The 'Three Ton' Hard Drive Destroyer 206
Barence writes "Last year, PC Pro welcomed a DIY-style hard-disk destroyer into its Labs to wreak havoc on some unsuspecting platters. Now the technology has moved on, with the Ideal 0101 — a device that pierces disks with between 2.5 and 3 tons of force. 'It's not the quick cut-and-shut process you'd assume it is,' says PC Pro's reviewer. 'Instead, the 0101 seems to enjoy its particular method of torture.The punch emerges from the side of the bay, slowing piercing its way through metal, silicon and glass, before retreating once the disk is destroyed.'" I attached a video clip.
recycling (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:recycling (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
I've given the platters to my girl fiend as purse mirrors. I also keep one in my car for when people have their high beams on behind me. Not sure why, but the surface is a near perfect mirror. And since it's not really deformable (brittle, not elastic) the image is always near perfect. Minus the hole in the center.
If you can toss them correctly they also fly rather well, requires you to snap the wrist.
I just don't see how this destroys 'everything'. A small hole like than in only a portion of the disk will
Re:recycling (Score:4, Informative)
I've given the platters to my girl fiend as purse mirrors. I also keep one in my car for when people have their high beams on behind me. Not sure why, but the surface is a near perfect mirror. And since it's not really deformable (brittle, not elastic) the image is always near perfect. Minus the hole in the center.
If you can toss them correctly they also fly rather well, requires you to snap the wrist.
I just don't see how this destroys 'everything'. A small hole like than in only a portion of the disk will still leave quite a bit of data.
There is a certain cutoff year where most of the pre-whatever drives are aluminum platter and the post-whatever drives are glass platter. Everyone whom does what we do, eventually has the "shattering" experience of discovering their first glass platter hard drive. And being precision ground surfaces they can't be prestressed like car windows, they leave some very nasty sharp jagged chunks of glass. Keep the 1st aid kit handy...
The large old aluminum ones (think 5.25 or bigger) also rang with a clang you cannot believe if dropped on a tile floor. Deafening, almost. Don't try with the glass platters.
Maybe for some models, but not all (Score:3)
There is a certain cutoff year where most of the pre-whatever drives are aluminum platter and the post-whatever drives are glass platter.
This does not seem to be true across all manufacturers. I dismantle all of our drives before disposal, and I've only come across glass platters in laptop drives (they seem to have been glass all the way back to the early 1990s, the earliest one I disassembled was from 1992 and had glass platters). All of the 3.5" drives have had aluminum platters, from the cheap 5400 RPM drives to 10000 RPM drives from servers.
It's possible that some manufacturers use glass platters in certain model lines of drives,
Re: (Score:2)
Now that you mention it, the one that chopped my hand up (didn't quite need stitches) was a laptop drive from the early 00s. Also found glass platters in double-digit-gig high RPM (for their era, anyway) SCA SCSIs.
For obvious reasons I don't try to pry stuck platters out anymore, so I don't know the ratios on modern drives.
Re: (Score:2)
I've only found glass in the sub-3.5" class drives, more often than not. I've never shattered a platter, because unlike everyone else I know, I prefer to unscrew all the screws first and take them apart that way, rather than the prying with a screwdriver approach. It's more satisfying, like a puzzle, to figure out exactly what order to take things out for a given model.
Re: (Score:2)
IBM Desk Star drives of the 20-30 gig size were the first 3.5 inch drives I encountered that were glass.
-nB
Re: (Score:2)
Glass is merely an alternative platter base material to aluminum. There are advantages to it (very good heat stability, for example) so it depends on the model. They've been around since the 90s.
IBM DeskStars were probably the most common consumer drives with them, but the other manufacturers all had their own as well. These days it's probably even more a mess trying to figure out if a drive has glass or aluminum platters. I'm willing to bet even submodels of a particular model line vary - one submodel will
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The best thing is that when they check the time they are also getting an eyeful of porn.
Brilliant. I'm saving that one for my son's wedding speech!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. I have a giant collection of jars full of various HD components. I have one of those giant plastic pretzel containers full of the heads. I can't fit any more in there, so I've been getting around to removing the bearings for later, and chucking the alloy, to make space. See! I threw something away! Please don't call the horder TV show people!
