Kids Review the OLPC
Posted by
kdawson
on Mon Aug 13, 2007 11:24 PM
from the mouths-of-babes dept.
from the mouths-of-babes dept.
A. N. Onymous sends us to OLPCNews for an account of kids' reactions to the OLPC XO, and comments: "My first impression is, it's just like when you give a kid a box of Lego." The video of a 10-year-old and his younger sister replacing a mobo is pretty cool.
Related Stories
Firehose:OLPC news: Children's Reviews of the OLPC by Anonymous Coward
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Neato! (Score:5, Funny)
"These computers sure make a cool fort!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
PS: I want one
Re:Neato! (Score:5, Insightful)
Are there any truly common sizes for low-denomination coins around the world?
Mal-2
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
LoB
Amazing concept (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I remember reading a long time ago that contact with the back of a colour TV tube was "invariably fatal". Mind you from your experience and a bit of Googling maybe they were just being overly cautious -
htt [repairfaq.org]
Re:Amazing concept (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
How about to pump water, the basic necessity of life? Or running a generator for electricity? Without electricity your day is basically over as soon as the sun sets. How about for a small tractor to aid in farming the land?
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
Frankly, though, I like OLPC. While I'm not sure it will benefit poor African children much more than giving laptops to middle-schoolers in Seattle, it will still provide some benefits to its target demographic.
Better still, for me, it's inspired tech companies to design similar devices for rich countries, meaning I might have a competent, cheap mobile platform in my future.
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Informative)
You seem to have an inaccurate idea (Score:5, Insightful)
1. Money. In the modern world, everything costs money, including getting water for irrigation, spare parts for those tractors, etc. And this is the root of all the evil that follows in this list.
2. An industry to support that agriculture. Just knowing how an internal combustion engine works, doesn't mean that you can just get a hammer and an anvil and make a tractor in a village smithy. Until this problem is solved, their agriculture is a case of either (A) inefficiently doing it by hand, or (B) importing expensive foreign tractors and spare parts, and see #1: that's money they just don't have.
3. A market where they can get that much needed money for their produce. And not just "market" as in selling it in the next city, but some kind of _export_ market, because you can't import much without exporting the equivalent. If you want to import something that costs US Dollars or Euro, you have to first sell something for US Dollars or Euro. Or you can take a loan, but then you're soon back to square one: you have to export something for US Dollars or Euro to pay it back.
But there they compete with the _massively_ subsidized EU and USA agricultural exports. And they lose.
It's as simple as that: if you and I make the same product, but the government subsidizes more than half the price of mine, you _will_ lose. That is their problem.
4. Some source of credit without all sorts of strings attached. A lot of "foreign aid" or "loans" actually come with strings attached, like "you must use that money to buy grain from the USA" or "you must use that money to buy trucks from Germany." (But when they break down, heh, you better have your own money to buy spare parts with.) Unfortunately while that may relieve a famine in the short run, in the long run it also just does even more to bankrupt the local farms and industry respectively.
5. An infrastructure. You can't have a modern agriculture without water pumps for irrigation, roads, silos, fuel pumps for the trucks and tractors, electricity, etc. And that's just infrastructure they don't have. In some cases they don't even have clean water for drinking, much less water for irrigation. And don't have the money to build an infrastructure.
6. In some cases, they don't have competent or honest politicians either. A lot of economies are run into the ground not because they don't know what an engine is, but because they're run by an incompetent, corrupt, kleptocratic clique.
Basically their main problem is that they're too poor, not that some white man has to come and teach them basic agriculture.
It's damn near impossible to start from zero and industrialize by your own efforts any more. It's a vicious circle: as long as you don't have high-tech stuff to export for the big bucks, you can't buy the machine tools and know-how to get even your basic industry started. Raw material and agricultural products are so damn cheap that you simply can't export enough of them to get some serious industrialization going.
Stalin did industrialize the USSR in the 30's... by starving a few million peasants (a lot of them Ukrainians) to death. Literally to death. That was the only way to export enough grain to be able to buy all the machine tools and blueprints he needed to start a serious industry.
Not only that kind of a solution isn't practicable in most countries, the problem just got much worse in the meantime too.
