Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Laptops May Be Hazardous to Your Fertility

Posted by michael on Thu Dec 09, 2004 08:50 AM
from the toasty! dept.
Spy der Mann writes "Researchers find that men who place portable computers on their laps are inadvertently raising the temperature of their scrotums -- and possibly damaging their sperm. Guess laptops should get a namechange soon... before our fertility does."
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • We're slashdotters after all. The only way to get sex is either paying for it or we take matters into our own hands. In either case fertility doesn't matter.
    • by synthespian (563437) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:14AM (#11041571)
      He uses a laptop.
      • There is nothing wrong with being fat.

        That being said, there is nothing wrong with abstinence when you can't get what you want.
        • by drinkypoo (153816) <martin.espinoza@gmail.com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @11:18AM (#11042753) Homepage Journal
          Being fat is unhealthy. There is something wrong with being unhealthy. People are typically fat for one of two reasons. Either they have a genetic problem, which means they need to take more extreme measures to be fit, or they are addicted to food (carbohydrates, mostly) and they have a problem. There IS something wrong with being fat. I've struggled with depression and ordinary food addiction all my life and I'm not fit by a long shot (I'm in good company here... h0 h0 h0) but the fact is that humans are not supposed to be fat and it takes a serious toll on the body.
            • by drinkypoo (153816) <martin.espinoza@gmail.com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @05:46PM (#11046930) Homepage Journal

              Food is now an addiction? People used to joke about that. Quitting the food or air addiction used to be a euphemism for death.

              Carbohydrates are addictive because of the insulin cycle, which goes something like this: You eat carbohydrates and your pancreas produces insulin which is involved in (regulates?) the process of converting carbohydrates to glucose. Glucose is not only the fuel upon which we run, but also the chemical which tells our brain that we are full. Relatively recent studies indicate that over time your brain becomes resistant to glucose and it takes more glucose, thus more carbs to feel full. Note the job of your pancreas, which gets harder as you eat more carbohydrates, especially ready carbs like sugar and white flour - which are nearly the same thing once you have ingested them.

              In other words, eating foods with high carbohydrate content is addictive and leads to diabetes. Arguably if you are very athletic you can consume large quantities of carbohydrates but it is always a mistake to consume them all at once. You should spread consumption of carbohydrates out among your day.

              Obviously being overweight in unhealthy. Apparently being unhealthy is now wrong, bad, or immoral. You never made that implication, but the concepts are closely tied together.

              It's bad for you. To me that's reason enough to campaign against it. It raises the cost of health care because we all have to pay for the fat ones. Unless you pay for your medical care out of pocket, of course, but we're talking about social services and health insurance here. One or the other of them describe the majority of Americans, certainly. If it were entirely the fault of the fat people that they're fat, then it would be reasonable to penalize them for it, but the fact is that the very kinds of foods which are most unhealthy are the most aggressively marketed.

              There's nothing "wrong" with being unhealthy, it's just a personal choice people make every day. This is the same kind of thinking that drives some people toward putting extra taxes on "sin food" that's high in fat/calories/whatever.

              As I believe I have shown above, it is not a personal choice. It affects all of us, and for that reason I think we should all band together to try to wipe out obesity, provided we can do it without creating worse problems.

              As for sin tax on junk food, it makes perfect sense to me. We tax cigarettes to help pay for the financial impact on the nation, and to provide cigarette education. We tax alcohol along the same lines. Why not tax food which has no real nutritional value but which makes you fat which degrades your quality of life and causes you health problems? Tax the living shit out of twinkies, little debbie snack cakes, potato chips, and so on. Obesity is a national health problem, and it needs to be addressed, just like cancer or AIDS. It is a state of unhealth that affects us all, and unless someone consciously chooses to be obese, they should not have to suffer with it. Lying to yourself and telling yourself it's okay to be fat just because someone will still find you attractive if they, too, have little disregard for health, is like not getting a cancer treated because some people might have a melanoma fetish.

          • by fubar1971 (641721) on Thursday December 09 2004, @10:23AM (#11042215) Homepage
            That is why I have now placed my tin foil hat on my other head :)
          • I'm banging a fat chick at the moment and I love it.

            Not anymore you're not.
          • by Erik Hollensbe (808) on Thursday December 09 2004, @12:37PM (#11043628) Homepage
            I never quite got why people equate "fat" women with desperate women. Besides the fact that any woman that actually fits a 'healthy' weight model medically is actually "fat" by most men's terms... I mean, shit, Victorial era England wasn't as draconian as popular society is regarding women's weight these days.

