Open-Source 3D Printer Lets Users Make Anything 242
An anonymous reader writes "Picture a 3D inkjet printer that deposits droplets of plastic, layer by layer, gradually building up an object of any shape. Fabbers have been around for two decades, but they've always been the pricey playthings of high-tech labs — and could only use a single material. A Fab at Home kit costs around $2400 and allows users to print anything from Hors d'Oeuvres to flashlights."
Any shape? (Score:2, Interesting)
You can't make that layer-by-layer in a single pass. You have to make the feet first, go all the way up to the knees, and then back down to the body.
Can it do that?
material (Score:5, Interesting)
Manufacturing is a solved problem (Score:5, Interesting)
This is just an illustration, that manufacturing is a solved problem. Design, research, and development is where the minds and ideas are or should be going.
The growing emphasys on the Intellectual Property — the kind, that can be stolen by simple copying (thus leaving the original owner, seemingly, unhurt) — is another illustration of the same trend, like it or not.
Re:I'm not convinced... (Score:3, Interesting)
3D printer to churn out copies of itself
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7165 [newscientist.com]
Re:I'm not convinced... (Score:2, Interesting)
http://reprap.org/ [reprap.org]
An open design from a project at the University of Bath. It has OSS control software and is specifically designed to be self replicating, using only 400 of materials.
Re:material (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Any shape? (Score:3, Interesting)
I've seen the results of these systems. They could model everything from differential gear systems to gearboxes and implicit surfaces.
Re:who cares (Score:3, Interesting)
PTC / Windchill manufacturing http://www.ptc.com/ [ptc.com] business process software includes pathing for fabbed model creation, for example, and accepts quite a number of 3D drawing file formats incorporated in the workflow. One of the guys we just hired on at our SI comes from mfg background and clued me. It's considered a must-have in a number of different mfg software packages now.
Re:More Discussion (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I'm not convinced... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Manufacturing is a solved problem (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not just that. Because we can't yet build at the molecular level, we have created all sorts of diverse and complex ways of achieving what we want using bulk processes. The diversity of these means that we need hundreds of huge factories to make all the components for a typical piece of gadgetry. So for example, if a hand-held video camera breaks on a future base on Mars, there is no way they can make another one without thousands of square miles of factories and thousands of workers to produce the components they need. With molecular level manufacturing, you eliminate the necessity of needing a huge set of factories.
With a molecular manufacturing machine, building something would be a case of having the required data file. I should imagine that there would be a vibrant open-source community designing all sorts of weird and wonderful things which you could download and "print". The potential of such a technology is enormous. There will be all sorts of issues to consider though. How do you prevent people from "printing" hand grenades and machine guns or Sarin?
If you are interested in this sort of thing, you should read "Engines of Creation" by Eric Drexler which is a non fiction book that explores these ideas. Drexler is the guy who coined the term "Nanotechnology" back in the 80s. You can read it all online here [e-drexler.com].