Slashdot Log In
Smart Robot Capable of Hunting For Its Own "Food"
Posted by
Soulskill
on Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:31 AM
from the note-to-robots-i-am-not-food dept.
from the note-to-robots-i-am-not-food dept.
coondoggie writes "Ok, maybe this is getting a little too close to bringing Terminator-like robots to life. For starters, eco-friendly engine builder Cyclone Power this week inked a contract from Robotic Technologies, Inc. (RTI) to develop what it calls a beta biomass engine system that will be the heart of RTI's Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot (EATR). The purpose of EATR is to develop and demonstrate an autonomous robotic platform able to perform long-range, long-endurance missions without the need for manual or conventional re-fueling — in other words it needs to 'eat.' According to researchers, the EATR system gets its energy by foraging, or what the firms describe as 'engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like, energy-harvesting behavior which is the equivalent of eating. It can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment as well as use conventional and alternative fuels (such as gasoline, heavy fuel, kerosene, diesel, propane, coal, cooking oil, and solar) when suitable.'"
We can only hope they don't team up with the Multi-Robot Pursuit System project to "search for and detect a non-cooperative human."
Related Stories
[+]
Packs of Robots Will Hunt Down Uncooperative Humans 395 comments
Ostracus writes "The latest request from the Pentagon jars the senses. At least, it did mine. They are looking for contractors to 'develop a software/hardware suite that would enable a multi-robot team, together with a human operator, to search for and detect a non-cooperative human subject. The main research task will involve determining the movements of the robot team through the environment to maximize the opportunity to find the subject ... Typical robots for this type of activity are expected to weigh less than 100 Kg and the team would have three to five robots.'"
To be fair, they plan to use the Multi-Robot Pursuit System for less nefarious-sounding purposes as well. They note that the robots would "have potential commercialization within search and rescue, fire fighting, reconnaissance, and automated biological, chemical and radiation sensing with mobile platforms."
[+]
Company Denies Its Robots Feed On the Dead 154 comments
Back in January we covered the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot, or EATR. The EATR gets its energy by "engaging in biologically-inspired, organism-like energy-harvesting behavior which is the equivalent of eating. It can find, ingest, and extract energy from biomass in the environment ..." So many news outlets picked up the story and ran it with titles alluding to the robot "eating flesh" or even "eating corpses" that a company spokesperson put out a press release saying, "This robot is strictly vegetarian." The statement says in part, "RTI's patent pending robotic system will be able to find, ingest and extract energy from biomass in the environment. Despite the far-reaching reports that this includes 'human bodies,' the public can be assured that the engine Cyclone has developed to power the EATR runs on fuel no scarier than twigs, grass clippings and wood chips — small, plant-based items for which RTI's robotic technology is designed to forage. Desecration of the dead is a war crime under Article 15 of the Geneva Conventions, and is certainly not something sanctioned by DARPA, Cyclone or RTI."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.
Not like Terminator (Score:5, Funny)
No, too-Terminator-like would be if it said, "You are not Sarah Connor. But I am a bit peckish...."
Re:Not like Terminator (Score:5, Funny)
Come on... look on the bright side. Instead of your child getting blown apart by a land mine left over from the last invasion, they can get blown apart by a hunter-killer drone. That's WAY cooler.
Reminds me of Stephen King's The Dark Tower... maybe they could dress it up like a bear...
Parent
Oh shoot! (Score:5, Interesting)
Quote from article, emphasis added:
...the EATR robot's inherent advantage is its ability to engage in long-endurance, tedious, and hazardous tasks, such as reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition under difficult conditions, without fatigue or stress...
So we've got omnivorous assassin bots that consume their "target" after "acquisition" to remove evidence of the mission. That's just great.
Parent
I'm starting to think that the Amish (Score:5, Insightful)
may just have a point.
Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish (Score:5, Funny)
I bet the Amish could apply for the "organic" label.
If a machine only eats "organic" people, do you think they'd be eligible for tax breaks as a "green" consumer?
