Consumer Ethanol Appliance Promised By Year's End 365
Newscloud brings us news of a startup called E-Fuel promising to ship a home-brew ethanol plant, the size of a washer-dryer, for under $10,000 by the end of this year. We've had plenty of discussions about $1/gal. fuel — these guys want to let you make it at home. The company says it plans to develop a NAFTA-enabled distribution network for inedible sugar from Mexico at 1/8th the cost of trade-protected sugar, to use as raw material for making ethanol. A renewable energy expert from UC Berkeley is quoted: "There's a lot of hurdles you have to overcome. It's entirely possible that they've done it, but skepticism is a virtue."
Shortsighted? (Score:5, Informative)
Apart from the blatant inefficiencies present in transporting these quantities of raw materials, I imagine that the cost of sugar will skyrocket even if the thing actually works.
Probably not a good thing...
Oh, lol, internets! (Score:4, Informative)
Oh, and how about calculating in electricity costs?
Denatured alcohol (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:5, Informative)
Additionally, some studies suggest that cane sugar is better for you than the high fructose corn syrup most commonly used in substitution for it, although according to some the jury's still out on that.
Did Someone Miss The Memo???? (Score:0, Informative)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:3, Informative)
A bottle of tequila will sit indefinitely in a glass bottle, one could simple line existing pipe infrastructure with glass or any other material that ethanol doesn't corrode.
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:5, Informative)
Look at Brazil for an example, here we make Ethanol from sugar-cane.It had virtually no impact on food price or availability, mostly because the culture is concentrated at the north-east region while our grain production is more concentrate on the middle and southern regions.
Also, Ethanol harvested from sugar-cane is a good alternative for lots of developing coutries, because it would give them a valuable commodity to export.
Ethanol would be good for Europe too, because they would have a cheaper alternative to petrol.
But Ethanol is bad for the USA, mostly because you don't get the same level of production from corn, so it's more expensive. And you have to dedicate a bigger slice of land to produce enough to supply the demand for fuel, and this means less space for food.
Also, the North American Petrol industry don't want to see their market taken away.
Ethanol is viable, and it's already a reality here at Brazil. My car can run on both ethanol and gasoline, but since Ethanol is about 30% CHEAPER I almost never put gasoline on it.
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:5, Informative)
The price of rice, palm oil, wheat, and corn has risen by 60% to 100% over the last year.
Within the last month, there have been food riots in 11 countries.
Numerous countries have banned rice exports.
The ones that haven't are raising export tariffs by large amounts.
As for what's causing all this, the US deserves a big heaping portion of the blame, but there are also ~3 other major contributing factors, like the ongoing droughts in Australia and Russia and changing eating habits by the Indian & Chinese middle class.
To specifically rebut your "better lives for and faster development for people in the poorest parts of the world" their fuel and fertilizer prices have gone up, just like everyone else's. Oh, and they're the ones rioting over food prices.
Re:Sounds like they just invented the still (Score:3, Informative)
Then you just distill it to concentrate the ethanol. You'd probably have to make two or three passes through the still to get it up to E85 level.
At home, with a modern turbo yeast, you can get ~14% alcohol in 24 hours and 22% alcohol in 5~10 days if you add extra sugar.
Some yeasts ferment cleaner than others, but if you're distilling, you might as well go as hot and as fast as the yeast will tolerate, since the impurities will come out in the fractionating column. With fractional distillation, you should never have to make more than one pass to get 95% alcohol.
/On a commercial scale, the top performing yeast does better than 22% because it eats cellulose and xylose.
//It also happens to be owned by Purdue University.
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:5, Informative)
Methanol itself is not toxic; rather, the toxicity is due to the accumulation of its metabolites -- formaldehyde and formic acid.
Wow. By the same token, antifreeze (ethylene glycol) isn't really toxic. It's just the metabolites that will do you in.
Can we just permanently ban Wikipedia references here and stop the madness?
Block the metabolic conversion with the appropriate enzyme inhibitor (or a competitive substrate like lots of regular ethanol) and you block the toxicity. The Methanol and Ethylene Glycol will gradually be excreted, and do relatively little harm in the meanwhile due to their low inherent toxicities.
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:3, Informative)
I would direct interested people to the following article at the oil drum. It discusses why Brazil's ethanol program is energetically feasible while the US program is impossible. Basically, they demonstrate that as soon as the energy gain is less than around 5:1, the economy spends all it's money on maintaining current energy needs instead of expanding. A ratio of less than 5:1 results in gradual degradation and stagnation of the economy.
The Oil Drum [theoildrum.com]
It's an *extremely* interesting read. It also explains why, regardless of how much oil might exist, as soon as it costs 1/5th as much energy to explore and drill for it, it is energetically no longer worth doing. It makes "peak oil" a lot scarier, as oil is currently only at around 13:1 at best.
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Stop turning food into fuel (Score:4, Informative)
Even for those in poor countries that export foods, the developed world has so many tarrifs and subsidies that they are still not able to benefit from it (USA and EU, take a bow).
Don't believe me? Fine. Last week's Economist [economist.com] had their leader article on exactly this topic. Go and read it. The Economist is an economic liberal, you will find them promoting trade and economic prosperity. They know far more about this issue than either you or me.
Re:Denatured alcohol (Score:2, Informative)