
Inexpensive Linux/BSD Handhelds 184
cloudscout writes, "The latest craze in handheld computing isn't the new Palm IIIc, it's the IBM WorkPad z50 currently being unloaded at ridiculously low prices by all sorts of discount Internet retailers. This device runs Windows CE 2.11 by default, however, a successful NetBSD Port means that this device could be the first widespread *NIX handheld. There's even a Linux Port in the works. The initial blowout saw these devices selling for under $250, but the huge demand has driven that price up to the $400 range now. Still cheap for a nearly full-sized system with 640x480 color LCD. "
I had a hand held.. (Score:1)
-slo bob
Possible uses?? (Score:1)
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
...but my favorite 'pi' program would have to be the Obfuscated C Contest entry that had a function that looked like a circle, and it said "To get a better approximation for Pi, write a bigger program." And it ran that function to mostly calculate Pi. I won't spoil the rest of it for you.
---
pb Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate [152.7.41.11].
Re:use the source, Luke! (Score:1)
Dear moderators: (Score:1)
Seriously, guys, please stop bumping up "gee, sounds like a loser idea to me whenever I've already got better" and "this has been posted before" bozos that apparently do nothing more than sit slack-jawed at their computers, giggling with glee when they see a new story pop up, and take the opportunity to flame the folks at Slashdot for possible having the gall to post a story a second time, or post a story well after another site has.
Jesus, people, get fucking lives.
Re:Why was this story only posted once? (Score:1)
Re:Palm "OS" trash gets the obscurity it deserves. (Score:1)
(Made ya look!)
Hard Drive? (Score:1)
All of the links that have the specs make the point that you can upgrade to 48MB memory easily. But, I did not see a single reference to storage space.
Can anyone here enlighten me?
Re:Typical (Score:1)
--
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
Good for you. But I'm guessing your laptop has less than 6 hours of battery life. That makes it next to useless as far as I'm concerned. I'd say for $500, you were ripped off. On the other hand, this device looks to be worth about that...
--
Re: Anyone know a UK supplier? (Score:1)
could find one of these?
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
Somehow, I doubt you'll get them at $300 now that everyone who's selling them are being /.'ed.. ;)
got one! (Score:1)
Now I just have to figure out if I'm up to learning how to get NetBSD onto it and maybe I'll be set. That and a network card. Yay!
No, that's a Pilot (Score:1)
----
Yes you can! (Score:1)
with any sort of net connectivity (including mobile) that you like!
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
I think I'll hang on to my Thinkpad 701, it's about the same size (just a bit thicker) and it has a bigger screen. Runs Debian just fiiine too. Excellent for playing nethack on train trips. And the folding 'butterfly' keyboard impresses people. :-)
Too bad the battery is dying, though... Anyone know where I can get replacement batteries for a 701C in .nl?
Re:XFree has QNX support (Score:1)
The server for my card didn't work until I patched it - for some reason, locking the console locked up the machine, and the API never returned. After working around this, xinit wouldn't work unless I was root. You need a beta (?) version of Watcom C to compile XFree86, and I wasn't willing to put that on a machine where I compile production code. I ended up putting off getting it to work for the forseeable future.
Mind you, the X11R5 package we got from QSSL was just as bad, and never worked either.
Re:Dear moderators: (Score:1)
Then maybe I'd post an article to slashdot that talks about x86 mininotebooks that run linux and BSD, and some people would think "gee that's cool" and buy those and maybe not like them as much as they'd like a z50.
The point is that it is worthwhile to discuss alternatives in the same forum as the thing itself, therefore allowing readers to compare options and think for themselves.
What a waste! (Score:1)
anything that cant be operated while running is NOT a palmtop.
Re:Wait for crusoe (Score:1)
No.
If someone needs a machine today, they should buy one today. The machines tomorrow will always be much better. After 15 or 20 years of desktop computers, hasn't that lesson been learnt yet?
Re:Cool. (Score:1)
Re:Wait a minute (Score:1)
I don't know if the current stock of palmtop/pda machines can really have all of these features (no USB port, no PCMCIA, parallel port, serial port, etc) Let alone the ability to run lynx over the wireless ethernet card.. (Or maybe netscape with a special version of X)..
The possibilities for a small PC are much greater than the current crop of PDA/Palms...
Dont you think?