            Personally, and this is just my experience, the women who are out working out every day and are constantly making lewd sexual references are the ones that paint "DESPERATE" all over their heads - what I find funny is when I was single and saw that sign, I thought "cool, free, easily attainable sex without strings attached - she'll keep asking for it no matter how I treat her". Most of these women were physically attractive, and beyond their shell of a personality, mostly vapid.

            Sure, a fun fuck, but not a "keeper". And the closer you get to 30, the more often "keeper" is used in your vocabulary, if you're still single. I know too many unhappy guys in their 40's that have resorted to the desparity of hitting on "barely legal" girls that have nothing better to do than brag over SMS to their friends that they nailed a really old dude with a lot of dough and a mercedes. Trust me, these older men might be happy for that hour or so, but no man deals with poorly anticipated midlife crisis well - I've seen too many guys fuck this up.

            Now, there's a lot of psych which tries to explain this but more or less it revolves around a lack of (percieved possibly) attention.

            Most fat women, in my experience, are a heck of a lot stronger minded - often thinking for themselves, and while that may not sound attractive to you - get a girl that knows what she wants in the sack instead of some girl that's out to impress you and compare. I guarantee you'll be happier with the former, and older men will agree that older women, while also not looking like Victoria's Secret models, are also much more entertaining.

            19 year old miniskirt hoes think the penis is a toy. 29 year old women know what that thing is for and know how it works, and know how to keep it coming back - that's all I'm saying. Married life does have it's advantages. :)
            • On being normal (Score:5, Insightful)

              by Chemisor (97276) on Thursday December 09 2004, @10:46AM (#11042428) Journal
              > Most normal people? Man, I can't wait till you life goes south.
              > In fact, why don't you do us all a favor and put that gun in your mouth NOW.

              One of the desirable traits of normal people is our tendency to avoid homicidal thoughts and other similar desires that include wishing everyone who disagrees with our opinions dead.
      • Try getting out into the world once in a while. Geeks actually get dates now. Most of us with "normal" people. Some of us with people that the "normal" people never have a chance with.

        Don't get me wrong, I understand the stereotypes, but the 80's are over.
        • by pmjordan (745016) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:35AM (#11041758) Homepage
          This is very true, but only after grammar school, high school, or equivalent. Everyone knows that during school, logic is in fact inverted.

          ~phil
            • by hey! (33014) on Thursday December 09 2004, @10:31AM (#11042287) Homepage Journal
              Well, things really don't change that much. And muscles don't matter much either. The key to getting dates is propinquity. If you never interact with somebody, and you walk up and ask them for a date of course you're going to get shot down unless you are some kind of adonis. If you are already friends with somebody several times a week in a fun environemnt like drama club, then (a) you immediately have a better chance and (b) the person knows you deper than you "geek" aura and (c) you have a pretty good idea of what your chances are.
              • by Erik Hollensbe (808) on Thursday December 09 2004, @12:08PM (#11043283) Homepage
                My perspective on weight lifting is simple, and elegant.

                After getting in my fair share of fights over the thickness of my lenses or other silly shit, I had a lot of pent up anger.

                Strangely, after lifting for a few years people stopped picking fights - I don't think it was the anger release, either... I think it was the fact that my last name was splattered all over H.S. lifting records for a school that had been around for over 50 years.

                I'm a stocky guy and weightlifting is pretty natural for a guy of my stature. Strangely people stop feeling the need to push you around when they push and you don't move.

                I'm not saying that's why someone should get involved in any sport - the release and the interest in getting strong for more or less mundane, not vengeful reasons was my intent, but the little unnoticed side effect until much later was nice.

                When two line tackles for your varsity team have trouble resetting a squat max you're doing - they don't just stop picking on you, they start backing you up. And it's damn nice when you're in a hick town with a lot of people who have nothing better to do than pick on others.

                And to be clear, it was more my build than anything, weightlifting just brought it out - I rarely went to the gym outside of my electives, and nowadays getting close to a gym normally involves passing by in a car. If I wanted to see "exercise", i'd get a gerbil and a wheel or I'd find some outdoor activity that I enjoyed. The people at 24 hour fitness make me laugh - all the mirrors, it's hilarious. I ripped out the seat of a lifting suit once, didn't know it until I went to the locker room.

