Swede Arrested For Building Nuclear Reactor 410
An anonymous reader writes "A 31 year old Swedish male was arrested for trying to build a nuclear reactor in his apartment. He got hold of radioactive material thru mail-order purchases and from smoke detectors. Police raided his apartment after he had contacted the Swedish Radiation Authority (Strålsäkerhetsmyndigheten) to inquire if it was legal to construct a nuclear reactor at home."
Now, Come On ... (Score:5, Funny)
Next on Discovery... (Score:3)
Re:Next on CBS (Score:2)
Bazinga!
Re: (Score:3)
What should the format be like? A mix of Mythbusters and Jackass?
Re: (Score:3)
Secrets Of the Universe.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ld-twoeg2s [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Well, a nuclear reactor potentially adds a whole new meaning to "there goes the neighborhood".
P.S.Namely, there it goes in a cloud of radioactivity.I know nuclear reactors generally can't explode.
Re: (Score:3)
Only if you're a superhero and only if it happened to you in the 60s.
*sigh* Even radiation was better in the past.
Re: (Score:3)
Want details (Score:5, Insightful)
How exactly one goes about building a nuclear reactor from mail order uranium (presumably depleted) and smoke detectors (about 1 microgram of Americium 241 each) ? The critical mass of Am 241 is over 50 Kg, so he would need 50 million smoke detectors to build a bomb. For a controlled, moderated reaction, much more, maybe hundreds of Kg. The technology to enrich natural uranium up to reactor-grade level is barely in the hands of states.
The fact that someone took him seriously and actually sent a guy with a detector AND a police squad to his house shows just how ridiculously incompetent the regulators are, and how paranoid people get when the word "radiation" is uttered.
Re:Want details (Score:5, Insightful)
That stuff is a reasonably zesty alpha emitter, and modestly well absorbed if taken internally, which isn't a good mix. If some noob has been fucking around, it is hardly unreasonable to take the precautionary step of assuming that he's manage to produce a bunch of toxic and radioactive dust.
Re:Want details (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm sure they were more worried about the radioactive material itself than the possibility he would actually succeed at building a reactor. He was never going to build a working reactor, but it's quite possible he might have acquired enough radioactive material to make himself and his neighbors very sick.
Re: (Score:3)
He told the newspaper that had he succeeded in building a nuclear reactor, generating any power would probably have proved beyond him. "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself," he told HD.
He also claims he had been using a geiger counter and had not detected "a problem" with the radiation.
i don't worry about regulators overreacting (Score:3)
i worry more about the insane things some crackpot might be doing with radioactive elements next door
you have strange priorities, because the regulators were RIGHT to overreact
if regulators got the impression some loony toon was playing with radioactivity in an apartment building, they aren't doing their job if they don't overreact
is this hysteria on my part? false alarmism on my part?
no, it is false complacency on your part to take the concept of some wackjob playing with radioactivity in tight living spac
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Sadly, knowing most landlords, I'm thinking the guy probably would, if only because it wouldn't require bolting the thing onto the structure.
Re:I just put a skylight in my place. (Score:4, Funny)
... and glow in the dark.
Lesson learned (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
If you're going to ignore the answer to a question, sometimes is best to not ask it at all.
Re: (Score:2)
It's better to beg forgiveness than ask permission, unless you're looking to stay out of jail...
Better to ask forgiveness than permission (Score:5, Insightful)
I love that the only reason he got busted is because he asked if it was okay...
Seems like he should have either:
(a) Asked BEFORE acquiring the material or
(b) Not asked at all
Re: (Score:3)
I really want to agree here but, this is one of those areas that tests my resolve a bit.
Look at the pictures on this guys blog. He blew up a container that he was working in and contaminated his whole stove area. Who knows what other messes this guy was making. Did you see the pictures of the original Radioactive Boyscout recently? (when he was caught stealing smoke detectors).
Admittedly, they are doing some cool stuff, and I have no qualms about them putting their own lives at risk for the love of their ho
What are you in for? (Score:5, Funny)
Prisoner 2: "I built a nuclear power plant in my kitchen."
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Prisoner 3: "I downloaded and shared 10,000 movies."
Re:What are you in for? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
OMG? What happened to Prisoner 4? You bastards, wait until Number 6 hears about this. (He'll probably look smugly at you .. in knowing sort of way)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:What are you in for? (Score:5, Funny)
Prisoner No. 6: "I am not a number!"
Re: (Score:3)
Prisoner 6: "I published a link on my blog to Prisoner 5's algorithm."
Re: (Score:2)
10,000? They'll be out loooong before you are.
