Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware

Keyless Keyboard 151

Nos. writes: "Keybowl has developed a keyless keyboard. Instead of using your fingers, as we're all used to, you use your hands and arms while reducing wrist motion. According to their research it suggests this is much better at reducing repetitive strain injuries as well as being easier to use for disabled persons. I'd be happy just knowing I couldn't drop any more crumbs between the keys!" As an official keyboard fanatic / inquisitor, I like to see unusual ideas like this. As it is, keyboards can mostly be pegged something from "horrible" to "terrible." Also, check out the comparison page at this site, which has a fairly non-judgmental rundown of many of the other ergonomic keyboards out there, from Kinesis to Bat.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Keyless Keyboard

Comments Filter:
  • Well it's a keyboard, no buttons. Since the site's been /.ed nobody knows what is looks like...


  • I submitted the word "while", which I can type in less than a second, and which I type fairly frequently when coding; I just don't believe you can get *anywhere* near the typing speed by co-ordinating these two domes. To get 'w' I've just got to make sure I hit the 'w' key on a normal keyboard, but on this thing I have to bring a time-element in too, I need to make two movements. I love gadgets, but I won't be ordering one of these.
  • Now, it would be very interesting if you could isolate the two domes' output at will. So, you'd have, say, the right dome for the arrow keys + tricks and the left dome for the various actions...

    ...then it just struck me... it'd be neat if the dome had (has?) the three mouse keys incorporated on *each* dome (both for the extra functionality *and* for accommodating left-handers like me). Then, we could happily forget about the "Claw" (/.ed this week, if you remember).

    Now, that would be neat...!

    Trian

  • by Six Feet Under ( 253007 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @07:17PM (#636931)
    So if this thing becomes popular, and it creates a keystroke by combining one position from each hand, I'd have to assume you can only type one keystroke at a time... Now this almost instantly makes it worthless for Windows users, seeing as a certain three keys are required to be pressed at the same time quite often :)
  • how bout straight females? they dont want those boobies n'more..

    how bout a look and feel for male butts for female users?

    sorry for my bad spelling.. :)
  • This would be great for a book-sized portable computer. Position small versions of the "domes" where they will be under the user's thumbs when the computer is held with both hands.
  • I therefore suggest they call it a breast board, since that is what it most closely resembles.

    Hmmm. And I can see that they may want to release different sizes for different hands. You know, sizes "A" through "DDD".


    --

  • I must disagree. Try one of SGI's PS/2 keyboards and you will be an SGI keyboard person for life :). The Extended Keyboard II is definantly nice, I have used them myself, but I find the feel to impede my typing ability. As far as typing speed goes with me, I type very quickly on the new Apple keyboards, but the keys are a bit springy for me so I am slightly more prone to error.
  • Well, there would have to be some kind of safeguard...I'm sure that by the time we have things that can interface with the mind like that we'll also be able to isolate things like trauma in the brain, and possibly cut it off from the virtual world. As for falling in love with something you can't have...that happens in real life too ;)

  • Every time a keyboard-related story comes up, someone has to bring up the old ibm mechanical keyswitch keyboards. I guess it's me this time.

    I used to have one from an old ibm AT - you know, the type with f1-f10 on the side (missing f11 & f12 - annoying every once in awhile.) Some guy in the wealthy section of town tossed it out on the curb on "massive garbage pick-up day" and I swooped down on it. Beautiful device. It had a *metal* backing and must have massed 5 kilos. The grad students with whom I shared an office thought I was a crazy computer nut because of the incessant clicking. Well, that or a secret agent of invading alien locusts, grinding my mandibles in evil anticipation of succulent human flesh. Maybe that's why they never talked to me...

    Eventually I picked up a couple of newer ibm keyboards (101 key model M's) at a surplus sale to replace it, since the lack of f11 & f12 caused problems. They don't have the metal backing, but they still have the "click" feel. Another plus is the fact that the keyboard cable plugs into the back and is therefore interchangeable with one of greater length. 9-foot keyboard cables are your friend. Put that server and its howling fans far, far away from your ears.

