Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

New Technology Turns Windows Into Solar Panels

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward
    Why restrict this to office buildings? I wanna live in a solar panel too!
    • Why restrict this to office buildings?

      Surface area. Most (if not all) homes lack the sq.ft. of glazing required to make a transparent PV array viable.

      • by Geotopia (692701)

        "New Technology Turns Windows Into Solar Panels"

        I knew someone would figure a good use for Windows. Hopefully there won't be driver and registry problems with the Solar Panels.

    • Re: (Score:2, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward

      It will eventually be a common technique when building homes. At some point in the future you will have solar shingles, solar windows, in wall solar panels with light redirected from above to make use of the dead space and possibly even solar paint (depending on house style) that all feed into the same generation system. Unfortunately it isn't viable today and all of those technologies have to be developed to be separately viable before they can be combined into some sort of piecemeal home unit that gener

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Isn't the purpose of a window to let light in, not absorb it?

    • by royallthefourth (1564389) <royallthefourth@gmail.com> on Monday June 27, 2011 @09:52AM (#36583018)

      This would be useful for a window that has the sun shining directly into it during the morning or afternoon; you only need so much light coming in!

      • by ledow (319597)

        Yes, and solar is already incredibly worthless without having to steal only "some" of the light, while letting the rest through, and being transparent (or at least semi-transparent), and not being 4-inch-thick, and providing access to the conductor to carry the electricity away, in a glass panel tested to all the relevant standards, on a couple of hundred square meters on the side of a building in a city (which won't be in direct sunlight for quite a lot of the time, unless it's the tallest building around

      • Yep imagine that your house's roof let some light in, just enough that you'd never have to turn lights on until sunset, even in the innermost rooms. You could have 90% of the light turned into electricity and the rest used to light your home during the day.

        And no you wouldn't need to worry about aerial spying, your roof would look like what car guys call "slut-black tint."

    • by TWX (665546)

      We like having nice views here in Arizona, but large windows are very bad for the temperature of the structure. If one could reclaim some of the cost of the air conditioning with solar power then it's more practical to have large picture windows.

      I for one would like to see this integrated into automobile glass, with it powering a combination battery-monitoring and air circulation system. It could be used to reduce the interior temperature of a car by cycling out the hot air with less-hot air from outside

      • by gstoddart (321705)

        One could even make a combination solar panel and LCD crystal windows, such that the operator can park, turn on the fan, and then whiteout the windows so that even less light makes it inside.

        And, just think of the benefit to teenagers and other people who want to go 'parking' ... no more finding a dark secluded place. Just pull over somewhere, and blank out the windows for a bit and have a quickie.

        Of course, the vigorous rocking of the car might be a give-away, but, it's a small price to pay. :-P

        • It might be interesting if a cloud floats over the car :-D

        • Of course, the vigorous rocking of the car might be a give-away, but, it's a small price to pay. :-P

          Nothing active suspension can't take care of. Crank up the shocks to maximum stiffness (using a servo-controlled valving knob or magnetic fluid suspension) and you'll hardly be able to rock it.

      • by EvilStein (414640) <spamNO@SPAMpbp.net> on Monday June 27, 2011 @11:01AM (#36583924) Homepage

        I'd be happy if we had a solar charger that worked well enough to charge my iPhone. :/ Tried a couple different brands and they were all awful.

        One day...

        and it's my opinion that the biggest barrier to solar panel adoption in the United States right now are homeowner associations. My worthless HOA forbids solar panels. (Sadly, it is legal for them to do so under state law.. for now, Texas is trying to strip HOAs of that power)

        • OK... your HOA forbids solar panels. Do they specify panels? Because solar arrays come in many forms, panels only being one of them. It's possible that solar window arrays or solar roofing arrays or solar sheets would not run afoul of your HOA, even though people might grouse about some of the options enough to re-word the bylaws.

    • by theIsovist (1348209) on Monday June 27, 2011 @10:06AM (#36583152)
      That's one purpose of a window. Thanks to modern building techniques, we have the option to create much larger openings in the facade, and thus you get your typical glass and steel skyscraper. Ever notice that they all have a reflective, metallic tint to them? This is to keep much of the light out, because in a large office building, your interior temperature suffers heavily from the amount of light let in. You also have an issue with glare, which tinting can help with as well. If your solar system reduces the amount of solar gain and the amount of light into the building while still allowing some light/vision/heat in, you can forgo the window tinting, and make the windows even more useful.
    • Windows with southern exposure get light all day. Sometimes it gets a bit much, especially in hot areas in the summer. The windows are tinted anyway, why not get some use out of them?
    • by uncanny (954868)

      Isn't the purpose of a window to let light in, not absorb it?

      Then what are blinds/curtains for?

      • Just a guess here, but to possibly block the sunlight/heat from entering? Or even to block someone outside from seeing inside?