                In other words, if you're lifting to get cut, or impress chicks - work on your personal skills instead of your grip - focus on listening skills.. It's funny, but I guess I have a wierd perspective with so many women in my home - but most men have no fucking clue how to listen to a conversation. Often times, I'll talk for a short while and have to actually confirm the guy on the other end is still listening - no 'uh huh' or anything like that - what's even more funny, is that some men are actually surprised when I do it. Women *really* enjoy hearing that stupid 'uh huh', even if you aren't listening. Married men have known this since the dawn of time. :)

                Enjoy lifting weights but it really shouldn't have any agenda tied to it - if you're not overly concerned with how you look, my experience is that more women, not less (and I'm not just talking about desperate women, folks) will find you attractive. It also helps to have sisters so you can see the other side of the equation. :)

                Anyways I didn't really intend this to be what it is, but oh well - some of you guys really need to hear it.
      • by Shakrai (717556) * on Thursday December 09 2004, @01:45PM (#11044462) Journal

        Who cares anyway. There are too many people already; fertility rates dropping would be a GREAT thing.

        Because it's much better for society if the smart geeks who use laptops become infertile as opposed to the dead-beat Dads who father 20 children while not having the income to support a single one of them nor the skills required for good parenting.

        Our problem is that the smart and educated people aren't having enough children.

  • by Overzeetop (214511) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:51AM (#11041339) Journal
    I like having a good ball-warmer on those cold winter nights. It's just not usually my computer.

    • by tangledweb (134818) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:59AM (#11041415)
      I think you might see an increase in sales of those watercooled cpu heatsinks that overclockers love.

      A warning though, the first time I see a casemod that includes a scrotum reported on slashdot, I will never read it again.
      • by MacGod (320762) on Thursday December 09 2004, @10:58AM (#11042542)
        Yikes! For a second there, I thought you said "I think you might see an increase in sales of those watercooled cpu heatsinks that overcockers love."

        Without the l in overclockers, the sentence takes on a whole new, very disturbing, meaning; albeit one not entirely inappropriate to a discussion of fertility.
  • DUH! (Score:4, Informative)

    by OmniVector (569062) <see my homepage> on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:51AM (#11041340) Homepage
    is this really such a surprise [theregister.co.uk]???
  • by TechnicalThug (799854) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:53AM (#11041349)
    Too many humans, not enough Laptops!
  • by KrancHammer (416371) <GunseMatt@NOSpaM.hotmail.com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:54AM (#11041359)
    I think laptops should be distributed free of charge to all male participants in day-time talk shows, reality shows, "dating" shows, and all MTV reality based programming.

  • by TrollBridge (550878) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:54AM (#11041360) Homepage Journal
    IIRC, that's the first time the word "scrotum" has appeared in the front-page headlines. Congratulations, Slashdot, on a new milestone!
  • So is an iron... (Score:3, Informative)

    by toupsie (88295) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:54AM (#11041367) Homepage
    Did you know that if you leave a hot iron on your crotch and press the steam button, its bad for your fertility? Strange but true.

    The only thing this article didn't discuss was it good for a woman to use a laptop? Should I encourage my wife to strap a powerbook to her punany?

    • by Lonesome Squash (676652) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:20AM (#11041624)
      Did you know that if you leave a hot iron on your crotch and press the steam button, it's bad for your fertility?

      So THAT'S what I'm doing wrong!

      I ironed my nipple once -- nothing kinky, I was in a hurry trying to get ready for work. It was an amazing experience for several reasons. One, it was a truly profound kind of pain. I've felt things that hurt worse, but this hurt right down to the soles of my feet.

      Two, and I am not kidding here, my nipple was really flat for a long time afterwards. My friends used to ask to see it once in a while so they could marvel and mock.

      It also led immediately to one of the more frustrating experiences of my life. I had just burned myself. Like a good little scout, I immediately tried to run cold water on it. I ran over to the sink, turned on the water, and stood there stupidly, thinking, "How the hell am I going to get my nipple under that faucet!" At that point, my wife, who had heard me yelling and cursing, asked what was wrong, and I told her I had burned myself. She called in helpfully, "Run it under cold water."

      She really didn't deserve being cursed out like that. I don't know what the experience did to my fertility, but I know what it did to my ability to mate.