Parent
Re:I'm starting to think that the Amish (Score:5, Funny)
No, more like "Genuine Corn Fed Humans, no extra processing, no artificial hormones or sweeteners! Raised on the farm without cages!"
Parent
Re:Ummm, I'm thinking that, in this situation (Score:5, Funny)
Parent
Only a few questions (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Only a few questions (Score:5, Interesting)
1) Yes.
2) Yes.
3) Yes.
I think the big limitation against a robot "eating" living things at this point is that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it. Bound to be an inefficient process.
In the long run, however, I think I'd be leery of giving them any sort of decision tree about whether or not "object A" is edible. Even discounting human.pet accidents, no one wants to wake up in the morning to find that a robot has eaten your picnic table.
Parent
Re:Only a few questions (Score:5, Funny)
...that the energy required in harvesting anything that moves is far in excess of the energy that the robot will be able to extract from it.
Tell that to every ambush predator on the planet. As an added bonus, I bet the standby mode on the robot burns less energy than most waiting ambush predators too.
"Hey, is that a new trashcan outside the Dunkin Donuts? Huh I think it moved....WAARGHHHHHHH...."
Parent
Re:Only a few questions (Score:5, Interesting)
Parent
My worst fear (Score:5, Funny)
It just keeps going, and going, and going.....
Remember the most important lesson... (Score:4, Funny)
Limit the robots to a six foot power cord.
Unstopable! (Score:4, Funny)
Great. This thing will siphon your fuel tank, and if that fails, threaten to eat your cat unless you hand over the charge card for the local service station.
What will it do when it figures out WE are biomass?
Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Alternative to scary Sci-Fi plots (Score:5, Funny)
"Attention, citizen! I am Robocop(rophage). Step away from the doggie doo and nobody gets eaten."
"Thank you for your copro-peration."
(Sorry, I just can't stop.)
Parent
My home would be an ideal habitat (Score:5, Funny)
Dr. Frankenstein (Score:5, Funny)
Maybe it's just me but I find it a little worrying that this monster of a robot was created by Dr. Finkelstein
It's alive Igor, It's Alive!!
Protection (Score:4, Funny)
DARPA's new endeavor (Score:5, Funny)
long-endurance missions such as search and rescue in the mountains and caves of Afghanistan and Pakistan
Greetings person in Afghan cave.
I am a robot.
I am here to rescue you.
*chainsaw*
Stand still so I can rescue you.
Re:biomass to fuel? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's almost certainly wildly inefficient.
That gasoline engine in your car is inefficient compared to a big power generator that uses the same fuel. The size, the inability to efficiently process the waste heat...It all adds up.
Taking into account the returns of biomass plants that use high-grade biomass (e.g. corn, unprocessed chicken/pig parts, etc) and then taking into account the efficiency that will certainly be lost by reducing that process to something small enough to be mobile, and I'll be surprised if they can make it work at all.
Parent
Re:biomass to fuel? (Score:5, Interesting)
Can you elaborate on whatever point you're making?
With two iterations they were able to make a vehicle more efficient than the original with superior performance.
This implies to me that with another couple decades (just give it a small fraction of the time that's been spent on your classic ICE four-strokes) the technology could be refined to be a direct drop-in, in terms of mass. Materials technology has advanced significantly since those vehicles were put out as well. And finally, if they had produced a vehicle with the same overall performance characteristics of the original the powerplant would have been lighter - this was a prototype retrofit designed to determine the potential of the technology.
My point was that using a heat engine does not necessarily have any drawbacks in common use whatsoever, including increased mass. That has only been the case so far.
Parent
Re:biomass to fuel? (Score:4, Funny)
Parent
Re:Not at all premature (Score:5, Funny)
Alternatives:
1.) Make the wheels smaller so the cat can't enter the business end of the machine.
2.) Get a dog. Most are too big for the lawnmower to injure, and will keep the cat off the grass.
3.) Reconsider feline sympathy.
Parent