Build a PC Inside of a Mac 142
jherro writes: "Looking for the coolest case on the block? Already have enough fish tanks? Then might just want to build a PC inside of your old classic mac. Makes a great little mp3 server. Sadly, the mirror at angelfire
will probably be faster than the original at Smuniverse." Finding a cheap 9" monitor would be a nice trick, too.
Hmm. (Score:3, Funny)
"What's that steaming puddle of plastic for?"
"It's my new Athlon Mac SE. You like it?"
--saint
Re:Hmm. (Score:1)
Ah, I see... (Score:4, Funny)
*chuckles* (Score:1)
Although, I don't find the old Mac case all that beautiful. Interesting, yes, and certainly innovating at the time, but I wouldn't want one on my desk.
Re:Ah, I see... (Score:2)
Re:Ah, I see... (Score:1)
Barf. (Score:2, Flamebait)
Besides, I just got a decent 9" (monochrome) SVGA monitor for $5. Just gotta know where to look...
Re:Barf. (Score:2)
Sadly, the 9" screen was a single item.
Re:Barf. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Barf. (Score:2)
I choose not to take a stance on use milk cartons at this time. Some of those were classics.
Re:Barf. (Score:1)
Actually, this is more like building a hotrod from a Model T wreck when the veteran enthusiasts has given up on it.
O.K, an SE/30 in working order is still a cool machine, but it isn't really unique. If you really want to barf, check out http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/~vance/www/vaxbar.html [arizona.edu] . .
Re:Barf. (Score:1)
These things are dead as doornails. One actually has scorchmarks on the video/powersupply board, and that's the one that at least boots, but doesn't display any video. Talking to some mac repair people, it appears that fixing them isn't really practical, and most likely impossible. I might be able to get 5 bucks for both on ebay, or I can do something fun with them, and this project might be a good thing to try.
Though I would agree with you if they were working. I also have a completely functional Mac Plus that will not be ripped apart.
vintage???? (Score:2)
Amost any 8 bit (save for post-Pet Commodore [VIC-20, C64]) would be vintage micro,the handful of Z-8000 and 68000 (not 68020 or later), and non-pc-compatible 8086 (generally *not* 8088) would really be the *later* limit for what might be vintage. You could stretch by arguing for the original (pre-XT) IBM PC as a transition from classic to commodity, but htat's as late as you can possibly get.
hawk
Re:vintage???? (Score:1)
Maybe I just like non-x86 machines.
Re:Barf. (Score:1)
Yeah - much better to let them get composted at the dump, isn't it! Then at least you know they're being used! Oh hang on...
Re:Barf. (Score:2)
Re:Barf. (Score:2)
Re:Barf. (Score:1)
Emulation (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Emulation (Score:2)
Wanna race?
Re:Emulation (Score:1)
Re:Emulation (Score:2)
Why the hell would you have the CD drive rear mounted? Some people have absolutely no style.
and *so* appropriate (Score:2)
In it's time, the SE/30 was pure brilliance. Mac had two lines, the little all-in-ones, and the Mac II line wiht the faster processors. The SE/30 was, essentially, the Mac IIx (top of the line) in an SE (bottom or near bottom) of the line case. It cost about $1000 more than the base SE, and only had the single expansion slot, but it was actually marginally *faster* than the IIx as it didn't have to deal with the nuBus.
I bought one in late 1989, and it was more than sufficient to run my law office from late '89 until it got replaced with a powerbook in Fall '93.
[Note that the replacement wasn't because it was no longer adequate, but because of stability problems from putting Chip Merchant memory in the second bank--at the time they had a (deserved) reputation for sloppy manufacture: the SIMM was a mm or two two wide, and cracked the slot. It's really amazing it lasted as long as it did with rubber cement holding the socket together . .
Anyway, the point is that Apple offered all of the horsepower of the very top of the line in the base system for a cost that was a fraction of the price differential--at a cost of the exandability that very few would need. Let's face it: how often do you add more than one card after you buy a system instead of replacing it outright (yes, I have, too, but it's still the exception).
I put in a controller for a 19" 1024x768 1 bit monitor--amazing for it's time, if nothing today.
anyway, an Imac/30 is an idea that should be *constantly* running around apple--keep the basic unit, with it's display, but offer a faster processor.
hawk, who still has a couple of pieces and the ROM's from Damien [1]
[1] hey, I *didn't* say we got along--the first tome the monitor swiveled 720 degrees in it's mount, it was named . .
Re:and *so* appropriate (Score:1)
Re:and *so* appropriate (Score:1)
No, the Classic II was pretty much a bottom-of-the-line LC II in a Classic case, and a poor replacement for the SE/30 (no expansion slots, 10 MB RAM ceiling as opposed to 128MB for the SE/30, and a 32-bit CPU on a 16-bit data bus), although it was significantly cheaper. A resurrected SE/30 at the time would have been a Quadra 700 in a Classic case, which would have been a kick-ass machine back in October 1991..
