3Com Files to Spin Palm Division Off in IPO 88
It's been an ongoing story about 3Com and its PalmPilot division. The question, of course, has been what to do with it. Just a few months ago, we covered their original plan for spinning off the division, but now it looks like they are actually putting the plan in motion and we should see an IPO in about six months.
How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:2)
Still use the software for contacts on my box, but am wondering - are any of you out there total palm junkies, and do you find them very useful?
I use mine all of the time (Score:1)
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
--
Donald Roeber
$100 million? (Score:4)
Are they just being humble? Unless the stock market comes to its senses in the next few months, I rather suspect they'll get a little more than $100 million (given absurdly high IPOs we've been seeing)!
Dana
Will they have the resources to survive alone? (Score:1)
With the backing of 3Com, you knew they had a parent company strong enough to fight off the big boys. Going out on their own, though, they're in a marketspace with Microsoft, HP, and Compaq, among others. In some ways, this feels like a stab at making some big IPO money by the folks at 3Com -- spin 'em off, watch the stock go high on the IPO, sell the stock and count your money. I'm curious, and a little skeptical, if they'd continue to help them out if the Palm spinoff starts to run into rocky waters. They've already got theirs, so what's it to 'em?
Cheers,
ZicoKnows@hotmail.com
How popular are they? (Score:1)
Wish I were in the conf. room at Handspring today (Score:1)
I suppose the fact that Palm is stepping out bodes well for the handspring folks as they get to go out first. However, the anticipation factor in handspring probably got scuttled a little bit too.
Palm Division? (Score:1)
A sure thing? (Score:1)
We're all allowed one totally obvious comment, right?
Acquisition fodder (Score:1)
Palm (Score:1)
They're not going to make billions... (Score:2)
Splitting a good thing for 3com (Score:2)
3Com's big name is in networking... no matter what else they do, they continue to be a network equipment supplier. The Palm, on the other hand, has little to do with 3com's popular image. In fact, some people probably are unaware of anything else 3com does... just work on the Palm.
By splitting the Palm away from the 3com name, the Palm is left to survive, and thrive, on it's own. The Palm doesn't have a huge impact on 3com's stock, because it is a side game. However, a company dedicated to producing the Palm would probably perform wonders in it's IPO... because the Palm is popular, works well, and generally has a name already.
Disclaimer: Hey, I could be wrong - I'm a geek, not a market analyst. Technically speaking, I'm way out of my depth.
Sure, but will it ship with Linux? :^) (Score:1)
By the way, how come they never release the even numberes? I want a Palm VI, dammit!
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
David
bash: ispell: command not found
Wait a sec... (Score:3)
So let me get this straight:
IPOs are typically used to obtain working capital for business development. But the Palm series is already popular and profitable.
Does this sound screwy to anyone besides me?
Schwab
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
Plus it's handy having "paper and pen" in my pocket should I need to jot stuff down quickly.
Using it to control my TV is pretty fun too.
Re:$100 million? (Score:1)
Yet another crazy IPO (Score:1)
Sheesh, forget about palm, buy 3com (Score:1)
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:2)
My concern was without merit.
I take my Palm everywhere I go, and use the phone book, the to-do list, the calender, the memo pad etc. all the time.
The phone book is great, when I meet somebody, I enter a few key words in the 'title' field, like what they look like, what they do, and so on. Then, when I want to remember a name, or need a phone number, I can just do a search for something I remember about them, and bingo! I have the name and number
To-do list. What can I say? It keeps me sane at work, my stress level is quite manageable when I'm organized.
The calender - the Palm will beep when I have a meeting or appointment coming up, It reminds me 5 days before a family member's birthday, That feature alone would make it worth while.
Notepad - Suddenly all those random ideas I have find a home so that I will remember them for later.
Of course I needn't mention the add on programs like CbasPad - a basic interpeter for the Palm (I wrote a program to track and plot my weight every day. I know within a day or two if I've been eating too much, so I can cut back before I get too heavy and have to go on a long diet). I also download books and read them with CSpotRun when I have free time (It beats carrying around several books, the Bible, and a greek New Testement). Of course there are games that you can have to keep yourself amused when you're bored (like PocketChess).
--Jacob
Re:$100 million? (Score:1)
The stock market has never lost its senses! It can see just as well now as it could two years ago, when I enjoyed the little scrapings of fat left on its plate after it had good prime rib!
Seriously, though. I expect that the market capitalization on Palm will go right into the absurd levels within one month. Over time, that phantom stock value will slowly come to reflect something more realstic.
