Tiny Fanless Mini-PC Runs Linux Or Windows On Quad-core AMD SoC 180
DeviceGuru writes CompuLab has unveiled a tiny 'Fitlet' mini-PC that runs Linux or Windows on a dual- or quad-core 64-bit AMD x86 SoC (with integrated Radeon R3 or R2 GPU), clocked at up to 1.6GHz, and offering extensive I/O, along with modular internal expansion options. The rugged, reconfigurable 4.25 x 3.25 x 0.95 in. system will also form the basis of a pre-configured 'MintBox Mini' model, available in Q2 in partnership with the Linux Mint project. To put things in perspective, CompuLab says the Fitlet is three times smaller than the Celeron Intel NUC.
Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My youngests computer died, and I ended up replacing it with a Biostar A68N-5000. It was $70 shipped. It is fanless and draws very little power. I imagine this is just a further iteration of the technology.
That is only a motherboard, though. You still need a case - and the mini ITX cases generally come without power supplies. You could likely get this with case and power supply for under $200 but not by a lot. A nice recommendation either way, though.
Re: (Score:3)
A M350 mini-ITX case runs $37 on Amazon. Presuming the power supply isn't some stupid proprietary design, $5-10 for a power supply. I did exactly this for a Intel miniITX HTPC that used a laptop charger as the power supply.
Re: (Score:2)
You can get an ASUS X205 with Windows 8.1 preinstalled for about $200 shipped if you shop around, $179 if you're willing to walk in to a Microsoft Store.
That said it's not three times smaller, it's three times less volume. It's only 2cm on a side smaller, not much bigger than a Raspberry Pi B+, which let's be honest, isn't game-changing at this point. 2012 was a long time ago.
Re:Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:5, Funny)
with Windows 8.1 preinstalled
And since nobody likes Windows 8.x, its pretty much a fanless PC as well.
Re: (Score:2)
You can get an ASUS X205 with Windows 8.1 preinstalled for about $200 shipped
When I search for "Asus X205" i find only laptops. We're not really in the same class, here; there are times when a small form factor desktop is distinctly advantageous for the application.
That said it's not three times smaller, it's three times less volume.
Yeah, but the former is catchier for advertising than the latter. :)
not much bigger than a Raspberry Pi B+, which let's be honest, isn't game-changing at this point
Have you seen a PC in the past 5 years that would honestly count as "game-changing"? Neither have I. Everything is an iterative step now.
Re: (Score:2)
Have you seen a PC in the past 5 years that would honestly count as "game-changing"? Neither have I. Everything is an iterative step now.
Really. I've been looking for something like this since for projects 2009. The nVidia ION nano-ITX reference platform looked perfect, but NOBODY ever made it for sale:
http://hothardware.com/reviews... [hothardware.com]
I did evaluate a Fit-PC2 , but it was too badly hobbled by the binary blob video driver. Plus, we had some severe issues with SATA that made it almost unusable with an SSD.
I'm glad CompuLab is trying an AMD version of this form factor. My only worry is with the AMD/ATi video, but it's been a long time sinc
Re: (Score:3)
I got an nVidia ION-based Asus Aspire Revo PC a few years back. It worked fairly well, gets nice and warm, and is still in service as my Kodi box, NAS/backup server (eSATA+GbE with RAID) and secondary DNS/DHCP. It does leave out the PCI slots from the reference platform though.
I'm currently evaluating a $150 (from Fry's) Asus VivoPC as my next primary server. Dual core, hidden micro-PCIe, SATA and USB3. So far, so good.
Re: (Score:2)
My only worry is with the AMD/ATi video, but it's been a long time since I had been burned by the ATi 7500 All-in-Wonder...
That stopped being a worry a few years back. I've been running Radeon graphcs exclusively and continuously now for years. I switched from fglrx to exclusively Xorg drivers a few years back, at first with some noticeable loss of functionality and performance, but now... no worries, it is way past good enough. BTW, that is not just normal desktop loads but a lot of serious OpenGL hacking. For a coulple of years I put up with jaggies... no antialiasing support (though I hacked some myself with buffer accumulat
Re: (Score:2)
I checked on that X205 laptop and it is sadly a model with everything soldered down (like a mac book pro) with not even wired ethernet, and limited storage (a fifth of what old Windows netbooks have, and these could be upgraded to bigger).
