Harnessing Vertical Sea Temperature Gradient 426
Sterling D. Allan writes "Sea Solar Power Inc., run by three generations of James Hilbert Andersons, has developed a solar power technology that does not fluctuate with the weather, but is available constantly. Their solution is to harness the solar energy stored in the sea by tapping the thermal gradient that exists naturally between the surface and deep waters, using a reverse refrigeration cycle. The modeling and testing done by the Anderson family over three generations since 1962 predicts that the cost of energy generation through this method will be within a price range comparable to nuclear, coal, natural gas, and other contemporary grid power plants. Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion, or OTEC, was invented in 1881 by a French scientist, Jacques Arsene D'Arsonval. SSP should be ready to build their first full prototype 2-3 years from now."
Are there environmental effects to be considered? (Score:4, Interesting)
Further, what of the potential for secondary effects? Climate changes brought about by changes in ocean current temperatures? Remember, el nino/la nina are caused by a change of only a few degrees. That's not unforseeable for a large-scale technology such as this.
Oh, and BTW - it makes a lot more sense to base this on something like an oil rig, rather than a ship. Just sayin', is all.
This isn't news (Score:4, Interesting)
It's an intriguing idea, but this smacks of somebody trying to get publicity to bring in venture capital or something of the sort.
waves? (Score:4, Interesting)
Local? (Score:2, Interesting)
The parent is right on. This is just trading one environmental stressor for another.
Someone will object (Score:1, Interesting)
Hurricane Control (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Unfortunately, it's not a passive energy source (Score:5, Interesting)
--LWM
ps - no "think of the earthworms", please.
Re:Unfortunately, it's not a passive energy source (Score:4, Interesting)
And what do you think that solar energy is going to do if you don't turn it into electicity? The sun already raises the temperature last I checked.
Re:Solar???? (Score:5, Interesting)
No, but it does derive it's power from heavy elements that were created by the explosions of older stars.
No, the ocean is too massive (Score:3, Interesting)
People sometimes forget the scale of things. On a global scale, we are not even part of the equation.
But you also have to consider the opportunity costs of doing this. If we would raise the global atmospheric temperature 1/10 of a degree with all the carbon we were burning, what will the net effect be if we can convert a significant portion of our energy sources from burning carbon to mixing a small amount of cold and warm water?
Nuclear = Geothermal = Stellar Power (Score:5, Interesting)
Fission reactors, our only current form of nuclear power, split uranium nuclei into smaller fragments and thereby release energy. However, to form the uranium atom in the first place from smaller constituents therefore required energy. This energy is thought to have come from a supernova ~6 billion years ago, predating the formation of the solar system. Thus current reactors are, by some (possibly warped!) definition, still using fossilized "solar" power. The same can also be said of geothermal which relies mainly on natural decay of nuclei formed by the same supernova.
Only if we ever get fusion reactors working then we really say that we are no longer reliant on solar based power...and that's because we will have made our own mini-sun.
Lets get on with replacing coal (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Unfortunately, it's not a passive energy source (Score:3, Interesting)
Right - and a good chunk of the world's ecosystems rely on this to continue. Remove the sunlight, transfer the energy somewhere else, and you've just removed local heat. Good? Bad? Who knows, as it largely depends on the circumstances. But it is something to consider.
And now for some math... (Score:2, Interesting)
ASSUMING this thing can convert a 40 degree F (22 C) temperature gradient into electricity at 100% efficiency (which it can't, just looking for order of magnitude kind of thing here) then a 6ft (2m) diameter pipe sucking water in at a 20fps (6m/s) velocity will suck up enough water to generate 1500MW.
Ignoring peak demand and all that, it would take 300 (300) of them to power the entire US.
Assuming an average ocean depth of 1000ft (300m), which I suspect is considerably on the shallow side, it would take 230,000 years (7.25 Ts) to suck up the entire contents of the oceans. By this time, perhaps the sun would restore the temperature gradient to its original magnitude.
All in all, one of the less moronic alternative power schemes I've heard of.
p.s. - I'm not sure if I'm assisting or mocking our metric friends.
go nuclear (Score:4, Interesting)
thermocline, solar, biodiesel, wind, tidal turbine, wave generated, etc.: these are all very cute boutique energy sources. but when all put together and maxed out in terms of realization of potential they won't dent 5% of our energy needs
oil and gas and coal are incredibly dirty and even geopolitically dangerous and increasingly expensive
put it all together and pebble bed reactors are an environmentalist's and energy policy maker's best friend
now we just need the lowest common denominator of uneducated environmentalist's opinions to catch up with reality
ps: YOU CAN'T MAKE BOMBS OUT OF IT
educate yourself, don't let your uneducated fears dictate your opinion
as time goes by, nuclear is only going to look more and more attractive to this world, once everyone gets a real education of the positves and negatives of nuclear compared to everything else
because the biggest thing going against nuclear really is only inertia and ignorance
Re:Unfortunately, it's not a passive energy source (Score:3, Interesting)
Isn't it 4 degrees all the way down? (Score:4, Interesting)
Non-Photovoltaic Solar (Score:3, Interesting)
No really nasty chemicals involved, and it uses technology that has been available for a really long time. I'm not sure about efficiency.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power#Solar_th
See Concentrating solar power (CSP) plants.
Reading over it, it looks like it is not always water.
Ah. Yes. (Score:3, Interesting)
Okay, maybe a tad off-topic, but I certainly find it fascinating.
Re:Interesting Tech, but Geographically Limited (Score:1, Interesting)
The areas of the oceans with the deepest water and greatest thermal differences to exploit also have some of the poorest countries near them. Also, no land or other natural resources to speak of, and better yet, no industries to use the power. The efficiencies are still too low to build small OTEC plants. You have to design for something to generate 100MW to have it make any sense at all. Guam thought about it in the late 70's, but it came down to who is going to build a 500 million dollar powerplant for an island population of 100K people? Okay, so you build it, then, now that you have 100MW, what industry can consume that energy or allow it to be moved to the 4000 miles away places that need it? Hmm.... Convert it into another medium again. Crack seawater into hydrogen. Run those cars on the hydrogen. Export the hydrogen via ships to Asia, Hawaii, and the Americas.
While you are at it, convert everyone's PC into a treadle-pc.
Re:Are They Kidding? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Sound too good to be true? Perhaps it is... (Score:3, Interesting)
For 20 years. Then the population will have had time to exceed the newly available resources, and they'll be in the same condition they are now, except there will be 5x more of them. The third world doesn't need energy, medicine, water, or food. Not the long run, as no matter how great the supply much of it will be stolen or ruined, and the population will just grow to exceed the supply. The third world needs education and the rule of law. Until they are able to form governments which aren't just 'top strongman of the week' they will never be able to harness resources for the good of the populace, and if they DO form such a government that can enforce laws and reduce corruption they will have no need for all these things, as they will be able to produce them rather easily. They have plenty of resources and mineral wealth. They just need to keep strongmen from stealing it long enough to harness what they have.