    I even have a couple of ibm keyboards I rescued off a pair of terminals. They look almost exactly like the 101 key PC ones, but they have 24 function keys and a connector which most closely resembles the AT keyboard connector, but with the pins spaced a bit differently. I've been meaning to try and interface them to my PC. (Clicky keys + 12 extra function keys...I could map out half of my most frequently-used apps to function keys!)

    Anybody know anything more about these keyboards?

    Part# 1386887, model M, appear to date back to 1986.

    As it is, I dream of having a ergonomic keyboard WITH mechanical keyswitches, but I don't know anyone who makes such.

    zeke
  • Sorry to disagree, but the old Northgate keyboards were the best ever - at least from a clicky comfort point of view. They had heft - probably the only keyboard that you could kill someone with.

    Of course, they're pretty much relics now, don't have PS/2 connectors (they still make adapters tho). The keyboard division lasted a lot longer than the parent company that once made computers, too.
  • I was talking with my brother recently about the social problems something like that would cause.

    It would be really cool, I agree, but how far is too far, in terms of realism?

    Eventually, we will make something like that, which can interface directly with the human conciousness. What happens to love, and sadness, and depression, and death then?

    If you can die because of things in the virtual world and how they affect your brain, should we allow that to happen? How can we deal with concepts like, falling in love with something in the virtual world, or being so tramuatized by a virtual event, that one can no longer function normally.

    Fascinating stuff...
  • Any mousepad is easily converted to be mouseless.
    --
  • by cronio ( 13526 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:18PM (#636941) Homepage
    Google [google.com]'s cache [google.com].

    Damn slashdot effect.

  • by Guyote ( 95153 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:18PM (#636942) Homepage
    For those that haven't seen it, this thing has a base shaped kinda like a Microsoft Natural Keyboard, but instead of keys, it's got a dome-looking articulation for each hand. The "domes" are moved in an x-y axis independently of each other. Moving the "domes" in combinations of positions correspond to the alpha-numeric key symbols as on a conventional keyboard.
    It looks like a lot to have to re-learn to me.
    I saw this on a site by the National Science Foundation. They were running a story on a new keyboard where ergonomics was the central design idea.
  • If a company puts up a web page to publicize a new product, they should be prepared for the possibility that they will actually succeed!
    ... or be slashdotted...

    --
    Americans are bred for stupidity.

  • google has a nice cache....
  • Uh, just like any keyboard, I would guess it doesn't give a fuck about the OS being used...it just sends keycodes. Sortof like the fact that, you know, BIOSes and the like don't need special keyboard drivers depending on your keyboard.

  • it only caches the HTML page, the images are still loaded from the original server, which is slash.ed
  • You can always try the poor man's cache. While it doesn't have the pictures (which is unfortunate), Google caches it [google.com].
  • Yeah they do. Read "Saw if on NSF a couple of days ago"
  • by cronio ( 13526 )
    Hmm, let's see...yeah, there are symbols in it.

    K....e....y....b....o....w....l....yep, those look like symbols to me.

  • There are basically three reasons that people get pains in their hands, wrists, and forearms from using computer keyboards:

    1) They are using a non-split keyboard and have large hands, so their wrists must always be bent at a somewhat outward-cocked angle (with the wrists nearly touching) in order to type on a straight keyboard.

    2) They are actually resting their wrists on the front edge of their desk or keyboard and all the motion that takes place during their keypresses is limited to the fingers. This places strain on the muscles and tendons in the wrist and forearm. The proper way to type (both more quickly/accurately and without inducing pain) is to keep your wrists floating/elevated above the keyboard, and to just let your fingertips sort of hang down and dance around on the keys as you type. The upward/downward motion of a keypress is supposed to come just as much from elbow movements and moving the entire forearm up-and-down as it is from moving your fingers.

    3) People have the keyboard positioned incorrectly in relation to their body. The keyboard should be placed at a vertical height equal to or just below your elbows when your arms hang at your side, and the keyboard should be inclined forward or backward (or even level) to whatever position you need such that your wrists, when floating about an inch above the keyboard, are level (not cocked upward or downward at a weird angle).

