OnePlus Announces OnePlus 2 'Flagship Killer' Android Phone With OxygenOS 154
MojoKid writes: The OnePlus 2 was officially unveiled [Monday] evening and it has been announced that the smartphone will start at an competitively low $329, unlocked and contract free. The entry level price nets you a 5.5" 1080p display, a cooler-running 1.8GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 v2.1 SoC paired with 3GB of RAM, 16GB of internal storage, a 13MP rear camera (with OIS, laser focusing and two-tone flash), 5MP selfie camera, and dual nano SIM slots. If you don't mind handing over an extra $60, you'll receive 4GB of RAM to back the processor and 64GB of internal storage. Besides beefing up the internal specs, OnePlus has also paid some attention to the exterior of the device, giving it a nice aluminum frame and a textured backplate. There are a number of optional materials that you can choose from including wood and Kevlar.
Reader dkatana links to InformationWeek's coverage, which puts a bit more emphasis on what the phone doesn't come with: NFC. Apparently, people just don't use it as much as anticipated.
No Compromises (Score:3, Interesting)
Unless you want an SD Card, NFC, Wireless charging, front speakers, OIS camera, or removable battery.
Re:No Compromises (Score:5, Informative)
Unless you want an SD Card, NFC, Wireless charging, front speakers, OIS camera, or removable battery.
Apologies, I missed that it does indeed have OIS; one of the sites I read earlier reported that it did not.
Re:No Compromises (Score:4, Interesting)
If the battery is the same as the OnePlus One it is removable, or at least not glued in. You need to pry the back cover off the phone, which isn't as easy as some but isn't difficult either. Again, not glued, just clipped. In fact they well official replacement back covers so removing it is officially supported.
The lack of NFC is disappointing. I understand having to cut stuff, but why bother with a gimmick like the fingerprint sensor at the expense of something really useful? It's a deal-breaker for me.
Lack of wireless charging is also disappointing. It's the one thing I wish my OnePlus One had, so much so that I hacked it in. With wireless charging it would be the perfect phone.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're not planning to use your cell phone also as a Credit Card...then what other uses really are for NFC?
I'd not want any of my CC info on a phone that can be stolen and cracked into. And from the article, apparently not that many people out there are even using NFC functionality, so I'm guessing to many it is no great loss.
What all do you use NFC for so much that it is a deal breaker for you? Seriously curious.
Thanks!
Re: (Score:2)
From what I understand, Google Wallet doesn't store the card info on the phone, and when you read it in (after putting in your pin), the transmitted card number is one-time use for the amount of the purchase. The potential for hacking seems to be the communication between Google and the Visa/MasterCard/AE people, but I trust them (not much :( ) more than I trust the individual vendor.
All in all, much safer than giving every vendor your card number, anyway.
Sam
Re: (Score:2)
Well as payment, I use it to read data from an Omron sleep monitor and check the state of my Suica card (a stored value card handy for travelling in Japan).
Re: (Score:2)
Personally I use NFC so my phone automatically adjusts itself when placed in certain positions. Mostly when I put it in the holder in my car, it makes sure the Bluetooth is turned on and set to maximum volume. It turns the WiFi off because I don't need WiFi while driving and might as well save the battery (I don't have kids using tablets in the back so no need for it to be a WiFi hotspot).
That is the only use I have found. Apple Pay type solutions are for backwards countries that still don't chip and pin li
Re: (Score:2)
Since it was in the summary, can we assume that /. is amongst the sites you _don't_ read?
Re: (Score:2)
For all that, you can spend 290 dollars more!
On a side note, NFC hasn't been used much, but I see that changing. That is a huge disappointment.
Re: (Score:2)
, NFC hasn't been used much, but I see that changing
It's a catch 22, if people don't want to use it and make noise for it, it won't be on phones. If it's not on phones vendors aren't going to justify replacing their POS equipment, or losing all the private information they're stealing from customer CC's, and will keep the status quo.
I really want NFC, Apple Pay works great in the 3 places I visit that accept it. But not enough people are complaining in the right places (i.e. publically, loudly) and so we'
Re: (Score:2)
NFC works for me everywhere I go. My vending machines are NFC enabled, every single fast good joint I've been to. My grocery store is NFC enabled, my gas station is NFC enabled. Many chain restaurants are NFC enabled (if it has a pay terminal on the table like chili's). Lowe's, walmart, and Home depot are NFC enabled. It's reached a point I get frustrated when I have to use my card.
