The New Commodore 64 339
An anonymous reader writes "After nearly 30 years, the Commodore brand has taken on new management and is re-releasing its flagship computer, this time with all the amenities of a modern-day computer packed inside. From the article: 'The new Commodore 64, which will begin shipping at the end of the month, has been souped-up for the modern age. It comes with 1.8 gigahertz dual processors, an optional Blu-ray player and built-in ethernet and HDMI ports. The new Commodore is priced between $250 to $900.'"
1st april? (Score:3, Funny)
1st april?
Re:1st april? (Score:4, Insightful)
It's still mostly a 90's Geocities-style website with 3D renders of products and lacking any real information.
For something as simple as a box to hold standard components, they are taking a long time to release it.
So the question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So the question is... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If not, give it a week.
Re:So the question is... (Score:5, Informative)
Apparently that is what it ships with. From their site:
Note: Commodore OS 1.0, along with emulation functionality and classic game package, will be mailed to purchasers when available. In the meantime, units come with the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS operating system on CD ready to install.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
The value of a cheap all in one home unit really depends on what side of that estimate they come closer too. I might buy a $250 Commodore-64 form-factor computer I can hook up to my big TV in the living room. I would not pay much more than that, though. Definitely not $900. I think a bargain coffee table computer could attract customers that might be intimidated by a laptop, tablet, or a big clunky desktop.
Re:So the question is... (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Nostalgia
It sure is a novelty item besides being a computer. And if it's a fully functional PC, too, you actually get a pretty usable office machine that way.
2. All-in-one
Computer and keyboard rolled back into one. At a price tag that a laptop probably cannot meet (due to flatscreens still being not free) while taking most likely much less real estate around your desk than the traditional PC, no matter whether it's tower or desktop.
Where I see its space is (home) office users who don't need high end specs but want a simple computer while already having a screen to plug it to. In other words, average computer users. And they're plentiful. Add a few nostalgic geeks and you have a market share.
Re:So the question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:So the question is... (Score:4)
It's more expensive than a lot of laptops, and almost all netbooks.
A lot of laptops and almost all netbooks cost less that $250???
$250 is for the barebones system: it doesn't even include the motherboard. You have to pay $595 for a fully functional one, unless you can build it cheaper yourself from the barebones.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy any number of micro form factor PCs (usually business workstations) in this power range for equal or less money. I'd argue that nostalgia is the only unique trait that they're bringing to the table.
Re: (Score:2)
You can buy any number of micro form factor PCs (usually business workstations) in this power range for equal or less money.
Which micro-form-factor PC do you recommend that has non-Intel integrated graphics? Is the AMD-powered Dell Zino any good?
Re: (Score:2)
It's not even that unique, the Commodore trademark seems to get passed around almost yearly and more Amiga or Commodore branded machines get pumped out.. at least Amiga has Amiga OS 4, but (possibly to my shame) I haven't ever tried it.. when I was a teenager I used to dream of having a PPC card for my Amiga so that I could run WarpOS.
Re: (Score:3)
Are you talking about the Asus Eee Keyboard?
It's all-in-one and you can certainly run any emulator you want on it to get your nostalgia fix. On top of that, it has wireless HDMI and wifi built in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_Keyboard [wikipedia.org]
Re:So the question is... (Score:5, Insightful)
1. It is too expensive for Nostalgia.
2. It is too thick to be comfortable to type on.
I really think they are blowing this. I would love to see a modern C-64 but this isn't it. If I was building one I would start with one of the new AMD fusion chips. Put that into a a thin all in one keyboard that is no thicker than a Notebook. Include an HDMI port so you can hook it to a TV. Install a small Flash drive and no hard drives or CD/DVD. Include few USB 3 ports and maybe a Firewire port for people to add mass storage, and throw on a network port and possibly include wifi.
Put A good Linux on it and a price of $100 to $200.
If you want a DVD and or windows that will be extra.