Re: (Score:2)
anyone else manually dismantle the things and remove the magnets because they're decently strong?
I took an old hard drive apart several years ago to get the magnets. Played with them a bit, then stuck them on a metallic surface in the garage and forgot about them. Sometime after, I was replacing a picture window. The frame was held in place by some large finish nails which had been sunk way below the surface of the wood and in places not that obvious. I went and found the old magnets. It turned out that if I let one rest on top of my finger and then ran the finger slowly down the frame, the magnet wou
Re: (Score:2)
Kind of silly. (Score:5, Insightful)
A drill press works faster and is a lot cheaper. granted it does not have bright green lights and a lot of over-engineering, but hey.
Can they make it do some laser effects and add a smoke machine so it looks really cool?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Too much unscrewing, though you could "flux cut" the stainless using your torch by holding some carbon steel wire or welding rod between the flame and the stainless. It's the way industrial scarfing torches work.
Re: (Score:2)
If you have an old electric coil hot-plate, melting them on the coil can make some pretty interesting artistic patterns for wind mobiles. I would not recommend trying it on your cooking stove, however -- you have to keep an eye on it and turn off the heat right away or you'll slag the coil.
Re: (Score:2)
Mine was even better:
http://picasaweb.google.com/mprinkey/MeltingHardDrives [google.com]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I would feel safer simply wiping the drive; punching a hole in it leaves most of the platter surface area intact.
But I suppose there's always option C, "both."
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Kind of silly. (Score:4, Informative)
The myth about '32 erase cycles' and similar nonsense about reading data with an AFM is pure bollocks, and has been since the introduction of MR (and later GMR, CMR and TMR) head drives nearly 20 years ago (15 for non-IBM drives).
Re: (Score:2)
Even that's overkill.
sudo dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdx
Good luck recovering anything from that on a modern drive.
Re: (Score:2)
I am lazier -- because I use TC with smart card encryption, with keyfiles on an IronKey drive.
Zeroing out the data on the drive just means unmounting the volumes, and formatting the smart card, or forcing the IronKey (only the Basic one can do this) to erase all the data and regenerate new keys. For safety, I do a zero pass, but it isn't really needed.
For Windows, I use BitLocker To Go, and post Vista, the Format command in Windows zeroes out the encrypted key sectors so unless someone saved off the unencr
Re: (Score:2)
Erased and encrypted (with a lost key) are not the same thing. A dedicated attacker could likely have a fun time with the latter, as there's potential for a fair bit of known-plaintext. ... of course, most of us are likely to encounter such an attacker. At work, maybe, but then we'd be doing wipe+destroy processes. At home, meh. I can't even give away old monitors, so Idoubt anyone'd end up with one of my drives.
Re: (Score:2)
If done right, encrypted with a lost key can pretty much mean the data is not accessible:
1: A diffuser needs to be used. This prevents an attacker from seeing the contents of sector 8 are the same as sector 5. TrueCrypt uses XTS mode. BitLocker uses AES-CBC and Elephant. Without this, it is easy to find patterns in the encrypted data.
2: A keyfile must be used. Passphrases can be brute-forced. A keyfile ensures that an attacker has to guess out of the whole keyspace.
3: The drive must be completely e
Re: (Score:2)
Shredding a harddrive, the linux way: http://linux.die.net/man/1/shred [die.net] (shred /dev/sdx)
It's for the paranoid, that think after writing everything with zeros some data can be recovered (which I think is impossible)
Re: (Score:2)
Data is considered recoverable for under 3 passes of random data. From what I read, the binary data on your harddrive is stored as an analog wave, so it is very possible to recover most, if not all, of the data if you just do a single pass of zeros.
Your best bet is 3+ passes of random data.
My last job as IT at my uni required a 5 pass NSA wipe of all working drives before leaving the uni, or physical destruction of them. All "dead" drives had to be destroyed since we couldn't wipe them properly. I still hav
Re: (Score:2)
Bonus! that give the smoke effects as well as a LOT of personal satisfaction.
And you can easily add lasers!