Re:What are you in for? (Score:5, Funny)
Arlo: "Littering." And they all moved away from me on the bench
there, and the hairy eyeball and all kinds of mean nasty things, till I
said, "And creating a nuisance." And they all came back, shook my hand,
and we had a great time...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"And they all moved away from me on the Group "W" bench there."
Re: (Score:3)
Arlo Guthrie: Littering
Re:Prisoner 6 (Score:3, Informative)
Prisoner 6: "I recorded a video of police beating the crap out of a teenager for no good reason at a bus stop."
http://neil.fraser.name/news/2010/12/23/ [fraser.name]
http://neil.fraser.name/news/2011/04/28/ [fraser.name]
P.S. There is a good ending to this story: follow the links to the blog of Neil Fraser, a Google engineer who bailed the guy out after he spent seven months in jail, accused of, since video recording police is not illegal... "attempted lynching"....
Re: (Score:3)
kind of a sad story. the kid did time for no reason and the cops and DA got off scot-free! ;(
and the kid only got off because he had a friend. a lot of us would not have had this kind of help and would rot in prison for a long time.
the system is broken if this can happen. HOW many months was he locked up - and for no good reason at all!
how much suffering did the cops and DA get?
NONE.
there is no justice. this thing happens a lot and the judges do nothing about it. they all know the system is an out of c
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Prisoner 3: "I had consensual sex with two women, who then met up and withdrew consent after the fact. They only busted me after I leaked crimes committed by the US Army."
Don't forget, this is Sweden.
The hard parts (Score:3, Funny)
Choice quote: "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself".
Yeah, it's not like thhey're nineteenth century steam technology like the redundant safety systems.
Re:The hard parts (Score:5, Interesting)
Choice quote: "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself".
On its face, the quote is correct. A turbine and generator would be hard to build yourself. From scratch.
However, you can go to an automotive junkyard and pick up a used turbo unit for a few bucks, and while you're there, you can pick up an alternator, too. Now the problem is no harder than piping the steam from a pressure cooker through the turbo, and hooking the turbo to the alternator. Just add fission and you're on the grid!
A lot of people are playing with homemade turbine engines made from junked car parts. Perhaps they are deliberately trying to make it sound hard to discourage other Swedes with too many smoke detectors from trying a similar experiment.
Re:The hard parts (Score:5, Insightful)
That would get you out some electricity. Building it as a continuously-operating system is somewhat trickier.
Even trickier than that is getting it into your house power grid, which means syncing up the AC and other EE-grade power issues. You can buy the device you need, but it would end up costing more than just buying power from the power company, and be less convenient. (Plus, he was doing it in an apartment, probably without direct access to the mains.)
He didn't want to generate power, just do a little tinkering. He might well have hooked it up to a junk generator at some point, just to prove he could, but it wasn't the point. And the authorities were right to get nervous about it: the materials are toxic as well as radioactive, and putting more lives at risk than his. Get yourself a shed in the middle of nowhere next time.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Why assume he wanted electricity? A subcritical pile makes heat. Heat is energy, heat is expensive. It gets cold in europe in the winter. Stack the pile in your furnace in the winter, unstack it in the summer so it doesn't make heat. Easy peasy. Only real problem is the toxic result of fission. Also libyans might try to steal your pile, so send a HS kid back in time to tell you when you need to wear a bullet proof vest. Easy.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:The hard parts (Score:5, Funny)
We're talking about building a kitchen table nuclear reactor, and your safety concern is that the junk-car turbo might not have been properly operated?
I like your style!
Re: (Score:3)
Mr Rogers is a terrorist!
Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED is. (Score:2, Informative)
What's the big deal about being "arrested"? Police (and others) use their power of arrest all the time. The big story will be if he is charged with something.
Re: (Score:2)
Chances are slim that the government will pay you for the emotional trauma of being arrested, the loss to your reputation if you are arrested and all other effects of you being arrested even if you aren't charged with a crime in the end.
Re: (Score:3)
I also don't like a police state where you can get arrested for no apparent reason. But it's not like there was "no apparent reason". He was playing with goddamn nuclear material!
What should the police have done according to all you complaining people? Kindly request that he refrains from building a nuclear reactor, and that he delivers the nuclear material before noon the next day, because although it's a grey area in the law, it's best not to play with it in a residential area?
Of course they raided the ap
Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED (Score:4, Insightful)
But the problem was that it is not even illegal to do that in Sweden. It is only a legal "greyzone", and there is no laws for it either.
I'm sure Sweden has laws against things like reckless endangerment. That Americium is some nasty crap. It's not as toxic as Plutonium, but it's no fun.
