Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Electronic Paper's Past and Future

Posted by kdawson on Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:20 PM
from the updating-in-your-pocket dept.
Iddo Genuth sends us to TFOT for his extended series of interviews around the question of how electronic paper will change our lives in the next few years. The article leads off with the "father of e-paper," Nick Sheridon, who came up with the idea almost 35 years ago at Xerox PARC, and goes on to explore how e-paper may evolve past its current incarnations in the likes of the Sony Reader.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Apple: Kindle Versus The iPhone 376 comments
Bernie Campbell writes "Forbes takes a look at the recently announced Kindle ebook from Amazon, and considers the possibility that Apple may have beaten them to the punch. 'Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs has a not-so-secret weapon when it comes time to load up the iPhone with content: Google ... Google's Book Search project has already pumped much of the world's printed matter into Google's servers. Downloads of classic titles, such as Bleak House, can already be had for free. Mix Apple's iTunes content distribution smarts with Google's vast storehouse of content, and you'll have an instant competitor to Kindle -- one with a touch interface and the ability to play movies and music, too.'
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • I've heard good things about them, specifically the battery life. Does anyone own an E-Reader? I was thinking of getting Sony's. Any thoughts?
    • Re:E-Readers (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Kris_J (10111) * on Tuesday October 16 2007, @11:39PM (#21005729) Journal
      My main thought is that since it's by Sony it'll be drenched in poisonous DRM.

      I owned a Newton Messagepad back in the day. I've read fiction, non-fiction, short stories, novels, news articles and heaps of other stuff on everything from a PDA to one a laptop connected to Second Life. The only place ebooks have a decent chance of success is to replace the two tons of textbooks most schools require their students to carry. Otherwise it's hard to beat the convenience of Dead Tree Format.
      • Re:E-Readers (Score:5, Informative)

        by chill (34294) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @12:51AM (#21006173) Homepage Journal
        The latest incarnation of the Sony Reader plugs in to a USB host and shows up like a drive, to drag files over. It can handle .txt and .PDF as well as JPEG and MP3. Feel free to totally ignore installing their software and never using DRM. I have one and it is fantastic for taking with me when I travel.
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Actually IMHO college textbooks are the LEAST likely place for ebooks to take off. College students like myself, being poor as we are, like to sell their books after their courses are done. There have been eBook initiative tried in some schools, but the lack of resale ability really killed it. I can get about 70% retail value for my books after I've used them, why would I pay something like 50% of the dead-tree price for something I can't sell later on?
        • Re:E-Readers (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Andrew Aguecheek (767620) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @05:15AM (#21007609)

          Depends on the subject. One of the most irritating things about being a law student is that by and large your books go out of date really fast. Almost every book from my undergraduate degree, which I only completed earlier this year, is now in a different edition. E-books would be really useful from our perspective. Not to mention the fact that libraries can only stock a limited number of journals and case-books.

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          I can get about 70% retail value for my books after I've used them
          Can I come visit your planet?
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          I once got 17 cents for a textbook I paid $50 for.

          If I had the choice, I would go e-book all the way.
        • Re:E-Readers (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Fred_A (10934) <fred.fredshome@org> on Wednesday October 17 2007, @07:16AM (#21008191) Homepage

          The obvious is simply missed. Newspapers and other formats for distributing the current events is old by the time it's printed. Get a newspaper if you want yesterday's news.
          Much of the stuff in papers (or at least the few proper newspapers that are still available here and there) is way beyond the one liners that passes for instant news nowadays.
          I regularly read newspapers that are days old and never minded their lack of "freshness".

          Apart from a few very specific things (maybe stock markets or the weather), freshness has no impact on the interest or validity of news.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 16 2007, @11:46PM (#21005785)
      Rumors are flying around that Amazon is going to release their own e-ink device any day/week now. A version of it went through the FCC a while ago since it might have a wireless modem in it. It will probably be more expensive than the Sony, but might have the ability to download newspapers and magazines directly.

      Bookeen is coming out with their own device any day now that's really similar to the Sony reader but will use different file formats. They all read RTF, TXT, etc... but if you want to buy a new book, it's likely to have DRM in the file. The DRM file format that the Sony uses is different from the DRM files that the Bookeen and Amazon Kindle will use.

