AMD / Intel Hybrid Motherboard 151
batgirl writes "ECS has taken advantage of their recent merger with PC Chips and released an interesting take on motherboards. Using the highly portable SiS chipsets, they were able to create a motherboard that supports all kinds of processors across all platforms. The PF88 starts as an Intel socket 775 motherboard, but different expansion cards can be purchased to add support for everything from a Socket 939 Athlon64 to a Socket 479 Pentium-M. The price is right, and performance is as good as can be expected. But how many people would make use of this?"
Not me (Score:5, Insightful)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe (Score:2, Insightful)
The article stated it well (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Not me; Oh but it is (Score:5, Insightful)
If this company has done it's job right, this should reduce the overall cost of the board. If vendors have to keep fewer types of boards around then they are buying fewer types, giving them a price break. By having one mainboard that is common to all daughterboards, the total cost of delivering the motherboard is cheaper (one hopes).
My two cents.
Re:Not me (Score:5, Insightful)
So much is built onto the mainboard now... USB, firewire, support for various forms of DDR, sound, LAN... These don't change as often as CPUs, but they change.
Of course, this is meant to be a budget board, or at least they're using budget chipsets. The best I can see is that it provides whitebox manufacturers more flexibility. Use whatever CPU is on hand.
- Greg
Cost Cutting (Score:2, Insightful)
it would be more interesting if... (Score:2, Insightful)
Who Would Use: Schools (Score:1, Insightful)
With Intel-based Windows/MacOSX dual-boot computers on their way to the masses, the ability to cheaply upgrade certain hardware to extend the life of these systems would be welcome. It would take years anyway for school officials to adapt (e.g., NYC Dept of Ed has a deal with Dell), but the future of the technology is interesting.
good for OEMs (Score:4, Insightful)
Buy bulk in motherboards that will support both.
No dead stock you can't shift anymore.
Regardless of the performance, the words "AMD" or "Intel" is enough to sell things to most of the Joe public...
smash.
Remember ALR? (Score:3, Insightful)
When I wanted to upgrade to a 486, the CPU card cost more than a new motherboard, CPU, and RAM.
There are two problems with the CPU card approach. The first is technical; new generations of processors are coupled with new generations of chip sets, and often, new RAM technology.
The second problem is economic; without a CPU card standard, you are locked into a specific vendor for upgrades. The vendor has no incentive to price the upgrade any less than just below replacement cost for the entire MB, CPU, and RAM package.
If this system had come out not too long ago, you'd be locked into PATA instead of SATA, slow RAM, and AGP instead of PCIe graphics. The CPU and MB should always be treated as a unit, and sufficient RAM should be purchased from the beginning, so memory upgrades should be fairly unusual. Graphics card, hard drive, and optical drive upgrades may make sense; not always, not for everyone, but often enough to consider.
Re:Same as... (Score:3, Insightful)
-matthew
Re:Same as... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Not me (Score:3, Insightful)
You are not their target market. In fact, as far as upgrading the CPU, no one is their target market.
You have three end users:
1) The individual who builds their own systems. If they upgrade, their old system is good enough to resell -but they aren't going to sell just the CPU card. Therefore the entire board, cpu card, and cpu are going to stay together after the original purchase.
2) The individual who buys their own system. If they upgrade, they aren't going to bother upgrading the cpu - especially since they originally purchased the computer because it was cheap. Another cheap computer is around the corner.
3) OEM system builder. This is the target market. These motherboard are not really good for upgrades. Upgrading the CPU made sense when the CPU was 1/3 of the cost of the system. That is only true now when you are buying a top of the line CPU, and if so you aren't going to accept the performance hit of this motherboard (which may only be 5%, but you're already paying hundreds of dollars more for a CPU that only gives 10% more performance than one that is *very* cheap).
The OEM builder has a few advantages with this mobo (though these aren't, in practise, all that great):
1) They can stock fewer/smaller components to support a wider range of system configurations.
2) They can pre-build more of the system - leave the cpu card, HD, and video card out. Add these components very quickly on demand.
3) If the CPU is bad on the final test removing the card and putting a new one in may be easier/faster than removing the heatsink, cpu, and replacing them on a regular motherboard.
The biggest downside is that this greatly impedes case airflow, and requires a special or modified case to be truly reliable.
-Adam