Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Power Science

Breakthrough In Use of Graphene For Ultracapacitors 250

Hugh Pickens writes "Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin have achieved a breakthrough in the use of a one-atom thick graphene for storing electrical charge in ultracapacitors. They believe their development shows promise that graphene could eventually double the capacity of existing ultracapacitors. 'Through such a device, electrical charge can be rapidly stored on the graphene sheets, and released from them as well for the delivery of electrical current and, thus, electrical power,' says one of the researchers. Two main methods exist to store electrical energy: in rechargeable batteries and in ultracapacitors, which are becoming increasingly commercialized but are not yet well known to the public. Some advantages of ultracapacitors over traditional energy storage devices such as batteries include: higher power capability, longer life, a wider thermal operating range, lighter, more flexible packaging and lower maintenance. Graphene has a surface area of 2,630 square meters, almost the area of a football field, per gram of material."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Breakthrough In Use of Graphene For Ultracapacitors

Comments Filter:
  • by loshwomp ( 468955 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:05AM (#25035537)

    Some advantages of ultracapacitors over traditional energy storage devices such as batteries include: higher power capability, longer life, a wider thermal operating range, lighter, more flexible packaging and lower maintenance.

    By contrast, two advantages of batteries are 1) vastly higher energy density, and 2) the fact that they exist.

  • Re:How? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by cryptoluddite ( 658517 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:17AM (#25035607)

    Generally things that are one atom thick are much more fragile than things that are millions of atoms thick. When they get this working in cars and not 'losing capacity' aka frying you when you go over a speed bump it'll be a pretty good replacement for batteries...

  • Re:Cost. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by kestasjk ( 933987 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:19AM (#25035625) Homepage
    Depends; we don't yet know how to commercially make graphene. This is a shame because in addition to ultracapacitors it could also be used to make integrated circuits. It's the same problem as with nanotubes; lots of great uses already found, now we just need to figure out how to make them.
  • by Ihlosi ( 895663 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:35AM (#25035689)

    If 1 gram of graphene has the surface area of a football field, what's the surface area of a football field of graphene?

    One football field, of course. They're both units of area. Now, if you were to ask what the surface area of a VW-Beetle-equivalent of graphene is ...

  • Here's the deal (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Colin Smith ( 2679 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:36AM (#25035697)

    Human resource usage expands to consume all available resource...

    That is the history of humanity in one sentence. In fact, it can be generalized to all life.

     

  • Safety ? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CdBee ( 742846 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @03:48AM (#25035729)
    Ultracapacitors may have proven brilliant usages (especially in transport and electricity storage) but is anyone else nervous about being around that degree of stored energy?

    As a teenager I was slightly injured by a 50-year-old 3300mfd cap I'd salvaged from a valve radio, which went off like a small bomb despite only holding 12 volts at the time. I for one would treat an ultracapacitor as a potential source of devastation until proved safe by a long period of use...
  • by OldMiner ( 589872 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @04:03AM (#25035801) Journal

    I know you're trying to be cleverly ironic here, but you can buy ultracaps today [digikey.com]. The higher power capability, swifter charging, longer life, wider thermal operation range, more flexible packaging, and lower maintenance are already there and have been for years [edn.com] along with the superior environmental characteristics. However, "lighter" isn't true yet, since the energy density of an ultracap is an order of magnitude lower than that for a dry cell [wikipedia.org]. That's why a breakthrough such as in this article is such a big deal.

    If grapheme could reliably be utilized to create the sort of energy density posited here, any application requiring large amount of batteries (such as electric cars) would benefit greatly. Unfortunately, since capacitors are more prone than dry cells to losing energy over time due to internal resistance, this won't eliminate the need for dry cells entirely.

  • by JSchoeck ( 969798 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @04:42AM (#25035991)

    Don't worry that the Graphene layer would rip. It's a very, very strong material and the connections between the atoms are strong conjugated double-bonds.
    This is the same structure as in Carbon Nano Tubes and Fullerens (C60), just flat (and not cylindrically or spherically rolled up).

    The problem to implement Graphene based technologies is rather the synthesis of it, since it's not yet easily possible to create a homogeneous Graphene layer on a large area (i.E. at my Applied Physics institute they create Graphene layers that are not even 1 mmÂ).

  • Re:Still... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by somersault ( 912633 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @04:48AM (#25036017) Homepage Journal

    First poster didn't seem to. Times were when you only got 1.5 hours of word processing time, and these days people have their wifi enabled all the time. Anyone with a mobile phone will know that that is a major drain on the battery. We're getting the same battery life as before, but we're able to do much before in that time.

    By the time affordable ultracaps everyone will probably be complaining of 'only' 11 hours solid gaming usage on their laptop.

  • Re:Here's the deal (Score:5, Insightful)

    by srussia ( 884021 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @05:05AM (#25036087)

    Human resource usage expands to consume all available resource...

    That is the history of humanity in one sentence. In fact, it can be generalized to all life.

    Agree with your first statement. The difference, however, between humanity and other forms of life is that humans increase available resources in order to be able to expand usage.

  • Re:Here's the deal (Score:4, Insightful)

    by HungryHobo ( 1314109 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @05:09AM (#25036107)

    We don't seem to have expanded to use all oxygen yet, we don't seem to have used up all the salt water, both are freely available to a great many people.

    Human resource usage expands to quite a high point but to assume it's infinite is a little presumptuous.

    It was assumed that the human population would continue to increase exponentially but in some developed nations we're seeing a birth rates drop below 2 children per couple.

    People multiply insanely when the chance of their children reaching adulthood is low, people try to obtain stupidly large amounts of resources when resources are scarce.
    Average resource usage may not increase forever. It'll probably still has a way to go but I can see the average leveling out at some point.

  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @06:08AM (#25036351)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Safety ? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by CdBee ( 742846 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @09:56AM (#25038175)
    Thanks, that was part of my point. Capacitors have in common with Lead-Acid accumulators the ability to dump biblical amounts of power in an instant... and it may be easier to unthinkingly short a circuit than it is to unthinkingly introduce a flame to a fual tank

    I drive a diesel car. It feels safer (low-volatility compared to petrol)
  • by maillemaker ( 924053 ) on Wednesday September 17, 2008 @10:49AM (#25038999)

    The fact of the matter is, it takes "X" number of joules of energy to move your typical car 300 miles.

    Whether that energy is stored in a tank of gasoline, a capacitor, batteries, or a spinning flywheel, you still have X number of joules of energy that have to be safely stored and protected against unrestrained liberation.

Always look over your shoulder because everyone is watching and plotting against you.

Working...