Nikon considers Linux support for its Digicams 55
Obscura writes "Recently I bought a Nikon Coolpix 950. When visiting the Nikontech Digital Camera Support Forum the admin mentioned that Nikon was considering official support for Linux and software for use with its digicams.
In a post he mentioned that they are watching the number of Linux related questions and requests for support.
" Hold your horses folks - I've got e-mail from the web master - it looks like the point has been made, and things taken a bit out of context- so no more posting, k?
Supports CompactFlash/Linux Supports CompactFlash (Score:1)
Since Linux supports Compact Flash Cards, and the Nikon uses Compact Flash Cards......
What more do you need, except the Gimp????
Serious question, considering upgrading my Kodak DC210 Plus to Nikon.....
motjuste@briefcase.com
Mail Bomb 'em?? (Score:2)
What? Spam another support site, to convince them that Linux users are a bunch of nice guys who they really want as customers?
Do these mail-bomb campaigns really represent a forward-looking attitude for Linux? Or does it make the whole community seem like a bunch of thugs?
If you're not going to buy one, don't mislead them (Score:2)
don't screw up people's businesses (Score:2)
1) hurt Linux,
2) hurt Nikon's businesses.
Nikon and other individuals (companies should be consider individuals, too) have a genuine and sincere interest in supporting those platforms where there will be a healthy profit margin. If these people are misled to believe that there is a profit, they would most likely resent having spent time and money investing on lies.
I think is it irresponsible, stupid and childlish to ask other people to request support for x or y just because one uses Linux. C'mon, guys. By doing so you are playing with someone else's money and property. That's not the right thing to do. If there is to be support for applications and devices on Linux, it should come out of genuine customer need. That's the only way to obtain healthy and lasting support for Linux.
So says the leader:)
Luis Espinal
http://www.cs.fiu.edu/~lespin03
odd anecdote (Score:1)
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
GPhoto support is easy! (Score:3)
We should just ask them to contribute to the Nikon module for GPhoto. It's a great app and writing simple camera specific driver modules for new camera support is the way it was designed. Then they could have automatic support built into the eventual GNOME desktop.
So mention www.GPhoto.org in your email.
Hope it supports SANE (Score:2)
Not that SANE is perfect, but it is a better standard then our other options.
From my recolection of the SANE mailing list, Nikon will give your the information you need to write SANE drivers that you can disktribute. (You can't distribute the information they give you however, only the source you write from that)
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
It really depends on your needs. There's megapixel cameras for ~$300 that are pretty nice, some of which were reviewed in PC Magazine [pcmag.com]. But then what they find best might not be best for you, depending how important things like storage medium type, time between shots, transfer mechanism, etc. matter to you. A two megapixel camera may be great, but if you're taking pictures for a web site, it's overkill.
My recommendation? Figure out what's important to you, and then look for magazine and on-line reviews. The reviews will help judge image quality as well as describing the feature sets of the individual cameras.
Advice (Score:1)
digital camera, and have been worried about
Linux compatibility... ideally, I'd hook it
up to my Alpha over serial, parallel, or
via something that hooks in via SCSI (although
I doubt such things exist)... less ideally,
I'd hook it into my PPro200 (also lacks USB) via
the same means... Anyone know of the
equiv of
http://www.guug.de:8080/cgi-bin/winni/lsc.pl
for digital cameras on Linux? Is anyone working
on a Digital Camera HOWTO?
Re:This is great news (Score:1)
-luge
How long before ... (Score:1)
Re:Coolpix Cameras in General (Score:1)
Treat it like a 64-100 ASA film camera and the images are superb.
Photopc works slowly but without a hitch, and I especially like the -f 3 option to name all the JPEG files based on the time and date of the shot. Then if I crop or rotate them, I still have the timestamp even though the file time may have changed.
My experiences with the Nikon 950 and my Linux box (Score:1)
"You cannot uncook Mushoo pork once is has been cooked" -- wiseman
I posted my opinion (Score:1)
==============================
Windows NT has crashed,
I am the Blue Screen of Death,
Re: (Score:1)
Parallel port card reader not slow on Windows... (Score:1)
Re:Smart Media = Good! (Score:2)
I think SmartMedia is actually a better design than CompactFlash. CompactFlash has pin-based connectors and carries a lot of electronics. SmartMedia cards have flat gold connectors (like smart cards) that don't get bent and don't trap dirt and are very easy to insert/remove. Te cards contain essentially just the storage and no extra electronics. SmartMedia cards are very thin and somewhat flexible. While individual SmartMedia cards are always a little behind CompactFlash in terms of capacity, their storage density seems higher, and it's easy to carry a whole bunch of them.