  • That's ok (Score:5, Funny)

    by yack0 (2832) <keimel AT gmail DOT com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:54AM (#11041369) Homepage
    With two kids already, I'm done anyway thankyouverymuch.

    "I'd like to trade in this 15" powerbook for a 17" please? My urologist says some of my sperm are still alive."
    • by Gopal.V (532678) on Thursday December 09 2004, @08:58AM (#11041403) Homepage Journal
      >I'd like to trade in this 15" for a 17" please? My urologist says some of my sperm are still alive

      That's what I first read ... Then I re-read it again and noticed the powerbook along with the 15" :)

    • by JohnKrasnay (160382) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:08AM (#11041507)
      I have three kids, the third of which was conceived after my first vasectomy.

      I have decided to begin placing my ThinkPad directly on my scrotum, just to be sure the heat has the desired effect.
      • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:13AM (#11041554)
        > I have three kids, the third of which was conceived after my first vasectomy.

        Are you stupid? Your wifes cheating on you, dumbass.
        • Assumedly that was the first thing he checked.

          It is not uncommon for a vasectomy or a tubal ligation to fail for any number of reasons. Further, it is possible to have either procedure reversed. If you get a vasectomy, you should make sure it took and held for 3-6 months following healing before assuming sterility.
      • by Bastian (66383) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:49AM (#11041888)
        after my first vasectomy

        I'm going to assume that there's a perfectly reasonable explanation for this phrase, and it's not just that you consider this a good way to spend your Saturday night.
    • Go for the 12" (has heat problems, but the 17" has more area for the heat to spread in than the 15"), or better yet, something with a P4EE or a Prescott (desktop CPU, FWIW).

      Or, just get my Toshiba Satellite Pro 405CS. Pentium 75, so it's cheap, and it's fucking HOT (I think it's the fact that the HDD is between the keyboard and the battery...)
  • Ever since CPUs started warming up the bottoms of laptops to unfomfortable temperatures, they've been renamed notebooks.

    On another front, I wonder if we'll see the new Trojan line of laptops soon? I'll take a pass on a lubricated one, though. :)

  • by DrXym (126579) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:00AM (#11041426)
    Before some geek wires their nutsack with a liquid cooling system!
  • MYTH ALERT !!! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Naikrovek (667) <jjohnson@@@psg...com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:01AM (#11041436) Homepage
    Before some of you conclude on your own that this is dangerous, read this.

    On this site a few months back ("few" = [3..12]) I read a story about some swedish dudes who found a way to cheaply and without prescription make themselves sterile. Their way? To dunk their testes in water that is over 105F for an hour a day.

    this killed their sperm, but the effect IS NOT PERMANENT! You will not permanetly damage anything by doing this. The effect lasts weeks but is not permanent.

    If you're into painful male birth control, perhaps this is an option for you.

    Guys, putting a laptop on your lap for extended periods of time will only make you temporarily less likely to conceive. It will not prevent you from generating sperm, and it will not last forever.
      • by tverbeek (457094) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:34AM (#11041754) Homepage
        I'd strongly recommend a vasectomy for anybody.

        You might want to be a little more specific in that recommendation. Men who still want to become fathers should probably avoid it. Men whose female partners are post-menopausal, who are chronically celebate, or who are exclusively homosexual might not want to bother, no matter how convenient and affordable. And it's definitely not for women.

  • by Junior J. Junior III (192702) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:02AM (#11041446) Homepage
    Thank you, HP for keeping me child-free! I enjoy a nearly stress-free lifestyle and have a ton of disposable income thanks to you!
  • My theory (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bogaboga (793279) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:07AM (#11041493)
    Is it why in most disadvantaged African societies, where young boys do not wear pants, one finds them very very sexualy potent well into their adult life. One also finds their tools (read pen*s) are really big for their age compared to western societies?

    Imagine: Despite the AIDS epidemic, the African population is still growing astronomically and is predicted to be one-fourth of the world's in 5 decades.

    As an African myself, I think this has something to do with the temperature on one's body "down there", where the tool is left to dangle in the air. Men on that continent remain sexually active well into their 80's. My grandfather married again at 82, and Uganda's former president (Binaisa) who is 86 recently married a Japanese - http://pages.globetrotter.net/mleblank/msd/nv-moon -12-09-2004.html [globetrotter.net] May be it's the genes or the food the people eat. It has been said that food on that continent is less contaminated with additives since most farmers are too poor to afford things like that.

