Apple's First Flops 434
Sabah Arif writes "Apple began the eighties with two major flops under its belt: the Apple III and the LISA. Both machines were attempts at breaking into the business market. They were technologically advanced, but major flaws prevented their success."
Re:Classic tech support advise! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Hot Product (Score:4, Informative)
Absolutely. In this day of multi-ghz processors and video cards requiring their own cooling, people forget what it's like to have a dead silent computer. Remember back then that many/most computers didn't even have hard disks, so unless you were accessing the floppy, there was no noise at all. Notice that he made the same edict when it came to the original Mac's.
What a concept! Usually when you drop things, they break. But when you drop an Apple, well, it just works (TM).
Actually this was a common problem with all computers of that era. Wasn't uncommon at all to have chips work their way loose, esp new computers. I'd get new units and the first thing I'd do is re-seat all the socketed chips, esp the memory dips as trouble shooting your computer locking up or randomly rebooting (ahhh, some things never change do they?) because one of your 36 64k dips was loose was not fun.
Re:Hot Product (Score:1, Informative)
Bingo. That's why the original Mac also lacks a fan, and I'm guessing why the original DV iMacs did away with the fan.
Larry Tesler was never CEO. (Score:5, Informative)
>where he led a dozen engineers (including future Apple CEO Larry Tesler)
Larry Tesler was never CEO of Apple. He was Chief Scientist and VP.
Kinda makes me wonder about the veracity of the rest of the piece...
The original killer app. (Score:2, Informative)
Visicalc [bricklin.com] nearly did that. But since IBM had yet to legitimize personal computers with their "entry level systems," PCs were still looked upon by the business community as hobbyist toys.
Here's a better list of flops... (Score:3, Informative)
Apple IIGS? (Score:3, Informative)
Wasn't that [oldcomputers.net] a flop?
Re:Hot Product (Score:3, Informative)
Not too well researched, like full of errors: (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Sounds reasonable. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Not too well researched, like full of errors: (Score:3, Informative)
My company (DeskTop Softare Corp, out of business now) wrote software for the III and it failed because there were a large number of 100% out of the box failures. The hardware stunk. Who can we possibly blame other than Apple?
Re:Sounds reasonable. (Score:5, Informative)
From Wikipedia: "The Apple LaserWriter was one of the first laser printers available to the mass market. Combined with GUI-based programs like Adobe PageMaker on the Macintosh, it is generally considered to have sparked the Desktop publishing (DTP) revolution in the mid-1980s.
Unlike models from HP, which had been introduced a few months earlier and used their proprietary PCL printing language, the LaserWriter included the PostScript page description language which allowed for far more complex graphics, high-resolution bitmap graphics, outline fonts, and generally much better-looking output.
The use of PostScript comes at a cost. Unlike PCL and other early printer control languages, PostScript is a complete programming language and requires a complete computer to run it. In the case of the LaserWriter this was a Motorola 68000 CPU running at 12MHz, making it the fastest machine in Apple's lineup, and the most expensive at $6,995 when it was introduced in late 1985."
Re:Classic tech support advise! (Score:3, Informative)
Except that you are wrong (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not too well researched, like full of errors: (Score:3, Informative)
That would make it difficult to explain why Apple recommended lifting the machine two inches and dropping it to reseat them . . . you can argue for a different cuase, but that was Apple's explanation back then . .
hawk
Re:Sounds reasonable. (Score:2, Informative)
What garbage... (Score:2, Informative)
4 months later, I was working at Apple -- before the company went public. Oh, everyone already had badges. I learned more than I ever wanted to know about the Apple
Was the
The Apple
And Lisa? May not have sold a lot of machines, but it was a technological milestone, introducing new ideas to the computing public. It was a stepping stone for the Macintosh -- that's where the Mac project got Bill Atkinson and the Quickdraw core.
Apple flops? They're there, but many stem from over-reaching technically -- the Twiggy disk drive for example. Many didn't have enough backing, or enough spine -- eWorld? Open Doc?
How about pushing products out the door before they're ready? Apple
Many failures at Apple were products or ideas which were ahead of their time -- part of Lisa's problem. Newton fits into that category, ahead of its time and born prematurely. So does Web TV -- it didn't "fit" with the then Apple model, so Steve P and others took it outside, made it fly, eventually selling it to Gates.
Another example of Apple's "mistakes" and "failures" -- businesses other companies find very attractive.
Re:Apple is a 2.0 or 3.0 company most of the time. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Sounds reasonable. (Score:3, Informative)
Strangely enough, that seems to be happening [xlr8yourmac.com].
I've been drooling over screenshots/reviews of OS X for ages now (Unix? Nice interface?), and I was pretty much ready to shell out for a Mini as my first Mac until I saw that report -- and many others like them [google.co.uk].
It's a shame, but I don't really want to shell out £350+ with the risk that I won't be able to use it with my monitor. I guess I'll just keep looking for a cheap, second-hand G4 PowerMac on eBay.
Or I might just completely flip my lid and buy a new Amiga [stellardreams.co.uk]. :)