I was greatly amused by how they compared it to Linux in the article, because I know some friends who are Linux champions that will pay ridiculous prices for a share of Palm stock for the same reason they would for a share of Red Hat. They will pay any price to support "cool" technology. I have to admit that it is an attractive viewpoint if one can afford to hold it.
(I am not a Linux crusader, sorry. I like it, but I accept that I cannot get the work I need to do done in a non-windows environment without putting in a lot more work than I currently do.)
B. Elgin
Re:$100 million? (Score:1)
For example, I think VA Linux made about 40 million shares outstanding for their IPO. That's a good number for an entire company--consider that the Palm part of 3com is a fraction of their total market cap. I would say that the Palm division would come out at about 10 million shares. VA had a very, very high IPO price, about $30 a share...I expect that Palm would come out at about 12-15 per share, where most are.
This comes out to about 120-150 million dollars. Even if the stock goes up to 200 (in that case the market cap would rise to 2 billion dollars), 3Com still only takes in $120-150 million.
Feel free to correct me, I could be wrong.
Re:Wish I were in the conf. room at Handspring tod (Score:2)
This will be big. (Score:1)
Even though the Linux companies seem somewhat shaky, Palm looks pretty sound. I wish I weren't a poor student and had enough $$$ to let e-trade sell me some IPO stock.
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:2)
IPOs are typically used to obtain working capital for business development.
My thought: they are worried about new palm devices hurting 3com's bottom line. So they spin the palm division off to seperate it from 3com. And if handspring, et. al. start to drown the palm division, only the stock holders of the PDA stock are feeling the heat -- not all of 3com.
-d9
I sure hope it's a big IPO (Score:1)
now, watching it do nothing but go down and sit
at pitifully low prices.
this IPO announcement brings me hope that maybe
someday i can actually get my money back out of
3com.
w00w00
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:1)
"One for you... Ten for me. One for you... Ten for me." -- 3Com at the Palm IPO
B. Elgin
palm apps (Score:1)
Now everybody start coding Palm apps so you can get in on the IPO!
A little bit humble, or not..... (Score:1)
Don't forget that they make a profit, too. (Score:1)
When will these starry-eyed corporate types learn? I mean, if a company already has a profit margin, then it can't have room for the immensely valuable future growth, right? Right??
Exciting time for the industry (Score:3)
Clearly, it's the leading player in the handheld category of devices, and clearly handhelds are where a lot of action will be for the next few years. But equally, handhelds need to be wired, tethered, and tied to existing platforms for awhile to take advantage of the vast networks of data which already exist.
By being independent, PalmPilot would be free to make alliances all over the place. A company like Compaq, for instance, might not "deal" with IBM as readily as they would with an independent. However, an independent will have problems growing quickly enough to cover all of the opportunities. Here lies the strength of a company like IBM having a division like PalmPilot. Think what the Apple Macintosh might have done had it been an IBM product in the early 80's!
There may not actually be a way for one player to capture the lion's share of the economic value of this market. Go it alone and you risk being the VCR Beta or the Mac, while turning it into the industry standard like VHS means you are just one of many players. Of course, the Microsoft story shows that it can be done, but I'd think that would be hard to pull off in this market. Back when MS was creating its monopoly, reverse engineering and cloning the PC seemed daunting, but not today. Plus, competitors are much more wary given what Microsoft did. Opensourcing it would be VERY cool... for the customers. Hard to recommend it to 3Com with a totally straight face as it would open them up to shareholder lawsuits.
Anyway, it doesn't make sense as a division of 3Com, no synergies at all with the sales force, channels, customers, etc. So, how should they dispose of it? They undoubtedly have had an eye on some of the wild IPOs lately and figure that's the best way to get the most money out of it now (watch: they'll tout it as a linux pure-play! :) which might make a pile of dough for them but won't necessarily yield the most successful outcome for the platform.
Very exciting time for the industry, though.
If they advertise Linux for Palm... (Score:1)
It did not work for me! Moved over to Win CE (Score:1)
I got a palm III at the begining of the year. At first it was the coolest thing and I tried to use it for everything. But I was never satisfied with the pen recognition. It worked, but I was limited to the speed that I write at. Personally I can type much much faster that I can write something. I ended up not using it and eventually got rid of it.
Now I use an HP Jornada 680 and I love it. I can actually use it for taking meeting notes, working on Word documents as well as all the other personal information I store in it. It's great for the plane flights too because I never have enough room to open my notebook all the way, but with this I can use it easily. Sure its bigger and a little heavier but I don't mind. I just started carring a leather organizer again when I take it out of the office. The voice record feature works great for getting those instant thoughts. On top of all that, it's actually useful for browsing the web when I dial-in from home. I can even use secure pages and check my bank account, email, etc. I love it and would not go back to Palm.
