Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

Robotics Science

Personal Robots From Valley Startup 87

Posted by CmdrTaco
from the i'll-believe-it-when-it's-cooking-me-dinner dept.
Tjeerd writes ""A Silicon Valley start-up is developing a hardware and software development platform for personal-assistant robots, autonomous boats and unmanned cars. The privately funded company, quietly started almost a year ago by eGroups founder and veteran Google architect Scott Hassan, plans to make its robotics software open source. That way, it hopes to draw a community of developers to build applications in these respective fields.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Personal Robots From Valley Startup

Comments Filter:
  • Think Tank (Score:2, Interesting)

    by UberHoser (868520) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @10:10AM (#21099315)
    "With no pressure to make money initially, the company will act more like a robotics think tank and will eventually devise licensing models for its technology"

    I have to admit this sounds pretty sweet. Not having the robotic overlords standing over you screaming "Bottom Line Bottom Line" would be refreshing......

    Oh god here they come.. "I serve only you, my lords .. no no not the tazer !!!!"
  • by Foobar of Borg (690622) on Wednesday October 24, 2007 @10:59AM (#21100007)

    It's an interesting strategy outlined in the article - that they're less worried about making money quickly and more worried about making robotics a sustainable sector of the economy means they'll either crash and burn early, or their efforts will single-handedly help to define a new generation of technology. Quite the fun dichotomy. :)
    I think the key is that they are planning on licensing the patents from the technology. At least, that's what I got from the article.

    1. Develop Robot Tech
    2. Patent Robot Tech
    3. License Robot Tech to those with the capacity to mass produce
    4. Profit! (no ??? needed this time)

Real Users find the one combination of bizarre input values that shuts down the system for days.