WorkPad details? (Score:1)
What's the deal here?
Re:You must be 14... (Score:1)
Yes, there were 186's. But they were soon superceded by the blazing might of the 286 a few months later, so no one used them.
~~~~~~~~~
auntfloyd
Pricewatch.com (Score:1)
Re:Wait for crusoe (Score:1)
I'm not a Linux expert so for people like me it's nice to be able to put a standard copy of Mandrake 7 on a machine and just download x86 rpms of which there are many.
I'd also like to be able to play quake on it
-idealego
Crotchety old man... (Score:1)
And not so crotchety('hey damn kids get off my lawn')
But I happen to find my IBM personal portable computer JUST FINE thank you. In case of wondering yes it is that 30 pound _portable_ offered by IBM back sometime long ago. It cost me 5 bucks. It has a blazin 186 processor, and 612 whole kb of ram(with a delay time soooo slow it takes 30 seconds to count it all up during boot). But yeah baby, I can MOVE on this badboy. It has a full sized 8 inch CRT monitor built in. No hd to slow it down, and 2-count 'em 2 5.25inch floppy drives.
When I was a kid(wait i still am) we didn't have these Ninos and Palmpilots. You'd be lucky if you're "laptop" didn't crush your manlihood beyond recognition. The only thing we had to worry about screwing our transistors was rats(you're wimpy Pentiums getting screwed up by radiation, ha, ha).
I like to fire up my blazin 186 every now and then and goat over how much _faster_ mine is that both MIR and all the Apollo spacecraft. I'll take my 186 with 612kb of ram anyday over you're winCE devices, ick.
(And before you come over and beat me senseless with you're "mice" yes I am joking)
Re:Why not? (Score:1)
to do something useful - wait... nooo... there's no mips-linux nor mips-netbsd
port of setiathome
Re:Still holding out for ScreenMedia (Score:1)
Re:Are you trying to unload your stock? (Score:1)
Becuase it's not $800. You can get it right now for less than $400. If you were lucky (like me), you could have ordered one when it was less than $300 (shipped!).
Now I just have to get a Compact Flash and figure out how I can dual boot WinCE and NetBSD/hpcmips. Oh, oh; I think I'm about to geek-out.
Still holding out for ScreenMedia (Score:1)
I want to be able to read the Wall Street Journal on-line edition and Slashdot at the breakfast table, or in bed, or on the couch without having to worry about a keyboard and mouse. The ScreenMedia device seems to be the perfect wireless solution.
Anyone have new information? Their website looks the same as it did months ago...
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
Right make, wrong model. Take a look here [zdnet.com]for a ZDNet review.
Re:"Moving parts" are not the main problem in lapt (Score:1)
let me repeat that
yes!
From my laptop, I want a big screen, good keyboard, large harddrive, long batterylife. Notice how processor speed a was abstent from my requirements. I'm thinking a 486 or even a 386 (hell all I do is use emacs anyway) would do me just fine.
Hey laptop makers! lookie here! This is a market segment waiting for your attention.
Johan
Re:Why? (Score:1)
I've actually been toying with completely unmounting my harddrive in my laptop -- it has enough ram to hold a decent sized ramdisk and still have enough memory to work out of. By completely spinning down the harddisk, I hope to be able to extend the battery life to almost an hour (So I was a cheapskate and bought the noname brand. Now I'm paying for it). The only reason I would be willing to do this is because I know that my system is stable enough never to crash.
not my fault! (Score:1)
If i erase that space, another random space is inserted somewhere else!
:-(
Re:Wait for crusoe (Score:1)
they probally ment they havent developed PPC morphing
-my
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
I say "was" because at the time of the WorkPad z50 price drop, IBM had already dropped it from its store and elsewhere on its site. I presume it's in the process of being discontinued. Not that that's an issue so much, with a CE 3.0 coming RSN, and ongoing ports of NetBSD and (at least in theory) Linux.
WorkPad z50 specs:
131MHz MIPS VR4131 CPU
16MB RAM
8.4" passive-matrix display, 640x480
1 PCMCIA Type 2
1 CF slot
Upgrade socket for 32MB SO-DIMM
VGA out
mic in/spkr out
TrackPoint (that's right, no touch screen.)
Sorry, this is all from memory, as mine is currently _in the shop_. Doh!