It is a tablet with permanently attached keyboard more than a traditional PC. In this the new tiny PC is more PC-like, as the memory is upgradeable and storage is too by the way of the mSATA slot (the next generation will probably have M.2 PCIe), external bandwith is USB 3
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:4, Insightful)
That said it's not three times smaller, it's three times less volume. It's only 2cm on a side smaller, not much bigger than a Raspberry Pi B+, which let's be honest, isn't game-changing at this point. 2012 was a long time ago.
"Times smaller" is an excruciatingly ambiguous phrase anyway. It is very much open to interpretation, even if you presume they mean volume.
Re: (Score:3)
Agree. Why can't they say "a third the volume?"
Slack thinking like "three times smaller" probably accounts for many bugs in software. Precision is important.
Re: (Score:2)
The $35 Raspberry Pi doesn't come with a power supply, or a case, or any storage. That stuff adds up... display, peripherals, HDMI cable... Most little projects I could think of doing as a Pi project would be better served with an old (or even a cheap new) android phone/tablet, which would also include a touchscreen, wifi, bluetooth, audio, camera, power supply for not much more.
For any kind of embedded use, I think an arduino would do better. For any kind of small computer kiosk, I think a tablet or e
Re:Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:5, Insightful)
If you buy the top of the line model for around 2k you get about 6 years out of it, so that is $300 per year. If you buy a starting PC for $400 you will get about 2 years out of it $200 per year.
Now if these barbone PCs will be able to operate modern OS and websites without being unbearable for over a year we are still making out.
Re: (Score:3)
Do low powered PCs wear out quicker, or are you talking out of your ass again?
Re: (Score:2)
I think he means "useful life"
Re:Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Even then he's wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
Load it with 8GB RAM and an SSD, and it's already better than my desktop except for the CPU performance.
OS requirements stay the same or decrease slowly over time (e.g. Windows gets better, linux graphics drivers get better).
Browsers get better with time : Firefox is better than a year ago, then it will get Electrolysis, then it will get the rewrite in the Rust language (this may takes years, but in the end you'll get the four CPU cores used instead of one and a half)
The Web will still be full and even more
Re: (Score:3)
If you buy a starting PC for $400 you will get about 2 years out of it $200 per year.
Where do you get this number? I've had my current PC for more than 2 years, and it cost ~$250 new. My previous PC lasted 6 years and cost ~$350 back around 2006 when PCs cost more.
Mini-PCs are a different animal though. People are buying them for the form factor and the lack of fan noise, not purely for price.
Re: (Score:2)
If you buy the top of the line model for around 2k you get about 6 years out of it, so that is $300 per year. If you buy a starting PC for $400 you will get about 2 years out of it $200 per year.
Ridiculous. For one thing, who would bother with a $2000 desktop, except for a gamer with money to burn?
Re: (Score:2)
I believe that was his point. Nobody besides a fanatic or clueless rich guy buys a high end PC these days, as witness the market statistics. Even highly paid engineers are now making do with years old gear that was never top of the line in the first place. So it goes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For one thing, who would bother with a $2000 desktop, except for a gamer with money to burn?
There are some professionals who think nothing of spending $5,000 to $10,000 for a high end PC workstation, let alone $2000. Hell, the software alone can cost many times that much, so why would they balk at buying the best hardware money can buy? Digital audio workstations are a good example of this sort of high-end niche industry.
Re: (Score:2)
Will I begin contemplating idiotic reasons why I need one of these in my car? Yes, yes I will. I don't know why in the age of laptops, tablets and GPS enabled smartphones, there is still some nerd sex appeal to the possibilities of trunk mounted PC. What possibilities at my command, what freedom from the confines of the factory "infotainment" system.
Re: (Score:2)
...there is still some nerd sex appeal to the possibilities of trunk mounted PC. What possibilities at my command, what freedom from the confines of the factory "infotainment" system.
What a great way to broadcast the guy who breaks your side window to the internet (be sure to take a photo for insurance).