    So basically I'm advocating the use of split keyboards, and I'm advocating proper ergonomic technique while typing.

    Personally, I used to hate split keyboards because I wasn't used to typing on them and always screwed up which keys I wanted to hit... but then I bought a split keyboard for use at home and got used to typing on it over a period of about 1 week, only to find that in the end it is far more comfortable because it keeps your wrists at a more natural angle.

    Even so, I've been typing away on computers since I was 10 years old and I've never had any kind of serious wrist/hand/arm trouble. If I find that something I'm doing is uncomfortable or strenuous, then I stop immediately and change the way I'm doing things. The worst thing you can do is just keep repeating a strenuous activity over and over again.

    As for this "KeyBowl" product, it sounds really lame. I don't care how much research they claim to have done with it--the mathematical combinations prove that it simply can't do everything a normal keyboard can accomplish, and there's obviously going to be a weird learning curve associated with it. Not only that, but the idea of an input device is that it should be standardized and/or intuitive enough that you can use any device that requires input. If you were to only learn to use one of these keybowl things, where would that leave you when you had to walk down to your co-worker's office and assist with a computer problem? How effective are DVORAK keyboard users when they have to assist with a computer that uses a QWERTY keyboard? The keybowl is a gimmicky product that plays off the fears of people who have pains but haven't thought to try proper ergonimic technique.

    Oh, and one more thing: if you're ever in the market to buy your first split keyboard, be careful to buy one that has the split in the right place! Many generic-brand split keyboards place the split between the keys in a non-standard way, so if you get used to typing on that keyboard you'll be lost when you have to type on a standard split keyboard. Microsoft's keyboards put the split in the standard place (between the pairs F5/F6; 6/7; T/Y; G/H; B/N) so that's a good baseline to use for comparison even if you don't like their keyboards.

  • When you go to buy a keyboard, you can request to have it extra "clicky". My dad has always bought keyboards that way. I suspect he normally buys them through IBM, but i would guess that anyplace that manufactures keyboards could make one for you. It does cost a little extra, but it's worth it!

    Today was just a day fading into another-Counting Crows

  • I loved the old heavy keyboards on the Indy machines, but not the newer ones on the o2's. Those old heavies were awesome - all the solid durability of the IBM clickity-clack keyboards, but with a smooth feel instead of the annoying sound. There's a couple of old Indy's at work that hardly get used anymore, and I can tell you the temptation to swipe those keyboards is really strong.
  • The problem with virtual glove keyboards is that you can't *feel* the keys, which means you can't type fast with tactile feedback. This is also why those touch-screen controls featured in Star Trek Next Generation will never replace keyboards either. You have to look at the screen to type.
  • by Russ Nelson ( 33911 ) <slashdot@russnelson.com> on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @08:39PM (#636954) Homepage
    This device is patented [ibm.com] already.
    -russ
  • Go to this URL - it shows you how to get those extra keys on that thing - you can push the domes downward to have "shift" keys.

    http://www.keybowl.com/support/training.htm

  • by Rombuu ( 22914 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @03:50PM (#636956)
    ...had a keyless keyboad too.. and that was almost 20 years ago.

    'Course it was living hell to type on too. Membrane "keys" and all that...


  • I can't really link to the original news story, but this is REALLY old news... and when I say old news, I mean more than 6 months AT LEAST.. please someone back up on me while I look @ my shit and find the original doc.. ok??

    I'm sure someone out there has heard about this one before.

    C ya.
  • by Denor ( 89982 ) <denor@yahoo.com> on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @03:52PM (#636958) Homepage

    So if it's a keyless keyboard, this means...

    Ye Gods, they've invented the BOARD!

    Can you imagine the lame jokes that are going to show up on this article?

    • Yeah, I think my local swimming pool can claim prior art, people have been kicking these around for a while
    • Can I iron on it?
    • If we put a checkered pattern on it, we could play chess and use the computer at the same time!
    • Mister President, Dire news: The Russians have the board.
    • And so on....
  • I wonder if anyone has considered using a miniaturized version of this for data entry on handhelds?