Schools would love it because it is cheap and should have no moving parts. Kids could use it with a TV in their room and it would actually work out. Of course many people could live with just a monitor anyway since cable boxes have HDMI out anyway. Don't make a copy of the C-64 make an new C-64. A cheap computer that will do what most people want it to do.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
It's not trivial. the SID is a cast-iron bitch to emulate. You can write an emulator that theoretically ought to be perfect, and could match the SID 'reference' perfectly.. but it wouldn't sound right, because the SID was notoriously variable, had a lot of internal interference and crosstalk, and in general had a unique sound that's a pain to try to emulate.
Heck, even different SID chips from the same _batch_ would sound different, and there were different models of SID in the 'breadbox' C64s and the slip C
Re: (Score:3)
It's not all about you. (Score:2)
My wife would probably love one for her studio in place of the space sucking and noisy desktop that's up there now. (Laptops with sufficient screen size for her research are too friggin' expensive.) I also might consider one for the living room - it's a cheap way to get an internet enabled TV without the bother of replacing my existing non internet enabled one.
So, just because you wouldn't buy one doesn't mean others won't.
Re:It's not all about you. (Score:4, Informative)
Too bad this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASUS_Eee_Keyboard [wikipedia.org] never took off. It's a nice idea - all-in-one with wireless HDMI.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Most laptops have external display options as well... the netbook I'm typing this on has a tiny screen, yes, but it also has a D-Sub display out. My main laptop has a 16" screen (which is good balance between portability and useability, IMO), and also has D-Sub, HDMI, and DisplayPort output....
Others have suggested buying a small form factor system like a Mac Mini, or an all-in-one system. Good suggestions. But why not also consider getting a laptop for the portability and using an external display? My main
Re: (Score:2)
From the article.
I for one welcome our new C64 overlords.
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. One version later and they drop support for all of the old cartridges and accessories. If I upgrade, my dot matrix printer, 5.25" floppy, joystick and sega genesis controllers will be useless.
Re:So the question is... (Score:4, Interesting)
Why would I buy one? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
... Why would I buy one?
If you need to ask... You won't.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll buy one as soon as I can. Not because it's OMG the best thing ever, but it's something that brings back good memories and I'd love to share something similar with my son.
Re: (Score:2)
Incidentally, am I the only one having problems today clicking on links on Slashdot (and even right-clicking anything)? They keep fucking with the code on these pages, and every day there seems to be some new pain in the ass to deal with. If it ain't broke, Slashdot seems determined to fuck with it until it is.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Everyone under 35 should STFU (Score:4, Insightful)
I think you set the age bar far too high.
I'm below 33, I fondly recall my Atari 65XE and later Amiga 600, I think I could afford such a toy, I have some spare time and no, you are the one who is stupid.
Alternate headline (Score:5, Insightful)
"Yet Another Company Sells Retro Computer Case"
Re: (Score:2)
It's a little bit more, they do apparently have some sort of proprietary Commodore OS that you can use. Not sure what they mean by that, if it's the old one or one that's been designed to be compatible with the original ones. Screen shot at the bottom of the page.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but since you can install a full blown Amiga (let alone C64) emulator on any PC made in the past 10 years, a pre-installed version in hardware isn't really much of a selling point.
Re:Alternate headline (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeah, but since you can install a full blown Amiga (let alone C64) emulator on any PC made in the past 10 years, a pre-installed version in hardware isn't really much of a selling point.
The one thing it would require is a drive to emulate the 1541. I have games on disks - not on 3.5 or HD or Flash drive, but original media. I trust I will have a bonafide 5 1/4 drive I can read my old disks with. If not, there's really very little point, unless I want to download the various images from whatever repositories exist. But I do have things you won't find on them, like programs, tools or artwork of my own making. I'd love to see this stuff again.
Re: (Score:3)
But I do have things you won't find on them
Given they are going on thirty years old, I bet there's lots of things you won't find on them either.
Re:Alternate headline (Score:5, Insightful)
PyQt (Score:2)
Every one should come with a full copy of LiveCode or something that lets kids mess around with building their own apps right out of the box, without the training overhead that comes from so many modern IDEs
Python with PyQt is the closest thing I can imagine. Although programming GUIs is still a PITA compared to the old ways, Qt comes close to having the best possible GUI API and Python has the simplest syntax among modern languages.
And, yes, it should be a Linux computer. If you want to motivate kids, there's no reason to encumber them with all the cruft that MS-Windows has accumulated over twenty years.