Re:Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:5, Informative)
Their previous offerings have been in the $300 range, I have two of them from a few years back. Beautiful, understated and rugged engineering. Due to the technology of the day, somewhat underpowered but they still manage debian with KDE, short of smooth video playback or 3D animation. With wifi and a hard disk they run a bit hot at 11 watts, but with 100 MHz ethernet and a SSD they drop down to less than 4 watts.
I certainly do not begrudge them their relatively high price point in the past, it allowed their boutique business to survive until technology caught up with them. Now, with the kickass AMD graphics, improved mips/watt, more memory and half the price, they land firmly in the buy it and try it zone. Remember Shuttle? We all hoped they would keep pushing the envelope of light and tight, but they lost the plot and devolved to just another mediocre box maker.
This new generation of Fit PCs should now be just about perfect for video playing, and even work decently for legacy 3D games, but don't even think about the latest Far Cry. Or the latest Windows for that matter, if you want it to be not a toy then it better be running Linux, you have been warned.
These little boxes are just about as perfect as you can get for a home server. Completely silent, can be exanded to as much usb storage as you want, the right network connectivity, enough memory. The tiny power envelope means "always on" is a no brainer. Also decent for a non-professional browsing/emailing box capable of running drawing programs but not engineering CAD. Gimp but not Photoshop (unless you are truly patient...) Blender but not Maya.
I really appreciate the return to the straight box form factor. Their previous couple of generations are curvy and cute, but what practical sense does that make? I will take squat and homely, but stacks nicely, any day. That is beautiful to me. Much like the way I like my stero amplifier.
So long as Android fails to gain the UI functionality you actually need for productivity apps, these tiny PCs have a niche to grow in, and needless to say, these are fully functional with completely "libre" software with all the benefits that entails, not at all the case with Android.
No, they didn't pay me to write this post or send me a free machine. I just really like the way they engineer their boxes, their general attitude, and their stick-with-it-ness, and needless to say, their first class Linux support.
Re: Perhaps at last an affordable mini PC? (Score:2)
I've been highly interested in a Gigabyte Brix with the AMD A8-5545. unfortunately, even with a modest sized SSD, and 2GB od RAM, it still works out to $350+ in my local currency.
I'd like one for a new HTPC. Its not a need at this point, so I've been putting it off.
These new units sound like they could work for what I need. Going to keep my eyes open.
Re: (Score:2)
I want an HTPC as well but I've found the software stacks offered by both Windows and Linux to be inadequate for that purpose (mainly due to lack of being able to switch applications with remote control seamlessly, but also some things like Netflix and Amazon Prime don't work terribly well with a remote in either setup as well.) Android TV sounds about right, but I don't want to buy a device like this without being able to verify that it works.
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty good job finding these for sale, considering they won't be available until February at any price. Amazon doesn't have them listed yet. Nor does anyone else they have linked.
Yes, there are other Fit-branded systems by the same people, but no Fitlets. And no idea about prices other than the bare-bone base model.
It sounds really interesting, and I'm sorry I have those cartons full of mini-itx stuff sitting on my kitchen table. This would probably have made a better firewall.
Re: (Score:2)
I paid $260 and $300 for the two earlier generation Fit PCs I have, and I love them. Getting a little long in the tooth now but they still work great as light duty headless servers. What do I like most about them? The anodized extruded aluminum box secured with bog standard cross head machine screws. Industrial art for my jaded eyes.
Frequency (Score:5, Interesting)
clocked at up to 1.6GHz
Actually we might as well stop mentioning the CPU clock speed of devices already. :) They all hover around 2GHz and still vary wildly in performance. At this point the clock speed is essentially just a trivial configuration parameter of the chip.
Re: (Score:2)
You can still compare it to other devices with the same chip.
Network appliance (Score:3, Interesting)
Depending on how well the ethernet interface performs, this looks like it would make a decent little network appliance (PFsense, etc). Of course with the R2 graphics, it's probably good for more than that, but since Via seemed to slow down on their stuff I've had issues finding good mini-boards for firewalls etc (not enough interfaces on a Pi, which is also a bit slow).
It looks like the 6200T also has some AES acceleration, but I wonder if there's anything like Via's padlock (which was quite nice for VPN's or SSL tunnels).
