Samsung Unveils 82 Inch LCD 232
karvind writes "Physorg is reporting that Samsung Electronics has developed the world's largest liquid crystal display panel. This 82-inch TFT-LCD is 17 inches larger than LCD flat panel previously developed by Sharp. This development challenges plasma display panels in this market area. This full HD image quality (1,920 x 1,080 pixels) TFT-LCD panel was developed at the company's new production complex in Tangjeong, Korea. The soon-to-be operational 7th-generation production facility uses glass substrates that measure 1.87m x 2.20m."
size/resolution (Score:4, Interesting)
rejects (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:size/resolution (Score:2, Interesting)
Actually, I think I would rather have a projector. Mmmmm, Battlefield 1942 on the entire wall of my living room.
Re:Great (Score:5, Interesting)
But one thing is to be considered: if it is as bright as a small tv, a white picture should be seriously blinding... 2 or 3000 lumen are headlight quality...
how big are the pixels? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:size/resolution (Score:0, Interesting)
in other news, these would be great for home theater applications!
What advantages over a DLP projector? (Score:4, Interesting)
A projector is light and can be easily moved. It gives you a huge display, with comparable resolution and brightness. It is cheaper. It can double up for business use, and can be carried in one hand. And when it's switched off, you get your living room back.
The only disadvantage of a projector is that it can be a little noisy - DLP chips get very hot and need a lot of cooling.
And perhaps there are no projectors with built-in TV decoding, which I don't care about personally since I don't have TV, and only watch DVDs.
Re:Big pixels (Score:3, Interesting)
I wouldn't use it as a personal screen unless I were five meters back, but that's part of the idea for some people, a convergence display.
Awesome! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:size/resolution (Score:3, Interesting)
Hehehehe... "99%" of the 2% who can afford to plunk down a few thousand dollars for a TV this size. Wake me when I can get an 42" OLED display for $500. That's when I'll move to HD. Doesn't anyone here think it's a little unrealistic to pay over $500 for a TV set? Hello? (Speaking as a non-gadget guy of course. I prefer building my own to buying pre-made crap)
Re:rejects (Score:2, Interesting)
Of course market forces in TVs means a bigger set => we can charge more for it, even if it costs the same or even less to produce. etc. Opposite applies to other things like cell phones where slim/smaller = higher cost so really manufacturing cost probably has little to do with pricing here.
Re:What advantages over a DLP projector? (Score:4, Interesting)
Actually, the biggest disadvantage of a front projector is that they are only good in dim to dark rooms. The white screen necessary to reflect the projected light also reflects all the other light in the room. Perhaps if Sony's ChromaVue screen becomes readily available, this will change.
The Lamps get Hot (Score:2, Interesting)
I agree about a good (even moderately good) DLP projector. I have a BenQ PB6200, does 1024x768. With my permenately tensioned DALITE screen, I paid less than $2000 for everything brand new even with cables.
It does HD too (granted slightly lower res than 720p) but it still looks better than SD. All in all, not a bad for a 105" TV than one can actually afford. I have a HD DVR from Time Warner that performs the tuning function for me.
In my opinion, it's not the noise, TV tuning, or even "rainbow effect" of projectors that is the problem. The problem is it is a lot of work to get something going that looks decent. Mounting, for the project, mounting the screen. Mounting curtains or something because the screen gets a bit washed out during the day. These are problems to me. But with a little effort and thought, they can be solved.
The attraction with LCD, is you just nail it up to the wall and call it done.
Re:rejects (Score:3, Interesting)
Also - the transistors are still photolithographically defined... which means they have to spin coat a photoresist. The wafers used to make your pentium chips are about a 1ft (.3m) in diameter. These are nearly 7 times larger and are not circular. So... imagine a rectangular piece of glass 2m in one dimension spinning at 3000 revolutions per minute. How does this effect yield? I don't know. But one thing I'm pretty sure about is that larger is not easier.
Re:When will it replace plywood? (Score:3, Interesting)
An interesting thing I've noticed is that larger community sites tend to present more conflict than the social networking type environments. For example, there's almost always someone ready to strike back with a counter argument on Slashdot, and even if it's just to be contrary, it still offers an opposing or at least different view of a subject. While Slashdot still obviously caters to a relatively thin slice of overall events, the discussion of those tends to reveal different frames of reference in which to view them. On the other hand, through my traversals of places like LiveJournal, where the users choose both the topic and the viewpoint, and everyone hosts their own reference frame's home, I notice an interesting tendency for vast networks of nearly identical views to be interconnected and to some degree isolated except for a few tenuous links from other reference frames.
Bah, crazy insane tangent. Now I'm interested in this social dynamic divide. But I'll probably explore it no further. Lousy lack of motivation...
Re:What advantages over a DLP projector? (Score:2, Interesting)