Is the Quick Death of Failed Tech Products a Good Thing? 181
Joining the ranks of accepted submitters, HumanEmulator writes "The NY Times reports on how the Hollywood summer-movie business model is being applied to tech products: 'Every release needs to be a blockbuster, and the only measure of success is the opening-weekend gross. There is little to no room for the sleeper indie hit that builds good word of mouth to become a solid performer over time.' New products are being pulled from shelves only weeks after a lackluster release. What if the TouchPad, the Microsoft Kin, or even Google Wave had had more time on the market? Is this blockbuster-or-bust model a good thing for consumers, or for the industry in general?"
Re:It's an investment strategy (Score:4, Insightful)
Companies deduce from this that future value [of a product] is worth nothing.
So why do they keep pushing for ever-longer terms for the copyright in a product if the value of that copyright is nothing?