Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Major Linux Hardware Donor Is a CNN "Hero"

Posted by kdawson on Tue Oct 02, 2007 05:52 PM
from the making-a-difference dept.
christian.einfeldt writes "James Burgett of the Alameda County Computer Resource Center calls himself a 'tattooed freak' and a recovering drug addict, but CNN is calling him a hero (video) for diverting tons of computers from landfills, installing Ubuntu Linux on them, and giving them out to schools, non-profits, and poor people. Burgett's filmed interview is currently leading a CNN contest among videos of 'ordinary people' whom CNN considers everyday heroes, narrowly edging out the video of a man who is saving gorillas from extinction. In his interview, Burgett points out that the people working for him are also recovering drug addicts or recovering mental illness patients." Update: 10/02 23:46 GMT by KD : Reader stefanlasiewski posted a journal article describing how, bewilderingly, the state of California is threatening to shut down Burgett's ACCRC.

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Major Linux Hardware Donor Is a CNN "Hero" 25 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • Weird (Score:5, Insightful)

    A guy actually doing something useful is beating out another guy doing something equally noble but less practical? Checks outside Nope, clear skies, no cats or dogs...
    • Re:Weird (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Otter (3800) on Tuesday October 02, @06:07PM (#20829953) Journal
      How do you figure protecting half the world's mountain gorillas, at constant risk of being killed himself, isn't "useful"? With all due respect to Ubuntu, that strikes me as at least as important as supervising a bunch of Linux installs.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Weird (Score:5, Funny)

        by SeaFox (739806) on Tuesday October 02, @07:24PM (#20830893)

        How do you figure protecting half the world's mountain gorillas, at constant risk of being killed himself, isn't "useful"? With all due respect to Ubuntu, that strikes me as at least as important as supervising a bunch of Linux installs.

        Maybe Ubuntu will find some way to show their appreciation to the runner up in their "Gracious Gorilla" release.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Weird (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Nyeerrmm (940927) on Tuesday October 02, @08:16PM (#20831449)
        I think the real utility of it isn't just that he's install Ubuntu, but the fact that he's doing the gruntwork to collect old computers, put them in a usable state, and redistributing them to those in need. Evangelizing for linux isn't necessarily the point.
        [ Parent ]
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 02, @05:56PM (#20829781)
    ...when he found himself in a public washroom installing Vista for $20.

    (just kidding...keep up the great work!).
  • by Chas (5144) on Tuesday October 02, @05:57PM (#20829801) Homepage Journal
    Getting off drugs, both him and his assistants. VERY Cool.

    Helping out schools. Cool

    Helping the environment. Cool (though some in the "movement" would gripe about the electricity consumed).

    Linux. Uber cool!
      • Re:But (Score:5, Insightful)

        by hazem (472289) on Tuesday October 02, @06:56PM (#20830617) Journal
        It's not like his installing linux on old computers is keeping the other guy from saving gorillas; or that every computer installed leads to a gorilla not being saved. Rather it's merely that the video of the guy installing linux is slightly more popular than the video of the guy saving gorillas.

        And it's not like he's hurting the knowledge about the gorilla program because I hadn't hear of either until today. If it weren't a guy installing linux (but instead a woman making sandwiches for hungry orphans) then it would have never made it on slashdot.

        So, we can call it a win for both.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:But (Score:5, Funny)

          by cez (539085) * <cezsolutions@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Tuesday October 02, @07:04PM (#20830697) Homepage
          hear hear... and you can bet your ass someone at gorilladot.org just learned what Ubuntu is!
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:But (Score:5, Insightful)

          by MollyB (162595) * <sysoptionalNO@SPAMyahoo.com> on Tuesday October 02, @07:31PM (#20830963) Journal
          >So, we can call it a win for both.

          I see it that way, too. But the (American, at least) culture is focused on Winners and Losers to the extent that such rich meditations as yours are easy to miss. Slashdot clearly (witness the comment list) reflects this attitude, but it is nice to see more light and less heat on occasion. Thanks.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:But (Score:5, Insightful)

            I see it that way, too. But the (American, at least) culture is focused on Winners and Losers to the extent that such rich meditations as yours are easy to miss.

            Definitely just Americans. Or something. What was that all about?

