The Guts Of An iPAQ 66
slashdot.org writes: "For anyone interested in the bowels of the iPAQ, this guy has taken one appart and put about a zillion pictures on a website. This may help for that in-dash installation you've been thinking about ;)" Cool engineering inside -- interesting to see the various companies that make the pieces going into one of these things, and a brave guy to take one apart. (iPAQs are still about 3 years from eBay prices for me.)
Cost effective? (Score:1)
Re:Cost effective? (Score:1)
Nope... (Score:1)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:2)
That's 1/4 the samples per second you would get out of a regular sound card, or out of a Rio or similar dedicated mp3 player. I don't recall if it's stereo or not. At any rate it's low grade.
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:3)
There are some hardware limitations in the current breed that are moderately annoying, and the reason why I'm not even considering droping a wad of cash on one until the next model has been out for quite a while. It's not even a matter of saving up my pennies. I've got the money, but it would feel like a waste.
The button controller on the iPaq has a bug. You can only get events from one button at a time. This means there's no way to have button-controlled games on it.
The audio is a little more limited than it has to be. They chose to use the built-in audio capability you have when you combine an SA1110 and an SA1111 -- this is 16 bit 11khz. So, although it has all the processor oomph you need, it won't make much of an mp3 player.
I hope that, if they do come out witha new ipaq that addresses these concerns, they keep the case the same and of course the sleeve interface the same. It's a great product, with two annoying shortcomings.
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:3)
This is a long dead thread, but, What the hell. I'll get the last word in anyhow.
Yes, I have heard the audio from an ipaq.
iPaqs are extremely common in my workplace. We aquired a case of them. Yes, a case. We have connections. And all of them are running Linux.
Several of my coworkers contribute to the handhelds.org effort. I have not only heard an ipaq play mp3s, I have heard an ipaq in a PCMCIA sleeve with a WaveLan card play mp3's off a wirelessly mounted NFS volume.
I realize most of you mundanes can't tell the difference in audio quality between your Rio, or whatever. It doesn't mean it's not there.
The SA1110 + SA1111 combination is capable of 16 bit 11khz audio. Period. Says so in the datasheet. Known fact. Not up for dispute. Just because you think it sounds great doesn't mean that it's not extremely limited.
Another problem just as big (Score:1)
These things have a big problem with getting dust under the screen, making for an annoying experience. It's incredible the number of iPaqs that have been returned and replaced — Compaq deserves a lot of credit for their responsiveness to their customers — it makes me wonder if these things would be so hard to find if not for all the machines that have gone out as replacement models to people already using the platform. I'm under the impression that they can't fix this problem for the 3670, although I'm curious to see if they fix the button problem. I'm not looking to ditch my Casio E-125, but I wouldn't mind adding an iPaq as a second PDA if Compaq would get these two problems ironed out.
Cheers,
Warranty (Score:1)
Same for my damned nokia.
Re:4p! (Score:3)
Re:Processor? (Score:1)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:2)
A few corrections here: the iPAQ doesn't use the SA-1111; it has a Philips UDA1341 codec attached directly to serial port 4 on the SA-1110 processor. Take a look at the hardware design description [handhelds.org], section 1.6, for more information. The codec, which is used in a number of designs (including Spot [wearablegroup.org]), will go up to 44.1kHz (16-bit, stereo). This is true even when used with the SA-1111, which supports the same sampling quality.
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:1)
Re:Warranty (Score:2)
Great. Computers caught up with cars in less than half the time. I remember my father's car being held together with bailing wire, a coat hanger, and some paper-clips (I kid you not). Try that now-a-days on one of these new fangled cars. Now computers are getting the same way.
Of course I admit that I have been explaining why I build my own system to my Fiance as being comprable to guys who build their own car, so maybe the analogy holds more weight then I thought.
That's nothing! (Score:1)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:1)
---------------
Re:Why, God? (Score:2)
What if the IBM BIOS was not hacked on? IBM would still be the only PC maker. Would that be good? What if that one kid did not hack DVD? We wouldn't have no DVD playback (on linux anyway). And if in 3 months someone has made something really cool based on this guys hacking of his ipaq, well, it would be worth it, no?
I can understand you want one, but sacrifices have to be made. I hope this brave guy can get his back together tho'
--
Re:Tables (Score:1)
But damned if he isn't running Win2k and IIS . . .
So Dale, how is that IIS treating you? When was MM DD, 2000 in Earth years?
-Peter
PS: If you don't know what I am talking about, look at the hit counter at the bottom.
"There is no number '1.'"