Not necessarily proprietary (Score:3)
It's a little bit more, they do apparently have some sort of proprietary Commodore OS that you can use.
I don't see anything on the manufacturer's site [commodoreusa.net] that necessarily indicates it's a proprietary OS. For one thing, they say "Commodore OS 1.0" isn't available yet, but they'll mail it to people who buy the computer when it's ready. In the meantime, it says the machines will ship with Ubuntu LTS. That suggests to me that Commodore OS 1.0 is likely to be yet another Linux distro, maybe with some sort of nostalgic Commodore-like skin.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
they do apparently have some sort of proprietary Commodore OS
Actually, they have a "propriety" Commodore OS. What that is I have no idea. But it sounds snobbish.
Re: (Score:2)
It's a little bit more, they do apparently have some sort of proprietary Commodore OS that you can use. Not sure what they mean by that, if it's the old one or one that's been designed to be compatible with the original ones. Screen shot at the bottom of the page.
It's Linux. Read the description.
http://www.commodoreusa.net/CUSA_OS.aspx [commodoreusa.net]
And for those of you pining for an Amiga look-alike, they have that too.
Re: (Score:2)
If they were actually selling a case with integrated (USB) keyboard that would take a standard motherboard, then it would be a compelling product. It would save the trouble of interfacing to the C64 keyboard, and finding a power supply that would fit in the box. Having to buy a complete PC in that case isn't even interesting. Also, while nobody cared last time this subject came up, that's not the case I want. I want an Amiga 1000. If I were doing an all-in-one, a 1200. But I have a 1200 and I've never been
Re: (Score:3)
First off, it's an Atom Mini-ITX board.
Second, they've also announced an Amiga 1000 and 2000 version.
(Not that I'd buy any of them.)
Re: (Score:2)
My point is that if they only sell it with their motherboard, ram, drives etc then that's dumb. I don't want their shitty Atom. In the same form factor you can get a real Socket M, for example, and run a Core Duo.
Re: (Score:2)
Keep your PC humming under your desk where is its place. C64 does not make noise.
As long as I can still play my old favourites (Score:2)
M.U.L.E.
Paradroid
Ultima II
Below the Root
Impossible Mission stay a while, stay FOREVER!
Slot Car Construction Set...
Re: (Score:2)
Re:As long as I can still play my old favourites (Score:5, Informative)
According to their site, you can "Play all your favorite 8-bit era games within seconds ... by selecting the C64 icon from the boot menu to run a C64 emulator directly".
Yes, but they also say:
ote: Commodore OS 1.0, along with emulation functionality and classic game package, will be mailed to purchasers when available. In the meantime, units come with the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS operating system on CD ready to install.
So it doesn't sound like they've worked out all the details yet, and don't expect to be able to just pop in your old Floppies and run the programs (hey, I still have my old Amiga Floppies somewhere ... probably time to get rid of them though).
Re: (Score:2)
DROLL
Choplifter!
Jumpman
Re: (Score:2)
M.U.L.E.
Paradroid
Ultima II
Below the Root
Impossible Mission stay a while, stay FOREVER!
Slot Car Construction Set...
Slot car Construction Set? Not familiar with that.
Racing Destruction Set, now there was a game.
I probably spent the most time on Pool of Radiance, but there were a lot of others...
Dual Processors? (Score:2)
Awesome press release, if they don't even get the terminology right.
Re: (Score:2)
April 1st called... (Score:2)
ugh-lee! (Score:2)
One look and... (Score:2)
I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one.
How sad. I never even had a C-64 when a youngster. I had to learn machine code on a Dragon 32 (6809 processor so not so bad!)
But still, I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I want one I
Re: (Score:2)
Come on man. You'll be much happier buying a real C64. They're dirt cheap these days, and still as much fun. This thing is just a boring PC.
Re: (Score:2)
you might recheck your data.
A set of C64+power supply+disk drive+2 joysticks+all the cables+a box of floppies (and maybe even a monitor) currently costs an arm and a leg.
A C64 without this all will be dirt cheap but good luck completing all the components on your own. In the end it may cost more than the whole set.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You mean...
How many (Score:2)
How many new C=64s have we seen already? How many are there still to come?
