The Ultimate Phone/PDA? 186
P800guy writes "Psion Place has a review of the SonyEricsson P800 available in Q3, this looks to be the best PDA/phone combined in the world. Running Symbian OS v7.0, 208x320 color touchscreen, triple-band GSM compatible, Multimedia Messaging (MMS), Bluetooth, GPRS always-on internet connection,
built-in digital camera, support for HTML, xHTML, Java, iMode, WAP, Word, Excel, PPT. Check out the pictures,
open, closed.
In the US it'll work on Voicestream,
ATT Wireless, and Cingular just don't expect it to be offically supported from day 1 of release." Getting closer- now if it just had a few gigs of memory for MP3s ;)
I need a new PDA. (Score:2)
Re:Newtons dont age! (Score:1)
ultimate phone (Score:1)
How much is it anyway? (Score:1)
Symbian OS (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Symbian OS (Score:1)
(Mod me down as uninformative, I didn't bother to find the press-release about what conversion-software the P800 would use
Re:Symbian OS (Score:1)
Re:Symbian OS (Score:1)
Re:Symbian OS (Score:2)
Re:Symbian OS (Score:2)
I hardly belive it isn't the case with the 92xx series - so you can get the SDK and write your own import/export filter..
Symbian OS: glorious past, uncertain future (Score:1)
Since around the time WinCE was launched things went downhill. EPOC32 tried to become the better Windows. Unnecessary features cluttered the screen and hampered usability. New machines with faster processors were noticably slower than older models (seems that even faster CPUs took care of that). I ended up switching to a Palm, which offered less than even early Psion models, but made it simple to get simple stuff done. And of the proprietary PDA platforms, Palm seems to cater best to people who don't use the Windows/MSOffice combo.
Symbian could have been cool, but the only apparent advantage over WinCE/PocketPC is that it's not made by Microsoft. A dubious advantage in the market place, as consumers don't care at best.
Re:Symbian OS: glorious past, uncertain future (Score:2, Insightful)
The advantage of Symbian OS over PalmOS is that it's a real OS
There's of course a lot more to say than this, but Symbian OS is a really good OS you definitely want instead of PocketPC or PalmOS
Re:Symbian OS: glorious past, uncertain future (Score:1)
I don't think I want Symbian. (Score:2)
I've always found that the most useful part of my PDA was software support. With PalmOS, I get Vindigo, which is one of the most impressive parts of my Pilot. I get AvantGo for stationary web stuff (I guess that's void with net-access pda) and I get a few closed-source medical databases of meds and prescription data. (I'm a MD.) I think all 3 of these are closed to other operating systems.
It seems like I'll lose all this when I switch to a different OS? Am I wrong? Has anybody had a great experience with an OS besides Palm?
Sam
Re:I don't think I want Symbian. (Score:1)
Yes.
Re:I don't think I want Symbian. (Score:2)
I'd be sad without it.
Saw it in Action (Score:5, Interesting)
Its small, smaller than the image suggests. Its fast, screen is awesome. The biggest worry "running time on one battery charge" couldn't be answered, the guys said the hardware wasn't final they had.
Also the flip cover with the keys simply presses the touchscreen below it. Advantage: saves hardware, disadvantage: flimsy plastic look on the back and the display has to be fully powered all the time.
They showed Lord of the Rings as MPG on it and demonstrated some PC-Phone connection stuff which looked pretty polished.
This is a phone for me, can't wait
Wow (Score:1)
Not that I have a cell phone, a PDA, an MP3 player, a laptop, or anything else portable. Except for my really spiffy digital watch. But this thing is amazing!
Now all i need is one that costs less than twenty bucks.
MSRP? (Score:1)
Re:MSRP? (Score:1)
Re:MSRP? (Score:1)
Re:MSRP? (Score:1)
It's form factor bears similarity to the 6035, with the camera lense on the back.
Looks like the stylus stows starboard on this new one. Does this bode well for the stylus loss statistics, or do they figure you just buy a gizmo pen that doubles as stylus?
It remains to be seen whether you get much use out of the camera.
Cases for these things are problematic. I throw mine in a HP 48GX case, which works well enough. Haven't heard of much difficulty with the flip, but I'm having strong thoughts of a Handspring Treo nonetheless.
As with laptops, there may be no single right answer to the ultimate gadget question.
Re:MSRP? (Score:1)
Nice (Score:1)
im confused (Score:1)
Re:im confused (Score:2, Informative)
the keypad is just a piece of plastic in which the button are placed. when a button is pressed it just pushes the touchscreen.
http://www.sonyericsson.com/3Dphones/p800/p800.
to see a demo
Third Party Phones (Score:2)
Many companies will not permit you to use a third party phone on their service.