        Did you really just actually ask what curtains are used for???
        • by uncanny (954868)
          That was in response to the person thinking that blocking light coming in through windows was a new or otherwise weird idea. Try reading the whole thing for once.
    • by jbengt (874751)
      Glass windows have at least three purposes:
      Keep out the heat, cold, wind, rain, and snow.
      Let in light.
      Allow a view of the outside
      Most windows are designed specifically to keep the heat of the sun out and reduce ultraviolet light transmission, which also happens to cut down on the amount of light let in. The typical design attempts reduce heat gain and fading as much as possible while letting in as much visible light as desired, but it usually comes down to a trade off that easily computes in favor of r
    • by skids (119237)

      Some light. Not all wavelengths and not all light, though. The rest is intentionally absorbed or reflected.

  • by jabberwock (10206) on Monday June 27, 2011 @09:47AM (#36582976) Homepage
    Linux has been doing that for years. Microsoft rips off open source, yet again ...
  • Windows is a trademark of the Microsoft corporation.
  • For a minute there I thought somebody found a use for the Windows OS, besides gaming :-P

  • A company called Konarka developed fully transparent cells in 2009 [cnet.com], brownish and blueish cells from Sunways are already used in existing buildings [solarserver.com].

    • And the Sears / Willis Tower in Chicago is slated to have such windows installed: Chicago Tower Solar Farm [slashdot.org]
    • by Stellian (673475)

      Another green fad. PV are only marginally cost effective when they tracking the sun. A PV cell that is engineered to look nice and has 3 hours/day angled sunlight will probably break even when hell freezes over.

      • If the solar windows cost a buck more than regular windows (not saying they do have that little cost difference, just rhetorically speaking), then even if they didn't provide much power, it might make sense to buy them instead of 'regular' glass, no?

        It all comes down to costs, not efficiency. Better efficiency would be great, but even marginally efficient PVs could be useful so long as they are cheap enough.

      • by rbrausse (1319883)

        I couldn't believe your claim but it seems you're right...

        I found informations about the PV installation at the main train station in Freiburg - it was build (mostly for political/design reasons) with vertical solar cells (see page 38 [baden-wuerttemberg.de] for a picture).

        according to the details on page 41 (upper table in the right column, German only...) the annual output is 59 kWh/m2, this paper [energybulletin.net] estimates the energy requirement for monocrystalline cell modules (including frame, supports, inverter and human labour) to 7900 MJ/m

        • by kyle5t (1479639)

          Since I install solar for a living I was curious, and I looked into this system a little bit. There are a number of problems here:

          * multicrystalline silicon requires more energy to manufacture, out of proportion to the increase in production efficiency
          * Germany, despite having very generous incentives, is actually about as bad in terms of solar resource potential as Alaska
          * the modules used should be more efficient than 10%, even considering the semi-translucent design
          * the balance of system components cou

  • by vawwyakr (1992390) on Monday June 27, 2011 @10:03AM (#36583110)
    Here I thought windows that "block sunlight" were called walls.
    • And you've never heard of sunglasses either?

    • Any company would rather make their offices floor to ceiling in glass, but then they get too much light in (the office being too bright is not the problem, just overheating), and thus have to install blinds. This ability to siphon off some of the heat will work in their favour.
  • About time (Score:4, Insightful)

    by mbone (558574) on Monday June 27, 2011 @10:04AM (#36583120)

    I've only been hearing about this for, what, about 30 years. I imagine cost is the crucial factor, as otherwise some of those other startups would be ubiquitous now.

    Even in this case, the article says "CEO Fink wouldn't reveal his system's cost per watt ," so I bet cost is still a factor.

    • by DaveGod (703167)

      The system's cost per watt straight-up isn't necessarily useful. What's interesting is the relevant cost per watt of this system, that is the cost over and above that of the regular tinted windows you would otherwise be buying.

      Furthermore with "cost per watt" I'm never really clear whether or how much they are counting for the land required. Again there is nil relevant cost with these windows.

      • by jklovanc (1603149)

        Cost per watt is an easily manipulated number. I most cases I bet it is based on optimal production and measured at the panel. I doubt very much it takes into account any of the following;
        Cost and power loss of equipment to convert from DC to AC
        Maintenance cost of panels and conversion equipment.
        Decreased output due to window facing, time of day, time of year and atmospheric conditions.

  • A quick Google search turns up results from at least as far back as 2007 [pvresources.com] and one article (apparently offline) from 2004 [googleusercontent.com].

    I guess the new product will be more efficient, but this is definitely nothing new.
  • It really can do anything!!!!!!