    If you can use your hands to type with combinations of two 8-way keys, why not do the same things with just your thumbs? (besides RSI)

    Something like this could make a lot more sense than current input methods... no stylus to lose, etc.
  • My keyboard's design takes off on the MS Natural Keyboard. This design is a quite comfortable one for me. Does anybody know how this keyboard is better/worse than the "broken keyboard" design I like so much?
  • It would be nice if the folks at say, guidescope would add a feature that sends you to the google site after oh, say, what, 10-15 seconds... It currently sends you to the google cache if you don't get a hit at all, but sooner would be better.

    Perhaps some of you could help. F'rinstance, I may have that capability implicitly already... perhaps if I reduce the time out delay, then maybe guidescope will pick up on that and send me to the google site.

    Of course, the google site often as not does not have the site cached...
  • Lets see. It has been about 2 mins since this news item was posted, and what do you know, it is /.ed
  • by Therlin ( 126989 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:25PM (#636963)
    Since the site has been /. I'll copy/paste their description on how it works.

    The Keybowl(TM) is made of two domes upon which the hands comfortably rest. One of the domes is called a "selector dome" and is used to activate the other dome, the "character dome."

    It may be helpful to think of these dome movements in a compass arrangement: N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, NW. Each dome is capable of sliding into the same eight compass directions.

    The Keybowl(TM) typist creates a keystroke by combining the positions of the two domes. He or she chooses a position on the "selector dome" and then types the letter with the "character dome" by sliding it in the direction of the letter or character he or she wishes to type.

    It may sound a little complicated, but it's easy to use. With very little training, Keybowl(TM) typists achieve a speed very close to the one at which they used to type before their injuries.
  • error: the document contained no data


  • by apsmith ( 17989 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:30PM (#636965) Homepage
    Since the site is /.'ed (and google's cache isn't helpful with no pictures) I don't know what this looks like - but what I've been wanting is something small enough to walk around with and to use easily on wireless devices. We've got to be headed in that direction - conventional keyboards are just way to big for the next generation of computer interfaces - maybe a chorded keyboard of some sort coupled with a mouse pointing device all bundled into one small package makes most sense?
  • Take out the spaces.

    --
  • maybe this will be a good way for geeks to develop some sort of self defense. we can exercise our arms and use the computer at the same time. i see a user typing in a style similar to the martial arts; a combination of speed, agility, and accuracy. too bad i can't actually see this thing... it sounds cool.
  • It may sound a little complicated, but it's easy to use. With very little training, Keybowl(TM) typists achieve a speed very close to the one at which they used to type before their injuries.

    Injuries?? I see now.. this is for ppl who have no fingers.. who would have thought about that??
    I thought that was what speech recognition software was for.. then again, how could you install the damn thing if you don't have fingers to doubleclick or press enter?

    I guess I should stop using needlenose pliers in my ears.
  • For those that haven't seen it, this thing has a base shaped kinda like a Microsoft Natural Keyboard, but instead of keys, it's got a dome-looking articulation for each hand. The "domes" are moved in an x-y axis independently of each other. Moving the "domes" in combinations of positions correspond to the alpha-numeric key symbols as on a conventional keyboard.

    With only 64 combinations of positions (not counting the possibility of leaving one of the domes centered, which could add another 16 combinations), it won't be able to deliver the full range of key combinations unless there's some "prefix" for the function keys, PrtSc, Ins/Del/Home/etc. It'd be like typing through the keyboard of a TI-99/4A or something similar that had a small number of keys (40-something for the TI, for instance). Lots of two-key combinations were used for common functions, IIRC (it's been twelve years since I had to leave my TI behind :-| ). Combine that with no visual clue for what's what and it seems it'd be a cast-iron b*tch to learn to use with any proficiency. (It'd probably be on the same level of difficulty as learning sign language...not impossible, but not something most people bother to pick up unless it's absolutely essential.)

