Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Wireless Networking Media Television Hardware

Wireless Neighborhood Networks in Canada 120

Anonymous the younger writes "Cringely once again has another column, this time with a company in Canada that does neato stuff with Open Source."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wireless Neighborhood Networks in Canada

Comments Filter:
  • by garcia ( 6573 ) * on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:04AM (#10404507)
    At this point, intellectual property lawyers are supposed to start reaching for their telephones to call Canada, but it won't do any good because all this content is perfectly legal and here's how. With the exception of local channels, which come from an antenna, all of Andrew's video content comes from a C-band (big dish) satellite receiver (receivers, actually), and is fully paid for. "I buy the channels just like a cable system does or a motel that wants to offer HBO, from the National Programming Service," says Andrew. "And as a result I pay wholesale prices. People don't realize how much of a markup there in is the cable business. The Discovery Networks, for example, cost me $0.26 per customer per month. The IP laws in both the U.S. and Canada say that if I have legal access to this content I can store and use it. And the over-the-air channels, of course, are free."

    Hmm, I wish that everyone could have a large dish in their neighborhood. Hell I had to put up with a ton of shit at my apartment complex to get a small dish ($400 damage deposit -- $300 non-refundable, make sure it wasn't attached to anything, etc). I have to sign a waiver at my house because of the HOA. I thought the FCC mandated that having a small dish was legal and easy? I just can't see anyone having a large dish to bring this in at least in my area.

    If getting this stuff for .26/mo is possible why aren't more people doing it? Is it because it isn't as easy as Cringley makes it seem? This might be possible now but once entire neighborhoods across the nation (and world) start to do this it might not be quite as easy. Remember, the conglomerates control a lot of things including media channels. You think that they are going to put up with losing the revenue from their residential customers?
  • by TigerNut ( 718742 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:17AM (#10404662) Homepage Journal
    The residential customers also cost them a lot of money to support, either directly or indirectly, so what is happening here is that de-centralizing the distribution of media and communications will require the cable companies and telcos to streamline their operations. It will put some cable service guys out of a job - until those service guys become your friendly local content provider. Providing an alternate content path as described (and especially having a roving phone automatically finding a way to connect to the PSTN regarless of where it is) is not "easy" but it's a good example of what someone who understands the infrastructure can do using the available technology today.
  • Re:Please. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheLogster ( 617383 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:19AM (#10404682) Homepage Journal
    Harddisks are cheap these days...

    You can build multi terabyte capacity systems for a few thousand bucks...

    Storage of video isn't and issue. 500-800KBps WM9 at SIF res is good enough for tv..

    So the system that tapes eveything that isn't on disk is not "bullshit". The company that I work for builds hardware for the broadcast industry that is designed to do such things.
  • What about the bugs? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by colin_n ( 50370 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:23AM (#10404735) Homepage Journal
    This setup sounds very compelling. I am interested to know what all the drawbacks are as well as what inconveniences the participants experience. I know that when I switched to Voip with Packet8, the price is great but there are some minor inconveniences such as service outages + sometimes bad connections if my girlfriend is accidentally using all our upload bittorrenting TV episodes. Everything cant be only plusses and no minuses. Can any of the participants share their experience?
  • Observations (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tyrani ( 166937 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:24AM (#10404740)
    1)
    This Andrew guy is obviously an UberGeek. Congratulations on achiving such notariety.

    2)
    This system is absolutly amazing. It is an interesting test of the application of exising technology. He didn't create anything new, he just used what was already avaliable.

    3)
    Everything seems perfectly legal, but some big companies are loosing money on the setup. Will Andrew's work lead to harsher laws in Canada? Once this type of setup is common place, I think that the non-communist values that some law making Canadians have may be overpowered.

    4)
    Another great article Cringely!
  • by garcia ( 6573 ) * on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:24AM (#10404744)
    The residential customers also cost them a lot of money to support, either directly or indirectly, so what is happening here is that de-centralizing the distribution of media and communications will require the cable companies and telcos to streamline their operations.

    So what you are saying is that they make no money on their residential customers and they only promote the service out of the goodness of their hearts right? They have no interest in spreading their power across the country and buying up every little company out there to take under their wing right?

    This is America and we work under the Capitalist system. If something isn't profitable it is either done away with completely or bought up by the government. Comcast wouldn't be buying up every cable company in the country to spread their influences if it wasn't profitable.

    Believe me. The conglomorates will not appreciate losing customers to this sort of operation. Luckily for them they can control the content that these neighborhood groups can receive and at what cost.

    Either way we'll lose.
  • by Rosco P. Coltrane ( 209368 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:24AM (#10404746)
    Remember how in the go-go Internet days of three to four years ago, we used to talk about "disintermediation?" That was using technology to remove middle men from transactions. Well, what Andrew Greig is doing is dis-intermediating both the telephone and TV cable companies. And he'd like to dis-intermediate the Internet Service Providers, too.

    Wrong: Andrew Greig isn't "disintermediating" anybody, he's "alter-mediating", meaning in plain english that he's cutting the grass under some other middlemen's feet and setting himself up as the sole replacement middleman for all the people he serves. Likewise, if he wanted to get rid of the internet providers, he's go into the business himself.

