Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

OLPC Mass Production Begins

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Mon Jul 23, 2007 03:01 PM
from the long-uphill-battles dept.
chris_mahan writes to tell us that mass production of the $100 laptop is finally being ramped up. "Hardware suppliers have been given the green light to ramp-up production of all of the components needed to build millions of the low-cost machines. Previously, the organization behind the scheme said that it required orders for 3m laptops to make production viable. The first machines should be ready to put into the hands of children in developing countries in October 2007. "There's still some software to write, but this is a big step for us," Walter Bender, head of software development at One Laptop per Child (OLPC), told the BBC News website."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by jollyreaper (513215) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:03PM (#19959823)
    I want to support OLFM, One Laptop For Me.
  • by Stanistani (808333) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:05PM (#19959851) Homepage Journal
    We'll shortly know how this massive social experiment works out. If it's even half as successful as they planned, Negroponte and folks deserve a Nobel.
    • by lawpoop (604919) on Monday July 23 2007, @04:08PM (#19960819) Homepage Journal

      So in a year or so... We'll shortly know how this massive social experiment works out.
      In a year or so? What exactly do you expect to happen in a year or so? The end of starvation and civil wars in Africa?

      I think a more reasonable time frame is 10 or 15 years. I remember using BBSes in the mid 90s and dreaming about an internet connection and one of those funky email addresses with an '@' symbol in it. I would never, *never*, *NEVER* in a million years predicted technologies such as Wikipedia or Bittorrent. Nobody did -- not Bill Gates, not Negroponte -- not any of the Powerful Old Men in computers. It takes a generation of new kids who can think outside the box and have the free time and audacity to try something that everyone knows could never work. Even now very few wikipedia proponents would ever say that they thought it would be as successful as it is.

      If millions of kids spend their formative years with a completely hackable, programmable, peer-networked computer, we are going to see a complete revolution of computing technology. It doesn't matter that they have brown skin, speak no English, or live in a jungle hut. They will do amazing things with programs and computers that the last generation would never think of. If there are millions of OLPCs distributed, the internet will be totally different 20 years from now.
        • by lawpoop (604919) on Monday July 23 2007, @05:47PM (#19962113) Homepage Journal
          Well, my personal prediction is that it will be 'successful', but not in the way that the OLPC planners will want it to be. The OLPC project is designed to be some kind of textbook replacement for kids in poor villages going to school. That will be moderately successful in a few areas.

          My prediction is that most of these OLPCs will be 're-purposed' by adults and young, budding geeks in small villages. It's like when cell phones came into rural Africa. Mining companies saw it was too expensive to run phone lines all throughout the jungle, so they threw up cell towers. Villagers got a hold of second-hand cell phones, and low-and-behold, they started lining up buyers to buy their crops as they were harvesting them in the field, instead of dragging them all the way to market only to have them rot in the hot sun.

          So the success won't be village school children learning from them, but the amazing new programs and communication technologies that both adults and children use *for their own purposes*, instead of doing what we think they should be doing with them.

          One of the programming languages that is coming with the OLPC is Smalltalk. That means there will be a new generation of millions 3rd world LISP-like hackers spread all throughout the world. This will be their first computer language. Not c, not BASIC, not visual basic. This, I predict, will lead to amazing new programs.
      • by Dr. Evil (3501) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:38PM (#19960329)
        I look forward to exploiting this low-cost labour for click-farms.
      • by jeevesbond (1066726) on Monday July 23 2007, @04:11PM (#19960847) Homepage

        Throwing laptops at kids in shithole countries may sound like a great idea, but that's making a LOT of assumptions (that they'll only use them for good, that the officials in their countries will actually distribute them rather than sell them, etc.).

        Whereas you are quite happy to assume everyone that lives in a developing nation is corrupt, evil and not worthy of a chance at a better life. Of course all of us middle-class people in the West, our business leaders and politicians are all whiter-than-white. We're incorruptible!

        Ever heard of a self fulfilling prophesy? Treat someone like a criminal and you'll generally force them to act like one: but try to help, do some good and a lot of people will respond. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if the OLPC--and projects like it--will decrease the amount of crime in developing nations. People will be empowered to work on worthwhile projects, and it will build communication bridges with people in the West.

        Wake up and stop dehumanising the rest of the world. There are arseholes everywhere, but there are plenty of good people too. Yes some OLPCs will appear on e-Bay, no doubt a few will be used to run scams (although most scammers already have computers), but the vast majority will be used for education. The benefits far outweigh any potential problems, it's really sad people like you can't see that and insist on branding whole nations of millions of people as scum (probably without having ever even visited the continent).

  • kids in the states (Score:4, Interesting)

    by jshriverWVU (810740) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:11PM (#19959935)
    Will kids in the states also be eligible for these? Think WV, Kentucky, or any poor state in central US. Or is it limited to just 3rd world countries like Mexico, Africa, etc
    • by Xybre (527810) <fantm_mage@yahoo.com> on Monday July 23 2007, @03:21PM (#19960097) Homepage
      Africa isn't a country. Oh wait, you went to American public schools? I feel your pain.
    • by locokamil (850008) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:24PM (#19960133) Homepage
      COMING AS I DO FROM A NATION OF DEPOSED MILLIONAIRE PRINCES AND BRUTAL MILITARY DICTATORS, I AM EMAILING YOU TO REQUESTING YOUR ASSISTANCE IN MOVING MONEY IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,000,000 (TM) AWAY FROM THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF THE NATION OF AFRICA TO AVOID [SOB STORY].

      IN RETURN FOR YOUR HELP, YOU WILL RECEIVE AN AMOUNT OF NO LESS THAN 120% (POSSIBLY MORE) OF THE TRANSFERRED AMOUNT. PLEASE REPLY AT THE SOONEST WITH NOTIFICATION OF YOUR ACCEPTANCE OF THIS DEAL, BANK ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.

