Consumer Ethanol Appliance Promised By Year's End 365
Newscloud brings us news of a startup called E-Fuel promising to ship a home-brew ethanol plant, the size of a washer-dryer, for under $10,000 by the end of this year. We've had plenty of discussions about $1/gal. fuel — these guys want to let you make it at home. The company says it plans to develop a NAFTA-enabled distribution network for inedible sugar from Mexico at 1/8th the cost of trade-protected sugar, to use as raw material for making ethanol. A renewable energy expert from UC Berkeley is quoted: "There's a lot of hurdles you have to overcome. It's entirely possible that they've done it, but skepticism is a virtue."
$10,000?! (Score:4, Insightful)
This doesn't strike me as a good alternative.
Less than $1 a gallon? Ha. (Score:3, Insightful)
Of course, once this machine is actually available, I predict the price of that inedible sugar will suddenly rise to a level where using it to create ethanol yields a final price-per-gallon that is comparable to just buying E85 at your local gas station. After all, the sugar will suddenly have a much higher value in use as a fuel verses whatever they do with it now.
Probably bad energy return on investment... (Score:5, Insightful)
Sounds like they just invented the still (Score:5, Insightful)
Then you just distill it to concentrate the ethanol. You'd probably have to make two or three passes through the still to get it up to E85 level.
There's a couple of fairly significant problems with this scheme, though. One is the energy that's used to operate the still; where does that come from, how much does it cost? And the other one - and one that'll be very difficult to overcome - is that ethanol is the stuff we drink. Dilute ethanol with distilled water at about 50/50 and you get some so-so vodka. Add this or that flavor and you've got a party.
The BATF isn't going to like this one little bit. Liquor taxes are an important source of revenue; they'll insist that you comply with their bureaucratic regulations if you're going to make any kind of product that contains ethanol.
And if this magic box will produce 170 proof at $2 per gallon - how much of that is going in the car and how much will be going into mixed drinks? Imagine the parties; gallons and gallons of alcohol and more being produced in every neighborhood every day. I suspect the law of unintended consequences is going to kick in on this one...
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:2, Insightful)
Please fill in the details for me/us?
Cue all the naysayers (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:4, Insightful)
Why? Because you can't understand the difference and don't understand how to check citations? Go ahead and just ignore the citation that links directly to the Oxford Journal of Occupational Medicine. Clearly you're the medical expert and not those idiotic MD's at Oxford...
Re:Not very useful. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Taxation of dangerous products for welfare (Score:3, Insightful)
What does that mean ? It can vary from faith to faith, and within faiths, and even then changes as religion evolves along with society.
Calling things sinful, is simply meaningless, as it projects your theist views on others, who may have differnet interpretations of sinful.
Some followers of Yaweh, will tell me that the yummy, healthy, normal sex I has last night is wrong and a sin.
I can't take that crap seriously, so I can't take you comment about "sin" seriously.
Bad bad idea. (Score:4, Insightful)
A simple fact - Mexico produces a total of 5 million tons of sugar a year. That amount, according to the article, is enough to make about 800 million gallons of ethanol. US consumes 400 million gallons of gasoline a DAY for transportation. That means the entire crop of Mexican sugar would be completely used up by cars in TWO days. What would we do the rest of the year I don't know. And guess what this would do to sugar prices. Also - no more sugar in your food either.
And if the proposition is to use this as an addition to oil-based fuels, well - we are talking less than 1% of total gasoline requirement from entire Mexican crop. This would hardly make a dent in oil consumption, but sure as heck would wreck havoc on the sugar and food markets.
Re:$1/gal fuel to perpetuate a cheap energy lifest (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree we need drop the sugar tariffs, and stop the corn subsidies, but c'mon....NO one is keeping Mexicans from immigrating to the US. All we ask is for them to follow the rules, and wait in line like everyone else from every other country that wants to come to the US and become a citizen.
It is only the people that come here illegally, and cost us money in services (schools, hospital ER's, etc) and not paying taxes that we have object to. At the present time, the majority of those coming to the US illegally are Mexican, so, these people do give the legal Mexican immigrants kind of a black eye to the general public.
Please...stop this confusion between legal immigraton, and illegal border crossings. The former is welcome, the latter is a crime...and should be treated as such.
Re:Cue all the naysayers (Score:2, Insightful)
Always amazed by the posters on this site never consider that you can live just fine without a car or being car light. Programmers should appreciate this simple, elegant solution to the oil problem by just reducing the number of miles you travel by car.
Get fresh air, get exercise, get sick less often, get healthy, get energy, pollute less, enjoy your commute, use a means of transportation that you can actually repair and maintain. Ride a bike.
Re:Bad bad idea. (Score:1, Insightful)
So with this mix you would assume roughly speaking that the entire sugar output of Mexico will only power the cars in the US for a little over a day.
So what about the rest of the world? Global sugar output in 07-08 was a record 168.44 million metric tons (http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1288887/). Assuming metric and imperial tons are roughly equivalent (the original poster's measurements were probably in imperial tons, but it doesn't matter for the orders of magnitude), and the original poster's calculations on the yield for Ethanol from sugar are correct (I haven't bothered to check) that gives us the capacity to produce approximately 26 billion gallons of ethanol, yielding 22.1 billion gallons of E85 which is *still* not enough to run US cars for a whole year (by my calculations you need about 27 billion gallons of E85).
And that's *just* to run cars in the US.
Ethanol is a crock. While Ethanol from sugar is at least efficient in the sense you get more energy out than you put in, the ability to wholesale replace gasoline with Ethanol just isn't feasible. It's possible as a short term strategy, cellulose-derived ethanol will suplement gasoline as a transition strategy. But the only long term solutions are: 1. Reduce consumption, and 2. Move to EVs transitioning via efficient gasoline-electric hybrids.
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:2, Insightful)
But ethanol doesn't have to be, and should not be, taken from food sources.
We should be working towards decentralized production of cellulosic ethanol from waste biomass. Decentralized production - you (or maybe your neighborhood) have your own still, feed it your lawn clippings and vegetable peels and autumn leaves, out comes alcohol. No piping.
Ethanol from food crops is indeed stupid, and has more to do with enriching agribusiness than solving energy supply issues.
That's because bicycles don't consume (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:3, Insightful)
1) They are farmers
2) They farm significantly more than they (+their friends+relatives) can eat.
3) The stuff they want to buy with the "doubled" income, does not itself increase in price (due to other people having to pay more for food and thus charging more for their goods+services).
What we have here is an increase in energy/resource costs coupled with the dollar losing its value.
To guess what happens when energy and resource costs go up, all you have to do is compare the ecosystem of a tropical rain forest, with that of a temperate rain forest, and also the ecosystem of the Arctic.
So on the whole, I don't think it is good for the poor.
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:3, Insightful)
This is why it's hard to read /. comments at times: highly moderated comments with no substance to back them up. The problems with world food distribution have far more to do with trade barriers [nytimes.com] than food production or any other issue save perhaps inflation. To the extent the U.S. is responsible, it's responsible for its food bill (explained in some detail here [nytimes.com] and its anti-trade stance.
Apparently everyone has forgotten the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff [wikipedia.org] and never learned basic economic theory to begin with.