Sandblasters work well too! (Score:2)
Back in the 80s I ran a Vax with the 14" RM05 removable disks. My successor at the job got to decommission the disks, which she did by taking them to the machine shop in the building's basement and having them sandblasted. Most sysadmins in those days had one or two RM05 platters on their wall scratched up by a head crash; hers was down to the bare metal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They also tend to fly in all sorts of interesting and unwanted directions.
Bullets are not nearly orderly enough for this task.
Re: (Score:2)
9mm FMJ: $0.19
not exactly breaking the bank~
Just slag it, it's the only way to be sure (Score:2)
Force? (Score:2)
"disks with between 2.5 and 3 tons of force"
"That’s enough power, according to Duplo, to theoretically lift a truck, so you can be sure it’ll put a rather large dent in the average hard disk."
Now I'm rather confused. I'm pretty sure they mean pressure not force, since I honestly doubt that a 2.5 'ton' of force is needed to punch through a hard disk.
Now when the 'truck lifting' part got mentioned it only made things worse.
Re:Force? (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm pretty sure they mean pressure not force, since I honestly doubt that a 2.5 'ton' of force is needed to punch through a hard disk
No they almost certainly mean force. Shop presses are sold by force. 1000 psi hydraulic tubing, fittings, pump, and o-rings vs some diameter (area is what actually matters) ram equals X tons. The shop press manufacturer has no idea what shape die you'll install. If its a wedge, I guess the area is theoretically zero at the point and the pressure is infinite. More likely limited by the compression strength of the metal in the die.
Here's a Harbor Freight Chinese 20 ton press, less than $300 delivered.
http://www.harborfreight.com/20-ton-shop-press-32879.html [harborfreight.com]
Chinese presses used to be famous for shipping with cast iron plates instead of steel plates. People die or are horribly wounded when the cast iron inevitably shatters. So be careful and/or buy or make your own steel plates. Another thing to look out for is Chinese "1000 psi" fittings and hoses might not actually survive 1000 psi when brand new, much less after years of abuse. So buying a press 10 times bigger than you think you need is not all that bad of an idea, assuming you can afford it.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, in a system of units where g=1...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
pascals as a unit of force
Pascals are a unit of pressure.
Metric uses Newtons for force.
1 N is the force required to accelerate 1 kg at 1m/s^2
So on Earth (g ~= 9.8 m/s^2) 1 kg weighs 9.8 Newtons.
In the Foot-pound-second system the unit of mass is a slug [wikipedia.org]
Thermite. (Score:2)
Thermite is cheap. Granted, a device capable of actually holding a melting hard drive might be more expensive, but I have to imagine that taking a trip to an appropriate location several times a year would be relatively cheap. It'd certainly be a lot more fun.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Does it not get between the joints and/or destroy the mortar? Maybe use firebrick materials?
Re: (Score:2)
Just remember, though, Ke
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.ev4.org/thermite/ [ev4.org]
3 hard drives we destroyed a few years ago...
I was expecting more than just a hole (Score:2)
Forensics buffs could probably restore a lot of the data on a hard drive that's just had a hole put it in.
Beating it senseless with a hammer & chisel will have a similar efficiency, but will be a lot cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not an expert btw.
Re: (Score:2)
While smaller, more informal, shops can probably do
Estwing rock pick for $33 (Score:2)
Forget the chisel, get an Estwing rock pick. These suckers can rain destruction upon almost any man made or natural object. Depending on how violent you are feeling, you can punch a dozen holes in something in seconds. Then flip it over and smash it flat.
Mine has been hammering rock, concrete, and metal for over 30 years and works as well as the day I got it. My great-grandkids will be beating the crap out of stuff with it long after I'm dead.
http://www.amazon.com/Estwing-E3-22P-22-Ounce-Rock-Pick/dp/B0 [amazon.com]
Links... (Score:2)
Why business intelligence matters in 2011
Because apparently, business intelligence did not matter prior to 2011.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd be skeptical to, it implies that business intelligence exists in 2011.
This is how we do it.. Shredder! (Score:5, Interesting)
OK folks.. this is how the government gets it done.
An industrial metal shredder. Nothing left bigger then a dime.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd_O7-rqcHc [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Much closer to what you really need to do to make sure that that the pictures for which you could be indicted are really gone. Although, something like a plasma torch would be better.