Re:Third Party Phones (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Third Party Phones (Score:2, Informative)
Voicestream supports "alien" phones... (Score:1)
Re:Voicestream supports "alien" phones... (Score:2)
Question
Can I activate VoiceStream service on a phone I bought from another carrier?
Answer
VoiceStream phones use a technology called GSM (For more information on GSM click here. GSM relies upon a smart card to function. If the phone you purchased from another carrier requires a smart card, you can activate it with VoiceStream. If your phone does not require a smart card, it will not be compatible with the VoiceStream system.
If you would like to activate your phone with VoiceStream, or are unsure if your phone uses a smart card, please visit any VoiceStream Sales Office for assistance or call Customer Care at 1-800-937-8997.
Note: You may be required to contact your previous carrier to unblock your phone for VoiceStream activation.
Another ad? (Score:1)
Yes, it's sort of a neat phone, but there are a *lot* of neat phones coming down the pipe. I hope they don't all merit a Slashdot commercial.
Here's a link to a Samsung Camera [samsung.com] with a digital camera too. The camera even sounds nicer than the Ericsson.
Sorry for being such a wet blanket, but I just don't see a whole lot remarkable about this topic.
Ericsson + Windows (Score:2, Interesting)
I think that many mobile phones can be thought as somekind of pre-PDA thing. You can check email with them, use calendar etc. Do we really need very colourfull screen on PDA's & mobile phones because it uses lot of battery? For some people it's a good thing but, I wouldn't actually really want it now.
Just waiting for a new release of nokia communicator.. (it'll rock)
Re:Ericsson + Windows (Score:2)
Care to expand on that little nugget? I fail to see why Linux has any advantage over Symbian in this context. In fact, I fail to see how Linux even comes close.
Re:Ericsson + Windows (Score:2)
As much as I know - you'll need to do MUCH more to tweak Linux kernel to work on a cell phone, add a new GUI (QTopia won't fit - too big, but thats just my guess), and I hardly see why people want to use Linux there - it's not like you're sticking a free copy of debian into it - you'll need lots of closed source apps & support for it (think browser, calendar, and don't forget - all the modem stuff and the hardware talking)...
In short - as it stands now - I didn't see any company sells a Linux solution for cell phone, and there's already some competition - Windows solution, Symbian Solution, GEOS solution (the one that comes with Communicator 9100), and others...
Re:Ericsson + Windows (Score:1)
Re:Ericsson + Windows (Score:3, Funny)
Obligatory question (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Obligatory question (Score:1, Redundant)
I'd like to see a Beowulf cluster of these...
Another Review (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Another Review (Score:1)
UI and included applications [infosync.no] And more on P800 [infosync.no]
Needs a better keyboard (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Needs a better keyboard (Score:2)
Re:Needs a better keyboard (Score:2)
It's still intended as a phone with PDA stuff in it, and the zaurus is a PDA, with potentially a phone add-on (not sure, but I know it doesn't come with one).
Nokia 9210 (Score:2, Informative)
picture of camera (Score:2, Informative)
Re:picture of camera (Score:1)
oy (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:oy (Score:1)
Do you mean make it with touchscreen buttons for dialing? That will displease a lot of people who prefer to touch-dial instead of looking at the screen.
Of course you can't please everyone, which is why we have so many totally different devices now.
Re:oy (Score:2)
Real nice demonstration. (Score:1)
Re:Real nice demonstration. (Score:2)
i have a cheaper one (Score:1)
Not surprised it's by Sony (Score:1)
Few gigs??? (Score:1)
Why? I would agree with a few hundred Mb (to 1 gig) for data storage, like text files, cache memory, ect, but gigs for mp3's?
The whole point of this phone is to be connected all the time, every where. So I would like to download, or stream my mp3' from an online data storage medium, like my home computer or a music service.
I don't know if GPRS, is allready fast enhough for this kind of usage, but UMTS will.
Re:Few gigs??? (Score:1, Informative)
1) It is bluetooth enabled, and Toshiba has just announced a pocket sized bluetooth 5GB hard drive called the Pocket Server [toshiba.co.jp] which means that you should be able to stream data back and forth from this P800 puppy quite easily
and
2) Sony Ericsson have come up with a technology called TrickleSynch (which uses what they call SynchML)which will basically continually synch your data from phone to base using the always on GPRS 2.5G system. So theoretically you will be able to synch all your data overnight while you're sleeping.