Re:Hard Drive? (Score:1)
Re:Wait for crusoe (Score:1)
I'm going to wait for the time-machine cpu. This will be a cpu that sends itself far enough back in time for each process to complete just after it has started. That way, I can start a job that will take years and years of cpu-time, but to me will finish instantaneously.
Where am I going to get such a machine? Well, I'm sure that they are available in the future, so I'll just wait for a future-me to send one back. Hey, a package just appeared on my desk...
Mike van Lammeren
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
Here's the link on Ebay [ebay.com]
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:1)
Cool. How many left? (Score:1)
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
It's not bad, but I'm selling it off now for $600, I don't use it anymore, I got a better job and don't do tech anymore
Laptops are somewhat nice, but really they're damn near useless in every day work for me, but when I worked tech it was great to bring my own comp and not deal with a shared pc(yuck). But when the servers you work on are several hundred miles a way whats the point? I don't really need to check my email in the car, come on now lets get serious whats the point?
You people are overreacting to a bottom of the line pos wanna-be laptop, true it's nice and thin but no mussle. I bet you own a webphone don't ya, come on now admit it you spent that extra money to get 3 lines of yahoo! on your phone. We need a slashdot pda, one that has only 4 functions:
1. read slashdot.org
2. check stock quotes
3. telnet
4. mp3 player
with a huge battery life of a week or more, running a curosoe.
When are they going to make some decent batteries? Maybe I should just carry a gasoline generator and plug the ac adaptor into it? I love that 2 ~ 3 hour battery life my lappy packed without power saving modes.
Where do you find these prices? (Score:1)
Re:Where do you find these prices? (Score:1)
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
Where is my mind?
mfspr r3, pc / lvxl v0, 0, r3 / li r0, 16 / stvxl v0, r3, r0
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:1)
Did you use > or < signs?
Where is my mind?
mfspr r3, pc / lvxl v0, 0, r3 / li r0, 16 / stvxl v0, r3, r0
Re:Wait a minute (Score:1)
It comes preinstalled with Windows CE, but you can install NetBSD or Linux?
I can see it now, geeks with no lives go marching onto microsoft marching on what they call a "Windows CE refund day".
Next thing you'll see is people wanting refunds cause they want to run Linux on their washing machines, not some proprietry crap.
I guess maybe Microsoft should produce hardware & software combos, then they wouldn't so much crap from people who see microsoft's licensing OSs to all sorts of manufacturers rather than control everything (eg. Windows CE compared to PalmOS/Palms, Windows compared to MacOS/Apple) as 'pure evil'.
Basically, people develop devices and software to run them, sell them (including cost of hardware & software development) noone cares.
Microsoft prefer to just write software, the license it to manufactueres so those with little software skill can easily create devices, everyone (at least here) start spouting "crap crap crap". The added advantage of Microsoft's model is that you *can easily* do things exactly like this, replace Windows CE with whatever you like.
And NT is VMW....WAS Re:MVS != VMS (Score:1)
WNT = VMS "done right"
Search for Cutler [dasburo.com]
mobile CONNECTIVITY with CDPD and Libretto (Score:1)
I've een thinking of replacing the current Win98 with some kine of *BSD, but I am not sure whether that will support the PCMCIA CDPD modem, so I haven't invested the time yet. Considering this is just a small comms machine, I also don't think it is worth it.
FJ!!
Re:Pen Input in Linux? (Score:2)
I think everybody is at least creating an onscreen soft keyboard first before worrying about handwriting recognition. I expect that right now the non-gpl code that OEM's will bundle with their distro's will have better performance for at least another 1-2 years...
They are pretty decent remote terminals (Score:2)
I tried the NetBSD port and was able to get it to boot up. Next step is to get ssh running.
There is also a Linux kernel port that will boot but isn't too useful as of yet. I haven't tried it out.
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:2)
These may be things are cheap 'cause they suck. (Score:2)
Re:$230 at IBM store.. (Score:2)
Here are the computer shopper Prices [zdnet.com] for IBM WorkPad Z3
And prices from auctionwatcers are Here [auctionwatchers.com]
Enjoy
--
Moderate this guy up! (Score:2)
It's brilliant.