Re: (Score:2)
How is it easier to use a big general purpose computer (your smartphone) rather than a small, special purpose one? (the card)
I am asking that question, naively. I've used chip-and-pin debit card for 12 years. They added an " electronic cash" solution (store and pay small amounts without entering PIN) but no one used it, now there's an NFC-like feature that no one uses.
This is very country or region dependant.
I don't know how you use the "contactless" feature, and if NFC phones are compatible with it. Smartc
Re: (Score:2)
It's very easy to use. I'm a wallet minimalist, so I hate carrying multiple cards. With NFC payment systems I can just tap the phone and pick the card I want to charge. It is also more secure in the US where pin and chip are not yet a standard. My phone is always at hand, my wallet not so much. If only we could get a digital drivers license I wouldn't even need a wallet any longer.
The biometric options are even nicer as I don't have to type in a pin. Just touch and press thumb.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, multiple cards for multiple purpose that get combined in one device, that sounds very useful indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I use NFC for just one thing - powering on a bluetooth speaker. (For some reason, i can't use NFC to power it off.)
There really aren't any NFC capable stores anywhere, and the only one I know of requires you to show a physical ID, which defeats the purpose, as it's less hassle using a card.
For anything else, bluetooth proximity detection works fine.. No need to use the NFC tag in my car when the phone and car pair up automatically. No need to use it for the TV, as i have to use a remote anyhow.
My wish
Re: (Score:2)
There really aren't any NFC capable stores anywhere, and the only one I know of requires you to show a physical ID, which defeats the purpose, as it's less hassle using a card.
IMO, the marketing for NFC was completely botched. There are so many people that keep hearing "convenience" being associated with it, and anyone with half a brain can tell that is bullshit. I have to get my phone out, unlock it (hopefully nfc doesn't bypass that), possibly enable nfc (it chews battery and is a possible security risk to keep on 100% of the time), swipe it, probably click something on my phone then, then lock my phone again and put it back. Versus a magswipe credit card, where I take it out (
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.google.com/wallet/ [google.com] : "An easier way to pay. Google Wallet makes it easy to pay - in stores, online or to anyone in the US with a Gmail address. It works with any debit or credit card, on every mobile carrier".
For Google Wallet, this is true. But NFC and Google Wallet are only tied together in certain Apps and for certain purchases. One of my favorite stores takes Google Wallet / NFC which would be great, except the damn store is a Faraday cage and I can't actually use it there.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, 64GB of internal storage is a fair bit, but yes, it's cheap to add one ... I don't give a damn about Wireless charging ... the speakers I need enough to use it as a speakerphone, so I'm not sure ... I actively don't want any fscking NFC ... I have dedicated cameras for real work, and I'm meh about the battery (since I've never removed the battery from my current phone so it's not like I'd be missing anything).
I'm starting to be in the market for something to replace my aging phone, and really don't wa
Re: (Score:2)
Honestly, because I don't use those features, and don't care about them.
For the overwhelming majority of the time, my phone is used minimally except for calls and texts. I'm not using it for conference calls and emails .. that's the last thing I want.
And, like my tablet, I only use internet feature
Re: (Score:2)
My OnePlus One has NFC, but the OnePlus 2 doesn't. I used NFC to transfer my Google account settings, which didn't really transfer much. From what I can find, NFC is incredibly difficult to configure and use--sending an MMC to transfer a picture or video is a lot faster and easier.
Wireless charging is also a waste. You have to be right up with it, and it uses 10 times as much power to provide as much charge to the phone. Likewise, quick charging, while nice, just doesn't make much sense when every car
Is this not the 21st century? (Score:2)
If you don't like wireless charging, you must not have a magnetic charging mount. I made one for my car - the phone snaps into place and charges without ever plugging it in. It's also easier to drop it on my nightstand.
I'll admit it's a minor convenience, but we're living in the 21st century. It should feel like it.
And a bottom headphone jack is (as the kids say) teh suck. Want to put your phone in a stand or tilt it up while listening - nope, can't do it. How about putting your phone right side up in your
Re: (Score:2)
Wireless power is excessively inefficient. Current projections suggest cell phones use 10% of the world's energy per year; wireless power is 10% as efficient as direct contact charging, meaning the total worldwide energy draw required for wireless charging would be just about 100% of the world's current energy consumption.