This again again? (Score:3)
Covered a while back, here: http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/03/24/0625211/Commodore-64-Primed-For-a-Comeback-In-June [slashdot.org].
It's just another article covering the same machine discussed previously.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, this isn't quite the same thing. Of course, if you'd read the article, you'd know that, so I guess I shouldn't expect too much...
Reading fail (Score:2)
Nope, this isn't quite the same thing. Of course, if you'd read the article, you'd know that, so I guess I shouldn't expect too much...
I read both articles; they describe the same machine, and both articles point to the same website, www.commodoreusa.net [commodoreusa.net]
It's the same damn thing.
Of course, if you'd read and understood both articles, you'd know that, so I guess I shouldn't expect too much...
Pass (Score:2)
Not laughing (Score:3, Insightful)
Proprietary Commodore OS? (Score:2)
I'm interested to see what that's all about. Please, please, please bring back ",8,1"
Could have been great... (Score:5, Interesting)
Now, if they had followed through ...
OS in ROM - no Virus worries or update hell. All the machines are the same.
BASIC (replaced with something modern) in ROM - make it easy and attractive to program.
Applications in ROM - Build in OpenOffice, FireFox, whatever else is commonly needed and make it front and center. Build an entire Linux Distro of applications in that are available with a bit of digging. But mostly, make it really friendly to start writing a letter, using the internet, whatever.
Cartridge slot for commercial apps.
An HDMI porrt
Make the computer an appliance again. Don't require the owner to be a SysAdmin to use it. Sure, you lose some flexibility, but you gain hugely in usability. I know precisely the number of times my mother has opened her computer to install a new add-in card - zero.
Re: (Score:2)
OS in ROM - no Virus worries or update hell. All the machines are the same.
BASIC (replaced with something modern) in ROM - make it easy and attractive to program.
Sounds like it's got that. It can boot to a C64 emulator "within seconds." It's just not "replaced with something modern."
An HDMI port
It's got that.
Re: (Score:2)
OS in ROM is easy enough - use CoreBoot (and/or OpenBIOS) to install the kernel. The equivalent of the old BASIC chip (which was really more than just BASIC, it was also your system shell) would be to have a mini root disk in the same prom as the OS - your minimal /bin, /sbin, /lib stuff. It just needs to be enough to boot from. You can have a more complete image file (compressed or whatever) elsewhere, or if you want to use the BBC style of sideways ROM then have each application plus non-editable suppleme
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
OS in ROM - no Virus worries or update hell
BASIC (replaced with something modern) in ROM - make it easy and attractive to program.
Applications in ROM - Build in OpenOffice, FireFox
AKA permanently vulnerable. Back in the days of the Commodore 64 virus were practically non existent, and they were made only to show off how 133t the coders were. Today Malware is a huge business, a large industry, and with the population increasingly using the computers for stuff like buying online, checking the bank account, etc. this can only go worse. I do think that we need to figure out how to make things easy again, but just locking ourselves to vulnerable software is almost suicidal.
It's a fake! (Score:5, Interesting)
This is nothing but a PC in a custom case with a famous trademark. I read a lot of vintage computing sites and no one has expressed an interest in these. It's a dumb idea, not worthy of mention,
What is worthy of mention, yet no one reports on, is all the custom retro modern hardware available these days. Want a C64 or Amiga without the hassle of maintaining old hardware? Try a C-One [c64upgra.de], an FPGA platform that implements both C64 and Amiga computers. Or, do you have a C64 but tire of floppy swapping? Get a 1541-Ultimate [1541ultimate.net], a cycle accurate 1541 emulator that even emits the sounds of a real disk drive. Or, do you love the sound of the SID audio chip inside the C64? Control it via MIDI with the MSSIAH [8bitventures.com] cartridge. Any of these projects are more worthy of attention in the tech media than the crass money grab we see in TFA.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
MSSIAH sounds totally awesome. It's too bad there's no SID in the Amiga, because it has a 31250bps serial port and can do MIDI with a dumb converter box. I guess you could use an Amiga as a MIDI-playback sampler, but there's no point today.