Re:Wait a minute (Score:2)
I think the big hullabaloo about Windows Refund Day was not necessarily getting the $50 or so back. The real issue was that users had a contract with OEMs/Microsoft for a refund, but the OEMs and Microsoft wanted to back out on that contract. If they had just given those few people who asked their $50 (or however much) right away, it would not have become a cause celebre.
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:2)
Unfortunately, since IBM's discontinued it, there may not be enough demand at the $500-$1K price point. Too bad; in most ways the z50 was a much nicer machine than its competition (the HP Journadas and Compaq Aeros), being based on the rather slick Thinkpad 240 chassis. (The only problem is that it really ought to have had an 800x600 screen -- it's big enough.
I'm not sorry I bought mine; nothing better if you have to sit in a library all morning taking notes and in a cafe all afternoon writing your notes up, especially if you don't want to be bothered with carrying around a power supply or looking for electrical plugs. I just wish the Linux port was a little farther along.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Once again, go do research; time-sharing systems are not the same as server OS's. Unix was designed for users to, given a terminal, be able to do their daily work. That's not a "server OS" thing.
The clients were users, not other computers.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Yes, stability matters.
Overhead? Yes, even with X, Unix has dramatically lower overhead than MacOS or Windows. I've run Windows and Unix on the same system; the difference is quite visible.
And, as to your last question, why would I want what is now a generalized data-processing system on my palmtop?
BECAUSE WHAT I MOSTLY DO WITH COMPUTERS OF ANY SORT IS PROCESS DATA!
Yes, I'd like a palmtop that had a good programming language built in, or the ability to run shell scripts or C programs I wrote for Unix.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Anyway, Psion's OS is great if you want to do *exactly* what they built the machine for. Beyond that, it's a closed, proprietary system. If I want a small, stable, general purpose computer, my best bet is a palmtop running some kind of Unix.
WinCE is too unstable. EPOC and Palm are too specialized. Thus, enter Unix on a palmtop. Yes, it's what I'd want if I were getting something like a WorkPad.
I'm not saying "Unix is the only thing it would ever make sense to run on a palmtop". I'm saying it's not particularly irrational to pick a Unix-derived system for a palmtop, because it's fundementally a general-purpose user OS, not some kind of mainframe-oriented server OS.
In search of the perfect form factor (Score:2)
Basically, imagine something only slightly larger than a Pilot (but smaller than the z50 or these other "micro laptops"), with a thick clamshell design that evenly distributes the weight between the two halves.
The reason this would be cool is you could build it rugged as hell-- think a "metal with rubber trim" exterior-- and it would be perfectly suited for clipping onto a belt or whatnot. Just like a tape measure.
It would sure beat these super-delicate quarter-inch-thick Pilots and their flimsy plastic screen guards (well, as long as you don't want to slip it into that shirt pocket...
Re:$230 at IBM store.. (Score:2)
Why not? (Score:2)
The overhead is simply not an issue. You can fit a useful Linux distro on a floppy and run it on a 386. This is easily small and efficient enough for a palmtop.
Linux is nice because it's free and there's lots of free software for it. Why reinvent the wheel? Instead of needing a massive promotional campaign to get developers to make stuff for it, you've already got a pile of useful software.
Re:Still holding out for ScreenMedia (Score:2)
When this is a viable setup I'm starting a company that does it. Hmm, where's that Ask
--
Re:$230 at IBM store.. (Score:2)
Re:blind leading the blind (Score:2)
Duh read again, I said that Transmeta's hype was about being able to run *all those x86* binaries. Linux has x86 binaries, but a fraction of the total amount available, and ofcourse transmeta really meant windows apps, cause that's where all the apps everyone uses is.
The crusoe was designed with the giak of quickly emulating an x86, I know that it could possible codemorph other insutrction sets. And that wasn't what I said anywa, i said that it was low power *for an x86 clone* - eg, it can clone an x86 - not it was *low power for something that can only clone an x86*, what you say hardly applies since it would consume basically just as much power if it was cloning a PPC.
Re:Wait for crusoe (Score:2)
Most Windows CE devices run on very low powered CPUs, more os than the crusoe - which is only low powered *for an x86* clone. I'm quite suprised Windows CE devices stay on for as long as they do. Think about it, sound, 16bit colour, multitasking/threaded OS etc.
I don't see what transmeta is on about personally, the only viable real space i see is windows laptops.