3) The company claims that the battery life will be around 12 hours of normal use, with 400 hours on standby. The design criteria was apparently to provide a product which only needed charging once a day or less under normal phone/PDA use. They claim to have achieved this by using a battery which is more powerful than the iPaq and by developing in-house a special low power screen.
The phone is very cool, and not much bigger than my Nokia 8890, and the handwriting recognition actually seems to work, which is even more amazing.
Re:Few gigs??? (Score:2)
Why merge the two? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Why merge the two? (Score:4, Insightful)
I also don't understand my so many people want microscopic-sized phones. Sure, they're kind of cute; but the buttons and screens are so damned small. Also, one's home/land-line phone is "normal phone sized" so why insist on much smaller cell phones?
I take my Kyocera QCP-6035 with me everywhere and use it more as a PDA than a phone. I use it in the supermarket (HandyShopper), the gym (thinkDB2), and other places.But those times when either I need to make a call or the select few people who have my cell number need to get a hold of me, it's great. In the Address Book app, I also keep store hours so I can know if they're open before I bother to call.
The phone even does a number look-up in the Address Book app for the caller's name when no caller-ID information is transmitted. Nice touch.
Not when it comes to the Address Book app where there is lots of overlap. The Speed Dial app also links to the numbers in the Address Book. Again, nice touch. Fine: that's your choice. Nobody is putting a gun to your head.Re:Why merge the two? (Score:2)
All of your other reasons can be remedied by:
BLUETOOTH
( Now you know why Microsoft is attempting to kill Bluetooth.)
LoB
Re:Why merge the two? (Score:2)
Really. By saying they would have a Bluetooth kit for MS Windows XP by the end of the year? That is not full support. Mark my word, they'll have Win-Fi (Windows-only WiFi) out before they release the Bluetooth drivers. I'd even go on a limb and say that the Bluetooth support will be flaky too and the device manufacturers will be pointed to by Microsoft.
I agree there is a lot of potential here with Bluetooth to have two separate devices, but to be honest, next year's phones will be the power of laptops two years ago, so why not steal as much PDA functionality as possible and make it as usuable as possible in the normal phone form factor. Hey if you love to do spreadsheets but find the screen too small, get a PDA too.
Not everyone wants a PDA but most will want a phone. Pricing pressures will limit the sales numbers of the combo-phone/pda. IMO, it would be smarter if the phone manufacturers worked with the PDA vendor and made sure they worked together via Bluetooth than attempt to take the PDA market for their own. Again, not everyone wants a PDA.
LoB
Re:Why merge the two? (Score:2)
That would be a good start. In a real competitive environment, those with the first or best products set the standard if open standards aren't used. In other words, the field is open and with the PalmOS at 70+% marketshare, that would be a good platform to support but it would depend on the bluetooth support the PDA has or will have.
LoB
Re:Why merge the two? (Score:2)
==[ Why are people so intent on merging PDA/Phones? ]==
Because it's a pain in the butt having to carry around 2 devices, especially when generally a PDA is much bigger. I recently brought a T68m, solely on the strength of its calendaring features. I keep its calendar and phone number list in sync with my PC organizer and consequently my Palm is now collecting dust. I doubt I'll ever use it again.
Having my diary entries for the next year and all my phone numbers to hand all the time, has turned out to be a god send. I doubt I'll ever use seperate devices again.
Is this a phone I can program? (Score:3, Interesting)
Java (Score:3, Informative)
/b
...and C++ (Score:1)
Re:Is this a phone I can program? (Score:2)
However, at least with EPOC APIs for C++ and Java you'll be able to fully program whatever features are exposed from the network.
I would rather have a personal network (Score:2)
is this so different?
take it to Europe and Asia? (Score:2)
How does that work? I've heard that pretty much everyone else in the world uses GSM. Is that enough to use your phone on their networks? How do they bill you?
Thanks in advance for enlightening me!
Re:take it to Europe and Asia? (Score:1)
1. Enable international roaming with your US provider, then - as long as there's a GSM provider wherever you are - people can call you as normal. This costs a lot though, average $1.50 per minute and will be billed by your regular provider.
2. Get a new contract with a provider in your new country. You'll get a new sim card for your phone, and your phone must be unlocked for this to work. This is obviously cheaper for usage, but most providers require a 12 month contract.
This phone is triband so you can use it pretty much anywhere.
