See Boston Dynamics' Robots Bust Freakishly Good Moves On the Dance Floor (hothardware.com) 59
MojoKid summarizes an article from Hot Hardware: Boston Dynamics made news recently when 80% of the company was acquired by Hyundai. The company's family of robots is always impressive and now it appears they're having some fun to celebrate the close of 2020. Boston Dynamics' robot dog, Spot and its humanoid-like Atlas bot friend, were joined by their oddball sibling Handle to shake their booties on the dance floor to "Do You Love Me" by The Contours.
The video starts off impressive enough with just a single Atlas showing its incredible dexterity while busting out some sweet moves that would leave even the late Patrick Swayze envious. However, as the routine progresses, the camera pulls back to show that another twin Atlas is dancing along with the first one as they show off their synchronized and fresh rug-cutting ways. As this robotic soul train continues to roll, Spot the dog saunters in to join in on the fun with the distinct flare that only rover can bring. The entire 3 minute clip is really a marvel to behold, and maybe even slightly unsettling for some that might not fully welcome our robot overlords.
The video starts off impressive enough with just a single Atlas showing its incredible dexterity while busting out some sweet moves that would leave even the late Patrick Swayze envious. However, as the routine progresses, the camera pulls back to show that another twin Atlas is dancing along with the first one as they show off their synchronized and fresh rug-cutting ways. As this robotic soul train continues to roll, Spot the dog saunters in to join in on the fun with the distinct flare that only rover can bring. The entire 3 minute clip is really a marvel to behold, and maybe even slightly unsettling for some that might not fully welcome our robot overlords.
It's just a PR piece... (Score:5, Insightful)
But it's a very well done PR piece. I quite enjoyed it.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
... except that Boston Dynamics has been making nifty demo videos for 15 or 20 years now, and has yet to actually deliver a significant number of robots that were actually useful for anybody. One begins to think that they're really more of a video company than a robot company...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yah, pretty cool. Three days old and already 20M hits (although not kpop numbers, still impressive). Like a roadster in space: engineering as art.
Seoul Dynamics (Score:3)
Boston Dynamics is own by Hyundai. should be dancing to Kpop. BTS
Re: (Score:2)
American scary dystopian robot dogs were never going to take over the world with the same amount of terror.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Did you miss the fact that almost the first two minutes of the video is a single camera cut? I'd say that's pretty conclusive evidence that they can string these moves together quite effectively. It look to me like the cuts in the last minute were done more for aesthetic reasons than anything else.
Re: (Score:2)
You should look up other videos done by Boston Dynamics. They've been doing dynamic for years.
Re: (Score:2)
Check out a video of people pushing them around, the robots know how to adjust to changing dynamics.
https://youtu.be/aFuA50H9uek [youtu.be]
https://youtu.be/rVlhMGQgDkY?t... [youtu.be]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Dance moves (Score:3)
busting out some sweet moves that would leave even the late Patrick Swayze envious
No lol. It was a bit awkward by human standards.
I did notice spot doing some jumps that looked very light, and could only have been accomplished by a human having very strong calves.
Re: (Score:2)
Spot was quite graceful doing the cross-tiptoe thing. And the "high-stepping" Atlases handled their center of gravities well. But, yeah, sock-hop level dancing, ultimately.
Re: (Score:2)
They're a level above these shufflers [youtube.com].
Re: (Score:2)
It's obvious that the goalie was paid to take a dive.
Re: (Score:2)
No lol. It was a bit awkward by human standards.
No, not really [youtube.com].
Re: (Score:1)
You've obviously never seen my "dance".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Even assuming it's programmed servo-by-sevo, it still demonstrates a pretty impressive range of motion and agility. And obviously it's not choreographed to that degree - balancing on one foot, or even just standing in place, requires a continuous active feedback system to maintain balance in the face of real-world imperfections. I'm sure there's a great deal of the normal dynamic stability routines that are being put to use.
They've got a ways to go to reach human agility, but they're improving at a
Re: (Score:3)
"The perfect is the enemy of the good", fearless AC. But, a poster on TFA says it more eloquently than you or I:
Quis custodiet Custodientes 2 days ago edited
Most people don't understand just what level of achievement this represents. You have to have seen the complex physics that are involved in such movements.
At the moment, the robots have limited intelligence. They manage all their movements automatically while they are essentially remote-controlled: the controller tells them what movements to perform, the robot figures out how to do them.