How about putting your phone right side up in your pocket so when you take it out you can see your program right side up.
When reaching down into your pocket, your arm is oriented downward, wrist spatially above your hand. When you raise your hand up to your face, your wrist is spatially below your hand.
Re: (Score:2)
Slowly put down your slashdot badge and step away, that way nobody would get hurt!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Was it published on the 1st of April by any chance?
It should be obvious for any slashdot member this can't be true, by some orders of magnitude.
If not, it is something too easy to find. Hint: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: Is this not the 21st century? (Score:2)
yeah, check out the compass on your phone. I've used a magnetic mount in my car for over a year now and found it magnetized my phone, totally screwing the compass up. Nexus 5.
back to clamp mounts for me.
Re: (Score:2)
USB is the only two sided connector which requires a minimum of 3 tried orientations to successfully insert.
Re: (Score:2)
Micro-USB adapters follow a sort of buttered-toast physics for me: no matter which way I try to plug them in, it's the wrong way until I have sufficient light to see what I'm doing. It's a two-hand, lights-on operation every. single. time.
If only someone would create a USB plug that can be plugged in either way. And if only such a plug was included with the new phone being discussed. Oh, wait, both of those things have happened!
Re: (Score:2)
The trick is to feel for the little spikey latches on the male USB connector. Once you find them, point them towards the back of your phone.
Problem solved.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unless you have a Oneplus One (the predecessor of the phone discussed here) in which case you need to point the latches "in reverse".
The connector is also quite stiff, I can imagine they've got a lot of complains or maybe even broken connectors.
Re: (Score:2)
NFC is a huge deal breaker for me. I was super excited about this phone, especially with dual sim. But sadly, I"ll have to pass without NFC support.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, it's not clear what you consider a "compromise", or even what features are desirable.
For example, I want a very thin, lightweight, but sturdy phone, and any additional hardware you pack in there runs the risk of adding weight, and any port or removable piece is a potential weakness in the structural integrity. If you give me a SD card port, I won't use it. If you let me remove the battery, I'll pretty much never do that unless the battery actually fails within 2 years. Front speakers? For w
Re: (Score:2)
OIS camera
Why use such obscure terms? I had to google it and it just means there is an optical stabilizer. "Optical stabilizer" is only a few characters longer than "OIS camera".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I want storage expansion and dual-SIM. I wouldn't mind front-mounted speakers. I actually want a real, physical keyboard but I know that's simply not in the cards. I want about double the battery capacity compared to most phones, with a removable battery. I want the LTE bands for my carrier in my area to all be supported. I want a camera capable of about 5MP p
Re:No Compromises (Score:4, Insightful)
I figure by the time you have a fairly large touch screen an physical keyboard is just bulk ... and can probably be done with Bluetooth anyway.
I've actually found the Google keyboard which lets you type by dragging your finger over a virtual keyboard is almost as fast as a real keyboard
Or they're trying to keep costs down and cover "most" of the market instead of all of it.
Re:No Compromises (Score:5, Insightful)
I am also firmly in the physical keyboard camp, and I constantly hear that argument that screens are so big now, to which I always reply: that's exactly the point. The screen is nice and big and beautiful, and I would like to use it to display *content*, not interface. When more than half the screen is wasted on drawing 26 letters and other assorted UI, then suddenly the amount of screen that can actually be used to compose your message, and display the context of that message, is tiny.
A physical slide-out keyboard allows me to use the entire screen for its actual ideal purpose: displaying things that change. A mostly static keyboard interface is a poor use of that space, and I absolutely do not mind the extra weight and bulk of the keyboard, because when composing long messages or working in a remote terminal shell it is absolutely worth it to me.
Re: (Score:2)
I would mod you up, but I don't have any mod points at the moment, so this is a post in lieu of that: I am also firmly in the physical slideout keyboard camp. We're a dying breed, which always seems weird to me - why *wouldn't* you want a slideout keyboard? Apparently most people don't. I really hope manufacturers throw us weird people a bone every once in a while, and that it doesn't go the way of 16:10 laptop screen, RIP :(.
