Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

New Electrode Lets Batteries Charge In 10 Seconds

Posted by samzenpus on Wed Mar 11, 2009 06:41 PM
from the greased-electricity dept.
Al writes "A new lithium-ion electrode allows batteries to be charged and discharged in 10 seconds flat. Developed by Gerbrand Ceder, a professor of materials science at MIT, it could be particularly useful where rapid power bursts are needed, such as for hybrid cars, but also for portable electronic devices. In testing, batteries incorporating the electrodes discharged in just 10 seconds. In comparison, the best high-power lithium-ion batteries today discharge in a minute and a half, and conventional lithium-ion batteries, such as those found in laptops, can take hours to discharge. The new high rate electrode, the researchers calculate, would allow a one-liter battery based on the material to deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."
+ -
story

Related Stories

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:44PM (#27159441)

    ...how many libraries of congress per square inch is that, again?

    • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

      yeah, wtf with the strange units?

        • by NeverVotedBush (1041088) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:28PM (#27160063)
          I don't think the ability to drain the battery in such a short time is the point. It's in delivering high current easily.

          Lots of loads pull a lot of current initially or periodically. One example would be an electric motor since they talk about applications such as hybrids. The stall current is limited by the resistance of the windings but once it spins up, reverse voltage in the motor limits the current to much lower values. If it was a motor under a heavy load, the current could be much higher.

          Another point is that in any high current circuit, the power wasted in the circuit as heat can be very high. It's current squared times resistance. With batteries that have a high internal resistance, that power heats the battery and is also power that's wasted. With a high current delivery capability, these would have very low internal resistance and under heavy loads, the batteries would run cooler and would be able to deliver more power to the actual load instead of throwing it away as heat.

          This really is an accomplishment and a valuable one.

          Just to illustrate battery self heating - if you ever get stranded in extreme cold because your battery doesn't have the power available to turn the engine over, just turn on the headlights for a while. It's a medium load but will heat the battery from the inside due to internal resistance and make the battery better able to start the car. This really works.
        • by Snowblindeye (1085701) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:33PM (#27160119)

          what the heck is the point of a battery can run 20 vacuum cleaners, for only 10 seconds?

          But it also means that you can *charge* it in 10 seconds. How nice it that. One problem for plug-in electric cars is that they take long to charge. If charging it doesn't take longer than filling up a tank of gas, that would be a step forward.

            • by camperdave (969942) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:34PM (#27160741) Journal
              What are you going to plug your charger into?

              How about the slow charge, high drain battery bank in the basement. You know, the one that's being charged by the solar panels on the roof and the wind generator in the back yard. Oh, and occasionally off the grid, during off peak hours.

              I'm kidding. When I go off the grid, I'll be finding a nice piece of land with good sized waterfall, and setting up a micro-hydro system.
            • by chrysrobyn (106763) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:34PM (#27160749)
              Perhaps there could develop a market of special charger stations at the intersection of roads whose purpose was to provide you with energy in exchange for money. These special stations might have access to energy storage banks whch they can charge as needed and charge your batteries using a higher current plug than consumers might ordinarily pay for. As time progressed, maybe they'd sell drinks, snacks and half rotten hot dogs.
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              I see the electrical equivalent of load balancing coming into play to address that issue. Just because a battery is physically capable of accepting a full charge in a few seconds doesn't mean that it must.

              I'm sure that's also awful for battery life - a lot of NiMH batteries at least (I can't speak for other types as I have no idea) can accept fast and slow charges, but the 15-minute rapid chargers take a lot of lifetime off the battery as compared to a four-hour trickle charge.

            • by fractoid (1076465) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @09:52PM (#27161419) Homepage
              Um, for starters, you're not going to be plugging all those cars in at the same time if each one's only plugged in for 10 seconds.

              Secondly, generally EV-sized batteries are fast-charged by using a 'dump pack', an identical fully charged pack of batteries that can supply as much current as the flat one can eat up. The important number is the continuous current draw, not peak.