Forget radioactivity for a minute. How would you feel if it turned out that your neighbor had been growing ebola cultures in his living room because he was convinced he could find a cure? I doubt if there are any specific laws against growing your own ebola cultures, but I'll damn sure betcha it's against plenty of laws that are on the books.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Being arrested is no big deal... being CHARGED (Score:5, Funny)
What's the big deal about being "arrested"? Police (and others) use their power of arrest all the time. The big story will be if he is charged with something.
He won't get a charge. Neutrons don't carry a charge.
I'l bet... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
He wasn't even an Eagle Scout at the time. He earned that later. Can you imagine if he was an Eagle Scout? I bet you he either would have figured out some awesome new method for nuclear power generation or would have died in the process as so many Eagle Scouts seem to do in the name of progress (Roger Chaffee, Ellison Onizuka, William McCool).
headline != article content (Score:5, Informative)
he was questioned by the police because he apparently violated some Swedish nuclear material laws.
the story in short:
- he invested $950
- he bought radioactive material and dismantled one domestic fire alarm
- he blogged about his expirements
- he asked the Swedish authorities if it is allowed to build a nuclear reactor
- some official accompanied by police offices visited his flat and found no radiation problem
- he was questioned at a police stations and was afterwards released
- all the nuclear stuff was confiscated
Re: (Score:2)
Is he being charged with anything?
If not then that actually seems a fairly reasonable response given that he asked permission before doing anything risky.
Re: (Score:3)
Everything about the story makes sense except for
- all the nuclear stuff was confiscated
What he was doing, and what he owned, was perfectly legal, right?
That's the whole point of exempt sources... Ultra super low power, yet detectable with good gear... Assuming he wasn't stupid enough to beg borrow steal non-exempt sources...
Now if he had unlicensed non-exempt sources, I can see why they'd throw the book at him and confiscate it all. I'd even more or less support it. I have friends who are in charge of non-exempt sources and the legal require
Re: (Score:3)
I'm sure that screwing around with a domestic fire alarm
He also ordered radioactive material from overseas.
so?
If its a non-stolen legally exempt source under the overseas country laws (probably USA) and also is a legally exempt source under local laws (most likely) and if he followed the export/import/shipping laws (hmm, getting complicated here, but for exempt sources its generally not a big deal) then it doesn't matter.
People/companies ship radioactive material overseas, perfectly legally, all the time. Even the non-exempt stuff is really no big deal even when you follow all the laws, most of which are common
Nope (Score:3)
He was not trying to generate electricity - "To get it to generate electricity you would need a turbine and a generator and that is very difficult to build yourself," he told HD. He was just tinkering! Obviously a DIY purist. This guy should get a geek medal or something. Utterly brilliant. And I am very pleased I'm not his neighbour.
Re: (Score:2)
The submission is a litte incomplete. Where are the plans and schematics of his reactor!? It could be the heigth of geekness and coolness if most of the case and support structure were made of LEGO.
another attempt (Score:5, Informative)
This kid [wikipedia.org] tried (badly, apparently) to do the same in the US a while back. I lived only a couple of streets over, but had left the area a dozen years before his attempt. I think I delivered newspapers to his house.
Re: (Score:2)
You're glooming
Overkill much? (Score:3)
Is it really necessary to raid a guy who was asking for permission in the first place? Seems like he would have welcomed an "inspection" and handled things accordingly from there. Since he was asking for permission it sounds like he wasn't trying to break the law - give the guy some credit. All this is going to do is discourage others from inquiring and just doing whatever they're after.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Is it really necessary to raid a guy who was asking for permission in the first place?
Ask permission first and you get licensed to work with non-exempt sources. No problemo.
F around and ask stupid questions after already doing it, they're gonna come down like a ton of bricks.
Try building an addition onto your house once by acquiring a building permit before starting work, and once by acquiring a building permit after the work is complete, and report back on which experience was more "fun".
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering that too. I'm from the States so police + raid doesn't usual equate to a friendly stroll. Then I started asking myself if it's that much nicer over that way in that aspect too.
I'm still curious why they confiscated the equipment and not just the radioactive material. I take it this story is too fresh to get any good details yet, but I have a hunch it'll come out.
Re: (Score:2)
Not quite...
FTB (From the Blog)
"Wednesday, I was arrested and sent to jail, when the police and the Swedish Radiation Safety Authory searched my apartment. They took all my radioactive stuff, but I was released after a hearing. But I am still suspekt for crime against the radiation safety law.
I was ordered by the police to get out of the building with my hands up, then three men came, with geiger-counters and searched me. Then I was placed in a police-car, when Radiation Safety Authory went into my apartmen
The worying bit is (Score:2, Interesting)
He ordered some radioactive material from overseas
Which was evidently delivered without any of the authorities being notified. How many Jihadi's are reading this and putting in their orders now?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
personally more worried, a dirty bomb could have affects lasting for decades
Only in a small area. As for the decades part I believe there are still 2 giant holes in the ground in New York that were created almost 10 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
lasting for decades
Or until someone busts out a hose. Whichever is sooner.
