Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Intel Hardware

Intel Launches 'Galileo,' an Arduino-Compatible Mini Computer 130

MojoKid writes "Although Intel is Chipzilla, the company can't help but extend its reach just a bit into the exciting and growing world of DIY makers and hobbyists. Intel announced its Galileo development board, a microcontroller that's compatible with Arduino software and uses the new Quark X1000 processor (400MHz, 32-bit, Pentium-class, single- core and thread) that Intel announced at the IDF 2013 keynote. The board makes use of Intel's architecture to make it easy to develop for Windows, Mac, and Linux, but it's also completely open hardware (PDF). Galileo is 10cm x 7cm (although ports protrude a bit beyond that), and there are four screw holes for secure mounting. Ports include 10/100 Ethernet, USB client/host ports, RS-232 UART and 3.5mm jack, mini PCIe slot (with USB 2.0 host support); other features include 8MB Legacy SPI Flash for firmware storage, 512KB embedded SRAM, 256MB DRAM, 11KB EEPROM programmed via the EEPROM library, and support for an additional 32GB of storage using a microSD card."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Intel Launches 'Galileo,' an Arduino-Compatible Mini Computer

Comments Filter:
  • Inigo Montoya... (Score:5, Informative)

    by charlieo88 ( 658362 ) on Friday October 04, 2013 @01:52PM (#45037665)
    Mini Computer? Inigo Montoya says, "I don't think that word means what you think it means."
  • Re:pricing? (Score:5, Informative)

    by pjrc ( 134994 ) <paul@pjrc.com> on Friday October 04, 2013 @02:01PM (#45037731) Homepage Journal

    Several articles have appeared claiming "under $60".

    For for free if you're one of about 50000 students or apparently about 400 people who attended a talk at Maker Faire last weekend in Rome.

    However, if you check out Intel FAQ, there are a number of Arduino compatibility caveats. Probably the main on is the I/O pins are controlled by an I/O expander with approx 2ms latency. That's pretty slow compared to Arduino's slow digitalWrite() function, which run about 4us on 16 MHz AVR, or direct AVR register access, which takes 125ns.

    The processor runs Linux and Arduino sketches are compiled to native Linux userspace programs, so it probably will open up a lot of possibilities.

  • Re:Inigo Montoya... (Score:4, Informative)

    by tepples ( 727027 ) <tepples.gmail@com> on Friday October 04, 2013 @03:01PM (#45038295) Homepage Journal

    Yeah... I was wondering how to hook up the teletype and the terminal servers.

    Through the Ethernet port, using SSH protocol. Ultimately, anything with preemptive multitasking and virtual memory can fill the role of a minicomputer. An 8-bit MCU is a micro, but a VAX or i386-family PC is a mini.

  • by jcdr ( 178250 ) on Friday October 04, 2013 @03:24PM (#45038539)

    Sorry for Intel, but the just announced Arduino Tre is far better from any point of views.
    http://blog.arduino.cc/2013/10/03/a-sneak-preview-of-arduino-tre/?utm_source=Arduino+World&utm_campaign=9f14cc4ca3-MakerFaire_World_201310_2_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_69a7d1abe4-9f14cc4ca3-76843037 [arduino.cc]

    * Run faster than the Intel solution: An Atom core yield the same code execution speed as an Cortex-A8 core at the same frequency, so 1GHz A8 will easily catch on a 0.4GHz ia32).
    * Cheaper and simpler to design on a custom board: just look at the chip package and at the PCB routing...
    * Simpler power supply design, again just look at the schematics and at the PCB.
    * HDMI output.
    * More I/O, and all are integrated directly into the two CPUs, not using peripheral chips with low bandwidth.
    * Already supported by larges communities, for the two processors.

    Intel is just trying to enter a new market with a big buzz, but there actual solution still far away from the concurrent solutions. There just don't understand that in the embedded market nobody is bounded to the ia32 instructions set. Integration is the key and there Quark X1000 don't bring anything new on the table.

  • by pjrc ( 134994 ) <paul@pjrc.com> on Friday October 04, 2013 @04:02PM (#45038887) Homepage Journal

    The "someone" mentioning 230 Hz is INTEL, in their Galileo FAQ.

    http://www.intel.com/support/galileo/faq.htm [intel.com]

    The question is near the end, specifically "What is the maximum rate at which GPIO output pins can be updated?"

    The answer, which you'll see if you click that link and expand the question to see the answer, is:

    The GPIO output pins on Intel® Galileo are provided by an I2C Port Expander that is running at standard mode (100 kHz). Each I2C request to update a GPIO requires approximately 2ms. In addition to software overhead, this restricts the frequency achievable on the GPIO outputs to approximately 230 Hz.

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...