Re: (Score:2)
I advise my clients to reduce the disks to powder or liquid, if they're worried about government-level magnetic force microscopy and other forensic attacks.
Re: (Score:2)
Set the drive to all 0's and give it to a company and see if they can recover it. There is not 1 company out there, not even the NSA that can recover that.
You keep on believing that, sport.
Re: (Score:2)
>waste of money and time
>money
First off, nobody says you have to buy a shredder. There are services that have one where you can send your drives to (or they show up) and you pay for that service at that time. And they even do the recycling for you.
>time
5 or less seconds through a shredder or half an hour (or more) while a drive overwrites every silly bit on a drive...
And you've got a pile of them to go through.
No, you don't overwrite, you call the shredder service and shred the drives.
--
BMO
Hey now! (Score:2)
That's no way to talk about my mother!
i think we should put old disk drives on rockets (Score:4, Funny)
not to destroy them, but to send them out into space, in a random trajectory, like voyager 1. 300 centuries hence, our distant children, or aliens, can find them, decipher them, and find all about the wonders of cookies, porn spam, twitpics, and excel 2003, among other digital detritus of our lives
Re: (Score:2)
excel 2003? i can only imagine the following response onboard the alien mothership:
"Nuke the site from orbit, it's the only way to be sure"
Re: (Score:2)
the internet
1. where someone can be guaranteed to post a mindlessly negative and/ or cynical response to your comment
2. someone else can read into what you say with the most radical assumptions you never even remotely alluded to, and respond with an angry tirade as if you had said something totally different
3. someone else can take the most throwaway ridiculous joke... and consider it with the utmost seriousness
http://www.google.com/search?q=internet+serious+business [google.com]
torch (Score:3)
I use my trusty oxy-acetylene torch, it takes but a second to pierce the top cover. Once the top cover is breached the disks are vaporized almost immediately with no possible chance of recovery.
A single hole? (Score:2)
I didn't read the article, only saw the video, but the video shows the machine punching only one hole through the disk? That leaves all the other data intact. Or does the machine keep repeating this step for the whole area of the disk and did the video show only one of the punches?
Anyway, why does the force even matter? If it punches only one hole. Whether that hole was made with one gram or one teraton of force, it's still just one hole...
Re: (Score:2)
The platters warp as well, meaning that no head will travel over it.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh so the expensive machine is not intended to prevent forensics from reading the contents of the disk then?
not impressed (Score:2)
I expected to see the entire HDD crushed. Or maybe an array of spikes to thoroughly perforate the disk.
A single spike? A single hole in the disk?
I'd assume the controller and electronics are toast... But I bet that if you were sufficiently motivated you could mount those platters in a new box and recover a good chunk of data.
Back in the old days ... (Score:2)
Boring, (Score:3)
Taking the thing apart is much more entertaining [google.com]...
Why make it so hard? (Score:2)
Philosophycal question here (Score:2)
Is public geek masturbation (which is essentially what this story is) indecent or just a waste if our time?
Discuss ...
Re: (Score:2)
As if it can't be both...
The video is stupid (Score:2)
Not even a shot of the drive after the crush. It gets withdrawn out the back of the crusher, no idea if it actually did anything butcrack the PCB. Lame.
lol (Score:2)
Poor method (Score:2)
Won't piercing a hole in a hard drive just render data around the area of the hole difficult to read?
I imagine that data in other areas of the platter will be unaffected, and subject to recovery by anyone with the appropriate tools/equipment to to do....
Personally, i've always destroyed old hard drives using thermite which ensures that the platters are totally melted down to form an alloy with the drive casing and the molten iron create by the thermite reaction.
cool enough, but (Score:2)
Gross overengineering (Score:2)
Physical force is certainly entertaining, but it's a waste of effort. If you want to destroy any magnetic recording medium, all you have to do is heat it past its Curie point. In the case of hard drives, a decently hot fire will do nicely. A bunch of waste paper and cardboard in a steel drum will burn more than hot enough. If you're still bent on brute force, disassemble the drive and use sandpaper on the platter surfaces. Dropping them into hydrochloric acid will also do the trick -- the hardware store gra
Re: (Score:2)
Just buy a sledge and a punch! (Score:2)
Looks like some one could sell a safety glasses, sledge and punch kit for half the cost of that machine and a person with reasonable dexterity and strength could do just as good a job, if not better. Heck, you could probably even throw in some kind of jig to hold the parts in proper alignment and keep from accidentally destroying a hand in the process.
sledgehammer (Score:2)
nuff said
Re: (Score:2)
Really, you have? On a modern drive?