  • And hasn't done a damned thing. Insert funding here. Yep. Revolutionary technology. Listed on the Tel Aviv stock exchange though.
  • I guess we'll have to wait and see if this tech is viable. Every year it seems some new solar tech comes out with big promises, and quietly dies in whispers.
    I haven't given up hope though; long ago I had given up on LED tech as any sort of serious display tech or light source, and suddenly(?), there were: LEDs that make gorgeous displays of all sizes, LEDs that for all colors of the visible spectrum and then some, and LEDs that put out 110 lumens (who'd a thunk?). I just hope there's a similar breakthr
    • by rahvin112 (446269)

      They aren't dieing. See that's the problem when you have a 2 second attention span. Most of these inventions are being incorporated into viable production lines. From discovery to production is at least 5 years and that's if they already have a factory in place that can utilize the new technology. If they have to build the factory as well it's another 2-3 years. So when you hear about one of these great new ideas do you check back on it in 8 years? Didn't think so.

      Bulk solar power is on our door step, other

      • They aren't dieing. See that's the problem when you have a 2 second attention span. Most of these inventions are being incorporated into viable production lines. From discovery to production is at least 5 years and that's if they already have a factory in place that can utilize the new technology. If they have to build the factory as well it's another 2-3 years. So when you hear about one of these great new ideas do you check back on it in 8 years? Didn't think so.

        Bulk solar power is on our door step, otherwise GE wouldn't have just bought one of the most important thin-film solar producers, coincidentally the company in question was already building the largest solar cell production plant in the world. The CdTe panels that this company produces use little of the very expensive rare earths that the other panels do, they can be produced on roll-roll processes (flexible panels as well) and it's expected that they can be produced for significantly less than a $1 a watt (considered the break point for mass acceptance).

        Riiight, just because GE -in whom it sounds like you own stock or something, and the same idiots who tried to foist mercury laden CFLs on everyone- bought into some solar tech, the solar future is right around the corner. We've been hearing these promises for far longer than 8 years, it's been more like decades; maybe the 2 second attention span is yours, not mine.

        • by rahvin112 (446269)

          I use GE in the analogy because GE requires that every division they own produce 20% returns or the company is sold. They have a corporate policy to avoid risky ventures and their movement into any new industry is a signal that industry has achieved a certain level of acceptance and growth that fits the GE prospects. As the single largest industrial conglomerate in the US they are a sign of a real market being developed. Up until the First solar acquisition GE only lended their name to solar panels (buying

          • Well, if things pan out for them, that would be awesome- I wish solar tech would take off, I really do; I still have some reservations about any cutting edge tech and the promises and claims that developers or mfgs make regarding it, but obviously from time to time the claims pan out. Please understand that I've been reading about solar in Popular Mechanics since the 70s', they usually made it sound like a revolution was right around the corner, and to date, it's not quite where they suggested it'd be. Sol
  • by Super Dave Osbourne (688888) on Monday June 27, 2011 @11:13AM (#36584106)
    You can use passive heating and cooling in the design of a structure and do without HVAC for most of the year. Bottom line is architecture and society's whim is responsible for selling inefficient systems to the public, the public is guilty of being dumb/ignorant, and the oil industry sells the stupid people what they want for 2000% over their cost and get stinking filthy rich and powerful. Who's to blame? Nearly everyone!
  • "New Technology Turns Windows Into Solaris"? <blinks> I'm overdue for a new eyeglass prescription, it would seem.
  • You can buy off-the-shelf solar windows from several companies. We normally deal with Scheuten or Schott.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      The question is, what do they cost?

      That is,

        X = normal window with coatings to limit solar illumination
        Y = windows with added PV

      cost = Y - X

      then how much that cost is per watt? If it is more than about $1-$2/watt, it obviously doesn't make sense.

  • Earlier this year, another company came out with an, arguably, better solution.
    http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/03/21/2125210/Chicagos-Willis-Tower-To-Become-Vertical-Solar-Farm

  • My heart sank the day I heard they were acquired by Oracle. Now that's a comeback! It's amazing to see two amazing technologies, Windows and Solaris to come together!

  • "...act as solar panels at the same time as blocking sunlight from entering..."

    So what you mean to say is take current technology solar panels and use them for windows? As that would accomplish the same goal.

  • Back in the '80s they used to put tinted windows on buildings to block the sun to reduce air conditioning bills.

    Then they realized that when they did this they spent more on lighting since the sun couldn't get in. So they moved to coatings that reflect heat but let the light through. Air conditioning bills down, lighting bills down, everyone wins.

    Now they want to harvest the daylight, so that they can use that electricity to... light the office?

    *sigh* I'm all for harvesting waste energy, but these don't

  • A relative is an employee and showed me an article from an internal newzine talking about this kind of development too. They have deeper pockets, I bet, too. Anyway, I recall it showing an auto moonroof application that I presume is oriented at electric/hybrid vehicles. But the company has many large building contracts so that would be a presumed application as well. As has already been noted, the question is value.

  • it's written java - what's the story here?

I bet the human brain is a kludge. -- Marvin Minsky

Working...