Network appliance (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
make nice network applicances
It only takes one word to counter your suggestion... RealTek
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's AES-NI, same as in the first 32nm Intel Xeon and successors, core i5 and i7, recent Core i3.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A... [wikipedia.org]
Only thing missing is a fan (Score:5, Interesting)
I have a Chromecast, which is a mini PC on a dongle. It has a fanless design, but it desperately needs on. Trying to keep it cool in the summer is difficult and after ten minutes it's too hot and stalls.
Re: (Score:3)
I don't have air conditioning. The Chromecast isn't exactly faulty, it's just not properly designed to be fanless. There's no thought whatsoever given to cooling, but for $30 that's what you get.
Hope it has GigE. (Score:5, Interesting)
I have an E-350 laptop, and although it has only two cores at 1.6 GHz, it can easily keep up with 1080p video. (Having maxed it out at 8 GB of RAM doesn't hurt.) The thing that tends to be an issue is WiFi bandwidth. If wired to the network (it has GigE) or if the file is copied to local storage first, it's fine. Otherwise, you're just asking for the darn thing to burp several times during your movie.
Even 100Mbps Ethernet (using some old three-pair cable already in the wall) can prove insufficient for pulling 1080p off the NAS box, if there's any kind of contention at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like it has you covered. I'm actually interested in turning the thing into a router. It's cheaper than a lot of commercial home router solutions, and can do a lot more.
Re: (Score:2)
I rarely say this, but RTFA. Not only does it have gigabit ethernet, you can optionally get 2 or more gig-E ports.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably a combination of:
1) High bandwidth consuming action scenes (actual bandwidth demand can fluctuate quite a lot over the runtime of a movie)
2) Not enough buffering (I guess that primarily depends on the media playing software)
3) Congestion on the WiFi channel (neighbour(s) also streaming video... and even if you can't find another SSID doesn't mean there isn't another non-WiFi appliance or a 'silent' WiFi using that bandwith and your access point has to 'packet switch' around the nuisance... )
Never c
Re: (Score:2)
Second, playing video is a situation where you need a smooth transfer of data.
Or a nice fat buffer. These days, ram is cheap. A lot of programs refuse to buffer enough to help, though
Re: (Score:2)
A more realistic conversion from bits-per-second to bytes-per-second is to divide by 10.
Not just realistic, but exactly correct, because 100 MHz ethernet uses a simple 8B/10B encoding, otherwise known as start and stop bits. FWIW, 10GigE uses 64B/66B encoding to claw back most of that 20% non-coding wastage.
Re: (Score:2)
Can you verify you're actively hitting the CPU for video decoding? Because that sounds very late 90s. My RPi can also easily keep up with 1080p video and has never once stuttered playing anything over a 100Mbps network despite it's horrendously specced CPU and RAM.
Playing video is not a good indication of performance given how many SoCs simply do hardware decoding or otherwise accelerate video.
Re: (Score:2)
it isn't the Toshiba in Monza Red from PC World (2011) is it?
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmm, do you have any older b or g wifi things? They will make your n wifi go down to their speed when they are on.
Yes. That's probably the problem. Still, if it's that simple to shit on an entire n network, this thing had best have a decent wired connection available.
Benchmarks for that AMD chip look bad... (Score:3, Insightful)
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cp... [cpubenchmark.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Really? For 4W TDP? Versus the top tier Intel i7 @ 47W? It depends on what you are measuring.
I believe he is measuring dick length. For the rest of us, this is a more than capable processor and the GPU is the best in the business at that form factor. See, at this scale the name of the game is getting the most out of small number of transistors because there is only so much power you can dissipate from that little box into the surrounding slow moving air. Or to put it simple terms, sure, you can stuff an I7 into that box but it will burn a hole through your hand and set your stero cabinet on fire if
Re: (Score:2)
Check the single-threaded performance - AMD is 50% faster than Intel.
(Not often you get to say that these days....)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But if the NICs are decent ones, and are able to offload most traffic, I'd love to use this for Untangle / PFSense / VMs and such.
cpubenchmark shows this as being roughly 30% more powerful than the Intel D525's that I've been using for said task.
Might even use it for XBMC / PLEX Home Theater.
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
It will be slower and/or consume more energy than an Intel version
Unlikely at the same total price point. That only happens in the $300+ area of the desktop space.