  • I'm using a Data Hand [datahand.com] keyboard. I would recommend it, because it really does exercise your fingers in various directions which gets rid of RSI. It's quite easy to learn, unlike chord keyboards, and the design overall is quite practical. Disadvantages are price, that it's fairly bulky and that the mouse is operated with the keys (which isn't that bad actually, but one does find oneself reaching for the mouse as well occasionally.) Would probably rate it best overall for practicality and anti-rsi ability, but not perfect.
  • They are, in fact, supposed to be shaped more like the Logitech Trackman Marble [logitech.com] (when viewed from the appropriate angle :-)
  • Sometimes I'd like a real tactile keyboard, the ones that click, but I don't know where to find those anymore. I actually have one in my basement, but many years ago I spilled a plastic bonding agent on the keys, and while the board still functions, the keys are all grimy.

    I picked up a Focus FK-2001 [focustaipei.com] a few months ago...it's nice and clicky. PC Club [pcclub.com] had a stack of 'em one day...don't know if they still do, but if not, Price Watch [pricewatch.com] had a couple of vendors that were selling them for around $20. This keyboard model has been around nearly forever, and for good reason.

  • Here's a (tiny) picture courtesy of CBC:

    http://cbc.ca/gfx/photos/keyboard_ergonom001108.jp g [cbc.ca]

    The thing looks more like two giant selector dials connected together.

    Cheers,
    -j.

  • Why not provide a facility on /. to mirror the page? Could be automatic...

    - Dale
  • Silly me, for maximal usefulness I should have linked better pages:

    homepage [google.com]
    Research [google.com]
    Products [google.com]
    Ergonomics [google.com]

    Their keyboard comparison comes from information taken from www.keyalt.com [keyalt.com].

  • by romco ( 61131 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:41PM (#636976) Homepage
    keyless keyboard...
    This that anything like a bandwithless server?
  • uh, that's the exact link that I had.

  • From the descriptions it sounds as if one can't press multiple keys at once. How do I press [Ctrl] + [Alt] + [BackSpace]?
    --
  • by commandant ( 208059 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:43PM (#636979)

    I don't know about you, but I still prefer the feel of actual keys. It will take a LOT of adjustment to bound on a flat mat, which provides no feedback at all.

    And that's the real problem, feedback. Suddenly, you can't type without looking at the screen, because you can't be certain if you hit the key. Now hunt-and-peck typers will double their time typing, since now they have to look at the screen after every peck.

    The same thing happened when HP introduced the 49G graphic calculator, with rubberized keys that have no tactile feedback. While I think it's a great calculator, they really blew it by cheapening the keyboard. The old keyboards had substance--you knew when you hit the keys, even if you weren't paying attention. Now, when I use the 49G, I have to double-check everything I enter.

    But not only the uncertainty of hitting keys, there's something deeper that comes along with getting no feedback. I can't pinpoint it, but things just feel wrong when you can't feel the keys going down.

    I'm sure some people might like this. I can't actually see the keyboard, because of the Slashdot effect, but I would imagine it's flexible, and if not, it should be. If it isn't flexible, there's no point in using it. The flexibility might appeal to travelers--roll up a full-sized keyboard for your laptop, and jam it in a suitcase.

    I really love my keyboard, a six-year-old job that came with a Compaq Presario CDS 526 (that's one of those all-in-one models). No Windows keys, it's not an "internet" keyboard (what the hell is that anyway?), nothing cheesed up. Just 101 keys, using capacitive (or inductive) key detection, and little rubber cups under the keys, to give them resistance that results in a little (barely detectable) "pop" when the key finally gives up all resistance and goes down. It just feels good. And you know it's a quality product (can we say that about Compaq anymore?), since it's spent 4+ years in service, and 2 years in a musty basement, and it still functions perfectly.

    Sometimes I'd like a real tactile keyboard, the ones that click, but I don't know where to find those anymore. I actually have one in my basement, but many years ago I spilled a plastic bonding agent on the keys, and while the board still functions, the keys are all grimy.

    Flat panel displays, DVD, gigabit ethernet--those are the real advances in computing. Contrary to the poster, I feel that keyboards are great--if they're older, when quality meant something. Making them keyless just estranges things even more.

