Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware Hacking Businesses Media Media (Apple) Apple

Shufflephones 2.0 147

Photo_Designer writes "After hacking my first pair of headphones to accept an iPod Shuffle, I just couldn't keep my hands off my other set of headphones and hacked an iPod shuffle adapter inside them, too. This version also includes an all-new expansion jack which allows sharing your music on the go, plugging your Shuffle into a stereo with a patch cable (without removing it from the phones), and also allows the headphones to be used as regular phones with the shuffle removed or turned off."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Shufflephones 2.0

Comments Filter:
  • by REBloomfield ( 550182 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:45AM (#11997739)
    yes :)
  • by That's Unpossible! ( 722232 ) * on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:51AM (#11997768)
    Yes, on one side you will only hear half of the music, due to the iPod shuffle blocking the speaker.
  • Re:It might sell... (Score:2, Informative)

    by springbox ( 853816 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @09:54AM (#11998135)
    TDK already made hardware [cnet.com] that is more compact than this. It's an audio player (have to convert MP3s or WMAs to a special format) that has 128MB of flash memory.. Anyway, it might not be the ideal solution, but you still can get the same effect of "singing along with headphones that don't appear to be plugged into anything."
  • by clarkcox3 ( 194009 ) <slashdot@clarkcox.com> on Monday March 21, 2005 @09:54AM (#11998138) Homepage
    Supposedly one could determine which three lines from a dock connection provide the line out signal & run them into a headphone jack.
    If you hold the iPod in your hand, screen towards you, pin 1 is the leftmost pin. Pins 2,3 and 4 are ground, right and left respectively.
  • Re:Goddammit! (Score:5, Informative)

    by 2nd Post! ( 213333 ) <gundbear@pacbe l l .net> on Monday March 21, 2005 @11:09AM (#11998882) Homepage
    Several points:
    When has cheaper ever meant better? Cheaper, by definition, means cheaper. Do you like looking cheap? Being called cheap? Would you date someone cheap?

    The iPod, as a non flash based player, has one advantages:
    Storage capacity
    Price

    The iPod, as a non Creative part, has two advantages:
    UI
    Software

    And then you ask, "What did Apple do to have such control...?" Some would answer 'marketing', and that's correct. Apple has adverts on TV and in print. The Practice had an episode two years ago where one lawyer said in court, "I would hate to live in a world where we are all plugged into iPods and ignoring each other. A little bit of noise is good sometimes."

    Then you ask what the Shuffle does better: It's cheaper. $89 for 256mb from Creative or $99 for 512mb from Apple. It uses iTunes, which is free if you want to see why it's better than Creative Nomad Exlorer (or whatever they call it now).

    Finally you ask, "Why do people act like Apple was the first people to make mp3 players?"

    The answer is, Apple was the first to make a portable high capacity high usability mp3 player.

    The Apple iPod did four great things when it was released that no one else had ever done:
    Make something the size of a pack of cigarettes that could store more than 256mb; it could store 5gb. The local competitor was the Creative Nomad, which was the size of a 4 CD box and weighed over a pound, and was far from portable.
    It used Firewire. Synching an iPod took less than 10 minutes to upload 5gb of music. The Creative Nomad, using USB, could upload 500mb in 10 minutes.
    It had a phenomenal UI, which could be used one handed. The Nomad, on the other hand, could not. It had a folder based UI display, and even today the Nomad 3 has 11 buttons on it's face to control it's UI. The iPod, still, only has five.
    It had phenomenal software, in iTunes. Not only could you upload 5gb of music, the software allowed you to manage many multiple gbs easily because it handled all the cataloging, database management, playlist generation, ripping, and encoding.

    Imagine how powerful this is, and this is something Creative only gained this year but Apple has had for two or three: A playlist generator.

    I want:
    Not country
    Songs played less than 4 times
    Songs not played in the last week

    That's what Apple offered, in iTunes, that no one else had. iTunes ALSO offered (new at the time, I'm sure everyone has most of these now):
    Streaming shared online libraries. iTunes users can see and play each other's libraries
    Automatic tagging
    Streaming to wireless speakers (Airport Express)
    Automatic ripping
    Automatic synching
    Music search via ID3 tags
    Album art
    CD burning (remember 'Rip, Mix, Burn'?)

    I think the MuVo works with iTunes; give it a shot!

8 Catfish = 1 Octo-puss

Working...