    If the above theory is correct, it might explain why the population of Africans in general, despite all the hardships continues to grow.

    Now, the above are facts so do not mod me down. In my home country, these is [almost] no market for Viagra and the like.

    • Re:My theory (Score:5, Insightful)

      by digitalsushi (137809) <slashdot@digitalsushi.com> on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:27AM (#11041700) Journal
      Perhaps the birth rate in Africa is higher because Africa's mothers do not have the proper education about contraceptives, nor sometimes the freedom to make their own choices. I've never been educated in the matter so it's a fool's speculation on my part. I have heard that population growth comes into check once a society has educated females treated as equals to the men. I realize Africa is large and has a diverse societal background, and that making such blanket statements is dangerous . . .
  • by Thrakkerzog (7580) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:10AM (#11041532)
    I have a laptop!
  • This is news? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by gordguide (307383) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:23AM (#11041647)
    Maybe I just pay attention more than most, but doesn't everyone know this by now?

    20 years ago they told us the kind of underwear you choose (and we can include going commando here as a choice) determines sperm count.

    Tight underwear = lower count; loose = higher. They even told us it was because of the heat retention, which adversely affects the count and motility (how "peppy" the little fellas are).

    Now, exactly which normal cognitive person needs a study to tell you s hot machine (or a heat lamp for that matter) on your upper legs might do the same thing?

    I got it. Lets do a combo study to cross-correlate exactly which kind of underwear and which type of laptop is the absolute worst . Yeah, that's it.

    Or maybe we could just figure it out for ourselves. Nah, let's submit it anyway; there's no research grant in using common sense, is there?
  • by catdevnull (531283) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:37AM (#11041787)
    Let's not get TESTE over this issue. At first GLANS, this might be a very scary prospect, but there's a VAS DEFERENS between damage and infertility. I believe the Finnish andrologist, Dr. Skro Tümm, did the SEMINAL work on this area of study.

    I'm sorry. I couldn't help myself.

    (reminds me of a New Yorker cartoon when Satan tells his associates, "Put the punster in with the mime...")

  • Fertility Sucks (Score:3, Insightful)

    by nuintari (47926) on Thursday December 09 2004, @10:05AM (#11042052) Homepage
    I can honestly say this doesn't bother me. I have never wanted kids, nor should I have kids. I would make the worst father in the world, and I am okay with that.

    So, everytime someone warns me about damaging my ability to reproduce, I go ahead and do it. Tight pants, warm undies, gratuitous and long term use of hottubs at every oppurtunity. Now, I am going back to using my lap as a laptop rest. My Inspiron is one heck of a space heater. My boys will shoot out in coffins dag nabbit!

    And invariably, I end up offending someone with my little "I don't want kids" rants. Tell me, why does the world care if I have kids? My doc said no on a vasectomy for a few years, as I am "still young (I'm almost 26), and will likely change my mind." and the possibility of a lawsuite is too great when it turns out to be irreversable.

    leave it to this nations great Lawyer population to force me to own many items which can be construed as "Ball Warmers."
  • It's been known for years that sitting in an too-hot hot tub for a while or wearing overly-restrictive underwear can cause a short-term decrease in sperm count. It is any real stretch of the imagination to determine that putting a different heat source near the crotch and sitting in a way that confines the testicles in that heat would have the very same effect?

    Your balls need to be somewhat cool to function properly... why the hell else do you think they have to dangle outside of the body in their own little storage pouch-- for ornamental purposes?

    ~Philly
    • Has there ever been a poll about this? It'd be nice to have some idea how many slashdotters are married/committed.
        • Are the two mutually exclusive? I frequently refer to my marriage license as my commitment papers.
          That's why all the married guys are constantly twisting their wedding bands around their finger - trying to figure out the combination (told at an engagement party by the groom-to-be)
    • by AEton (654737) on Thursday December 09 2004, @09:03AM (#11041455)
      The entire first paragraph of the article is devoted to the notion that boys tend to spread their legs far out for exactly this reason - but notebook computers force a more artificial, closer-together position that's somewhat less conducive to gamete production.

      I salute you on obtaining the same result independent of the linked article! Your simultaneous conclusion is on par with Newton and Leibniz! Gauss and Legendre! Napier and Burgi!

      Hail the Slashdot warrior.