They talk about the TM3120 running Linux on webpads, but then also say how cool it is cause it can run x86 binaries. Well sorry, Linux doesn't run most x86 binaries, so that liaves the TM5140 for notebooks. But then the power usage decrease is "ok" but not that much considering the CPU accounts for less than 50% of the notebook's power usage.
Re:Wait a minute (Score:2)
Re:Don't wait for crusoe (Score:2)
> on ebay and in 2ndhand computer stores, so most people can afford to run a desktop on something
Yes, I know. I'm looking for a used Sun Sparc or SGI (and even VAX!) for quite some time now, but it's not that easy here. (But I want one more for the hack value than for real work.)
BTW: I've used ARM2 and later StrongARM-driven Computers before I had to switch to x86 1 1/2 years ago. I still have them, but a NetBSD "make build" needs nearly one day on a 277MHz StrongARM (overclocked).
> else then x86... Oh, and it runs linux as well if you want..
As a second choice maybe.
> Anyway, RISC is not new, its in fact quite likely to be older then the average age of the posters on
> slashdot, so do not call it new technology or such
I haven't said that RISC is new.
I 've just called x86 old crap.
> maybe newer then plain cisc, but hybrid cpus have been around since at least end 70s and early 80s
Some dates:
First commercial CPU: 1971 (Intel 4004).
First commercial RISC CPU: 1987 (Acorn ARM2).
So RISC is still quite new in the microprocessor universe.
> Not that risc is not cool, it is, but it isn't the coolest thing since sliced bread or whatever,
I haven't said that. I've said "Crusoe is by far not as cool as those pure RISC CPUs".
Re:Wait a minute (Score:2)
Re:Wait a minute (Score:2)
use the source, Luke! (Score:2)
what could be easier? Try doing that with Microsoft's windows.
with enough eyes, all new hardware is shallow : )
Transmeta is working on that. (Score:2)
Transmeta was showing of a tablet at their presentation. I think you can still find it on their website. Now Linus (I think in an interview) said that the handwriting recognition software was better this week then the week before. Meaning that they work on it. If I am not mistaken the 400Mhz Crusoe was going to run the webpads using Mobile Linux. This means that there would be pen input for Linux in the near future.
Re:Why? (Score:2)
A commandline can be a very handy thing, didn't someone once say that 'the reason for windowing was to allow more xterms'?
If features of linux aren't needed, they can be deleted from the kernel, linux doesn't have to be restricted to being a 'server OS'.
Doubtlessly there are some companies using 'me too' factor, but alot of work has been done on embedded linux by other individuals,but linux is completely hackable, you can change it to make it fit your device - AND draw on previously written code, and lots of it - project managers love 'code reuse'....
just my $0.02
Why? (Score:2)
Linux is derived from UNIX. UNIX is a server OS. It is multi-user, with tough security and relitivly high system overheads. Even getting it into a usable desktop OS is a pretty big hack, so why force a server OS onto a palmtop? What advantages do people think there are to using Linux on a palmtop? Maybe they'll provide an ethernet port and allow multiple users to telnet in? Didn't think so.
The only reason i can see for companies to use Linux is the "Me too!" factor involved.
Re:Cool. (Score:2)
The itsy - did that have specifications? I think a project would be cool that was to make gpl circuit diagrams, so people can buy a crusoe [transmeta.com] cpu, compactflash [cfa.org] card, ethernet [national.com] driver and a touchscreen lcd - and make a hell funky pda.
Linux PDA (Score:2)
Re:mobile CONNECTIVITY, not just computing (Score:2)
Are you trying to unload your stock? (Score:2)
Sounds like a loser move to me.
Anomalous: inconsistent with or deviating from what is usual, normal, or expected
Pen Input in Linux? (Score:2)
-
Re:use the source, Luke! (Score:2)
Why this is a win (Score:2)
If you like your P90 notebook, I'm glad for you. But it's not comparable to the WorkPad by any stretch.
Why was this story only posted once? (Score:3)
How to install NetBSD on the Workpad (Score:3)
Re:Here's some more details of the z50 (Score:3)
1. 2.7 pounds.
2. No touchscreen.
3. Full keyboard.
This is NOT a palmtop folks. As a handheld it is more like a low power low graphic low memory low expansion ultralight, than a color palmpilot.