              That's what makes small, high-current batteries so good. Imagine a car window motor which pulls, say, 5 amps at 12 volts. You need to run 5amp wiring to it. But assume that the motor only needs to run for a few seconds at a time, very infrequently - instead of running 5 amp wiring, you can simply put a battery next to the motor that's sufficient to run it for a minute or so, and trickle charge the battery over the car's CAN bus.

              Another use (actually this is one I read about where ultracaps are useful) is making a hard drive that doesn't lose data when the power drops during a write operation. Basically the cap would store enough energy for the drive to detect loss of external power, finish writing its buffer, and park itself before it ran flat.
            • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

              The crazy thing is what you could do with these batteries in a drag car. Top fuel drag cars weigh ~1000kg (if my quick googlation is correct) and output up to 1500kW. A 60-liter battery back could output the same amount of power while cutting the weight of the car by at least a couple of hundred kilos.

              Just wait for electrics to be banned from drag racing because they don't make enough noise and smoke... well actually smoke I can see happening.
            • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

              That's for the included on-board charger, which is limited by the 110 volt, 15 amp circuit it would plug into. The "high power" 220 volt charger sitting in the garage can charge the same battery in as little as 3 hours.
          • by hardburn (141468) <hardburn@nospAm.wumpus-cave.net> on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:02PM (#27160435)

            Fast recharge and discharge go hand-in-hand. This will particularly improve the range of electric/hybrid cars, since regenerative breaking is limited right now by how fast the battery can take in all that power.

            I don't see it improving the overall charge time of a car from a household plug, though. The limit there is that 120VAC just isn't enough. You can double up a circuit to get 240VAC, and in fact high draw appliances (like electric dryers) often already do in the US.

            If dealerships are smart, they'll contract the services of local electricians to put a 240VAC plug in customers' garages and roll the cost into the overall financing.

            • by sunspot42 (455706) on Thursday March 12 2009, @01:30AM (#27162931)

              I don't see it improving the overall charge time of a car from a household plug, though.

              Why not? Just install another battery pack at home, and keep it charged up at all times. It could then be used to quick-charge your car(s).

              It could also be used as backup power during a blackout, or maybe even to supply home power during those times of day when electric rates are especially high. You could charge it from the grid (especially during those times of day when rates are low), from solar cells on your roof or from a wind turbine.

        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          No, watts are correct. The thing that's special about this battery isn't the capacity, it's the rapid charge/discharge.

    • by NotQuiteReal (608241) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:06PM (#27160471) Journal
      You should think more along the lines of a Beowulf Cluster of Roombas.
  • by DigitalReverend (901909) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:44PM (#27159449)
    That sucks.
    • I'm fairly surprised to hear that vacuum cleaners use that much power - 1.25kw each is about 1.6 horsepower each. That should be enough for your vacuum cleaners to do 0-60 in the 10 seconds worth of battery you've got...

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        Vacuum cleaners are rated in "Amps" of power. you don't have a good vacuum unless it's rated at 10 amps or more. Of course this leads vacuum companies to design really inefficient motors that pull huge amounts of energy just to get the Amp Rating up high.
            • by Muad'Dave (255648) on Thursday March 12 2009, @09:12AM (#27166293) Homepage
              I've never heard of a 10A circuit or receptacle. Many outlets in the US are supplied via a 20A branch circuit using #12 copper, but are wired with 15A receptacles. This is legal according to the NEC code. The remainder are supplied via a 15A branch circuit using #14 copper. The 15A receptacles have the typical 'I I' look to them. 20A receptacles look more like 'I- I' where the neutral blade has a Tee shape. A 20A plug has the neutral lead rotated 90 degrees, so it'll fit in a 20A receptacle but not a 15A one. Similarly, a 15A plug will mate with a 20A receptacle. This chart [nooutage.com] shows various NEMA plug and receptacle configurations.
    • 20 vacuum cleaners for 10 seconds?

      That sucks.

      How many yomamas is that?

  • by icebike (68054) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:45PM (#27159455)

    > deliver 25,000 watts, or enough power for about 20 vacuum cleaners."

    What could possibly go wrong with that!!??

    • new electric bass boat, the Chevy Fibrillator ...