Re:Emulation (Score:1)
Re:Emulation (Score:1)
Re:Emulation (Score:2)
It depends on how you define "work." You're not going to use an Apple II (or other vintage computer) to (for instance) write videoconferencing software, but lots of people used 'em all the time in the 80s and early 90s for word processing, BBSing, etc. On the few occasions that I need to grind out a letter, I'd probably use Word 2000 now...but there's no reason I couldn't use AppleWorks 3.0 to do that if I wanted. (Hell, I haven't bothered porting the maintenance log for my car...it's still on my IIGS, which still gets fired up after an oil change or whatever.)
Some things (like web browsing) are a little more difficult to pull off, but they're still doable. The first browser I used was Lynx on a shell account, dialed in to either UNLV or Access Nevada with my II. I still use text-based mail and news clients (Mutt and trn, respectively); trn, in particular, isn't all that different from the rn that I learned 12 or 13 years ago. Finding an ISP today that would support that type of usage would be more difficult...but if you can live without the chrome, I think an Apple IIe with 128K, AppleWorks, and ProTERM (or something comparable if your tastes in vintage computing swing some other way) would still do the level of stuff that your average AOLer would do with a computer (write letters, send email, etc.). At least it would never display pr0n popups, punch-the-monkey banners, or the goatse.cx guy...
Re:Emulation (Score:2)
Someone actually thought my post was serious?!?!?!
Ok, my C64 with toast all your Crays, baby!
Is my sarcasm too subtle, is this too close to the truth, or are some people just a little dense?
Re:Emulation (Score:2)
News flash (Score:5, Funny)
MP3 Jukebox (Score:1)
But isn't there some solution to set up your vast song database on your main server in another room and tell 'em to server your AUX-input of your normal Hifi Equip. by a (obviosly non IR) remote controller?
Anyone any experience?
Re:MP3 Jukebox (Score:1)
Re:MP3 Jukebox (Score:2)
Perhaps you mean A-UX input?
-fester (who had the a-ux floppy-based install somewhere...)
The guy (Score:2)
Re:The guy (Score:1)
Re:The guy (Score:1)
Faster...Stronger...Better... (Score:2, Interesting)
Isn't there enough room around the edges to bolt a 10" LCD panel in, then just configure to use the visible part?
Cheap 9" monitors (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Cheap 9" monitors (Score:2)
Re:Cheap 9" monitors (Score:3, Funny)
Well then. These would be perfect for this project.
Re:Cheap 9" monitors (Score:1)
Greg
Re:Cheap 9" monitors (Score:1)
Yeah, I know. It wouldn't be much of a joke otherwise, would it?
9" monitor? No thanks. (Score:2, Funny)
/me wants one :)
I shudder.. (Score:1)
I knew I had seen this before... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:I knew I had seen this before... (Score:1)
"I did not hack the original keyboard or mouse to work with my computer. The main reason is because i don't actually have either one. It should not be too hard theoretically to create a PS2 compatible keyboard using the stock parts to work with this computer."
At any rate, it's a cool hack.
Re:I knew I had seen this before... (Score:2)
Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not try something similarly imaginitive with old Macs? It would be interesting to see what a machine code programmer and some control outputs could do. Certainly automate a bedroom at least. Replacing it with a PC is dull and an old Mac is far cheaper than a 68000 based embedded development board and better documented than a lot of embedded developement boards. Re-program, skew, take out of context but don't ditch the heart and soul of the machine.
If you want a wacky case take up shop lessons and learn to work metal, don't destroy the past (with some effort and time spent).
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:5, Funny)
Turducken [thesalmons.org] to the rescue.
Yes, I've had one and yes, they do taste great.
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:2, Interesting)
Another historical excess. King Henry VIII was keen on things like that, probably tasted of borage or whatever other herbs they used at the time.
There were Indian recipes like this too; a few centuries ago a dish was cooked up for the Indian royals. It composed of an ox stuffed with a goat, stuffed with a hare or rabbit stuffed with a peahen, stuffed with a quail which was finally stuffed with a finch. Each animal was de-boned in one piece, then marinaded in a different spice sauce and then roasted. To serve it was sliced crossways.
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:1)
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:2)
I wonder what that kind of technology would be like now...
/Brian
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:1)
Re:Why not stuff a chicken with a turkey. (Score:2)
Hardly innovative by the time of the Amiga--the Atari 400/800 had that!
The Ataris had a "display list" which indicated how manyy pixels to put in the line, what depth to use, how many times to repeat each screenline, and how many times to use this information. A trivial example would be the Apple II graphics modes, which used either 4 bit at 40/line repeated 8 times, or the high resolution with 1.2 bits (or whatever you want to call that), both with 4 lines of text at the bottom. Apple had these hard-wirecd; Atari let you do any combo you could conceive of on a line-by-line basis.
Also, you could specify where in memory the display started--so you could shake/move the screen by adjusting that adress.
hawk
Alternate Choices (Score:4, Informative)
quick search on google only finds 9 inch monitors in monochrome, and ten inch color. He uses a ViewMagic [google.com], which currently only shows a 10" color available as new product.
odd fish indeed.
Re:Alternate Choices (Score:1)
I could use one of those in my office... (Score:3, Funny)
"Ah HA! Is that a Mac I see on your Desk!? FINALLY saw the light, did you?"