Certainly I could see some uses for a product like this, but since I see people in this discussion talking about handwriting recognition I would like to suggest they make sure they understand the specs. This one uses a nubby eraser pointer like thinkpads and such do.
For some reason the performance chart for this says it has handwriting recognition but since it doesn't have a touch screen that seems sort of a part of the OS and not really relevant to the piece of hardware we are talking about.
D
Re:Why? (Score:3)
Unix has "high overheads"? Compare it to MacOS or Windows, and laugh.
Why do I run NetBSD on my laptop, instead of Windows? Because it's a more flexible desktop platform. Why would I run Linux on a PDA, instead of Windows CE? Because it would be a more flexible platform - to say nothing of "more stable".
But mostly, you're just plain wrong about a "server OS". Unix isn't a server OS, it's a desktop/workstation OS that happens to scale well. MVS is a server OS.
Re:Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:3)
Cool, It Runs Linux. (Score:3)
Wait a minute (Score:3)
Laptops are inexpensive. (Score:3)
I bought an extra ethernet/modem combo for 60$CDN and it runs linux (slackware) with X prefectly.
I don't know about these pda's or sub-laptops, but I think they must get a lot cheaper before they can compete with out-of-date computers.
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:3)
mobile CONNECTIVITY, not just computing (Score:3)
this might be a bit off topic, but if anyone is doing this sort of thing, gimme a heads up.
(and yes, I've read homepages of several libretto+cdcp people; I know itspossible and it's being done, I just want to know if peopel are happy with it and hear some more experiences.)
You aren't the intended target market (Score:3)
Instant-on and extremely long battery life (8 hours on a single charge) make this a convenient device for those of us who deal with on-call support. A 56k modem would be nicer than the 33.6k modem built-in, but all-in-all, simple support activities aren't too painful at 33.6k. VNC is even bearable.
I have the Novatel Wirless Merlin PCMCIA CDPD modem in mine, but the usefulness is limited in Windows CE since TCP/IP applications for that platform are crappy at best.
Your P133 may suit your needs just fine, however it is not going to have instant-on or the long battery life afforded by the WorkPad z50. The people who will use this aren't going to use it as a primary workstation. It's going to be a slight step above a mobile thin-client.
Typical (Score:4)
Re:Wait a minute (Score:4)
Yes it's bad that you'll be paying for a CE license when you won't be using it. However, if enough people request a BSD or ``blank'' version of the z50, I'm sure IBM will notice and offer that option.
Don't underestimate the value of BSD or Linux on this kind of machine. Fit it with a FE card, and you'll have a router/firewall/web-server/etc. Not that you would want to use it for production, but imagine coming to some customer as a networking consultant, technician, or whatever, then plugging in your handheld to the network - and instantly they have the transparant proxy and news server they needed temporarily
The OS is the computer.
user/developer of CE and z50's tries to explain (Score:5)
On a CE device the RAM is SRAM not DRAM. So the RAM's state is maintained when you power down. So you install everything into RAM. (Unless you also have a compact flash card).
CE is loaded from ROM, and the ROM's are masked - meaning not flash upgradable. But the bootloader and OS are installed into ROM. SO to boot Linux or NetBSD you run a CE app which is a bootloader for a bsd/linux kernel which is on a compact flash or pcmcia card. (Don't even get me started on the lack of protection in CE that allows you to do this) There is hope, on the z50 the ROM card is removable. On some other CE devices its soldered on. So there's a possibility of people selling linux distro's for the z50 that you just pop in... that will be a long time coming though...
In response to a response below this level - IBM is not going to offer NetBSD or Linux as an install option. Ha! Keep dreaming. They have just dropped this device, why would they go on and bother to do development for a dead platform?
Also, yes you can play MP3's on it. It has a fast 131mhz r41xx MIPS chip. IMO its the display driver on all CE devices that makes them seem so slow. (Oh, and probably WinCE)
Oh, and this is not a palmtop. Its a Jupiter class device. Its a mini-notebook sized device. Roughly the size of a Sony VAIO...
Here's a screen shot of a developer running X on a z50: http://pc1.peanuts.gr.jp/~kei/Xscreen.gif [peanuts.gr.jp]
Re:WorkPad details? (Score:5)
A product overview... [ibm.com]
More to come if I can find it..
Here's some more details of the z50 (Score:5)