It's not even adding that much weight! A little more depth, but... so? (That said,
Re: (Score:2)
My first smartphone was a Motorola OG Droid with a side-out keyboard. it was one of the reasons I got that phone.
And then I discovered Swype and found that I never actually used the physical keyboard. Once I figured out that I could switch between the Hacker Keyboard for ssh sessions and Swype for everything else, the virtual keyboard became much less of a pain to deal with than the physical keyboard. Even with the tiny, low-res screen on the old Droid, the virtual keyboard was better. With newer phones
Re: (Score:2)
I share your feelings, I would never buy a phone without an integrated keyboard. I don't care if it adds 5mm to my phone. Unfortunately that limits my options quite a bit.
I also don't understand why phone makers are so obsessed with keeping them thin. I would gladly trade in a few mm for more battery life.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My only problem with slide out keyboards is that it's just something extra to break. I've had 5 or 6 phones in my lifetime, and all the ones with moving mechanisms like flip phones or slide out keypads have died a premature death in the connection in the moving part. The first phone that I had that lasted until I actually wanted to upgrade (not counting my first analog cell phone), was a device which only had a touch screen, power and volume inputs. Every other phone suffered from keys that stopped work
Re: (Score:2)
Well, in the spirit of the incessant "I think I type faster with swype so your physical keyboard preference is invalid", let me just say that "I've never had a keyboard phone fail so your experience with your hardware is invalid."
Re: (Score:2)
A beer spilled on my Treo 650, killing a couple of keys. I was able to buy a replacement keyboard off a random eBay seller and swap it in without much trouble (after which the phone was as good as new), but it was an annoyance all the same.
I suspect a newer touchscreen phone would've been less vulnerable to that kind of failure. Can't say that I've tested the theory yet, even though I usually have a beer in one hand and my phone in the other (to log the beer) whenever
Re: (Score:2)
Well, honestly, given that people make bluetooth keyboard cases [cnx-software.com] this is fairly trivially solved if you care enough.
Maybe phone companies figure the accessories market can solve this problem?
I'm willing to bet it's a smaller amount of people who want a physical keyboard than those who don't. In which case, you're not a profitable enough segment for the companies who make phones, but an excellent niche market for people who make accessories.
It's not like you can't have what you want now, you just won't get i
/|\ Double degree economics & English. At DeV (Score:2)
You're saying that only the most popular option is profitable? I guess that explains why there isn't, and never has been, a manufacturer of absolutely anything at all that produces two different models.
P.S. People aren't sand. It's number with a countable noun, not amount .
Re: (Score:3)
No, I'm saying companies are cheap and don't tend to make a lot of variations on models because it costs them more, unless they think it's worth it.
If they figure only 5-10% of the market would buy a phone with a physical keyboard, they might not be willing to chase that because it's not worth it. And if it poses a risk to make something until they know how many would be sold, they just might not do it.
Just because you want a feature doesn't mean the company making it gives a damn. If they did, they'd pro
Re: (Score:2)
I'm also in the physical keyboard camp. Physical KB's have one huge advantage that cannot be negated by big screens. You can type on them without looking at the keys.
Sadly it's very difficult to find a phone that has a physical KB and even though larger screens have helped its not really the same as using a physical KB as I'm constantly having to watch what letters I press rather than the out
Re: (Score:2)
Out of interesting, what do you need more storage for? Taking the 64GB version, you could load up 6000 songs and not even half fill that. Double that many photos. So the only thing I can really think of needing more for is movies, and even with a 5.5" screen I don't really want to watch them on my phone.
To be SD cards mattered when 64GB was really expensive, but with phones like this it's pretty cheap so I don't care any more. Well, it's annoying to pay more and an equivalent card costs, but then again chea
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nudge nudge, wink wink, say no more.
Re: (Score:2)
With music if you need/want several genres, several artists you can easily go in the 10s of GB music (less if you trim down some of the boring things, but well).
8GB or 16GB fixed smartphone is unacceptable there (I mean, that computer is so powerful but we had more storage 15 years ago?)
64GB is adequate, if you don't mind having not much storage for non-music data..
Storage can also be used to carry data for use on a "real" computer.
That said, smartphones are too immature technology for me and as you said th
Re: (Score:2)
Out of interesting, what do you need more storage for?