      The Iliad is bigger and can render letter size PDF files without the hassle of the smaller devices. It has wifi and a writable screen that you can take notes with... but it's supposed to be slower and more than twice as much money.

      I want one really bad, but I'm waiting to see what Bookeen and Amazon finally release before I throw down my cash. Sure they're all kind of expensive, but you can load up with free classic books from Project Gutenberg and you'll save money in the long run (if you read a lot and are too lazy/busy to make trips to the library).

      http://www.mobileread.com/ [mobileread.com]
      http://www.engadget.com/2006/09/11/amazon-kindle-meet-amazons-e-book-reader/ [engadget.com]
      http://www.engadget.com/2007/10/03/kindle-edition-books-appear-on-amazon-reader-launch-imminent/ [engadget.com]
      http://www.bookeen.com/ [bookeen.com]
      http://www.irextechnologies.com/ [irextechnologies.com]
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      Sony's e-paper reader is a disaster, I looked at it at Fry's and couldn't force myself to like it. Ghosting, low contrast, and most unpleasant is the low speed of updates (about 1 second to flip the page, with awful flickering all the way.) It is also a single purpose reader, nothing more. I ended up buying a Sansung Q1 Ultra, it is not perfect but at least it is a usable tablet with a Windows OS so you can load stuff onto it, run Mozilla, do things (802.11 + Bluetooth) and in general I like it. The hand
        • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

          I am the target audience. I read many books, I read every day. Many books are available on the Internet, so a browser is not a caprice, it is a necessity. Besides, right now I am reading a book on my Samsung tablet and also replying to you - so it is practical as well.

          If you believe there is some other interest group that would favor e-books over paper, I can't find one. Every "normal" book reader would pick a paper book without thinking. That's what libraries have, right? Only a geek would choose an obsc

    • Re:E-Readers (Score:5, Informative)

      by tlhIngan (30335) <.ten.frow. .ta. .todhsals.> on Tuesday October 16 2007, @11:56PM (#21005857)

      I've heard good things about them, specifically the battery life. Does anyone own an E-Reader? I was thinking of getting Sony's. Any thoughts?


      They're actually quite nice.

      The e-paper screen is *beautiful*. The only thing you'll miss is a book light. It's very nice and contrasty (but more like black on a dull grey background), and the text isn't buried under glass, but appears on the surface, like real paper. It's a nice matte surface, so glare is a non-issue, and is extremely readable in all lighting conditions except pitch black (like a regular book).

      The bad thing - if you want to use its internal memory, you need to use Sony's software (a poor imitation of iTunes). But luckily, it accepts Memory Stick and SD cards. Just plop in it text files, RTF, or PDF files onto your SD card and away you go (making this the OS agnostic way of using it - just need a card reader and external card). The other issue is ghosting - when the screen updates, the parts that were black don't return all the way to background color, but leaves an imprint. Not to worry - another refresh will fix it. Might be slightly irritating if the book lines alternate.

      The other bad thing is when it needs to refresh the area - what happens is it inverts the entire screen, then writes the new image to it (in an effort to alleviate the ghosting).

      But the screen is really nice, you can easily forget about such issues. Just remember the flashlight if reading beneath the covers.
  • the question of how electronic paper will change our lives in the next few years.

    Two words: porn.
  • One Question (Score:5, Interesting)

    by sqrt(2) (786011) on Tuesday October 16 2007, @11:32PM (#21005677) Journal
    Can I still write on it?
  • Well, (Score:5, Funny)

    by K.os023 (1093385) on Tuesday October 16 2007, @11:38PM (#21005727)
    From TFA:

    Q: When do you predict we will see the real e-paper revolution?

    A: It has already started but will become a real mass market in about 2012.


    So that 's what the Mayans were worried about!
  • I don't know... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by RalphBNumbers (655475) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @12:01AM (#21005893)
    I'm actually not sure that stable-image type displays (what I would generically consider e-paper) are going to be the first widespread paper-replacement. As nice as their low power consumption is, their bit depth, color, contrast, and refresh rate are all horrible at the moment. And while they are certainly improving in those areas, things like LCDs and OLEDs are improving in power consumption and form factor as well.