So they have the logistics of performing complex moves in place. Essentially what the primitive sections of our brains do for us. Now as higher level AI engine could be added to control the actions of those robots independently, a bit like our gray matter controls our actions.
Robot brains will be built like ours, in successive layers.
Re: Impressive? Really? (Score:5, Insightful)
Bullshit.
You can't possibly develop the sophisticated , incredibly quick algorithms required to keep Atlas balanced - if you could, you'd be working for Boston Dynamics, not wanking to photos of Robert De Nero.
Re: (Score:2)
I was going to write a detailed rebuttal, but I think I can get more value of my time by just saying you're an idiot. You moron.
Re: (Score:2)
You should have just not written.
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, others have handled the detailed rebuttal just fine. This was still valuable to be said. The OP is so clueless he doesn't even realize he's clueless.
Re:Impressive? Really? (Score:4, Informative)
You have obviously not tried to program a robot. "Simple" things like balancing on one foot are incredibly complex activities for a robot to undertake. Walking is an exercise of constant falling forward, and catching oneself with a well-placed step, with constant corrections. It takes humans several months to learn this. Robots don't come by it naturally. Having been a software developer for 30 years, and having done some robot programming, I for one am extremely impressed.
I for one welcome our new... (Score:5, Funny)
So much equipment and... (Score:4, Funny)
They didn't get it to do the robot!!!
Re: (Score:1)
Hummm... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
It looks that way because they have extraordinarily strong servos in their "toes"
They definitely gotta remake Saturday Night Fever (Score:1)
And let's see some square dancing
Might not all be one shot (Score:2)
However, it did occur to me that this might not all have been shot in one sequence. It is possible that the robots frequently fell over and the final video was spliced together from those occasions where they didn't. However this is not to decry from the considerable achievements on display. Even if it took ten goes to successfully film each section, it would still be very impressive.
Re: Might not all be one shot (Score:2)
I posted this on another thread, but it bears repeating to avoid conspiracy theories developing: yes, it is real. Boston Dynamics has a decades-long, well-documented series of ever improving videos, and their products are available for sale (albeit at very high prices). Plenty of people have seen the robots up close. The "dogs" are independently reported to be on patrol in some parts of Singapore: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/te... [bbc.com]
It is highly unlikely that any video tricks were used to make the continuous t
Pre-programmed? (Score:2)
Re:Pre-programmed? (Score:4, Insightful)
Are the move pre-programmed, or do they robots react to the music? I cannot find that information.
Likely pre-programmed. I would love to hear what it actually sounds like in the room (without the music). I suspect it's actually quite loud, mechanical, (and cool) sounding. I would also be curious as to what percentage of a charge is used up by a routine like that. Many of the past demo videos I have seen show the robots tethered to a power source, here we see then running on stored power.
Re: (Score:2)
Definitely pre-programmed.
Also probably shot over several weeks, one cut at a time.
I've worked in TV before. Junkyard Wars supposedly happened in one day. In reality, it took most of a week, including the no-camera rebuild and testing day right before the competition.
In this video, every time the scene cuts from one angle to another was an opportunity to recharge and load the next sequence, or go back and correct a flaw in the previous sequence.
The better version of this video (Score:1)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re: The better version of this video (Score:2)
:) :) :)
DWTS (Score:1)
Was this actually real, though? (Score:2)
Re: Was this actually real, though? (Score:2)
Yes, it is real. Boston Dynamics has a decades-long, well-documented series of ever improving videos, and their products are available for sale (albeit at very high prices). Plenty of people have seen the robots up close. The âoedogsâ are independently reported to be on patrol in some parts of Singapore, with movements completely consistent with this new dance video: https://www.bbc.com/news/av/te... [bbc.com]
His best dance... (Score:2)
...is, well, you know.... [youtube.com]
even the late Patrick Swayze envious (Score:2)
Robot wars (Score:2)
I'd love to see these robots compete in some of those robot wars on TV. I'll bet they could literally kick some butt!
Re: (Score:2)
Not seeing any twerking yet (Score:1)
Until I see twerking we're not there yet.
Meanwhile in Soviet Russia, (Score:2)
you dance the robots [youtube.com]
(now with a New Year special [youtube.com]).
I for one... (Score:2)
No, COOKIE robots . . . (Score:1)