Re: (Score:2)
Or, do you have a C64 but tire of floppy swapping? Get a 1541-Ultimate [1541ultimate.net], a cycle accurate 1541 emulator that even emits the sounds of a real disk drive.
Wonder if you can make it play music [youtube.com].
Weird Al said it best (Score:3)
"You think your Commodore 64 is really neato, What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?"
vid [youtube.com]
Check the date. (Score:2)
Yeah, yeah, ho hum, another story that his the nets on April ... 6?
Huh?
Checks date again.
Not April 1. Still says April 6.
<boggle>
Re: (Score:2)
AGAIN?! (Score:2)
The only positive thing to say about this is that fake-Commodore has a very good marketing department, congratulations on another free slashvertisement.
Nostalgia aside... (Score:2)
Someone already said it further up...buy an old one if you are feeling nostalgic. Still, I hope it takes off.
Did this get stuck in the queue from April 1st? (Score:2)
???
This was already done in 2003 (Score:2)
I'll buy it... (Score:2)
...just to play "Questron" again.
And "Forbidden Forest"
And "Wizard's Crown"
While I'm making wishes, maybe they could let it run the 3DO version of "Star Control II" as well.
No, I don't want an emulator. I want all the same colors and the same beeps, though I do want it to run faster than my C64 did.
64-bit? (Score:2)
I might wait for the 128-bit version with 64-bit compatibility mode to come out.
not quite (Score:2)
"Note: Commodore OS 1.0, along with emulation functionality and classic game package, will be mailed to purchasers when available. In the meantime, units come with the Ubuntu 10.04 LTS operating system on CD ready to install. "
So it's not a commodore... in any way shape or form... and they don't even have the licensing for the old OS emulator nailed down, and probably never will.
Not authentic! (Score:3)
If it doesn't have a 6502/6510 processor, it's not a C64. They may stick something else in there for modern software; but if it has to emulate "itself" it's disingenuous to use the name. Of course, they may emulate other things, too - when I was selling the originals to schools, they'd put 15 on the truck for each 10 that were ordered. Because about 1/3 were dead out of the box.
Re:No numpad? FAIL (Score:5, Insightful)
I think that unless it comes with a seperate numpad, this is going to fall flat on its face. The tactile response of the keyboard may be nice (assuming they use individual switches for each key), but the lack of keys will make it close to useless.
What part of 'Comodore 64' did you not get?
Re: (Score:3)
Commodore 64 had no numpad, therefore this one wouldn't, either. Most laptops don't have numpads, either, and they're outselling desktops.
Re:No numpad? FAIL (Score:4, Insightful)
I think that unless it comes with a seperate numpad, this is going to fall flat on its face. The tactile response of the keyboard may be nice (assuming they use individual switches for each key), but the lack of keys will make it close to useless.
The market for this thing is nostalgic people interested in a retro looking computer. Adding a numeric keypad (which the original C64 did not have) would probably negatively impact the machine in that market segment.
It looks interesting for what it is.
Funny story: once upon a time as a Commodore 64 equipped kid I had no concept that a keyboard wasn't a whole computer. I remember being in a store (I believe it was a Service Merchandise, if anyone remembers those) and seeing what I now know was a standalone keyboard for an IBM computer. Price tag was $35, and I thought that was unbelievable for a computer (remember - to my mind back then keyboard = computer). I begged my mom to buy that for me. Thankfully, she didn't. I'd have been mighty disappointed to get home and discover that that keyboard was useless to me :).
Re: (Score:2)
Unlike your computer that keyboard is probably still working. Typed on a model M older than many Slashdot posters.
Re: (Score:2)
Coming from the opposite side, one day a friend and his kid came across a plain old typewriter. His kid asked where the monitor was!
Re: (Score:2)
At least they put the quote key where it belongs, right next to the RETURN key, rather than up on SHIFT-2.
Shift-2 was the stupidest place for the quote key - never could get the hang of it there.
http://www.classiccmp.org/dunfield/c64/h/front.jpg [classiccmp.org]
Re: (Score:2)
No screen, Lame.
Same goes for a Mac Mini, and that's a pretty big seller.
Re: (Score:3)
www.commodoreusa.net [commodoreusa.net] is down already...
Maybe it's running on a C64.