    • A lot for people who don't treat them with the proper respect.

      That kind of short circuit current would probably amputate fingers if someone shorted one with a ring, melt metal in seconds (or less), and depending on the circuit, could possibly create enough of a magnetic field to launch that molten metal across a room (think rail guns).

      High fault currents can lead to a whole range of bizarre effects. People will need to take off jewelry and should wear gloves and safety glasses when handling them. Also
          • I think secretly I want it to be true....no wait, not secretly, I just want that EMP to happen

            After spending way too many hours in a datacenter today (which, incidentally sounds about like 10000 vacuum cleaners), I could care less about escaping kids, but if an EMP could put an end to the buzzing in my head, I'd strongly consider it.

  • by NaCh0 (6124) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:47PM (#27159495)

    Great, by the time I have backed out of the driveway I'll need to recharge it.

    • Think about it (Score:5, Interesting)

      by jeffmeden (135043) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:07PM (#27159759) Homepage Journal

      Actually, the big thing about electric driving isn't getting started in the first place, it's reclaiming the energy when you have to stop (at least for inner city driving.) If you have a battery that is bordering on a supercapacitor to dump energy into, you can reclaim nearly all of the stopping energy into the battery to use to start again. Given that there are 745 watts/hp, a battery capable of a charge rate of 25KW gives you 33 horsepower of braking capacity with one cell. Get 3 of them in a car and you can reclaim 100hp during a stop, which would be good for all but the most grueling emergency stops (depending on the weight of the car).

        • Re:Think about it (Score:4, Insightful)

          by iksbob (947407) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @10:02PM (#27161517)

          A 100hp generator weighs 1500 pounds.

          Really? I assume you're including the substantial weight of a diesel engine to drive said generator, as a quick google search turns up the Winco EC75PSB4G-17 - a 75 kilowatt emergency backup generator head (just the part that turns shaft movement into AC power) that weighs in at 605 lbs. That's a unit intended for stationary use, not to be mounted to a vehicle. I'm sure a similar device intended for mobile use could be constructed from less massive materials.
          In fact, may I direct you to look over the specifications page for the Honda FCX Clarity: link [honda.com]. There you will find that power from the vehicle's fuel cell stack and lithium ion battery is converted to motive force by a 100kW (134 hp) AC electric motor with integrated transaxle. While the page lacks a weight listing for said motive unit, I doubt it exceeds 400 lbs.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:47PM (#27159505)
    for about 10 sec.
  • Boom!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by owlnation (858981) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:55PM (#27159621)
    Where does the heat go on rapid discharge?

    Or is this the Sony method of rapid discharge?
      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        The 25kW is power delivered by the battery to a load, not power dissipated by the battery. Granted, given the amount of current involved and the inherent internal resistance of the battery, there'll be a fair amount of power dissipated in the battery itself, but it would be a fairly small percentage of the 25kW
  • c'mon, boys (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:56PM (#27159639)

    a page of comments and no one has yet said:

    "10 seconds? the average /. geek discharges faster than that"

    sigh.

  • Armageddon (Score:5, Funny)

    by GottliebPins (1113707) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:07PM (#27159755)
    Wow, now we can expect to see spectacular laptop fires hot enough to burn through an engine block. Where can I get some of those batteries? Sony?
  • by Alain Williams (2972) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:13PM (#27159857) Homepage
    My last laptop battery was faster than this after a few years, it would completely discharge in 5 seconds, not a slow 10 seconds!
  • by Mr Z (6791) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:38PM (#27160175) Homepage Journal

    Anyone else notice this from the article?

    To improve the batteries, the researchers modified an electrode material called lithium iron phosphate . . . The models suggested a way to improve conductivity by directing lithium ions toward particular faces of crystals within the material.

    To exploit this, Ceder included extra lithium and phosphorus. This helps form a layer of lithium diphosphate, a material known for its high lithium-ion conductivity.

    Wouldn't it be something if someone trademarks this use of lithium diphosphate on targeted crystal faces as, oh, I dunno, dilithium crystals?

    First, transparent aluminum, [wikipedia.org] and now this!