    I came to this realization when I looked at the new 505 revision of the Sony Reader's marketing, and it occurred to me that I'd rather get an iPod touch. Recharging every few days instead of every few months is a sacrifice I'd be willing to make for real web content and video (while Sony could probably put some sort of basic very-static web browser on it's reader despite the display's low refresh rate if they wanted to support HTML, video and quick interactivity are going to be out of the question until there are fairly major changes in the display technology). And, as more and more content moves online, from static paper to dynamic computer screens, moving content is only getting more prevalent (rollovers, pull-down menus, AJAX widgets of all sorts, and even content in flash and other plug-ins)...

    I kind of suspect that e-paper has missed the window where it could have widely succeeded with a refresh rate measured in seconds rather than milliseconds. Stable-image type displays may have to get their refresh rates down into the low-double-digit milliseconds (and coincidentally gain high bit depth color and decent contrast) before they can take on to the mainstream.
    • Re:I don't know... (Score:5, Informative)

      by chill (34294) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @12:48AM (#21006165) Homepage Journal
      Really? Then you don't read. The Sony Reader's screen is 100x better than an iPod for reading something like a book.

      The Sony screen is 6.9" x 3.9", whereas the iPod Touch's is like 3.5" x 2.2" -- not even close. Add to that it is usable in full, direct sunlight and has an almost 180 degree viewing angle and much higher contrast ratio and for READING, not browsing, ePaper blows the iPod (and iPhone) out of the water.

      Screw web content. Believe it or not there are people with attention spans not defined by MTV. Try a few of these [literature.org] on the iPod Touch and then the Sony, then get back to me.

      Totally different targets.
        • Re:I don't know... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by martin-boundary (547041) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @05:56AM (#21007831)
          That doesn't seem right. My experience is that if the screen is twice as big, one only needs to press the scroll button half as often. There's nothing more annoying than trying to read a novel while pressing a button each time one has read 5 or 10 lines of text. It's an optimization between portability factor and annoyance. There's a reason books come in standardized sizes.
    • by Gadzinka (256729) <rrw@hell.pl> on Wednesday October 17 2007, @01:47AM (#21006511) Journal
      You missed the point. E-paper as the name implies isn't a replacement for computer screens. It's a replacement for a printed paper as in newspapers and books. Most of the people still get their knowledge from dead trees and e-paper for them is more or less just like paper, only better, since you can "print" on it many times.

      I am an avid ebook reader using Palms for the purpose for years, but as soon as I can get an e-paper reader without stupid limitations at a reasonable price (which for me is anything south of 250eur), I'll go that route. I mean, that would be the best of both world: paper book with the ability to (non-destructivelly) bookmark, annotate, search, copy text at will.

      Robert
    • Re:I don't know... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by mark-t (151149) <`markt' `at' `lynx.bc.ca'> on Wednesday October 17 2007, @02:30AM (#21006711) Journal

      There are two significant advantages to epaper that LCDs and OLED's simply cannot match.

      One, epaper is a reflective technology, rather than emmissive, so the brighter the area in which one views it the better (just like a book).

      Two, epaper draws no power whatsoever to maintain a static display, none, zero, zilch. It only requires power to update the display. Once changed to what is desired, the power source could be disconnected entirely and the last image stored on the display would remain. No powered display technology can top that.

      Refresh rate is not a huge issue for epaper, as long as it is geared towards displaying content that is relatively static.

      So the biggest problems with the technology are just poor resolution and the price for color displays. Even more unfortunately, these areas do not seem to be improving at a promising rate.

  • by 3seas (184403) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @03:35AM (#21007081) Homepage Journal
    ... we are going to cut down even more trees...

    I'm not a tree hugger as trees are just crops that take monger to harvest, but the point is clear.
  • by knorthern knight (513660) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @06:29AM (#21007971)
    Just as VCRs were starting to take off, Polaroid launched "Polavision" [wikipatents.com]. It was a moviecam that used a one-shot film cartridge that produced rather grainy movies. Polaroid always compared the low-cost moviecam against $2500 VHS moviecams. Main problem... the 10-minute film cartridges were damn expensive. By the time you bought enough 10-minute cartridges to equal a 2-hour VHS cassette, you'd spend more on the cartridges than the cost of the $2500 moviecam... ouch. AND THE VHS CASSETTE COULD BE ERASED AND RE-USED, while the Polavision cartridges were one-shot devices, like 8mm and "Super-8" film. Polavision was intended as a competitor to 8mm and "Super-8". 8mm and Super-8 were anihilated by VHS moviecams, and Polavision also fell victim to VHS moviecams.