Because modern drives have glass platters and the gunshot shatters them into millions of pieces.
A drive from the 80's and early 90's? yes.
A drive from the past few years? no.
Nope, still aluminum (Score:3)
Really, you have? On a modern drive?
Because modern drives have glass platters and the gunshot shatters them into millions of pieces.
A drive from the 80's and early 90's? yes.
A drive from the past few years? no.
I dismantle every drive that we are getting rid of, usually about five a year.
So far, the only glass platters have been in laptop drives. The most recent 3.5" drive was from 2010, and had aluminum platters. The laptop drives seem to have had glass platters all the way back to the early 1990s.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. I have disassembled lots of drives. 2,5, 8, 30, 80 gigs...sata or IDE, 3.5 or 5.25" (!!!) , ALL of them had metal platters.
Never took apart a 2,5" - yet. But recently I dropped a 250GB Seagate. It fell flat on the floor. Plugged it back in and it worked - I'm not really sure a thin glass platter could whitstand that. And I'm not really a lucky guy.
Re: (Score:2)
I recently took apart the 2.5 drive out of my nv9400 mac mini.
That was a metal platter.
Never knew they were so... shiny.
See. They're even shiny on the inside!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Granted, this was "back in" 2004.
Don't forget a lot of posters here weren't even born then.
Re: (Score:2)
I call bullshit on that. A bullet will make a mess inside a drive, shattering the platters. At least post a link to more information if you are going to make such claims.
Re: (Score:2)
Smashing the aluminum platters with a sledge hammer or maul is a very good stress reliever.
Re: (Score:2)
even if=/dev/zero should be enough, I don't believe the rumours of restoring data with AFMs and such. The magnetic pits on modern HDDs are too small to stable store more than one state (correct me if I'm wrong)
Re: (Score:2)
However, you can't verify just by looking that a disk has been entirely wiped, and drives are often discarded precisely because they don't work any more so they can't be wiped. Also, I think drives can re-map bad sectors so they are not visible to the OS and thus could not be wiped.
Re: (Score:2)
How long does that take?
Can someone interrupt the process?
Can you trust DD?
A drill takes less time, does not require a running computer that you trust, if it is interrupted in the short time, you'd know. DD can be stalled by bad blocks as it tries to write. A drill doesn't care.
re-allocated sectors (Score:2)
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/hd[x]
When a sector is about to go bad (not be reliable for writing), it's remapped to somewhere else on the disk. The original data is not wiped, and can be recovered with forensic readers.
Some SATA devices support an ATA Secure Wipe command that is designed to erase the whole drive, including re-allocated sectors. But Seagate refuses to tell people which drives successfully implement ATA Secure Wipe. I've tried, they flatly refused, even as a member of their 'Business Partner'
Re: (Score:3)
The margins between the heads and platter are extremely small. The platters will warp making the disk unusable.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, the disk will be unreadable using the standard heads present in the drive (not to mention the drive controller board also has a hole through it)...
But the *DATA* is still intact on the vast majority of the platter surface, where specialised equipment will be able to recover it quite easily.
Re: (Score:2)
Drill through the aluminum casting instead of the stainless plate. Less work, less bit wear.
Re: (Score:2)
That substantial of a chunk of metal would make quick work of the magnetron in a microwave. There's a reason you don't put silverware in a microwave.
You'd have to take them out of the hard drive at least, since the hard drive's enclosure is basically a faraday cage around them.
May as well whack them with a hammer a few times at that point.
Re: (Score:3)
Possible, it certainly is a lame device and an even lamer (?) article.
The device is flawed, because as brutal as it is, it does very little to protect the data from being read again. You may need a laser to do it, but apart from whole it is still all there.
And the article is just terribly pointless. Pressure is not measured in tons. Pressure actually has no role in erasing hard disks - 30 kN is no better the 1 kN, or even 1 N. You can drill a hole with less, if you like...
Overwriting your hard disk once