So, anyway, ironically giving them some computer skills may actually do them a hell of a lot more good than trying to teach them basic agriculture (which they already know.) If they can at least work offshore tech support, or assemble computers in a sweatshop, they and their country might even get _some_ dollars out of that. And, who
Point number six should actually be #1 (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Suppose you live in an agrarian culture. You probably can't afford a two stroke engine, but even assuming you have one and can keep it running, you can't make much of a living. You see, the US subsidizes their farmers to produce a surplus, and they do so
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
Of course we all know it'll probably be mostly used for pr0n, but that's just a good hook to get kids online and techno-literate. And it's not like you coculdn't say the same thing about us when we were kids....
d
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You can't do this, can you?
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
From another angle, when the kids saw me replacing motherboards, several of them were fascinated. One of the older kids learned how to do it just because he wanted to, and helped us out for several weeks. Now, I'll admit that it is seems a useless skill, but that's only if you consider learning and enjoyment for its own sake to be useless. No, he won't likely be able to monetize the skill, but honestly he'll be lucky if he can monetize anything. So why not enjoy life in the meantime? And any brain exercise is good for these kids, as it sharpens the mind. There are geeks over there too -- they just don't have access to the stuff we do.
Cheers.
Re:Amazing concept (Score:4, Insightful)
One of the older kids learned how to do it just because he wanted to.... Now, I'll admit that it is seems a useless skill....
In the long run, possibly about as useless as writing a 386 kernel just for the fun of it.
Nope, nothing good ever came of doing tech for the sake of loving tech.
Mod parent up,
pww
Re:Amazing concept (Score:4, Insightful)
Why? Because at the moment my mother will not use a computer, because almost every other action you do you will get a pop-up, asking you to decide on a technical question, with lots of choices. If you are not computer literate, this is a HUGE barrier to start. And what's up with the clicking. Sometimes you right-click, sometimes you left-click, sometimes you have to double click, sometimes you have to hold the button pressed. My mother asked me when you have to double-click and when not. Say, in the start menu, one click will be enough to start an application. But on the desktop, you'll have to double-click.
I hope the OPLC will be a bit like that, removing the non-obvious computer behavior that has settled itself into almost every desktop GUI around. As for your example about the kid, he was doing something technical, working with foreigners, getting used to the kind of work that is done with computers. Those skills start you up and get you somewhere. As a 16 year old I brought the newspaper around, how is that for a useless skill? But you learn how to deal with angry costumers, get responsibility (early starts!), and lots of things you add to your the luggage that make you who you are.
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Technically true, but developping a love for computers will help them in other ways.
I mean, by old skills wi
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Amazing concept (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Amazing concept (Score:4, Insightful)
Is this real world testing? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Once the OLPC is distributed, there will be a growing population of kids who have "used computers before".
And I don't think the plan i
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Is this real world testing? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Actually, some of those people are quite rich and would only need your assistance with getting vast sums of money from their corrupt countries...
12-year-old post (Score:2, Funny)
New World Meet the Old World (Score:2, Funny)
Chinese kids are even cheaper. (Score:5, Informative)
Information Age (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
uh oh (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"guided" disassembly (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The only thing any adult provided me with was the money for the parts and a good amount of faith in my ability (thanks, Dad).
Kids can actually do quite a lot. The only instruction
missing the point? (Score:5, Interesting)
What I want to know is whether kids can actually do anything useful/interesting on these laptops.
Re:missing the point? (Score:4, Insightful)
Kids being able to put the thing back together again in a working state shows that thought has been given to the design to make it kid-proof (or at least kid-resistant.)
Worst music ever (Score:3, Insightful)
Soft jazz: neither soft nor jazz.
Child labor (Score:5, Funny)
Think Back.. (Score:4, Insightful)
If I hadn't had occasion to do things like this as a child, my mechanical and computer aptitude would probably be nothing like what it is now. I commend these folks for what they are doing. The fact that there is an adult in the video "helping" doesn't mean anything to me, as I can see the value in this that goes beyond our "television reality challenges" expectations when we read something about a challenge with kids.
The real challenge is that they got two kids to sit still in one place long enough to even take instructions like this and still manage to accomplish the task.
On another note, I'm tempted to buy one of these things for myself, looks like a great platform for DamnSmallLinux.
Re:spare mobo's (Score:4, Informative)
http://wiki.laptop.org/images/1/10/Proto-a-front.
Note the near-absence of electrolytic caps, especially the junky through-hole ones you find on your typical motherboard.
Re: (Score:2)
If and when they have OLPCs there, there will be.