    Fast-forward several years. "Browsing devices" are the "VHS moviecams" to epaper's version of Polavision. Before anyone starts ranting against web-browsers, let me point out...
    1. the ORIGINAL web, as developed at CERN, was text-only with browsers like lynx
    2. you can read files on your local drive with Firefox or IE or Lynx
    Note that I said "browsing devices", not PDAs, or micro-laptops. I think that cellphones with browsers are going to be far more of an epaper-killer than laptops...
    • there are a lot more people already lugging around cellphones/smartphones than will ever buy single-purpose "ebook readers"
    • many cellphones/smartphones already have browsers built-in
    Which do you think the average person WHO IS ALREADY LUGGING AROUND A CELLPHONE/SMARTPHONE more likely to do for casual reading...
    • buy yet another $200 device that they have to lug around, or
    • use the cellphone/smartphone THEY'VE ALREADY PAID FOR AND THEY'RE ALREADY LUGGING AROUND to accomplish the same task
    In a world where cellphones/smartphones/PDAs do not exist, a $200 stand-alone "ebook-reader" might have a market. In today's world, fuggedaboutit. Most people will end up sticking a USB stick into a cellphone/smartphone/PDA and reading text directly with their browser. Verizon subscribers, however, will find that their cellphones are crippled, and they have to upload the file to their account, and Verizon will charge them by the kbyte for the uploads.
  • by WillAdams (45638) on Wednesday October 17 2007, @09:01AM (#21009055) Homepage
    (I wrote this up for the bookpeople mailing list....)

    The local Borders store set up a display w/ one of these yesterday and I spent a while playing with it. Initial impressions:

      - nice size, _very_ thin
      - crisp, sharp greyscale display --- very readable
      - uses GPL software (there's a list of utilities in the user manual as well as notes on where to d/l the source for the software)
      - decent interface w/ sensible buttons and okay layout
      - supports pdf, txt, rtf, bmp, jpeg, gif and png files as well as the proprietar? BBeB books (.lrf and .lrx)
      - plays mp3s
      - switches from portrait to landscape and back quite easily
      - nice magnification mode

    On the downside:

      - ~2--3 seconds to switch from one page to another sometimes one gets a distracting flashing
      - sometimes one gets ``ghosting'' if the new page has a lot of white space where text or image was before
      - the text H&J when displaying text files and .rtfs is _awful_, allowing widows and orphans and pages to end on a hyphen
      - the font used for displaying rtfs uses oblique, not italic for emphasis
      - sidebars of some of the text font characters, ``i'' most egregiously is not good resulting in poorly spaced text
      - urls in .pdfs which break at a line end become two distinct hyperlinks (this may be a problem in how the user guide .pdf was created)
      - while one can play an mp3 while reading, controlling the mp3 functions require going all the way back to the main menu --- would've been better to've over-ridden the number buttons for use as audio controls while an mp3 is playing.

    One can't help but wonder if the status bar at the bottom can be turned off --- it displays a persistent page number --- perhaps people will format .pdfs especially for this and leave page numbers off?

    More information on the reader at:

    http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/CategoryDisplay?catalogId=10551&storeId=10151&langId=-1&categoryId=16184 [sonystyle.com]

    Apparently this is an updated model and the text updating used to be even slower.

    Borders didn't seem to have a mechanism for selling BBeB books in their stores though which is strange since they can be stored on memory cards (Sony proprietary sticks and SD memory cards).

    William
    (who found it inspiring enough to want to put some more effort into getting his Fujitsu Stylistic to boot off of a compact flash card in a CF-IDE adapter, since he uses that to read a _lot_ of ebooks and the hard drive noise is distracting (and to make them, see http://members.aol.com/willadams/portfolio.html [aol.com] which includes my version of _The Book of Tea_ which is in the TeX Showcase))