The price of the Atoms people are comparing the E-series with doesn't include a GPU for the Atom... as if GPU's are magically free... dont use energy... conveniently ignored for the purpose of cheering on... shitty Atoms?
Re: (Score:2)
I got burned twice believing Intel's crap that an Atom would be anything other than an electric hot plate chewing through my software at snail speed. Never again.
Re:Benchmarks for that AMD chip look bad... (Score:4, Informative)
Intel is two generations ahead on semiconductor process technology.
One generation. Atom is at 22nm and AMD is at 28nm. When Atom goes to 14nm TSMC/AMD will be at 20nm. Intel could move it along a little faster if they really wanted but they won't because, firstly the shiny new tech always goes to the high end chips, and secondly, they fear cannibalizing their own markets.
Another point: the generation advantage isn't what it used to be, remember when the speed would double and the cost would halve like clockwork? Those days are gone forever.
Re: (Score:2)
remember when the speed would double and the cost would halve like clockwork? Those days are gone forever.
True. If you buy AMD processors, you aren't getting the fastest possible, but they will still be plenty fast enough. I built my wife's computer with an AMD FX-8350 and she's very happy with it (and I want one for myself).
And as I said, I would be happy to buy the tiny computer discussed in TFA. Sounds neat. (I'd also be happy to buy a tiny computer based on an ARM chip, but I'd rather have full Linu
Re: (Score:2)
I'd also be happy to buy a tiny computer based on an ARM chip, but I'd rather have full Linux than just ChromeOS so I probably won't buy a "ChromeBox".)
Full Linux runs on ChromeThings with various degrees of hardware support. I would like that too, though keep in mind that once you start putting full scale application demands on an ARM it starts hitting a rather similar power envelope to AMD's APUs. The win for ARM is part costs... those things are produced on way huger scale than anything by AMD, and sell for way less than Intel can possibly afford (given that shareholders have become dependent on a certain level of monopoly-blessed income). And you get:
Re: (Score:2)
Huh, I didn't think that was a troll when I wrote it. But it has been modded as Troll twice now.
Well, I really do prefer to give my money to AMD and I really would buy the fanless mini-PC in TFA.
Cablecard (Score:2)
Can you connect a USB cablecard tuner to these things and use them to replace your cable company provided STB?
Re: (Score:2)
Why bother? Put in something like a homerun and get multiple tuners serving the whole house.
Re: (Score:2)
But the homerun needs to connect to a router or PC anyways.
Three times smaller!!! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If something is three times larger, it's 4x the original size.
I seriously hope you're only trolling...
3 Times Smaller (Score:2)
It takes up negative 2 times as much space as the Intel NUC?!
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, you're doing the marketing math wrong.
If product A is 99% the size of product B, then A is smaller than B.
Therefore, if product C is 97% the size of product B, C is "three times smaller" than B.
Re: (Score:2)
I like that "three times smaller" assumes multiplication is the operation we're talking about, and having "smaller" instead of "bigger" means we should use the inverse operation of multiplication, not the inverse operation of addition. So, casual language is geekier than you.
If people understood that more often, they would multiply percentages together when appropriate instead of mistakenly (and nonsensically) adding them.
A very sexy router-NAS (Score:2)
The competition (Score:2)
"1.7GHz Exynos4412 Prime Cortex-A9 Quad-core processor with PoP (Package on Package) 2Gbyte LPDDR2 880Mega Data Rate"
$65.00
- http://www.hardkernel.com/main... [hardkernel.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Lack of a case makes it a poor comparison. Sure, if you're in the mood to DIY things, maybe even trivially, it works. But the Fitlet is "buy and then place on a shelf". When prices are this low, the time and effort and money to find or make a case that'll fit this other thing is actually pretty significant relative to the final cost.
Re: (Score:2)
ASUS Chromebox $160, has been $120 complete. ...
Fanless, 2GB (+ vacant slot), 16GB SSD, 4xusb3, Gig-E, display-port, wifi, BT
Only thing missing is s/pdif.
Might be a subsidy from Google. Sells with Chrome-OS but freely unlockable.
Not really (Score:2)
the competition [techcrunch.com]. costs $100, but it's a complete product and not a bare board. it's going to be superior in every other way, too.