To sum it up, my personal answer is that the palm computing platform did not work for me. I wanted to do more than it would let me. I didn't mind the increase in size. I can actually use the jornada keyboard like it was a full size one.
My final point, when I was at Comdex this year I saw people scribbling notes as fast as they could on their palms while I entered the same ammount of information in a fraction of the time on my keyboard. I saw most palm users quit mid-way through sessions while I never had a problem.
Just a thought (Score:1)
Perhaps 3Com is worried that focusing on keeping "Best Buy" and other consumer outlets happy and selecting the right fruity colors for the plastic shell is detracting their management from pushing their commercial equipment. IBM stopped selling home computers for a similar reason.
Of course, what good is naming a stadium after yourself if you have a funny name only sell obscure networking equipment? I guess there really is no such thing as bad publicity.
--
Future of handheld computers and phones (Score:2)
This shows us a clear direction where mobile computing is now headed to: There will be a fierce fight between WinCE and Palm camps over dominance in handheld WAP handsets or, later in the future (not many years more, anyway), powerful handheld mobile Internet-enabled computers.
No one will be using their cell phone only for talking in ten years (+-5 years, depends on when the 3rd Generation UMTS cell phones start appearing on consumer market) AND no one will be using their Palm X disconnected at that time.
Apple? God I hope not! (Score:2)
I'm not sure what effect Apple ownership would have on overall innovation. Apple tends to be ahead of the curve on some things, but can also be behind on other things. They tend to burn their bridges when they switch technologies, though, hence my comment above about legacy support.
Jon
This IPO is gonna bomb... (Score:1)
maybe if they change their name to "3com linux systems"
:)
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:2)
The obvious - they want the cash for expansion.
Publicity - in this day and age, having a big IPO will get you a lot of free publicity.
Make management of the company a lot of $. In this case, doubtless the staff of Palm is clamoring for the IPO considering their parent's (3Com) stock has been going nowhere for a while now.
Help attract new management and staff through the ability to give them options for a stock that is already public.
Like I said, there are many more reasons, but these are the ones that seem applicable in this case.
Re:How popular are they? (Score:3)
It's also my understanding that there was (is?) a large brain-drain going on, as Palm lost a lot of its really good people to Handspring. (Ironic, given that Hawkins and Dubinsky left Palm in '98 to form Handspring after 3Com refused to let them spin off Palm.) Palm may be hoping that the results of an IPO will enable them to afford to keep (and hire) good employees.
Re:Just a thought (Score:1)
They sell networking kits, hubs and NICs through CompUSA, Office Max, and probably others.
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:1)
--
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:2)
Absolutely. I grabbed a Pilot when they first came out, and my life instantly got a whole lot more organized.
Now I've got a Visor (the PalmOS device from Handspring), and I'm even happier with that. Could I live without it? Yeah, of course ... but I'd sure as hell miss it.
Now if only someone would just hurry up with a wireless-modem Springboard, I'd be all set ...
Re:Just a thought (Score:1)
Sorry, I don't consider networking hubs or cards a normal consumer electronic device (like a CD player, say), even if they are sold into the home office market.
--
About time, but is it too late? (Score:1)
As always, the success of this company will depend on what it can do next. It won't be an automatic success just because the Palm[X] was successful. It will have a nice stream of licensing royalties from Handspring, and sales of existing products are good, but it will have to innovate in order to thrive. Imagine the irony of licensing Handspring's "springboard" expansion card technology?
I'm just waiting for a big notepad-sized palm with a color screen that can read regular web pages, has a nice text editor, and costs $300.
Alliances (Score:1)
Just some names: Nokia, Motorola, Sony
Handhelds: PalmOS vs. Linux???
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
I think some standards for synchronization of various devies (maybe of data formats) needs to happen. Ideally I'd like my palm to be on the net all the time and also work as my cell phone (the PDQ is too big). Maybe some day.
The tough thing is making a device small enough to make people bring it with them all the time, but with a large enough screen to be useful.
Re:It did not work for me! Moved over to Win CE (Score:1)
-ec
Jornada's are bigger and more expensive (Score:1)
A Palmtop is smaller than a mini-laptop - this has all the disadvantages that a small size has... small screen that's hard to read, no keyboard, little or not expansion, etc. But, it is smaller. If you are like me and will only carry something around if it can fit in your pocket, then the Jornada is simply too big. Also a Palm is cheaper. Those Jornada 680's start at roughly $900. This is about 4X the price of a Palm IIIe, and approx. 1.5X the price of a Palm VII.