"Oh, yes indeed I did, now go away while I play some Dungeon Siege on it".
Re:I could use one of those in my office... (Score:1)
(If you are using something else, I apologize)
How About A Power Mac Tower? (Score:2)
Has anybody managed to convert a PowerMac case into a case accepting any standard-sized PC motherboard and related internal parts? This PC inside of an LC is kind of neat, but what we all really want is a Power Mac case.
-Waldo Jaquith
Re:How About A Power Mac Tower? (Score:3, Informative)
~Philly
Re:How About A Power Mac Tower? (Score:2)
By the way - The pictures on the site aren't the most current. I have the CD-ROM flipdoor installed now, and the floppy drive is gone. I put in some rounded cables on the inside, and I fixed the wiring up some more.
Re:How About A Power Mac Tower? (Score:1)
Hmmm (Score:2)
I expect it'll be a much, much easier mod than a classic Mac conversion, but it'll also be more useful when I'm done.
Re:Hmmm (Score:1)
Sucked in! Mine's just missing the disk drive.
DD.
Don't destroy a WORKING mac (Score:1, Insightful)
There are probably a few to be found on eBay, but there are many Mac users (like myself) who love collecting classic Macs. They are getting harder and harder to find, and the prices keep increasing, so please check around first for one that no longer works. It'd be a shame destroying a piece of history.
Re:Don't destroy a WORKING mac (Score:1)
The University will generally have a Mac lab.
The University will also probably have a surplus store.
The one near where I live has Pallets and pallets of them that nobody wants...they're probably destined for the landfill...quite a shame about that...
The ULTIMATE... (Score:1, Funny)
Wouldn't it be more fun with a grape colored iMac???
Nice disguise..... (Score:2, Funny)
Perfect for MacOS X on Intel (Score:1)
[just after hell freezes over and Microsoft GPL Windows]
Re:Perfect for MacOS X on Intel (Score:1)
These guys equips SE/30:s with G3-processors
--
We don't need no stinkin' x86-cpu
G4 Tower case (Score:2)
Re:G4 Tower case (Score:2)
Go to compusa.com and look for FMI 300-watt screwless. It's about $60 online.
/Brian
Stupid Macintosh Tricks (Score:2)
ANyway, though: what i would be very interested to see is this: There was a product available for the very early macintoshes-- the classic nine-inch one-piece ones that the current discussion is about-- that looked WIERD but was really just about the ultimate case mod.
Here is a link to a picture taken out of the Macintosh Bible edition i originally heard of this thing in.. just look at it. [io.com] It was called the MacChimney, or something, and as the name suggests it was basically a chimney for your macintosh. You'd go in with some tools and install this thing, and your macintosh would suddenly be about twice as tall and have this cone-like thing sticking off the top with a big stovepipe at the top.
The advantage to this was, the product had been designed in such a way that between the chinmey and the way it affected the air circulation inside the case, once the chimney was installed you no longer needed a fan. At all. So you'd remove the fan and get a literally totally silently-running macintosh.
So, basically, since we are talking about putting a PC inside of a classic macintosh, my question is this:
MacChimney (Score:2)
smuniverse?? (Score:2)
Re:smuniverse?? (Score:1)
Hell - I didn't even know his name was James until more than a year after I met him!
Well, that was stupid. (Score:4, Insightful)
It's a useless mirror now...
Workgroup Server (Score:2)
~LoudMusic
How about putting a Mac into a Classic Mac? (Score:2)
Don't rip apart that classic Mac... (Score:1)
Sadly... (Score:1)
MP3 Server? Pfah (Score:1)
Something like this would make a great semi-portable for gaming with friends. Put a decently quick system in it with a decent video card, and make fun of your friends that have their tricked out cases with handles on 'em. You can get your system to a friend's place with less weight AND have the monitor built in.
Still not as portable as a laptop, but a hell of a lot better than a tower case and a 17" monitor for LAN parties and the like.
-l
9 and 10" monitor source for anyone in the UK (Score:1)
They do them for £10, and the monitors are great. From old POS terminals, but they're very clean with no burn and can handle 800x600 at 24bpp!
They also throw in cool telescopic stands; I have two flanking my main 19" CRT like mickey mouse ears. Perfect for throwing debug windows etc out onto... and a 3-monitor setup for £30 (including a tenner for a PCI dual-head Matrox card) really ain't bad.
Last time I was down there they had hundreds left in the warehouse so if they're not on the list anymore give 'em a call.
More Mac wackyness (Score:1)
Temporarily Unavailable (Score:1)
The Angelfire site you are trying to reach has been temporarily suspended due to excessive bandwidth consumption.
The site will be available again in approximately 1 hours!
LOL.... another one slashdoted:))))
Re:Temporarily Unavailable (Score:2)
Temporarily Unavailable
The Angelfire Excessive Bandwidth Consumption Page you are trying to reach has been temporarily suspended due to excessive bandwidth consumption.
The error will be accessible again in approximately 1 hours!
Wow, imagine a B... (Score:1)
What about the 486 expansion card? (Score:1)
Cool Idea (Score:1)
Re:just a question.. (Score:2)