Equally tiny UPS? (Score:2)
I really want one of these things, or something similar sized, for a tiny home server. The only issue I have with running a home server is that, with home renovations, we need to kill the power for a couple minutes now and then and I'd love to not have to shut down the server every single time...same with relocating it to a different shelf. Could someone recommend a tiny UPS suitable for these mini-servers, with lifetime in the neighborhood of an hour?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure somebody could recommend a normal-size UPS with uptime much greater than an hour (even when running this as a server, plus your router, plus your cable/dsl modem), which seems better to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Way overkill. UPSes are expensive to maintain if you need to replace a car battery every few years, they're very bulky which ruins the point of a tiny server that sits on a bookshelf, and they don't solve my problem of "I'd like to move it to a different shelf without losing power" unless I want to get a few people to carry around the UPS + everything attached to it. From my experience with large UPSes, just replacing batteries will cost more over the life of this machine than the computer would. I don't
Re: (Score:3)
Get a tiny $200 fanless laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
Closest product I have seen is a href="http://www.mini-box.com/picoUPS-100-12V-DC-micro-UPS-system-battery-backup-system">PicoUPS. Takes a 12v battery and maintains a constant DX output. With a standard 9Ah battery you could run most small devices for at least 8 hours.
Personally surprised that there aren't any 12V power supplies that can provide 3-4 regulted 2A outputs. Eliminate multiple wall warts and give yourself battery backup as well. I would love to have all the home networking gear and a NAS in
Re: (Score:2)
I haven't got an advice on what to buy. I do have an advice on what not to buy.
Don't trust a Trust
I have one. It is too slow. If I use it as an UPS and pull the wall plug the computer first shuts down due to power loss and then the UPS comes up and I can immediately restart my PC without putting the plug back in the wall.
It drops the power long enough to kill the PC. How can they not have detected that during testing?
It is useful for some other use cases, but not as an UPS. Just as an easy 240V power suppl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My feelings towards big UPSes is that the battery only lasts a couple years, and costs a ton to replace. PiUPS looks pretty cool aside from the part where it only supplies enough power to run a Pi, so we'll see... ..."Input range — 10 to 15V DC"
Worth a look to see if I can get that out of it. Running on AAs is fine, especially given that I'm not actually too concerned about power surges or neighborhood outages. It's really just for planned outages in my use case, so "put a couple batteries in, unpl
How to choose a UPS (Score:2)
My feelings towards big UPSes is that the battery only lasts a couple years, and costs a ton to replace.
Just make sure to buy a UPS that takes a standard battery. All my UPSes will accept a standard 12V 9ah battery (search for "UB1290") which you can get for $20 or less. I bought a six-pack from Amazon for $100 or so.
It pays to buy a decent UPS with decent status reporting. I have some old ones that I bought cheaper, and they don't report how loaded they are (they have a single "overloaded" light that li
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
sidecutters for the piezo sounder takes care of that annoying beep that wakes you up in the middle of the night when a tree takes the entire neighbourhood down.
Goddamnit ... (Score:4, Interesting)
<RANT=ON>
... I simply DESPISE the locultion "(x) times smaller than." It's lazy, stupid writing, and it needs to die in a fire.
The proper way to phrase the concept would be "(suitable fraction) of the size of", as in "one third the size of".
<RANT=OFF>
With name like "MintBox" (Score:5, Funny)
can I kill my Epia first, please? (Score:2)
still got that thing, it's still trucking even after its third power supply and nth set of capacitors (why the fuck is it going through so many capacitors??), that titchy little fan is gone (finally burned out) so I chucked a 120mm on the back of the Shuttle XPC box it's in (had to take the hacksaw and the dremel to that to make the board fit), it's now practically silent.
Re: (Score:2)
no, that would be system-and-peripherals-on-a-chip. You don't get to make the definitions.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Good one :)
Re: (Score:3)
No but you can install such kind of SSD in there (a picture is worth a few dozen words)
http://www.newegg.com/Product/... [newegg.com] or http://www.newegg.com/Product/... [newegg.com]
After which there's wired ethernet, or attaching a 2.5" hard drive to USB 3 (which can power the drive with a single cable) ought to give some nice quite fast storage.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that is they come with. I upgraded an older one with PATA hard drive to PATA SSD (getting a bit hard to find those now...)