    Thank you.

    I do not belong in the spam.redirect.de domain.

  • Interested parties wishing to save the resource-challenged people at Keybowl a hard time might try some of the following URLs:

    A PDF File about the Keybowl
    http://www.acm.org/pubs/articles/proceedings/ass ets/228347/p86-mcalindon/p86-mcalindon.pdf

    A mirrored copy of an image of the thing
    http://www.brandeis.edu/~ekendall/large_keybowl. jpg
  • ...to grab some more info for you people... directly copy paste from their site.

    "The Keyboard that will Change the World."

    The Keybowl[tm] keyboard offers much greater flexibility in meeting the needs of its users. For
    the first time, anyone who types has the ability to adjust a keyboard to suit their own requirements.

    The Keybowl[tm] is . . . Your key to a higher quality of life and pain-free productivity!

    o Totally eliminates finger movement
    o Minimizes wrist movement
    o Easy to learn
    o A solution to carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) as it relates to typing.
    o Allows people with upper extremity disabilities to effectively type, interact with, and navigate with little or no pain.

    Because the Keybowl[tm] offers great flexibility in accommodating any user who wishes to type, some users type at much greater speeds than when they use a flat or traditional keyboard. The most researched keyboard. Visit our ergonomic research section to learn about the development of the Keybowl[tm].




  • gotta love fctn-=. I forgot about that style of keyboard untill I downloaded an emulator and wondered where the hell the quote marks were. regular keyboard does not translate very well.

    ----
  • No seriously, all they'll remember is Neo.. just let it be.. At least he got rid of the bill&ted image..

    Look, are you sure? I thought Wayne and Garth played Bill and Tedd, or vice versa... I mean those guys were actors. I'm talking about the Matrix here, not some movie! :)

    --8<--
  • Instead of wasting all their time on 'the board' they should put all their efforts in creating a better voice-interface, the best keyless keyboard you can imagine.

    I'm still waiting for the they when I can say to my computer:"Computer, moderate this lowsy reply DOWN"

    Mark [zwienenberg.com]
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
  • You'll have to ask a couple of friends to give you a hand.
  • Nah more like widthless bandwidth.
  • I have always liked the idea of (subtle) continuous audio feedback like this. The main problem with this is similar to the problem I had with dragondictate - it only really works well when you aren't switching apps a lot and jumping around. For focused-tasks, it's a lot better. Unfortunately, I don't get to focus on a single task for too long, in the office at least, and I suspect many other people suffer the same way.

    Since I have no sense of smell, the stinky-keys wouldn't help me out at all. Have a thought for the anosmics.
  • Hey what about.....
    Caps-Lock on, Caps-Lock off
  • How fast can you type with it? Let me rephrase...how fast is the fastest current typist with this method? Theoretical speed is vaporware as far as I'm concerned. Does it have function keys? What about having to move your hands to use the mouse?

    Most importantly, how will this affect playing Quake? Enquiring minds want to know.

  • by ebola-zaire ( 122422 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:52PM (#636991) Homepage
    i found some information about the keybowl. this is actually a very interesting device. the following pdf has lots of information about how it works, and also includes some sketches.
    http://www.c-60.org/keybowl.pdf [c-60.org]
  • their router vomited on itself

    13 ats1.worldramp.net (207.30.147.2) 55.705 ms 47.382 ms 50.295 ms
    14 * router.uneedus.com (205.161.235.1) 447.491 ms 264.871 ms
    15 205.161.235.52 (205.161.235.52) 287.682 ms 433.657 ms 711.278 ms

    -dk
  • What I don't like about the M$ Natural keyboard and the M$ Internet keyboards is that they have that strange curvy front to them. Most keyboards are flat in the front, but M$ keyboards seem to be different. The only reason it sucks is that it doesn't fit well into a lot of standard keyboard trays we use.

    I guess they sell the Microsoft, Proprietary Keyboard Tray separately for twice as much as a standard one.
  • by Canar ( 46407 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:55PM (#636994)
    "For years [things] had been operated by means of pressing buttons... then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made [hand] sensitive - you merely had to [move] the panels your [hands]; now all you had to do is merely wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope."