      YOURS RESPECTFULLY,
      GENERIC AFRICA MILLIONAIRE PRINCE

      1 AFRICA ROAD
      AFRICA CITY, 12358
      NATION OF AFRICA
      • by CastrTroy (595695) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:35PM (#19960293) Homepage
        Since it seems that there are so many people interested in getting one of these for themselves, would it be possible to set up your own non-profit to distribute them to regular people? Possible things include charging extra and donating funds to the OLPC project or other such organizations. Seems like they refuse to sell them to end users, but why miss out on a market that is obviously there? Especially when it means increased production, which will bring down production costs, and allow extra funds to bring down the cost for the 3rd world countries.
  • by dashslotter (1093743) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:12PM (#19959963) Homepage
    The kids in the factory that makes them?
  • by fyoder (857358) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:16PM (#19960023) Homepage Journal

    "There's still some software to write, but this is a big step for us," Walter Bender, head of software development at One Laptop per Child (OLPC), told the BBC News website. "
    A 3rd world tyke expressed disinterest in the OLPC initiative, saying "Scratching figures in the dirt with a stick has always worked just fine for me. I'll consider getting an OLPC computer in a few years once they've worked out the bugs."
  • by denttford (579202) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:19PM (#19960063) Homepage
    The one with the preloaded porn?

    It's for a... sociological study in aesthetics... purely educational...
  • by mpapet (761907) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:27PM (#19960189) Homepage
    Anyone that's done any business in government would anonymously back me up when I say that this whole project moved into mass production so quickly I find it hard to believe. From the olpc wiki, they list some countries.

            * 2.1 Romania--No
            * 2.2 Argentina--Yes
            * 2.3 Brazil--Yes
            * 2.4 Korea---driven by a few citizens
            * 2.5 Libya--Yes
            * 2.6 Nigeria--Yes
            * 2.7 India--No
            * 2.8 Uruguay--Yes
            * 2.9 Rwanda--Yes
            * 2.10 USA--Talking

    Anyone that's worked government IT would tell you that it's incredibly difficult to get paid in a timely manner. On top of *just* getting paid, they've been paid so much the entire OEM chain is ready to mass-produce?

    Someone somewhere has a lot of influence (e.g. money) to get this going because OEM's certainly don't work for free and governments rarely, if ever, are enlighted enough to see a good thing an let it pass. Who's pushing this and where's the money coming from?
  • Millions and millions of little processors hooked up by a ad hoc wireless network . . . I figure we have nine months until it gains consciousness and starts organizing legions of Third World kids.
  • The Diamond Age (Score:3, Insightful)

    by MobyDisk (75490) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:44PM (#19960403) Homepage
    The OLPC project reminds me of "A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer" found in The Diamond Age [wikipedia.org]. In the book, a poor girl is given a nanotech book that basically teaches her everything should could ever want to know. Later on, it gets mass-produced resulting in an army of intelligent young girls. The OLPC is kinda like that.
  • by davmoo (63521) on Monday July 23 2007, @04:27PM (#19961107)
    Why do all these stories keep calling this the "$100 laptop", when it actually costs $176 even in quantity?
    • Not really (Score:4, Insightful)

      by WindBourne (631190) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:44PM (#19960417) Journal
      1. if they produce electronic text books on this, that it will be lower cost education than what is currently happening. IOW, the country will have more to spend on improving total education, on health factors, etc.
      2. This is a case of give a man a fish vs. teach a man to fish. It is difficult to get an education in many countries. If this raises education levels, then it will raise the country as well.

      Considering that you are a brave AC, I am guessing that you already know this, and are just opposed to THIS project.
    • Re:Blah (Score:4, Informative)

      by DragonWriter (970822) on Monday July 23 2007, @04:22PM (#19961025)

      Most of these people would probably better off getting $100 which is like 5 years wages where they live.


      In what is, IIRC, the largest launch country, Brazil, median income for black women (the worst off racial/gender mix) is $156/month. (source [reuters.com])

      Heck, even Rwanda (which is one of the poorest nations that may get it early, through Libya purchasing it for them) has an average per capita annual income of $206 (source [state.gov]), over an order of magnitude higher than you suggested for "most" OLPC recipients.

      • Re:Blah (Score:4, Funny)

        by d3ac0n (715594) on Monday July 23 2007, @03:26PM (#19960169)
        Heh, I was going to post that link, but you beat me to it.

        Personally, I suggest a new slogan:

        "OLPC, Bringing Internet Porn to horny third world pubescent boys!"

        They could include a complimentary subscription to playboy online and a safer sex care pack!

        In all seriousness, Come on. Did anyone REALLY think that these things would be used for only "educational" purposes? Hell, I'll bet good money that the majority of them hardly EVER end up used for education. Unless you consider learning new sexual techniques "education".
    • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)


      When did porn become a bad word? Society's today seem to be fixated on how sex is bad for you.

      I don't see how having access to porn should deter these users from eventually using it for learning. Its pretty much the same as when we first got access to computers and the internet (or in my day, bulletin boards). The first thing you do is look for porn, and once you've exhausted yourself, start learning to use the computer for other stuff.

      As for illegal activity... the users who would normally gravitate toward
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        Wouldn't building better water, road and electricity infrastructures be a better way to help the world? Most of the articles I read about OLPC mention Africa which is a place that often lacks the basic systems I just mentioned.

        Better? I don't know if you can even put them in the same category.

        The fact is, these computer hardware manufacturers and the OSS community are pulling their own resources together for the vision of bringing technology and information to parts of the world that don't yet have it.

        How a