            Anyway, here's the real issue: humans have a natural bias to assume a zero-sum game first, even where none exists. It's the source of all envy. Maybe it was a good survival trait back in the poor, nasty, brutish, and short days when competition over resources was fierce, but it's clearly maladaptive now.
            [ Parent ]
  • You don't have to be crazy.. (Score:5, Funny)

    by onkelonkel (560274) on Tuesday October 02, @05:59PM (#20829821)
    You don't have to be crazy to install Linux

    but it helps!

    sorry... old joke...couldn't resist
  • I know (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 02, @06:04PM (#20829897)
    Get the gorrillas to start using linux. That would surely win the top prize then.
  • Good for him (Score:5, Insightful)

    by avm (660) on Tuesday October 02, @06:08PM (#20829967) Journal
    Good for him, on a number of levels.

    First, on a personal level, for taking control of his life back.
    Second, on an environmental level, for saving unnecessary rubbish from a landfill somewhere.
    Third, on a charitable level, for donating the results of his work.
    Fourth, on an economic level, for using free software and cast-off hardware to do something useful.
    Fifth, on a geek level, for using Linux to do it.

    My hat's off to you, sir.
  • Interestingly, James is asking voters to vote for the other folks [blogspot.com]:

    "Vote for the gorillas. 25 grand and fame that id probably just piss away anyway is not worth a specie.".

    Nice honest opinion from the Hero.
  • California doesn't like him.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by nsanders (208050) on Tuesday October 02, @06:12PM (#20830035) Homepage
    He's in a bit of trouble with the law too: http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/16/computer-recycler-th.html [boingboing.net]

    The Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency has issued the ACCRC a violation that could make it very hard for the group to stay in business. And, quite frankly, that's a damned shame.

    • Life imitates art. Unbelievable. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Tackhead (54550) on Tuesday October 02, @06:36PM (#20830357)
      > He's in a bit of trouble with the law too: http://www.boingboing.net/2007/09/16/computer-recycler-th.html [boingboing.net]
      >
      >The Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency has issued the ACCRC a violation that could make it very hard for the group to stay in business. And, quite frankly, that's a damned shame.

      And when I wrote Natalie's Restaurant [slashdot.org] more than two years ago, I thought it was fiction. Shit, the only thing I got wrong was that I imagined a San Francisco bureaucrat, as opposed to a Berkeley bureaucrat, and that my imaginararily-awkwardly-named "California Computer Recycling Use Fee Commission" wasn't long enough to match the actual bureaucracy's name (namely the "Department of Toxic Substance Control of the California Environmental Protection Agency").

      Because nobody, not even in the Bay Area, could be so dumb as to suggest that tossing a bunch of working hardware into a container ship bound for a crusher/smelter in China, was somehow a "more green" solution than reusing (and giving away) perfectly functional hardware so that it doesn't go into the waste stream in the first place.

      But then again, that's the difference between recycling as done by folks like the ACCRC - which is interested in reducing and reusing as well as recycling - and recycling as done by a government bureaucrat, to whom the only "green" that matters is how many taxpayer dollars can be milked out of an operation.

      So we'll sing it again when it comes 'round on the guitar.

      Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day, diggin' through their closets and attics, findin' somethin' that still works, and givin' it to someone who ain't got one? And friends, they may think it's a movement...

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Life imitates art. Unbelievable. (Score:5, Informative)

        by E-Lad (1262) on Tuesday October 02, @08:01PM (#20831301) Homepage

        Can you imagine fifty people a day, I said fifty people a day, diggin' through their closets and attics, findin' somethin' that still works, and givin' it to someone who ain't got one? And friends, they may think it's a movement...
        It already exists. It's called Freecycle [freecycle.org].
        [ Parent ]
  • Similar... (Score:5, Informative)

    Anyone in Portland should check out FreeGeek [freegeek.org] and consider volunteering.
        • You are plain wrong. (Score:5, Informative)

          by tux_deamon (663650) on Tuesday October 02, @10:34PM (#20832515)
          Wrong. All electronics recycling is FREE at the ACCRC. That means, if you bring your old computer and monitor to this facility, and you are a resident of California, you pay nothing.

          Furthermore, the refurbished computers that are granted by ACCRC to nonprofits and needy individuals are granted free of cost. Zero. No dollars.

          If the recipient is not happy with the free computer they received, they can return it for no charge. Again, it's free at the ACCRC.

          There's no mandatory recycling fee either for disposing or receiving a recycled computer. There is a recycling fee assessed to the purchase of new monitors by a reseller. You basically pay your recycling fee when you buy your monitor. This is similar to car batteries. That said, if you don't buy a new monitor, and instead say receive a free monitor from an organization like ACCRC, you pay nothing.

          [ Parent ]