Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Power Businesses Government United States

Feds Boost Goal To 75k New Solar Power Workers By 2020 69

An anonymous reader writes: The U.S. government has announced plans to help train 75,000 people to enter the solar workforce by 2020, including a number of veterans. The new goal is part of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) SunShot Initiative, which helps fund research, manufacturing and market creation. The SunShot Initiative's Solar Instructor Training Network works with 400 community colleges across the country for training, and claims to have already certified 1,000 solar instructors and nearly 30,000 students in the last five years. Ultimately, the SunShot Initiative has a goal for solar energy to reach price parity with conventional power sources in five years.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Feds Boost Goal To 75k New Solar Power Workers By 2020

Comments Filter:
  • by Chrisq ( 894406 ) on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @03:36AM (#49427701)
    Why are they implementing all this training network and colleges for the solar industry whereas the solution for IT is "issue more visas"?
    • Because installing solar panels doesn't require much in the way of rare intellectual skills?
      • by swb ( 14022 ) on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @06:40AM (#49428079)

        What exactly is so special about installing solar panels? It sounds to me like pretty conventional electrical and construction work.

        Even recreational marine electrical systems can be more complicated, with a mix of solar, wind, grid, generator, battery (12/24/48V) and mixed loads (native, 12v, AC).

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 ) *

          That's why they are teaching people this instead of CS skills. CS is hard, it needs years of study at a high level just to reach graduate level skill. In comparison installing solar PV systems is easy, can be learnt quickly and at fairly minimal expense, so is ideal for people looking to retrain or move up from burger flipping.

          • The problem with the federal government funding this is that the expense will not be minimal, and in all likelihood the training will be superfluous. What will happen is gov't money will end up in the hands of proselytizing greenie professors and their employers, to provide less useful information in hundreds of hours than apprenticing 10 hours to a licensed electrician would provide.
            • They could use a similar strategy as the one Ontario's FIT used. As a home owner you pay to install solar panels. The electricity produced is put back into the grid and you receive an amount per KW produced. The return per KW is higher than the current cost of electricity but the government pays for it. This is cheaper since the program promotes the creation of new companies through demand. The requirements for FIT also made it that solar panels had to have a local manufacturing component to them (can't rem

    • Why are they implementing all this training network and colleges for the solar industry whereas the solution for IT is "issue more visas"?

      Because in this case, there is no worker shortage to begin with.

    • Why are they implementing all this training network and colleges for the solar industry whereas the solution for IT is "issue more visas"?

      Your cynicism is ridiculous.

    • by mlts ( 1038732 )

      Same reason why plumbers, electricians, HVAC workers, and vend a goat repairmen don't get offshored... it just costs too much to grab people off the boat, train them in US standards [1], then them licensed in the specific state.

      Here is what I don't get: What exactly is a "solar job"?

      First, there is the actual placing of PV panels. This is just physical moving of the object, dropping it into place and bolting it down, perhaps making sure the single or double-axis controller is calibrated.

      Second, and this i

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        Second, and this is the most important: Electrician work. PV panels, wiring to proper code, not getting high voltage across the nipples, getting power from the PV panels to the inverter or the battery charge controller (depending on if the person wants an on grid or off grid setup.)

        You missed wiring up the smart inverter. Some places demand them where the solar arrays are not blindly fed into the grid, but intelligently provide the necessary power to the grid, which requires an inverter to either respond to

    • The number of H1B visas hasn't changed since 2005. And that's controlled by Congress, not the President.

  • Photovoltaic is what most people think of immediately when talking about "Solar Energy", and it does hold significant promise. Government programs are overlooking a couple of really high-payback, lower cost solar technologies in the big push for electrics that deserve much more support. Passive solar design for heating and cooling has almost immediate impact in significantly reducing the energy cost of a space, not just in the extreme cases where the design is so heavily skewed into support of the solar en
    • Having lived in a passive solar home for 20 years or so, they are a joy to live in. It's also not something you can add on to an existing home.

      Were pushing straight PV when we know that hybrid panels are more efficient on the pv side (hotter panels are less efficient) while adding hot water for heating and domestic hot water.

  • 2020 is about 40 years too late to do anything about climate change. But, this is potentially good. This means that when all economies collapse due to multiple gigantic natural disasters, there will be more solar panels to scavenge and I can find one and still play Skyrim and Red Alert 2 :D
  • by goodmanj ( 234846 ) on Wednesday April 08, 2015 @08:56AM (#49428721)

    The success of an energy sector should not be measured by the number of people it employs. The goal of the energy industry should be to produce boatloads of dirt-cheap energy with almost nobody working at it, so we can all go off and do something more fun with that manpower and energy.

    It's quite easy to provide tons of energy jobs: we did this 1500 years ago, when almost everyone in Europe worked in the energy sector (farmers and animal handlers and woodcutters, back then). But gradually wind and water mills, coal and steam, electricity and petroleum came along, increasing the energy output of each energy sector worker, providing cheap energy and spare labor that were used a much richer, more interesting society.

    • by stomv ( 80392 )

      > The goal of the energy industry should be to produce boatloads of dirt-cheap energy with almost nobody working at it, so we can all go off and do something more fun with that manpower and energy.

      I disagree. The goal of the US energy policy should be to produce boatloads of clean and safe energy, as cheaply as we can. The goal of the energy industry should be to maximize profits while abiding by the law and minimizing worker injury.

      • Point taken. My complaint is that the government is setting employment as a goal for the energy industry, but I didn't distinguish between the two.

        But there shouldn't be a distinction: government energy policy should set the rules of the playing field to ensure that energy companies can only maximize profits by producing lots of dirt-cheap, clean and safe energy, so profit motive is aligned with the needs of society.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    The end game is to artificially create a new domestic market to employ more Americans whose work has left the country as a direct result of outsourcing work to foreign countries. Also known as global socialism or global wealth shifting. The green movement has taken the bait hook, line and sinker, so to speak. I don't blame them; people followed Hitler, Mussolini, Kim Jong Il and Stalin.

    That IS the driving force behind climate change initiatives even though the science for climate change is rapidly disapp

  • Is Elon Musk at Solar City going to hire them all?

    I mean, it's great they get training; I'm not so sure training *for this specific vocation* is actually going to be that useful to them.

    • Is Elon Musk at Solar City going to hire them all?

      Maybe. The Feds have absolutely no idea how many solar workers the market will require - they just pull numbers out of their asses to fool some people into thinking that they should keep their cushy jobs on the taxpayers' dimes (err, debt instruments - total unfunded debt/tax obligations are now $1.4M per worker). Almost all government estimates of future markets are wildly incorrect.

      Musk may well even have a better model of workforce requirements than DoE

To stay youthful, stay useful.

Working...