    Modified from that grand ol' book,
    The Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy by Douglas Adams
  • There'd be no way to fire, and just like using a joystick for Quake, you wouldn't be able to turn nearly as fast or as accurately as with a mouse...looking up and down would also be harder just like with a joystick.

  • What if my arms and hands are.. busy.. when Im browsing the internet?
  • by Anonymous Coward
    If they included two PEDALS, I could get all 256 ASCII characters! (8x8x2x2=256!)

    Now all I need to do is CLONE myself, so I can type in UNICODE!

    Oh, and I need to use the BUCKY-BITS too. Damn. Should I BLINK my EYES for that? In MORSE CODE?
  • you use your hands and arms

    With such keyboard layouts as "The Robot" and "The Running Man", this keyboard looks like fun for the whole family.

  • You could have at least gone to the trouble of copying it somewhere else, rather than blatantly whoring the link from my post [slashdot.org].. .

    Honestly, the things people will do to try to get karma.
  • ...non-judgmental rundown of many of the other ergonomic keyboards out there, from Kinesis to Bat
    All the others have been made by microsoft =p
  • damn straight... any how many geeks are actually interested in consumer grade input devices?
  • I can't get the site or see images on the google cache so I am gonna ask this here:

    Would "typing" resemble someone playing a two handed game of Missile Command? (or perhaps Centipede and Missile Command at the same time?)

    On a related, and more serious, note has anyone ever tried those "cyber gloves" that let you type in midair. I am thinking of the gloves that Neo uses in Johnny Mnemonic, but I was pretty sure that a product like this actually existed. Is this the case? I am thinking some kind of VR system would be needed right? Arg.

    Thanks

    --8<--

  • This kind of setup would *rock* for Quake and FPS!

    Can you imagine remapping it for gameplay?

    Left hand controls direction movement; strafe left/right, move forward/backward

    Right hand would be aiming; turn left/right, aim up/down

    Or you could do the meta control, I guess;

    If you could match this with a decent set of pedals; pedals would do forward/backward, left hand would be strafe left/right and 2 meta controls(weapon switching and jump/crouch?) while right hand would be freelook|weapon select/mode|jump/swim/crouch/duck/fly?

    The nick is a joke! Really!
  • I don't think (TM) is part of the name :)
  • by Lord Ender ( 156273 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @05:49PM (#637017) Homepage
    Well to me this sounds like you put your hands on two domes and wiggle the domes around. Now all the need to do is put nipples on these domes and I will love typing on this device.


    Oh, and it will be great when they come out with the force feedback version, like those new logitech mice.


    And since they don't have keys, they can't call it a keyboard. I therefore suggest they call it a breast board, since that is what it most closely resembles.

  • Just imagine, every time you push either of the hemispheres to one of the cardinal points, you get a different musical tone. After a few weeks of using this thing, you'd know immediately if you hit the wrong key because you would get a wrong beep-boop sound.

    I like it.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    Oh my God. You /.ed Google

    You Bastard

  • How can I use encryption then if I can't shift my home-row fingers over one key?

    ;sihj oyd s kplr


    ---
  • That's why you should always post and then read the article.
  • by 11thangel ( 103409 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @03:59PM (#637027) Homepage
    Why not a mouseless mousepad, or a car that doesnt move? Technology is often annoying complex...
  • by lizrd ( 69275 ) <[su.pmub] [ta] [mada]> on Thursday November 09, 2000 @08:55AM (#637031) Homepage
    Not only does it seem that you wouldn't be able to press multiple keys at once, but with 2 different devices each capable of 8 different positions it follows that you would have no more than 64 character choices. This makes it kind of a tight squeeze, but almost sufficient for typing most things in English.
    26 lowercase letters
    26 uppercase letters
    10 digits
    1 period
    1 question mark
    ----------------
    64 total characters
    Of course, it's missing a comma and apostrophe which I use a pretty fair amount. Maybe you could get another 8 from each hand by using the center position. This would give you a total of 80, giving room for a few more of the common punctuation marks.