Re:Tables (Score:1)
Mozilla does not wrap within tables (To be totally honest, I don't know which is "correct.") which means that I had to scroll the page for EVERY LINE I READ! What is the "fatigue factor" of scrolling left to right and back again for EVERY FUCKING LINE?
So, I'm not an idiot, I just don't use IE. (Which, in my opinion is a small amount of evidence that I am not an idiot. Especially in light of a recent slashdot story . .
What really blows my mind is that a genius "human factors engineer" can't secure a slashdot login for himself.
-Peter
"There is no number '1.'"
Re:Why, God? (Score:1)
He Should Have Bought The Extended Warranty. (Score:1)
Why, God? (Score:1)
Before you say "Well, he could put it back together," can you imagine the amount of effort it would take to put something that complex back together? It's like chopping off a dog's leg then saying "Well, we'll put it back once we're done."
Why can't people just leave the technology alone, interface with it through the normal channels, and stop trying to "tweak" it? Isn't it enough that it's a *#(@ iPaq?!?!?!?!! Just be glad that you have one and don't destroy it!
------
That's just the way it is
A boon for Altivec? (Score:2)
Here here. (Score:1)
Put together nicely enough when you cracked it open, but I never could figure out why it randomly rebooted itself on me. To their credit, they did send out a replacement unit before we returned the buggy one. After chewing out multiple people on their end.
With four racks full of Compaq servers and a mess of workstations, you'd think you'd get slightly better treatment than that.
On the bright side, I learned to save early and often?
i unpaqued (Score:3)
Re:Why, God? (Score:5)
Why did people have to take apart the math theories of the Pythagorean crowd? It was good enough in their hands alone. I mean nobody else needs that knowledge, right? We should leave stuff like that into the hands of professionals alone.
Especially those computers. I mean, what would happen if just anyone could make one in their garage? I mean, those pros at Apple never started by tinkering, I bet!
Not quite the last word (Score:3)
11k is not that bad. It's only one octave short of 20khz, which is generally accepted as the limit of human hearing. There is very little musical energy in this top octave. It merely adds a sense of 'air' or 'space'. I know from experience (working in professional sound) that you can have a great-sounding sound system that is mostly or completely lacking the top octave. For example, the Meyer MSL-10's [meyersound.com] used by Ultrasound on the Grateful Dead tours top out at 12khz. Out of the many things that contribute to great sound, this top octave is not one of the most important.
Anyhow, people seize on numbers like this because the things that affect the quality of digital audio playback are so complicated that it's tempting to focus on something simple and understandable. I would bet that there are serious problems with the ipaq's dac/amplifier that greatly outweigh the loss of one octave. By the same token, 16 bits is overkill for a device like this, because it implies 96dB dynamic range, which can't be accomplished in a small battery-powered device. Even good electronics running on split 15volt supplies have trouble reaching 90dB dynamic range (ratio of loudest signal to noise floor). To phrase it differently, the least significant bits of this DAC might as well be disconnected because they cannot output a signal that will rise above the noise floor.
Re:Why, God? (Score:1)
Ipaq's are available at handheldcanada.com! (Score:1)
HandHeldCanada [handheldcanada.com]
Plus, if you get the "expedited delivery", that takes care of some broker fee that would otherwise apply on items shipping from Canada to the US.
Just be aware, that you may get a call from your credit card company, b/c they originally denied this charge (due to the fact that I was an american charging to a company based in Canada). In spite of that, I ordered my Ipaq Sunday night and received it on Thursday!
Re:Why, God? (Score:1)
Re:Agreed - Compaq desktops are sketchy (Score:1)
Re:Agreed - Compaq desktops are sketchy (Score:1)
I'm convinced that your problems are because Compaq's Presario line is intended as cheap, cute, "Mom & the kids" type machines, much like HP Pavilions and the like. Such models tend to be flaky and made from questionable hardware. Back in the Deskpro's heyday, you got a much more reliable machine -- and paid top dollar for it too.
Re:Agreed - Compaq desktops are sketchy (Score:1)
Re:Here here. (Score:1)
:)
Webring (Score:1)
IPAQ troubles (Score:1)
Agreed - Compaq desktops are sketchy (Score:4)
The Compaq PC have generally been nothing but trouble for our group. They lock up regularly, particularly on CAD or other graphic intensive work. They also are just generally rather flakey. Nothing huge, but it's kind of like the death of a thousand paper cuts. Weirdness with service packs, stability issues, odd software conflicts, etc. It just eats at you little by little until you are ready for some "percussive maintenance".