PrePay SIM (Score:1)
And to back up your statement on availability:
DualBand GSM phones work in most countries apart from the US. TriBand phones work in the US as well as other countries. A quick check on Vodafone UK's website (http://www.vodafone-roaming.co.uk/) told me that I can use my phone in 132 countries. So pretty much anywhere. The only problem I have had while travelling was in Brazil where I could not get service.
Re:PrePay SIM (Score:1)
To correct you on dual-band phones though
Re:take it to Europe and Asia? (Score:2)
Re:take it to Europe and Asia? (Score:2)
You can almost always unlock your phone in a couple minutes for about $10. There are sometimes problems with the newest phones, newest software. But, usually, it's not a problem.
Check out Google [google.com] or ask electronics/telephone freaks in your local area. It will probably void your warranty though, so beware.
This reminds me... Poland's largest cellphone operator, Era [www.era.pl], offered the Nokia 8210 for a symbolic 1zl ($0.25) to it's business customers who'd sign a 2 year contract. The phone was selling for 500-600zl with a 2 year contract so it was quite a deal. The phones didn't weren't simlocked, everyone I talked to assumed it was Era's way of showing appreciation to their business customers.
Later it turned out that phones were supposed to have been simlocked and somebody just screwed up. Six people - a chunk of a whole division at Era - lost their jobs.
Re:take it to Europe and Asia? (Score:2)
900lb gorrilla vs. Godzilla (Score:4, Interesting)
Microsoft:
XBox - success uncertain
Other attempts at (non-hardware) domestic entertainment products
MSN - dissapointing - not very profitable - failed to unseat AOL
Microsoft Bob - 'domestic OS' - laughable failure
Pocket PC operating system for phones and PDAs - moderate success, not a significant revenue generator yet
Various TV/cable ventures - moderate success or failure
Microsoft games - successful and profitable
Sony
TVs, music systems, VCRs, DVD players etc - very successful globally over many years
Sony Walkman, personal stereos, mini-disc players - very successful globablly over many years
PlayStation 1 and 2 - very successful worldwide
Mobile phones - increasingly successful collaboration with major service providers
Other domestic ventures (not hardware):
Sony entertainment products (movies, record lables), generally successful or very successful over many years.
Who would you bet on winning in the domestic appliance ring - the 900lb gorrilla or Godzilla?
Re:900lb gorrilla vs. Godzilla (Score:2, Funny)
TheRegister.co.uk has also reviewed it (Score:1)
_
Q would be impressed (Score:1)
With GPS via Bluetooth and a built in Camera, all we need now is a miniature high-powered laser or other such energy weapon capable of burning through steel and this thing would be ready for use by all '00' agents.
Regardless if it has the laser or not, I'm getting one of these killer P800's the day they come out with one for Verizon, since they just got the 3G wireless services up and running here in the Bay Area, it's time I got a phone capable of using the uber-network that floats in the air around me.
And the idea of taking a picture and sending it over my phone to some one in an instant is just way too cool. I think that's going to be all the rage: take a picture - add a note and send it off.
That's the ultimate in communication right there...
Next time I'm running late for a meeting, I could just snap a quick pic of the nightmare traffic I'm stuck in and send it to the people waiting on me
Except for every Japanese-market phone (Score:2, Funny)
Total Cost of Ownership (Score:1)
The idea of the camera in the phone is quite useful and has been available here in Japan for quite some time and is very reasonably priced. Almost all the phones over here have a great deal of PDA functionality and connect to the internet which is very useful.
But we return again to the target audience. The novelty of the phone being able to play my favorite mp3's and mpg's is going to wear off about two seconds after I read the price tag. The reason being is that like most salary workers, my day is fairly evenly divided up between work, commuting, eating, sleeping, and trying desparately to have something called a social life. Aside from amazing my friends during the "social life" part of my day, I have no time to play with gadgets, nor do I have any professional use for playing mp3's or mpg's. I didn't even get the camera phone over here because the cost didn't justify the very few times I would actually use that feature. IMO the P800 looks really cool for a technology demo, but I don't think they will be able to produce it at a sufficiently low cost for it to succeed. It's simple economics....when you have to pay rent/bills, support a girlfriend/wife/kids, and still manage to feed and entertain yourself, you find yourself seriously asking, "How often would I REALLY use this?"
----------
Re:Total Cost of Ownership (Score:1)
Bluetooth (Score:1)
Re:Bluetooth (Score:1)
Bluetooth is for low-bandwidth, short-range wireless applications, e.g., cordless peripherals, PDA/phone sync'ing, i.e., things that don't have lots of power.