Re: (Score:2)
He ordered some radioactive material from overseas
Which was evidently delivered without any of the authorities being notified
it was most likely a Radium preperation like this one [ld-didactic.de] (or a similar product for scholastic purposes), more intensive radiation sources are strictly controlled.
How was this going to work? (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm puzzled how this guy was going to build a "nuclear reactor" out of mail-order isotopes and smoke detectors. Smoke detectors usually contain Am-241, which is an alpha emitter. The mail order stuff I assume was uranium ore. Was he planning to create neutrons from (alpha, n) reactions and use those to trigger a few fissions from the uranium?
This sounds like his experiment bears as much similarity to a reactor as a balloon full of hairspray resembles a car engine.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
richardsreactor.blogspot.com/
Re: (Score:3)
Now after the Americium-241 degrades into Cm or plutonium, that is another matter. For the neutron radiation a good thick wall of lead should do it. Just keep that tucked inside your closet for easy access.
Afterwards... (Score:2)
Cool (Score:2)
Belt buckles, shoelaces and a piece of gum (Score:4, Funny)
Who needs radioactive material to build a nuclear reactor? This is clearly no Macgyver.
Re: (Score:2)
Extremely old? (Score:2)
Ugh (Score:2)
Easier to ask forgiveness than permissions.... (Score:2)
Un-sharp (Score:2)
Information published by the experimenter himself (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Nuclear-secrets.com is dead homer used it when (Score:2)
it still had real info on it.
But he needed to steal some plutonium from the power plant to make it work.
"Arrested" (Score:2)
In his apartment? Ridiculous! (Score:3)
I build mine in a rented garage, like all right-thinking people. It's right by the death ray and the free energy machines.
Just goes to show (Score:3)
Why arrested? (Score:3)
He was obviously making a good faith effort to find out the relevant laws and comply. He bought freely available materials over-the-counter so to speak. This isn't a bad guy but rather a curious one and justice is not served by punishing him. As some point people have forgotten that the law is guideline to justice and that actual justice should be served by the system, not strict compliance with the letter of the law.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Considering he was doing this in his own home, with a risk of irradiating his neighbours, I think it was right to stop him experimenting. If he did it in a properly shielded location then it wouldn't be so bad.
Re: (Score:2)
Considering he was doing this in his own home, with a risk of irradiating his neighbours, I think it was right to stop him experimenting. If he did it in a properly shielded location then it wouldn't be so bad.
No one seems able to answer if his sources were exempt or non-exempt. Thats the key.
As for the "properly shielded location" that is pretty irrelevant, if he had to dough to own a pig and pay inspection fees, unless he's trying to make a political statement, the paperwork to make it perfectly legal would be pretty easy, depending on what he's doing.
Exempt sources are technically radioactive, and great for experimenting and fooling around, and the level of radiation is right up there with a granite counterto
Re: (Score:2)
So what you're saying is that it should be perfectly permissible for someone to tinker with chemically dangerous and radioactive chemicals in an apartment building where he will surrounded by other people? Some of those other people being the particularly vulnerable kids and the elderly? The danger here isn't that he could be building a bomb, the danger is that large concentrations of radioactive material is inherently unhealthy. There was no one to make sure he stored it properly, didn't have too much o
Re:Government destroys economy (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
weapons grade or not
That distinction would be wrong to gloss over. While it is relatively easy to build a nuclear reactor (not a safe one, mind), building a nuclear weapon (and merely producing or handling weapons-grade nuclear material) requires technological and industrial resources beyond any individual. Therefore, this is not nuke material. It is at worst usable in a dirty bomb.
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.unitednuclear.com/ [unitednuclear.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If by "nuclear material" you mean legally exempt sources, there's a couple places. United nuclear is a marketer/reseller of the actual suppliers. Kind of like digikey and mouser do not manufacture resistors, they resell them. By legal definition exempt sources are harmless; don't sweat it.
If by "nuclear material" you mean legally non-exempt sources, there's a couple perfectly legal places. Just submit your valid non-expired NRC licensing information, which they'll verify, and then ship the goods. If I
Re: (Score:3)
Radioisotope thermoelectric generator
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator [wikimedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
"Tiny" nuclear reactors can be as small as 9 inches by 16 inches, as in the SNAP-10 used to power a spacecraft in the 1960s (this was a full-fledged nuclear reactor, not an RTG). Much much smaller than a hot tub.