A great use for a smartphone is a portable gaming / emulation device. For that, you need two things: a fuckton of storage, and a bluetooth gamepad.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:No Compr0nises (Score:2)
Yeah, call it music if you want. I suppose there's some chackawacka guitar and saxophone in the background...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're a total fucking idiot. Really.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
There are a lot of things about phones that are not deal breakers. You might want front facing speakers, but that's probably not a deal breaker. Then there are deal breaker features.
For example, I can't stand phones bigger than 5.5". So those giant nexus 6's are a deal breaker. If you don't support my carrier of choice, that's a deal breaker. If it's not stock or nearly stock android, it's a deal breaker. This phone was on my must buy list though the entire launch event, until I found out it's missing NFC s
:( No Cyanogenmod (Score:2)
Too bad they dropped Cyanogenmod. With Cyanogenmod you know that you can get easily installable updates, particularly when something nasty like Stagefright vulnerabilities appear.
I doubt the customized OxygenOS will be updated regularly, like most vendor specific Android devices.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Oxygen might be worth a shot. I like having Cyanogenmod preinstalled on my OnePlus One, but it would be nice if the people who wrote the OS and apps actually used phones. For example, it would be fantastic if the default messaging app would send pictures at a resolution above the minimum, or at the very least if they added an option for that. The default messaging app has some cool features but I still need to install some crap like Hangouts or whatever else if I want to send pictures at higher than 461x
No NFC (Score:2)
That's bonkers! Or maybe not...
Re: (Score:2)
Interestingly, I had no use for NFC.
Until I got a set of bluetooth headphones last week that let me connect/disconnect by bumping them on the phone.
Do not want to live without it now.
Missed opportunities (Score:2)
NFC and wireless charging really seems like they should have been no-brainers.
The removable backs would seem to really favor of uSD storage (they're already using the cover for access tot he dual sims) and replaceable battery.
It's a shame they went totally cosmetic with the backs. If it had included the back and side (wrap-around), that would have been fabulous. Something like the slim guard case for the LG G3 (that was, oddly, only available in S. Korea) would have been awesome. I know, you can always add
Microsoft Android tax .. (Score:2)
Are they paying the Microsoft Android tax?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Buy an Android phone? LOLOLOLOLOLOL.
What's the alternative Crapple or Blackberry?
Re: (Score:2)
Android runs fine IFF you get a Google Nexus phone, AND don't go through Verizon or AT&T and have their malware installed. I wouldn't buy anything else if they paid ME money, it's gotten that bad. But if you can get over the stickershock and buy a nexus and add a plan, then it's pretty good.
Re: (Score:3)
Or if you buy any Android-compatible phone, root it and install your own OS on it. Seriously, I don't understand why anyone on Slashdot doesn't do this.
Re: (Score:2)
Or if you buy any Android-compatible phone, root it and install your own OS on it. Seriously, I don't understand why anyone on Slashdot doesn't do this.
Or you can buy an Android phone outright with the manufacturers image on it.
I know this concept may be foreign to many in the US, but it's quite a common occurrence to those of us in Europe, Australia, Asia... pretty much anywhere that isn't the US.
BTW, you shouldn't need to root the phone to get rid of carrier crapware, all you need is the signed base image from the manufacturer. I understand these aren't hard to find.
Re: (Score:2)
Can you root a note 3? If you can, Reply w/ your location, I think there's about a 30k bounty out still. You might be getting paid.
The Note 3 is very easy to root, like almost all Samsung phones. Maybe you are talking about :
- Carrier locking : pay cash instead of subsidized and not only your phone won't be locked but you may even save money in the long run.
- KNOX warranty bit : when you root the "official" way, you permanently lose KNOX features (a secure framework designed for corporate use), you may also lose your warranty depending on your jurisdiction and goodwill of the repair center. Everything else works fine.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Cost of 160GB of SD card NAND: $48
Cost of 48GB of same NAND soldered to the board: $50
They don't want you storing videos, pictures, music, and audio books on SD card; they want you to pay over 3x as much for that same SD card.
Re:SD Card? (Score:4, Insightful)
They don't want you storing videos, pictures, music, and audio books on SD card; they want you to pay over 3x as much for that same SD card.
Right, that's why they're selling an unlocked top-shelf phone for $329, because they're all about making as much profit as possible and they really want to control exactly how you use the device. That's why the OnePlus One shipped immediately also, because they had massive inventory.