Size/weight?? (Score:1)
I can't find that information in SonyEricsson site and neither this nor The Registers review has any mention of the dimensions of this thing...
I find that a bit confusing. Usually "forgetting" to mention these little details imply vaporware.
Otherwise this thing looks very desiarable indeed.
As comps and phones collide, who's # Pad wins? (Score:4, Interesting)
Each are standard in their own field; You'll never find a keyboard with a phone-style pad and you'll never find a phone with a keyboard-style pad, but they're opposite from eachother. When I finally get a computer/phone combination, what kind of pad will it have? And who was the monkey that allowed these standards to differ so drastically?
Sam
Re:As comps and phones collide, who's # Pad wins? (Score:2, Interesting)
The reason phone pads are the way they are was a conscious decision by Bell Labs when moving away from rotary-dial phones to Touch-Tone. If you recall a rotary dial, the lower digits were on the top of the dial. To make the transition to Touch-Tone, they put the lower digits on the top of the pad.
Before you criticize Bell Labs for not following the defacto standard, remember that if Apple and others didn't break with the 8.3 filename convention, we would have been stuck with that for many more years.
Both? (Score:3, Informative)
When used with the dialer software the number pad changes to the phone layout, while otherwise it uses the standard PC keyboard layout.
To add to the confusion the keys have both numbers on it.
So for example the '7' key has a little grey '1' printed on it next to where the '7' is printed, & 'home' is printed underneath. While the '8' key has a little grey '2' printed next to where the '8' is printed, & also has the up arrow printed on it to. Etc, etc.
Re:As comps and phones collide, who's # Pad wins? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:As comps and phones collide, who's # Pad wins? (Score:2)
According to Donald Norman's Design of Everyday Things (great book, you should read it!), when AT&T designed the first touch tone phone they looked at keyboards for comptuers, and asked WHY, and were horrified to discover that there was no reason. AT&T then spent a lot of money to figgure out the best arrangement for the number keys and put that on the phone.
Data input? (Score:1)
If it has Newton-style on the fly handwriting recognition, that would be WAY cool.
Even cooler (but unlikely) would be voice recognition or OCR via the camera module
Ahh, the wonders of technology! (Score:1)
At least it looks like the flimsy cover isn't actually wired, so replacements won't cost an arm and a leg.
Re:Ahh, the wonders of technology! (Score:2)
Im not ready yet (Score:2)
MP3 capability - letter from SONY-Ericsson (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.wanna-save.dk/specialtilbud/defa
Price: About $50.
I plan on buying a P800 ASAP (MP3 or not - it ROCKS) and sent SONY-Ericsson a letter asking about MP3 support, they answered:
Dear Sir/Madam,
Thank you for contacting Sony Ericsson,
With regard to your enquiry, the P800 does not have a built in MP3 player.
Details of compatibility with accessories are not currently available.
For further available information regarding this product you should log onto
our website www.sonyericsson.com
Should you require any further assistance please do not hesitate to
contact us.
Kind regards
Mike Rowlands
SonyEricsson Customer Support
Telephone: 08705 237 237
Fax: 0845 300 2439
Email: questions.gb@sonyericssonmobile.com
-----Original Message-----
Sent: 23 April 2002 18:49
To: questions.gb@support.sonyericsson.com
Subject: Contact form CWS
Product: MP3 Handsfree HPM-10
Opinion: Buying a HPM-10 I wonder: Will it work with the P800 or will the
P800 have a more practical builtin MP3 capabilities and a flashmemory
expansion slot of sorts? (yes, I can actually imagine listening to music
during a boring meeting).
Thanks
Best regards.
Looks like a mockup to me (Score:2)
I also see the shadow of the pen looking like a artists mockup. Shouldn't there be some reflection?
If they can build this it looks good for those who insist on having a phone AND PDA in one device. I personally like the option of wireless connectivity between phone, pda, headset, etc. Keep the phones disposable and pack as much as possible into the PDA. IMHO.
LoB
Smartphone P800/P802 Whitepaper (PDF) (Score:2, Informative)
Wonder if mic and speaker is accessible by apps (Score:2)
Phillip.
Re:screw it (Score:1)
Legally, in 19 states you are *required* to carry liability on giant killer attack robots, so it's not like you can ignore it. I'm not sure if this applies to the small and large classes of attack robots or not.
And don't even get me started on the attack robot taxes...
Re:Specs for this badass...(for the SI challenged) (Score:1)
H: 4.6in
W: 2.3in
D: 1.1in
Weight: 5.6oz (.35lbs)
----------