Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Robots Assimilate Into Cockroach Society

Posted by Zonk on Fri Nov 16, 2007 09:33 PM
from the good-to-see-the-robots-making-new-friends dept.
sufijazz writes "Scientists have gotten tiny robots to not only integrate into cockroach society but also control it. 'This experiment in bug peer pressure combined entomology, robotics and the study of ways that complex and even intelligent patterns can arise from simple behavior. Animal behavior research shows that swarms working together can prosper where individuals might fail, and robotics researchers have been experimenting with simple robots that, together, act a little like a swarm.' The BBC also has a video story on this."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Science: Cockroaches at Their Best at Night 98 comments
Science_afficionado writes "A new study has found that cockroaches are morons in the morning and geniuses in the evening in terms of their learning capacity. Previous studies suggest that the learning capacity of both people and rats are also affected by their internal biological clocks. But the effect is far more dramatic in cockroaches and it is the first time it has been found in insects. And, no, the researchers didn't try giving their cockroaches a sip of coffee to see if it revived them!"
[+] News: Mythbusters to Test Cockroach Radiation Myth 573 comments
redwoodtree writes "An article on the site for the Tri-City Herald sums it up perfectly: 'Contrary to popular belief, not a significant amount of research goes into cockroach radiation.' To test the old saw about 'the cockroaches being the only survivors of a nuclear war' Discovery Channel's Mythbusters are going out to Hanford Site, where plutonium was manufactured for the first nuclear bomb. It's the single most polluted nuclear waste site in the U.S. The Mythbusters are going to take cockroaches and other insects and apply successively higher doses of radiation in a controlled setting."
[+] Science: The Rules of the Swarm 166 comments
Hugh Pickens writes "Researchers are starting to discover the simple rules that allow swarms of thousands of relatively simple animals to form a collective brain able to make decisions and move like a single organism. To get a sense of swarms, Dr. Iain Couzin, a mathematical biologist at the Collective Animal Behaviour Laboratory at Princeton University, builds computer models of virtual swarms with thousands of individual agents that he can program to follow a few simple rules. Among the findings are that swarm behavior has patterns common to many different species, that just as liquid water can suddenly begin to boil, swarm behavior can also change abruptly in character, and that just a few leaders can guide a swarm effectively by creating a bias in the swarm's movement that steers it in a particular direction. The rules of the swarm may also apply to the cells inside our bodies and researchers are working with cancer biologists to discover the rules by which cancer cells work together to build tumors or migrate through tissues. Even brain cells may follow the same rules for collective behavior seen in locusts or fish. "How does your brain take this information and come to a collective decision about what you're seeing?" Dr. Couzin says. The answer, he suspects, may lie in our inner swarm."
[+] Researchers Reference Flocking Birds to Improve Swarmbots 62 comments
inghamb87 writes "Scientists have studied flocks of starlings and cracked the mystery behind the birds' ability to fly in large formations, and regroup quickly after attacks, without getting confused and ramming into each other. While the information is cool, some scientists seem to think that the best use of this knowledge is not to aid our appreciation of nature, but to make more effective robot swarms. We've talked about swarming robots many times before, but usually researchers look to insects for inspiration."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Wait, so... (Score:5, Funny)

    by jcr (53032) <jcr@macPLANCK.com minus physicist> on Friday November 16 2007, @09:34PM (#21386211) Journal
    They sent robots to Hollywood?

    -jcr
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday November 16 2007, @09:39PM (#21386251)
    I resent that you characterize our society as "cockroach". Geez, just because the robots were able to assimilate and blend in --I mean, it really did look exactly like Cindy Margolis [wikipedia.org]-- how were we supposed to know that she was a robot!

    And besides, the article says ... actually, I haven't read the article yet ... hang on, let me read this ... oh, umm ...

    Er, never mind.
  • No, not overlords (Score:5, Interesting)

    by TheMeuge (645043) on Friday November 16 2007, @09:39PM (#21386259) Homepage
    I am not going to go to the obligatory "robotic overlords" reference, except to note that in human society, a determined and united groups of individuals have caused masses of people to perform actions that contradict their instincts, common sense, or any boundaries and taboos set by their parent societies.

    One conclusion one can draw from this study, coupled with historical precedent in human societies, is that animals come evolutionary pre-programmed to join groups and be subjugated by the rules of said groups, despite better (or alternate) judgment.
    • Re:No, not overlords (Score:5, Interesting)

      by turing_m (1030530) on Friday November 16 2007, @10:01PM (#21386423)
      "...is that animals come evolutionary pre-programmed to join groups"

      Depends on the animal. In social animals, yes. In others (e.g. tigers, bears, moose, spiders), communication will be restricted to mating rituals and that sort of thing. Those methods of communication can of course be mimicked and often are by other species (or sub-species) for their own gain. e.g. orchids and insect mating behavior, moths with "eyes" on their wings etc.
      • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

        Damn, you can't fit lions before tigers and bears because they're social. Gah! Talk about life not imitating art.
    • ...united groups of individuals have caused masses of people to perform actions that contradict their instincts, common sense...
      Why did I think of the user interface for Microsoft Office 2003 when I read that?
    • by Kingrames (858416) on Friday November 16 2007, @11:38PM (#21387037)
      "I am not going to go to the obligatory "robotic overlords" reference"
      Good! I'm sick of that meme.