The other machines we have aren't without their quirks but the Compaq's seem to overall cause the most trouble. It's only the desktop PCs that seem to have issues. The servers and occasional laptop seem to work as well as any other make running Windows. Don't know why this is but it does seem to be an ongoing problem for us.
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:1)
As the rumors I've heard [pocketpcpassion.com] go, there are no plans to fix the button problems on the 3670. They might possibly be fixed in the 3690(?), but there are no official reports that I've seen about them.
Re:Why, God? (Score:2)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:2)
with so many pictures... (Score:1)
on a semi-serious note, while I'm not so sure this is *that* newsworthy, I applaud the author for his detail-oriented dissection.
Re:Been There, Done That (Score:1)
Let's See What This Baby Has Under The Hood (Score:1)
--
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:1)
Agreed. And beware the PRE SELL! It's staggering the number of people on eBay selling something, often burying in the hype or fine print that they don't really have it, but will ship it any-day-now when they actually have it. Pre-sells are a violation of eBay policy, but they don't police it very well. Probably the vigilance against the sale of human kidney's requires all of their effort.
--
Kewl Beenz® (Score:1)
I wonder what's inside of that box?
What did the other 8 of 9 look like?
Where'd all these leftover parts come from?
Did the MIR fungus really get burned up in re-entry or is it just waiting!?!?
Where'd that little spring shoot off to?
Do flamers really have beedie little eyes, protruding brows, pointed heads and buck-teeth?
Do other transistors think darlingtons look cute?
Is this thing now making a funny noise or didn't I notice it before?
Just who is Kally Spaeth and what do they have against The Committee?
Was it supposed to go back together this way?
If there's no seal, how will they notice it was opened?
I wonder if they'll even look at it if I take it back and exchange it for another one.
--
Re:Same here.... (Score:1)
Been there, that was how I made a living in highschool. Deliver papers for a whole year for $1,000 or fix a couple of electronic things I trash picked or got cheap and repaired for $100 a week. By all rights, I should be selling used cars and have a name like "Mike Dell", instead I run, mountain bike, and generally keep fit and hang out at the bar chasing babes all the time. Odd, this all started when I broke down and threw out all the old electronic junk I had in the basement...
I used to be cool. What happened?
Welcome to the dark side of the force! (Your taped glasses and pocket protector [slightly used] are in the mail.)
--
Re:Warranty (Score:1)
--
Re:Warranty (Score:2)
Gone are the days of user serviceable electronics. That is, unless your iPaq needs a new 12AX7
--
Re:Why, God? (Score:1)
---
Vollernurd.
Re:Radiohead (Score:1)
---
Vollernurd.
Re:Slashdot Weenie song (Score:1)
---
Vollernurd.
Re:Agreed - Compaq desktops are sketchy (Score:1)
At school I set up a Cad lab of P120 Compaqs, I have yet to see a lock up.
Bleh
Cool Beans (Score:1)
I would pick stuff up at garage sales, and fix it.
But now it seems like I can't afford the things I want to take apart. I'm glad to know that someone can. And I like that they showed me how.
Same here.... (Score:1)
Goddamn, I am a geek. I used to be cool. What happened? I was in a punk band!! I was an artist!! Now, I'm just a geek.
feedback to Compaq on wince bundling (Score:1)
Obsess much? (Score:1)
umm... freak != geek
Processor? (Score:1)
Been There, Done That (Score:1)
-----------------
Re:Why, God? (Score:1)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:2)
And even with the button bug, Super Mario Bros. 3 is perfectly playable with the 4-way pad + onscreen buttons. I've already beat SMB 1 on it :-)
Re:Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:2)
Support chip - Intel StrongARM SA1111: NOTE this chip is not used in the core H3600 unit, and cannot be used in expansion packs because it does not support the full SA1110 bus.
How about yet another "known fact":
The iPAQ H3600 onboard audio system communicates to a Philips UDA1341 code through SA-1110 serial port 4 (MCP/SSP). The port is programmed in I2S and L3 mode. Digital audio sample rates (8 KHz, 11.025 KHz, 22.05 KHz, 44.1 Khz) are generated by a hardware clock generator.
There. 44.1Khz sound is possible on the iPAQ, in full stereo. Discussion over (for real this time).
Best way to get an iPAQ (Score:4)
MAN O MAN.... (Score:1)
Re:Tables (Score:1)
Ipaq Nerd of the Year (Score:1)
Re: Ipaq nerd of the year (Score:1)
iPAQ Extended Battery (Score:1)