Wait, sorry, that didn't happen. People needed to get invites to even purchase the OnePlus One and then wait a while for delivery because their profit margins are so thin that they cannot afford to manufacture inventory that isn't going to be sold, and then they ended up selling 10 times what they estimated and had to ramp production up mid-run.
And you think they didn't include a removable SD card because of some profit motive. I bet its the other way, I bet they're trying to keep costs down. I bet it's the same reason they didn't include NFC: because the majority of people don't use it.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you deny that the OnePlus One 64GB cost $50 more than its $16GB counterpart, while holding exactly the same specifications aside from an extra 48GB of NAND?
Sorry, are you asking me to confirm or deny facts?
even though we can clearly demonstrate that the hardware does indeed cost less than $50.
So, find the parts that OnePlus put in the One and show the cost that they paid for those parts.
Seriously, there's absolutely no point in you and I arguing about cost, profit, etc. If you have questions then contact OnePlus directly and ask them. They're not a major corporation, they're a small startup with actual people working there who will respond to you. Ask them what their profit margins are on both models, and ask them why the bigger one is $50 mor
Re: (Score:3)
So, find the parts that OnePlus put in the One and show the cost that they paid for those parts.
OnePlus One with 16GB NAND: $300
OnePlus One with 64GB NAND: $350
Run the cost of NAND chips. 64GB MLC NAND chips fluctuate at a spot price between $1.60 and $4.34. Adding 64GB of NAND to a platform costs $4.34, much less switching from an expensive 16GB NAND platform to a 64GB platform. A 32GB chip fluctuates between $1.70 and $2.93--two of those would cost $3.40 to $5.86--and the next common size down is 4GB MLC NAND. Once the manufacture process is reliable, the sheer silicon wafer size is what co
Re: (Score:2)
The profit margin is demonstrably larger on the one with bigger NAND.
Right. Maybe, for example, the profit on the larger one was $30, while the smaller one was a loss of $20. Who knows? What I know is that OnePlus is making high-end phones and selling them for half the price of their competitors with comparable hardware, and that they have publicly stated multiple times that the reason for the shipping delays in the past was because they could only afford to manufacture stock that they know will actually sell (i.e., manufacture after they have the orders), that if they ma
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
$30 this way or that won't sway people onto or away from your phone.
Right, so even if that $30 is completely profit off the top thanks to peoples' willingness to pay it, what's your point? Who cares?
Re: (Score:2)
Probably because this isn't marketed at the premium price point
Your argument is: "premium shit costs like $500 and this costs $300, so their +$50 offer isn't a premium option."
The problem is they sell two options: the basic 16GB option and the premium 64GB option. The fact that their PREMIUM OPTION is cheaper than some Rolls Royce bullshit doesn't mean it's not a premium option.
Right, so even if that $30 is completely profit off the top thanks to peoples' willingness to pay it, what's your point? Who cares?
The original argument was that availability of SD card slots would suppress the market value of in-phone storage. This is a fairly complex concept.
First off, SD card readers in wide-spr
Re: (Score:2)
Your argument is: "premium shit costs like $500 and this costs $300, so their +$50 offer isn't a premium option."
No, if that is what you got from that then you obviously have some problem with basic English. What I said was:
"this isn't marketed at the premium price point"
And of course it isn't, it is substantially lower than the $600-$800 offerings at the top end.
The problem is they sell two options: the basic 16GB option and the premium 64GB option. The fact that their PREMIUM OPTION is cheaper than some Rolls Royce bullshit doesn't mean it's not a premium option.
Oh what a terrible problem! They sell two options, how awful!
The original argument was that availability of SD card slots would suppress the market value of in-phone storage.
Yes it's all a big conspiracy that all the phone makers - who are also competitors - are colluding on even though many of these phone makers offer phone models with and without SD card slots.
Why don't phones have SD storage?
Many of
Re: (Score:2)
I said their premium model is +$50. You said it's not a premium phone. You just reiterated that it's not a premium phone. The fact of the matter is it's their premium offering.
Oh what a terrible problem! They sell two options, how awful!
The problem isn't with what they sell; the problem is with your argument. Your argument is they don't have a premium phone; the problem with your argument is they sell two options: the basic 16GB option and the premium 64GB option. The fact that their PREMIUM OPTION is cheaper than some Rolls Royce bullshit doesn't mean it's not
Re: (Score:2)
I said their premium model is +$50. You said it's not a premium phone. You just reiterated that it's not a premium phone. The fact of the matter is it's their premium offering.
