Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Shark Hardware Science

X-ray Generator Fits In the Palm of Your Hand 32

Posted by Soulskill
from the set-phasers-to-scan dept.
ananyo writes "Scientists have reported the first tabletop source of ultra-short, laser-like pulses of low energy, or 'soft,' X-rays. The light, capable of probing the structure and dynamics of molecules (abstract), was previously available only at large, billion-dollar national facilities such as synchrotrons or free-electron lasers, where competition for use of the equipment is fierce. The new device, by husband-and-wife team Margaret Murnane and Henry Kapteyn based at JILA in Boulder, Colorado, might soon lie within the grasp of a university laboratory budget — perhaps allowing them to one day be as common in labs as electron microscopes are."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

X-ray Generator Fits In the Palm of Your Hand

Comments Filter:
  • How time flies (Score:5, Insightful)

    by overshoot (39700) on Saturday June 09, 2012 @09:44AM (#40267945)

    perhaps allowing them to one day be as common in labs as electron microscopes are.

    And back in my day, electron microscopes were big-ticket gear that only a few big labs could afford.
    Now, get off of my lawn!

  • Re:Proteome (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Naffer (720686) on Saturday June 09, 2012 @11:51AM (#40268629) Journal
    Not to mention that home X-ray sources have improved dramatically over the last few decades. I think if you've got enough cash Rigaku or Bruker will sell you single or dual wavelength rotating anode sources that would be totally fine for routine protein x-ray crystallography on nicely diffracting samples. Not all protein crystallography needs a synchrotron, since a lot of times people are just doing ligand soaks to try to find small molecule binding modes in protein active sites.
  • by Btrot69 (1479283) on Saturday June 09, 2012 @10:49PM (#40271913)

    This is a fully coherent laser -- not just an X-ray source. So, you would not be scattering photons the way crystallography is done -- you would be taking holographic photos of the protein molecules.
    And yes, these are soft X-rays now -- but this is and brand new technique, and it appears to be very scaleable. Hard X-rays might not be too far off.

Sigmund Freud is alleged to have said that in the last analysis the entire field of psychology may reduce to biological electrochemistry.