DIY Augmented Reality Heads-Up Display 39
mkwan writes "A PhD student in Melbourne, Australia, has built an augmented reality head-up display using a baseball cap, an Android smartphone, and off-the-shelf optics. It won't win any awards for style or practicality, but it's a fun way to use Wikitude. All we need now is a Terminator-vision smartphone app."
Not nearly as modern, but vaguely related: the Private Eye P4.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
How does his blog keep getting on
Re: (Score:1)
Do you understand VNC? That app works by rendering everything to an offscreen framebuffer in RAM, then VNC copies it into a separate process's RAM (I presume directly into the display framebuffer). This means no hardware acceleration for the X server, and some battery-draining CPU load for copying the pixels. It gets particularly bad if you attempt e.g. video playback, where the normal flow is sending YUV (or similar) data directly to the video card, which handles scaling and RGB conversion in hardware, and
Re: (Score:2)
Both the "native" X11 server and the "fake" X11 in a VNC session will have essentially the same performance it that situation.
Re: (Score:2)
This application implements a mostly-complete X11 server, running natively in Android. It allows X Window System applications to be run remotely and displayed on an Android device with internet access.
(bolding mine) which is why I assumed most people used it for ssh tunneling.
You may want to run the app remotely rather than NX for many reasons - accessing data or controlling hardware on a remote server for example. Your point about copying pixels between processes is certainly correct for your use case of a local chrooted OS install. However, for my ssh tunnelling use case, I'm not sure I agree, because the VNC pixel copying and X11 rend
Not goofy looking at all (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Have ask what 'You don't say (so)!' think It is a pus to think such Christ alive!
Obviously.
You're preaching to the choir here buddy.
Re: (Score:1)
Modifications. (Score:2)
2. Link lens to single eyepiece.
3. HUD app.
4. Make deliberately fragile and cheap.
5. Infinite business as geeks the world over keep buying them to crush while screaming that it's over 9000.
Re: (Score:2)
7. Profit
Re: (Score:2)
Its not quite a HUD yet (more of a screen in a part of your vision that would be obscured by the goggles) but its pretty cool. Far less than $9000 although still more than I'd be willing to pay--would be kind of cool to get some live stats plus trail maps showing where all of your friends are on the mountain.
CV value and what Apple is to spend on now (Score:2)
He could have reduced the CV value of the gear if he didn't use double mirroring - i.e. the phone could be horizontal, screen down. One fewer mirror is better quality. Software can mirror the screen contents (I tried an Iphone in a similar setup, using the car windshield as the mirror). As a next project, the camera could continuously monitor the user's eyeballs and determine where in the real life and on the screen he is looking at, including depth! Also, whenever an image is shown on the screen to augment
Re: (Score:1)
The compass works (well, to the extent it does) when the phone is horizontal (and that way only, AFAIK); accelerometers etc. work all different ways, and AR software *could* take orientation into account. And btw. with augmented reality, all kinds of positions should be prepared for by the browser vendor. With a ducttaped baseball cap headgear, Layar's use case is invalid - you don't wander around in Rome searching for the nearest pizzeria (nothing wrong with the contraption but the baseball caps suck in ge
Re: (Score:1)
He used a standard AR-Browser (Wikitude, which existed long before Layar) to build a proof-of-concept thing with available hardware and software.
Since the standard use-case for that software is displaying something on the screen of your smartphone, camera orientation matters (even if he's not using the camera in this case).
Of course I wouldn't go wandering around with that stuff on my head, but I think that's not the point. He wanted to prove that it can be done without custom hardware or software.
Reminds m
Re: (Score:2)
In breaking news... (Score:1)
Still deserves credit (Score:2)
I guess the whole point of it is to say that it is rather easy to create a (although perhaps rather ugly) HMD. Which is nowhere for use by common folk. The whole point of it proving that there is no real excuse for there not to be on the market other than no demand for it.
Say what you want, but he at least managed to get it working. Which I didn't, and I haven't seen somebody selling one of those.
Previous research (Score:3)
Seems like augmented reality has been a popular research area in Australia for a while. At LCA a few years ago there was a presentation by another PhD student on his AR project and I even got to try out the gear (somewhat bulkier than this latest one though):
http://www.tinmith.net/ [tinmith.net]
Build vs. buy (Score:2, Troll)
While his project is cute, there are already commercial solutions [buytvhatnow.com] that are pretty much the same thing.
P.S. I am not responsible if you decide to AR while biking on real roads...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The TV Hat looks awesome
You must have been a brilliantly easy kid to buy Christmas presents for.
No, mummy and daddy, I don't need a silly Nintendo DS or iPad. Who needs that when I can have this awesome dirty piece of string tied to a stick?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I'm too jaded, but that TV hat is just a joke, right?
gotta look sharp (Score:2)
Does it have to be a baseball cap? Can I have mine in a propeller beanie or a leopard-skin pillbox hat? Maybe a motorcycle helmet because you know I'm going to be crashing into all kinds of stuff trying to ride my bike while I play Counter-Strike on this thing.
Re: (Score:1)
Another issue will be privacy. If you think Google can track you now, wait until people start buying Google AR camera/display contacts and they can
I was hoping to buffer reality... (Score:2)
not augment it, but then I realized that it would just go faster and faster the longer I was in it. That's when I decided to go back to bed.
progress (Score:2)
It's sloppy, it has no "value," it will not win awards,.... and that is how progress is made. Value is he went and built something, unlike everybody else simply buys. He has an idea, ideas are a time a dozen, and he created something of substance and that takes time and expense. During that time, he learned what works, what doesn't work, and what parts and tools needed to build things.
I've been going through something similar of packaging 900MHz amateur TV transmitter and a receiver in a box for field use.
Would be interesting (Score:1)