    • by localroger (258128) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:25PM (#27160657) Homepage
      I suspect dilithium came from a hint dropped in somebody's ear that regular old lithium was a critical component of hydrogen bombs. But just as regular old triticale, a grain that actually exists, wasn't good enough for Star Trek and so had to be supervened by quadrotriticale in The Trouble with Tribbles, the critical element lithium without which hydrogen bombs couldn't be made probably had to be expanded to dilithium to meet the demands of starship engines. (It's never occurred to me before now but I guess if they ever had to do it again it would have been octo-something.)
    • by pgn674 (995941) on Thursday March 12 2009, @02:58AM (#27163383) Homepage
      Wow, boy do I love the internet.

      So, Slashdot just recently had the Could Fuller Take Trek Back To TV? [slashdot.org] and What Has Fox Got Against Its Own Sci-Fi Shows? [slashdot.org] articles, then this one, which I can imagine influenced Mr Z to notice the dilithium crystal Star Trek connection. So he linked to the related Wikipedia transparent aluminum article, and I followed that link. In that article's In Fiction section, it is mentioned that the Enterprise D's windows are made of transparent aluminum, as noted in an episode that involved subspace anomalies and hull breaches.

      This reminded me of a TNG episode I saw when I was a small child watching TV with my dad. All I could remember from the episode was a lady looking frozen and half way through the floor, and I was scared silly that I would fall through the floor right there in the living room. Just last week I had actually thought of that episode and tried searching for it, unsuccessfully. That one part and E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial are the few childhood memories I have of TV scaring me. I wanted to see what the episode looked like to me now.

      So I followed the Wikipedia link to the TNG episode [wikipedia.org], and the description of the episode matched what I remembered. So I quickly found a torrent for the episode (I would never ever actually buy the DVD online just to watch one episode once to satisfy my curiosity. If it was streamed online by the copyright holder with ads I would probably go that route), downloaded it, and watched the episode. I finally saw that childhood fear with grown up eyes.

      And that's why I love the internet. I was reading a news site, read a comment that referenced some interesting sounding technology, and stumbled upon a childhood fear that I had tried searching for only a week before. Then I reexperienced the fear initiator as I am now to see how I would perceive it. Now I am writing about my experience and attaching it to the original comment that started it. And I did all this within a short and entertaining time span. I love the internet. I think this shows that, at least in some way, we are living in an age of awesomeness.
  • Critical hit! It's super effective! END USER fainted!
    • Re:charging (Score:5, Informative)

      by yincrash (854885) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @06:49PM (#27159537)
      after reading the article, fast charging has not been developed. the article writer only says that it may be possible, w/o citing any source regarding that claim.
      • Re:charging (Score:5, Funny)

        by Repton (60818) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:21PM (#27159949) Homepage

        All you need is a wall socket that can deliver 25,000W!

        Note to self: pick up some 100A fuses on the way home.

        • Re:charging (Score:5, Funny)

          by Rufty (37223) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @08:58PM (#27161025) Homepage
          In the fuse draw of a local college electronics lab I found a length of 6inch nail lovingly cut to length with cleaned ends, painted round the middle with the designation "10000A, slow-blow" (Apparently one of the techs had a dead scope that couldn't be powered up - it just blew the fuse. Hence the nail. Bung it in and now you know where the hard short *was*. It's the melted patch with the smoke coming out...)
      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        From the BBC article [bbc.co.uk] on the same topic:

        A prototype battery made using the new technique could be charged in less than 20 seconds - in comparison to six minutes with an untreated sample of the material.

        So it sounds like fast charging has been developed, and it's just a matter of taking orders and tooling the factories at this point.

      • Re:charging (Score:5, Informative)

        by AnotherBlackHat (265897) on Wednesday March 11 2009, @07:00PM (#27159673) Homepage

        >Sure, as long as you can find a 25000 watt outlet.

        I don't think so...

        Typical Miles per kilowatt hour is 4.
        A 100 mile fill-up = 25 kilowatt hours = 90,000,000 watt seconds.
        If you want that in 10 seconds, you'd need a 9 Megawatt outlet.