    His business is that of a concentrator of services, no more no less. Cheaper, more friendly perhaps, but nothing so glamorous as what Cringely portrays him to be. If he's clever and maintains his services, he should make money out of it too.
  • by Qzukk ( 229616 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:28AM (#10404790) Journal
    Being .26 a month is probably why these channels all get bundled together into a "basic" service, and the cable companies have been fighting tooth and nail to prevent customers from getting the choice of a pick-and-choose "cheap" service.
  • by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @11:29AM (#10404794) Journal
    Blah whine "conglomerates".

    He buys the shows from the conglomorates, the only people he's competing with are the service side of the industry.

    His solution scales until there's an old dipshit on his cul-de-sac waking him up at 3 AM screaming because something went wrong and today's Oprah got cut off.

    The content is really cheap, (another argument against "broadcast flags" and DRM). But the larger your customer base, the more they'll expect from you, and the stupider they'll be.

    Comcast charges 40 bucks a month markup because people keep digging through the cables, can't get their cablemodem working, etc.. (Comcast sucks and is a ripoff)
  • by Mysticalfruit ( 533341 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @02:20PM (#10406882) Homepage Journal
    Firstly, I'm not sure how your home network is setup but one solution might be to use a traffic shaper and give your VOIP packets the highest priority.

    Secondly, this setup sounds very compelling until you start to read between the lines and realize that this guy's got a whole cellar full of hardware...

    1. The C-Band satellite dish in his back yard and probably 10+ receivers.

    2. Two or three MythBackend Systems each with multiple hardware mpeg encoding cards. These machines would probably also need at least 2 gigE cards each.

    3. A database server running mysql to hold all of the recorded program meta data.

    4. A storage system capable of storing 30,000 movies/tv shows/mp3's. This solution should be robust enough to support having multiple streams being written (since you've got those 3 mythbackend boxes constantly writing) plus having any number of reads as any number of Myth Front ends read data from the array. So, this would either be some sorta direct connect SAN or some type of NAS toaster with a shit loads of disk on lots of spindles.

    5. A couple good gigE switches/router to connect all of this too. You would probably want to look at switches that are capable of trunking and creating VLANS.

    6. WAP equipment. I'd go for something that had some really good management tools that'll allow you todo bandwidth throttling, usage monitoring/logging, traffic shaping, etc.

    7. A good omnidirectional wireless Antenna so that everybody can connect.

    8. An ISP that's
    a) going to be cool with what your doing (such as speakeasy)
    b) can provide the bandwidth necessary so that a whole street worth of people can surf the Internet while also chatting on the phone.

    Now, there's also some other considerations.
    Because of the cost of the equipment, Electricity and bandwidth bills, your going to have to charge for this.

    So, unless your going to try to get NPO status, your going to have to get a business license and start keeping track of what you take in for profits so you can pay the tax man. Not to mention that the cost of this equipment means that you'll probably need to take out some loans for the initial acquisitions, so you'd have to figure out your THAC0 so that can hit zero to at least break even. Also, you'll need some infrastructure so that you can keep track of who's paid you and how much and who hasn't paid you, etc.

    Beyond all that, we haven't even gotten into the aspects of providing tech support for all the clueless users who'll call up at 3am when they can't make a phone call and the problem isn't at your end, it's at the ISP's

    Now, you've got 10 people with these Starnix thin clients in they're house hooked up to their TV's. Who's going to do the initial configuration of these things? I doubt they come pre-configured with the mythfrontend (though it would be nice), so you'll probably need to configure these things to all the settings for your myth back end.

    Also, since your now their ISP, you can expect (since they're paying you for network access) that they'll be calling you whenever their completely unpatched, spyware addled Windows ME box shits all over itself... Not to mention that they'll be calling you whenever they want to put another piece of wireless equipment in their house, which means you'll have to start page listing all the gear you know works with your setup...

    With all that said, this solution would work, it's just going to require a bit more work then Mr. Cringely makes it sound...
  • by Claw919 ( 604849 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @02:32PM (#10407033)
    Man, lots of people who think this won't work... 1) System stability. He's probably got APs (and you-name it) on standby. Nobody (let alone a high quality geek of this calibre!) ever designs a network without minimal failovers at least. Hell - he's probably doing some AP meshing or something. 2) Cash is king. Want failover 911 service in case your neighbour's house gets hit by a meteor? Okay... keep your basic phone service. You're still way under what you were paying for phone + cable. (Oh, by the way - in Canada (Ontario at least), any company who wants to resell phone services CAN - they wholesale it out from Bell Canada. What's to stop him from doing that?) 3) Yes, you can definitely store hundreds and hundreds of 30 minute shows on hard disk. He'll be using TV-quality, not the super-extreme-videophile quality that people mindlessly use for their old Tick reruns (yes, I like Tick). Ease up on the "big corporations will never allow this", by the way. To be so defeatist is to withdraw any claim to the title of "Geek" - and, as such, you should not be reading Slashdot.
  • by daybyter ( 684997 ) on Friday October 01, 2004 @04:30PM (#10408360)
    Is there any kind of neighbourhood-net howto? I'm trying to create a very, very basic WIFI service for my neighbourhood and already learned, that you lose a lot of time searching for the right hard- and software. What APs to use? How to configure my linux router? And much more details. Would be great to have a forum, where admins of such networks could discuss all those issues.

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.

Working...