Scientists Worry Machines May Outsmart Man 652
Strudelkugel writes "The NY Times has an article about a conference during which the potential dangers of machine intelligence were discussed. 'Impressed and alarmed by advances in artificial intelligence, a group of computer scientists is debating whether there should be limits on research that might lead to loss of human control over computer-based systems that carry a growing share of society's workload, from waging war to chatting with customers on the phone. Their concern is that further advances could create profound social disruptions and even have dangerous consequences.' The money quote: 'Something new has taken place in the past five to eight years,' Dr. Horvitz said. 'Technologists are replacing religion, and their ideas are resonating in some ways with the same idea of the Rapture.'"
I thought this was the whole point? (Score:1, Informative)
Religious people are regularly and strongly ridiculed.
50% of scientists call themselves Democrats, 48% call themselves Independents, 2% calls themselves Republicans - in a recent poll described on Slashdot.
I kind of thought the development they describe was the goal all along.
Old news (Score:5, Informative)
Bill Joy wrote an essay about this very subject back in April 2000......and he's a much better writer.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html [wired.com]
Re:Linguo says: (Score:4, Informative)
In case you want to indicate that there were something wrong with the used grammar: There isn't. There's one group they are talking about. This group consists of several computer scientists, but the "is" refers to the group, not the scientists.
Re:Revoke their degrees (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Finally; a solution to the problem of Humanity (Score:3, Informative)
Dunno - I think I'd prefer Paula Abdul as an overlord to a Dalek. Ditzy and scatter-brained, but at least with some compassion.
Daleks aren't robots, they're mutants [wikipedia.org]! Please hand in your geek card and go rewatch Dr. Who.
Re:I thought this was the whole point? (Score:5, Informative)
historically, well-to-do states self-limit the birth rate because of economic selfishness. Look at Japan or Scandinavia... They have just 1-2 children (from 2 adults) so that's negative growth. They live a long time, and the children are highly schooled, and well cared for... unlike in India where you have to have 4-5 kids just to make sure a few live to be productive adults so they can take care of you. Also, the strong social programs (medical care, pensions, etc) reduce the need to have kids as economic "insurance", so they're actually a liability in terms of costs to feed, clothe, school, free time, social calender, etc. Rich people have fewer children because it distracts from making money and doing what they want!
Even in the US, the birth rate from non-immigrant citizens is already negative. Growth comes mostly from all the students and workers we import that still have the old views of children for economic reasons.
Re:I thought this was the whole point? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Finally; a solution to the problem of Humanity (Score:3, Informative)
Daleks aren't robots, they're mutants [wikipedia.org]! Please hand in your geek card and go rewatch Dr. Who.
Every life form is a mutated form of the thing it descended from. Daleks are cyborgs. They consist of a genetically engineered organic part with a robotic shell around it.