Still, there's no doubt that you are correct, Palms are for some, and not for others. I tell anyone who asks about my Palm, to buy one from a store with a good return policy.
AvantGo? I meant Landware GoType (Score:1)
-ec
Useful ? (Score:1)
o Remember my home number
o Remember my wife's work number (she wasn't happy)
o Remember my home zip code
o Frequent long trips to the in laws were boring because no games !!!
I'm totally dependent on this device !!! If you don't use yours send it to me
Re:How popular are they? (Score:2)
It's not as if 3Com is just cutting Palm loose. They'll get a fairly huge amount of shares in the new Palm and stand to make quite a bit of change off of Palm's efforts.
Palm also gets more freedom and "maneouverablility" not living under the 3Com roof. They're not limited to who they can deal with. For instance, it wouldn't look good if Palm - a division of 3Com - were to suddenly write wireless network software to run on Cisco hardware. Strategic decisions don't have to be run past as many committees and managers who may not be as "in tune" with Palm's needs and situations.
All in all, I think it's a Good Thing(tm) for everyone involved.
Re:Will they have the resources to survive alone? (Score:1)
Re:Sure, but will it ship with Linux? :^) (Score:1)
In the words of David Pogue: "Here, take a look at my Palm Death!".
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
Everything that used to go on bar napkins or post-its or whatever now end up on my Palm, rather than a pile of papers bits (and ultimately the trash).
The key, for me, is that I actually take the Palm everywhere! If you leave it at home, you can't use it! So I had to find a case I could deal with (originally the Slim Wallet, but I've switched to the hardshell JetPac) that was small enough to fit in a pocket, but rugged enough to protect the device. Now I don't leave home without it.
And while there are paper pocket organizers, they tend to be bigger that the Palm. And they can't remind you of an appointment or event unless you remember to look at it. The Palm can beep until you have a look.
On the other hand, I've found that my usage has stabilized down to using the phonebook, the notepad, and memopad. I had assumed that I'd use any number of add-ons, but that tends to be rare with me.
Now I just want a stable version of the pdQ phone with a cheap wireless net access plan...
Reading Palms Future (Score:2)
Sure a PDA is cool and all, but thats not the Killer App. An easy to use, crash proof(mostly), fast, cheap, handheld window to the infinite resources of the internet.. now thats utility. And I dont really need Windows/Linux/MacOS or any other full figured operating system to accomplish this. Granted there will always be some wonderful open sourcers that shrink a kernel down, but IMHO Palm OS will most likely be the OS thats running on such a device.
They pretty much have it in the palm VII's (all but the cheap part) I use my wireless palm to read slashdot on the bus to work everyday, check my email, etc. My boss uses his to unlock his car when he locks the keys in (using the infrared port). The value of these devices cant be understated. There is just too many possiblities.
The whole IPO craze is definitely a little disturbing, brought about because everybody wishes that they had bought some cisco 5 years ago, but IMHO you'll probably wish you had some Palm stock 5 years from now...
Re:$100 million?: They're Only Selling A 20% Stake (Score:1)
I believe that $100 million figure is just for the 20% of the company that will be sold to the public. According to this New York Times article [nytimes.com], the figure is actually a bit under 20%. That said, they're shooting for something closer to a $500 million market cap, though I'd say that still leaves plenty of room for the share price to jump to insanely wild heights in the first few days of trading.
palm desktop for linux? (Score:1)
Yes, I know that there's other versions out there (anybody know of good instructions to get it to work with StarOffice?), but I'd still like to see 3com's original program ported over. I'm willing to bet if they announced better Linux support, their stock would go up further.
John "Dark Paladin" Hummel
Game news? http://www.pcfan.com [pcfan.com]
Addicted to Palm and going through withdrawl (Score:1)
Re:Sure, but will it ship with Linux? :^) (Score:1)
Umm, Japan, I think, and the number is four. There are two/three ways to say four, and one is associated with death. Can't remember which one it is though.
Re:Wait a sec... (Score:1)
> But the Palm series is already popular and profitable.
> Does this sound screwy to anyone besides me?
The small reason: IPOs are called "liquidity events' by venture capitilists.
The big reason: Chambers (Cisco CEO) was a keynote speaker at the Palm developers conference. He hinted that there are big deals that would NOT happen if Palm had remained strictly a 3Com captive division.
Re:Jornada's are bigger and more expensive (Score:1)
I pulled the price off of HP's direct sale's web site. Most often these are slightly more expensive, but in this case, I guess HP is ripping off it's direct sales customers.