      I, for one, welcome our new non-obligatory overlord referencing overlords. ...shit.
  • by evanbd (210358) on Friday November 16 2007, @09:42PM (#21386277)
    That when the humans and the robots destroy each other in a nuclear war, it will be up to the cockroaches to continue the battle against the robot cockroaches?
  • Pied Piper anyone? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cp.tar (871488) <cp.tar.bz2@gmail.com> on Friday November 16 2007, @09:42PM (#21386281) Journal

    I wonder, if robots can actually control swarms, could we perhaps make them lead the swarms not to world domination, but to some sort of... mishap?

    There's gotta be some way to get rid of them.

    • by QuantumG (50515) <qg@biodome.org> on Friday November 16 2007, @09:51PM (#21386349) Homepage Journal
      Yes, that's what the research showed.. the cockroaches will follow the robots 60% of the time. RTFA.

      More interesting, I thought, was that the researchers seemed pissed off when the journalists asked the kind of "how would you apply this?" questions that you just asked.
      • by StreetStealth (980200) on Friday November 16 2007, @11:43PM (#21387071) Journal
        (translated from pheromone language)

        Cockroach A: "I have this theory. About our new leader."

        Cockroach B: "This had better not be another one of your retarded colony conspiracies."

        Cockroach A: "Well... I don't think he's cockroach. In fact, I have reason to believe he's a robot. Put here by highly intelligent beings for some bizarre purpose... Maybe to lead us all to destruction. Maybe as a test. I don't know. But have you seen him? I mean, with your own compound eyes?"

        Cockroach B: "..."
          • Damn! Where are my mod points when I need them?

            There, someone gave you one, I only hope it was an Offtopic mod point you required ;-)

      • by timeOday (582209) on Saturday November 17 2007, @12:25AM (#21387265)

        the cockroaches will follow the robots 60% of the time.
        My cat will follow a ball of yarn 90% of the time.
        • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

          Slashdotters will make up statistics based upon wildly inaccurate supposition and blatantly false assumptions 100% of the time.
  • This... (Score:5, Funny)

    by ale_ryu (1102077) on Friday November 16 2007, @09:59PM (#21386411)
    May be the only case in which the phrase "it's not a bug, it's a feature!" is not applicable... or is it?
  • by gv250 (897841) on Friday November 16 2007, @10:07PM (#21386483)
    From TFA:

    The results also apply only to cockroaches, Dr. Halloy said. "We are not interested in people," he said.
    He programmed his robot to play with his cockroaches, and he is not interested in people. Sounds like a /. reader to me.
  • by xPsi (851544) * on Friday November 16 2007, @10:09PM (#21386511)

    Scientists have gotten tiny robots to not only integrate into cockroach society but also control it
    So I guess (except for the cockroach part) it's a lot like life in the United States
  • by davidsyes (765062) on Friday November 16 2007, @10:31PM (#21386653) Homepage Journal
    So, will they command it to bugger the bugs they bugged? I guess it will bug the shit out of them... real buggery-like...

    Sounds kinda... insectstuous....

    Watch out for mating season. This is the REAL widow-maker. Exoskeleton-crushing sex....from a real sex-bot... I wonder how endowed this bugger is...

  • So... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Kjella (173770) on Friday November 16 2007, @10:56PM (#21386801) Homepage
    ...does this mean that the robots have passed the Turing test [wikipedia.org] for cockroaches? I guess probably not yet, but if we can create robots that can act like the real thing - well that's pretty much the definition of it isn't it?
  • by kyashan (919683) on Friday November 16 2007, @11:26PM (#21386967) Homepage
    Mentioning robots evokes AI, but the key is that those carts are doused with cockroach sex hormones.
    Show me a girl with a miniskirt and over knee stockings and I'll follow her not 60% but 100% of the times.
  • by morari (1080535) on Friday November 16 2007, @11:41PM (#21387059) Journal
    Lower your exoskeletons and surrender your motels. We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      "We need to push this to it's limit. Like mammals for example."

      I worked on a dairy farm for a while that had ~100 cows. At milking time the farmer would swing open the gate and walk off into the milking shed, seeing the open gate the (old) dog would trot out and round up the cows by itself. Often there wasn't much for it to do other than stroll along behind the herd because the cows also knew the drill. Not sure how the cows knew what time it was since none of them were wearing watches but they would oft