Go back and read it again: "this isn't marketed at the premium price point ".
Oh what a terrible problem! They sell two options, how awful!
The problem isn't with what they sell; the problem is with your argument.
Well no, you just said The problem is they sell two options [slashdot.org]. Maybe try and work out what you're trying to say before you type.
Your argument is they don't have a premium phone
No, it isn't. Nowhere did I write or imply that.
I've already explained that it's not lucrative to offer SD cards slots on mainline-model phones.
Yet most of them do, it's only a few that don't. Your argument fails.
"Some" being all modern mainline phones
Wrong. Xperia Z3, Note 4, Note Edge, G Flex, HTC One, LG G4, ZenPhone. In fact the only mainstream ones that don't have them are the Galaxy S6, Nexus 6 and the iPhone.
Re: (Score:2)
Go back and read it again: "this isn't marketed at the premium price point ".
Listen you fallacy-of-equivocation prick, I said it's a PREMIUM OFFERING. It's their premium offering. It doesn't matter if it doesn't cost as much as an expensive-ass HTC phone; a Chevrolet Cobalt SS doesn't cost as much as a Mustang Cobra, but the Cobalt SS is a premium car (which costs $25k). Why? There's a base model, and a premium model.
No, it isn't. Nowhere did I write or imply that.
I said the 64GB model is their premium offering. You said it's "nuh-uh".
Re: (Score:2)
I said it's a PREMIUM OFFERING.
In response to me saying their phones arent targeted at the premium phone price point, whether it is their "premium offering" version is irrelevant, nobody cares about that.
No, it isn't. Nowhere did I write or imply that.
I said the 64GB model is their premium offering. You said it's "nuh-uh".
Wrong, you failed reading comprehension.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you deny that the OnePlus One 64GB cost $50 more than its $16GB counterpart, while holding exactly the same specifications aside from an extra 48GB of NAND?
Yes. According to the summary: "If you don't mind handing over an extra $60, you'll receive 4GB of RAM to back the processor and 64GB of internal storage.". So it is an extra GB of RAM and extra 48GB of internal storage.
Re: (Score:2)
That's the OnePlus One. The OnePlus Two gives additional RAM on top of NAND; the One only gives 64GB or 16GB of storage as options, with the same amount of RAM. I was discussing Bacon.
Re: (Score:3)
Cost of 160GB of SD card NAND: $48 Cost of 48GB of same NAND soldered to the board: $50 They don't want you storing videos, pictures, music, and audio books on SD card; they want you to pay over 3x as much for that same SD card.
Compare the IOPS between an SD card and on-board NAND. Not the same thing.
Do you see a need for high IOPS for storing or viewing videos, pictures, music, or audiobooks? Because I don't. Even for loading apps that's a tough sell. I have a microSD card on a Windows 8 tablet and the only noticeable affect is that read/write speed is slower than the on-device storage. And that's because they used a cheap SD card controller- the card itself is more than capable. It isn't an issue with media consumption devices like phones and tablets.
Re: (Score:2)
Is that SD card even reliable?
For write once, read-many why not (e.g. music), although copying it from a real computer to the SD card will be infuriatingly slow.
If you do have some more write heavy use, I wonder how long it goes before you get corrupt sectors.
I would rather have a tablet with a 500GB or 1TB HDD, with about 100MB/s write speed and with that you write 4KB blocks to, not 128K blocks.
Re:SD Card? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You get the same memory, a faster processor (by raw GHz - the Zenfone is Intel), for $299.
Why would I go with this phone instead?
Surely the people of /. at clever enough not to compare by raw GHz when two processors have the same architecture. Oh wait, they don't even have that.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes it still has privacy controls similar to CM Privacy Guard. That was one of the points in their launch demo. The 1080p screen I'm actually ok with. It's plenty resolution for a 5" screen and better on the battery, though I'd also agree that it's not a major bragging point spec wise.
Re: (Score:2)
I love how fast it is, and that I don't have to hand my CC over.
I use tap to pay WITH my credit card. Its even more convenient and faster than getting out my phone. I can't even really imagine why I'd ever prefer to setup and use tap-to-pay with my phone.