    Contrast that with the generic Dell keyboard I have in front of me now. 104 keys total. Subtract 9 meta keys that don't do anything on their own. That's 96 unmodified. I now have more than I could figure for the dome thing. By using the 5 unique meta keys (Control, Alt, Shift, windows, menu) I come up with 30 different combinations in which I can press them down or not. Multiplying the remaining 96 keys by 30 I get 2880 possible key combinations. Now there's flexability.
    _____________

  • The point of this keyboard is not to look or feel anything like a keyboard...in fact, not only is it keyless, you don't "type" on it.

    It has two domes which can move into any of 8 positions each. You move the domes in combinations in order to type a key.

    So, if you had waited until you could read/see about the keybowl, you wouldn't even have posted this. And if the moderators had, it wouldn't be (Score: 3, Insightful).

    Not saying you're not making valid points (I like keyboards too), they just don't have anything to do with the story at hand ;).

  • by theancient1 ( 134434 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @06:10PM (#637043) Homepage
    There was a story about this on CBC, which includes a small picture.

    voila [cbc.ca]
  • There are a lot of very nice ergonomic keyboards out there right now. IMHO it is a much better interface than, say, the mouse (having just switched to larswm, I barely use my mouse at all now)

    If you think you know what the hell is going on you're probably full of shit. -- Robert Anton Wilson
  • You'll pry my Sun type 5 from my cold dead hands (besides, it kinda goes with the Ultra).
  • with 16K!!

    The Atari400 actually had:
    - keyless keyboard
    - quiet, lowpower, fanless CPU
    - interchangable ROM Memory Cards
    - TV OUT !!
    - built in sound, and advanced sound processor
    - A Universal Serial bus that could be daisy chained and connect devices like Floppy Drives Tape backup, Printers and Modems.
  • A research company tries to bring a new idea to light and you bunch of gawking geeks tear em to pieces. Forshame...

    If a company puts up a web page to publicize a new product, they should be prepared for the possibility that they will actually succeed!

    __________________

  • by Sanity ( 1431 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:06PM (#637057) Homepage Journal
    ...and so I continue my advocasy of mirroring websites in Freenet [freenetproject.org] prior to linking to them on /. (and before you ask - yes I have read the FAQ). What do you think someone would mind more? Their website being mirrored in Freenet (with all links to banner ads etc retained), or to have a well-meaning DOS attack from SlashDot bringing down their website for all of their other users?

    My question is not whether it is right for slashdot to mirror websites, but whether it is right for them no to!

    --

  • dude... you might want to lay off the porn surfing somewhat...

    Or maybe you're just spasming from using Microsoft products...

    "Titanic was 3hr and 17min long. They could have lost 3hr and 17min from that."
  • I challenge the notion that the mouse is the end-all, be-all of FPS control.

    Moving an arbitrary object a precise amount to control a character on screen with no real relation to the mouse is terrrible, from an intuitive point of view. Moving this little thing around a tiny space, and having to fine-tune just how little i move it, is a pain in the ass to learn.

    Someone will come up with a better controller...the mouse is just too inconvenient.
  • With very little training, Keybowl(TM) typists achieve a speed very close to the one at which they used to type before their injuries.

    That's crap. Speaking as someone who types very fast, there is no way someone using something like this can type as fast as a touch typist. Maybe they're talking about how fast the marketing department can type. :)


    --

  • The KL-2000 is easy to make. Follow these three easy instructions:
    • 1. Remove keyboard case
    • 2. Remove keys
    • 3. Touch the wires printed on the membrane where the keys used to touch
    Simple. I have too many spare keyboards to screw with.
  • Well, this would prevent the character in Gattaca from having to vacuum bits of his DNA out from the crevices of the keyboard. I will never use this because I crave the dramatic clickety-clack typewriter noise..

  • mice wont have buttons too... oh wait Imac people already did that...


  • by Krimsen ( 26685 ) on Wednesday November 08, 2000 @04:14PM (#637076)
    Ahh, for once, all the flailing arms seen around the office will not be from frustration...

On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN.

Working...