evening, goodbye and write to you some time.
Oh, btw: you're famous [slashdot.org].
cognitive dissonance: BSOD/Linux/scandisk (Score:1)
Concerning the review, why was there no mention of CPU clock speed, memory wait states, cache size, RAM, or any of the other statistics that any self-respecting geek would require?
This looks like just another Win32 brick with either WINE or a dual config, and the reviewer told me nothing about what it is actually capable of.
homepage of terapin-mine (Score:1, Redundant)
Some Links (Score:5, Informative)
Web Site:
www.terapin-mine.com [terapin-mine.com]
Purchase:
http://www.thinkgeek.com [thinkgeek.com]
Reviews:
http://www.digitaljournalist.org [digitaljournalist.org]
http://www.edgereview.com [edgereview.com]
http://computers.cnet.com [cnet.com]
Some info (Score:1)
Re:Some info (Score:1)
At First I Thought This Was the Perfect PDA (Score:1)
Trying to follow the link in the article soon led me to conclude that the site had been slashdotted, but hey, there's always google! A couple of minutes later I still didn't have any further information on the battery life, nor about input methods. I did find out that the device seems to have a ridiculously small display that makes it mostly useless for me. Maybe adding a couple of bucks to the ~ $ 500 it's listed for at geek.com could give us a QVGA color display and boost battery life (I'd rather have 10 times the battery life with a CompactFlash card than 10 times the storage space with a harddisk). Maybe the day I'm going to buy a PDA isn't that far from now...
---
The nice thing about Windows is - It does not just crash, it displays a
dialog box and lets you press [OK] first.
Re:At First I Thought This Was the Perfect PDA (Score:1)
OTOH, the Jukebox's batteries take forever to charge... but being that they also take forever to drain, I don't find that to be a problem.
Other Terapin Mine reviews (Score:1)
Terapin Technology - Mine Product Reviews [terapintech.com].
Lithium Battery? (Score:1)
Is it too much to ask for a goddamn lithium battery on this thing? I mean c'mon people there is no way that I could transfer 10GB over a 10Mb network and this thing have a long enough battery life to stay alive. I would gladly rather see firewire replace the ethernet as some have already suggested.
-Jeff
Trolling, trolling, keep those /.ers trolling! Rawhide!
Re:Lithium Battery? (Score:1)
I forgot to add that if Lithium were used instead of Alkaline batts this system would be a little bit lighter as well.
-Jeff
Re:Lithium Battery? (Score:1)
It appears that I was trolling... I didn't see that the lithium was optional.
My bad.
hook it up to TV to view pictures... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:hook it up to TV to view pictures... (Score:1)
There is nothing wrong w/ a little portable porn [iafrica.com].
Old news and an old problem... (Score:2, Interesting)
Well, enough trolling, I do have a legitimate question that perhaps a few here have resolved. I've looked into this and other devices as an easy way to carry around a lot of my work, since I tend to bounce from using a computer at home, at work, and on campus. I have control over the computers at work and home, but not on campus. From what I understand, you would need to load certain drivers or other software to get this device to work with Windows, which is what they have on campus (please correct me if I'm wrong). So, since I can't load the drivers, I wouldn't be able to access any of my stuff stored on the drive when I on campus, right? Is there a solution to this? How do some of you carry large amounts of data around (other than zip disks or burned CD-ROMS)?
Re:Old news and an old problem... (Score:1)
From what _I_ understand, though, Windows automagically assigns a drive letter once the device is plugged in (into the USB-port, that is). No drivers, no nuthin', PnP how it was meant to be. Leaves the question of how the folks on your campus feel about you plugging devices in their boxen...some BOMFs are really clueless...
Re:Old news and an old problem... (Score:1)
Complete Linux ? (Score:5, Funny)
On top of all this it has a Linux OS installed complete with scandisk and defrag.
[root@cerberus root]# scandisk
bash: scandisk: command not found
[root@cerberus root]# defrag
bash: defrag: command not found
Sh*t, my Linux is not complete ...
USB master port (Score:1)
The USB master port is a killer feature though - if it works as expected. In principle that should allow it to be directly connected to any slave device (eg: a digital camera) and data transferred. Seems like it would be extremely handy for backing up PDAs, and digital cameras.
Re:USB master port (Score:1)
Whoa... (Score:1)
Talk about being slashdotted HARD
crash (Score:1)
Not to be confused with "Terrapin" (Score:1)
Go Terps!
some serious disconnect (Score:1, Insightful)
I have this piece of dog poop... runs linux and...
scandisk? (Score:2)
Kinda like Windows?
Imagine a . . . (Score:1)
It is ugly (Score:1)
Does anybody else think this thing looks ugly compared to other handheld devices?
Geez, at least they could have made it circular or maybe added some interchangable plastic skins.
The device looks like an oversize old cellphone with no keypad.
Mush, huskies, mush! (Score:1)
So much for using oatmeal as a storage medium. Back to the drawing board.
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:1)
stipe42
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:2)
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:2)
I personally like to zoom way the hell in. I like my uber zany levels of resolution, you apparently don't. Therefore, congratulations, technology has provided you with a product that you never have to replace.
And to continue your nonsensical logic, why don't you just decrease your rez to 32x32, you can store a crap load and you don't even need to waste cycles making thumbnails.
My question to you is, why do you care that other people want higher rez pictures?
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:2)
I personally like to zoom way the hell in.
I suppose you have one of those $20k professional digital cameras where the optics don't limit your resolution no matter what kind of film you use. Yes sir, nothing like using the highest resolution film in a $75 fixed-focus camera.
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:1)
Re:Digital cameras do need a portable hard drive (Score:2)
What's the difference between a $100 SLR and a $5000 SLR? Not a whole hell of a lot, all the cost is in the optics.
Which is why I'm wondering why the person I was replying to was storing 4.4 megapixel images when the optics in his digital camera likely couldn't resolve to that level.
I could be talking out of my ass, but it seems to me that a $300 digital camera won't have great optics on it since all that cost is in the CCD and hardware.