Go here:
http://www.hp.com/jornada/products/680/overview
And click "Buy Online" to see the $900 price that I mentioned.
$680 is much better, but it's still too much to spend on a glorified organizer. But each to their own.
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
The great thing about the palm for me, is the ability to have all the information you could want with you at all times. For class, I have
A note on graffiti: it's great for what it was intended for, quick jots while holding the device in your hand without having to unfold or setup anything. Meeting someone and taking down their number/setting up an appointment is really what the system was geared for. It doesn't scale up very well, though, for something like taking extended notes in class or working on a paper. So, I now am anxiously awaiting This really cool folding keyboard [thinkoutside.com].
I have gotten to play with a WinCE (I refuse to call them by their new name) device (my dad's HP Journada). Save the battery life (s'posedly 10 hours) and possibly the price (~$900) I see no reason to buy one of those things. True, it can do all the things that most people want from a laptop (ms office stuff, web access, email) but in that case, why not just get a laptop? As for using them as a PDA-type function. They are a bit smaller than a laptop, but not small enough. One of the major things I enjoy with my Visor, is that I always have it on hand. During class, at work, at a consulting job, and at home. You just can't just stuff a jornada in your front pocket (well, I probably can [mmm, big pockets. plenty of room for visor, RJ-45 crimper, penguins, etc..] ;-) but it's still not very practical).
So, I always have my Visor, and am thusly never really bored (games, books, news, work). The next step is to go for total integration: wire the visual output directly to my brain and have the unit tickle my visual cortex so that the screen overlays whatever I see. After that, thought recognition and after that make it have some sort of temporal shifting capabilities so it knows what I want it to do, even before I tell it (hrm... reminds me of some certain elevators ;-)).
Re:Sheesh, forget about palm, buy 3com (Score:1)
They'll take however many shares of COMS you own as of some date, run it through the calculation, and give you X shares of the new PALM and X shares of the new (rest of) COMS. After that, the shares trade basically independently and you can buy or sell as you like.
I have no idea what the date you have to own COMS is, for all I know it alrady passed. I also have no idea what the calculation is going to be or how to determine if it will be beneficial to you. Consult your financial advisor. YMMV, IANAL and IANASB
Re:Just a thought (Score:1)
No, I don't think that claim is ridiculous. The person who buys networking equipment is most likely not the "end user" (meaning the person who is actually using the NIC/Hub). It's the person who is paid to worry about such things.
(You and I may have home networks for our personal use, but that's an exception to the rule.)
--
Re:How succesful has palm computing been? (Score:1)
Lucky bastard. :-) I was riding my bike back from class one day, and something happened (hand slipped or something) such that I fell off. My PalmPilot Pro was in the front pocket on the side I landed on...c-r-a-c-k. :-(
I was still able to sync my notes out of it, though, and got a replacement for $100. As part of that process, 3Com "screwed up" somewhere and ended up sending me a Palm III as a replacement. I called them to verify what should've happened...they said I could keep it, or if I was really set on another PalmPilot Pro, I could send it back and they'd send out the "right" product. I think it's pretty obvious what choice I made. (Let's see...double the RAM and infrared...what would I do with those? :-) )
hmm ? (Score:1)
many companies have ipos, who cares ?
Trouble manageing? (Score:1)
I also worked in that facility for a bit (6 months ago). And I got some impressions that 3COM corporate have different expectations than the realities of the USR/Megahertz PCMCIA manufacturing process, when compared to PC LAN cards (very small form factor, LOTS of parts count vs. lots of room, almost no parts).
It may also have to do with problems managing divisions/products that are too far removed from the 3COM core products that they are used to and understand. This way they don't have to worry about how to manage a product that isn't their forte'
Remember that 3COM probably bought USR so that they could cover more computer data COM bases. Palm Pilots are not directly associated with that racket, though they do use that kind of stuff.
It may not be the only reason, but could be a factor. And yes, make some bucks along the way.
Panting like a blood puppy... (Score:1)
What I wish: Why can't there be an IPO listing service? or am I just being stupid and not paying attention?
Apple? I hope so! (Score:1)
Palm makes a great product but they don't have very good mac specific features (though it used to be worse). With Apple growing in market share, this is a bad thing for Palm. Hopefully, Apple will buy up a stake in Palm and use that to influence the company to at least license the Palm OS out to Apple.
DB
Re:Apple? I hope so! (Score:1)
Jon
Re:Addicted to Palm and going through withdrawl (Score:1)