While both SmartMedia and CompactFlash are usable, I actually prefer cameras that use SmartMedia.
Linux also supports SmartMedia (Score:2)
I have been using a D-600L (and lately a C-2000Z) from Olympus with my Linux machine for a year and a half. I go directly from SmartMedia to the GIMP, no drivers or anything required, and the SmartMedia cards are easier to remove/insert than a floppy.
This is great news (Score:2)
As well, it lets me run my QuickCam as a TV input device rather than requiring specific software to run the capture program.
Re:Good timing (Score:1)
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
I think this is the true reason you haven't gotten it yet.
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
--
With a laptop, the CoolPix 950 is very usable. (Score:3)
That's my laptop recognizing the 48 MB flash card that I pulled out of the camera. The camera formats it with vfat, so a simple "mount -t vfat /dev/hde1 /flash" gives me access to all the photos from the camera,
On the other hand, if you don't have a laptop, you are screwed. The raw TIFFs that it takes are 5.5 MB... the highest quality JPEGs around 800K. The flash cards can be hooked up to a flash card reader, either USB (no dice, under linux) or Parrallel (slooooooooooowwww, if it's supported at all). Or, of course, you can hook a serial line into the camera... but I don't think that is supported under linux... not to mention how slow it is.
So if Nikon wants to give us drivers to use the serial line, I say: no thanks... serial lines suck anyway. Help finish USB support!
--
Re:i know _just_ what to do! (Score:1)
Mark Scheuern
Re:Hope it supports SANE - gPhoto is a better bet. (Score:1)
Phill
Nikon and gPhoto (Score:3)
a few leads on developing a driver for them. Please mention gPhoto if you mail then.
I have been sent a form to fill in to get the full details of the Nikon cameras by their European technical office manager. It claims that it'll take 4-6 week for Nikon Japan to review it and release details so we at gPhoto can write the driver fully (Apparently gPhoto will already do some of the stuff needed).
On a related note Konica are already writing a GPL driver for Linux based on some of the work included in gPhoto for the Q-MX00 series. They are currently the most Linux friendly company (at present only my gPhoto code is available, theirs will replace it in due course).
Phill
phill@gnu.org
Coolpix Cameras in General (Score:1)
For use under Linux, photopc works. It uses the serial port, which is kind of painful, but it works. You can take the pictures at standard resolution, which produces ~260k jpeg images. You can do the math how long you'll be waiting around.
For serious use, though, a CompactFlash Memory reader is crucial. I have one for my Mac, but it would be great to have it on one of the Linux boxes. That would put everything in one place!
Re:What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
Sometimes they ship an item out of a warehouse in California and then it takes about a week, but that is ok.
The only time I've ever had a 'problem' was when I ordered RH6 the day it was released and it didn't ship for 5 days and then UPS 'lost' it for another week. Other than that, I've ordered all kinds of stuff from monitors to ethernet cards and have always been pleased with the quick turn-around.
Now, if you order an item that is out-of-stock...
Re:I posted my opinion (Score:1)
"I will buy a new digital camera this year, and as I have switched my OS preference from Win32 to Linux in the last year, support for Linux will be one of (if not the most important) factors in my purchase decision.
Two things are most important:
1) Availability of interface specifications so that open-source developers can create software that interacts with Nikon digital cameras.
2) Availability of Nikon digital camera software for the Linux platform either included with the product or available for download from Nikon which is supported at the same level as software for other platforms (windows). It would be preferable but not required (by me) that this software be open-source.
hmmm... (Score:1)
Linux discussion moved (Score:1)
i know _just_ what to do! (Score:1)
yep. buy an Olympus -- they make much better digital cameras. They're the only SLR digital cameras I know that don't cost $15K+. I have a 620L and it kicks ass. 3x Zoom, 1280x1024 resolution, and a five frame memory buffer means you can take 3.3 shots/sec! sure beats waiting for those Mavicas to write to floppy! certainly my choice ok hardware for putting images on the web [wammo.co.nz].
sure, it's great to get as much hardware support for Linux as possible but if it came down to lobbying for a particular camera -- why not "a sk olympus" [olympusamerica.com] for a little linux support?
Re:This is great news (Score:1)
Sure, but by the looks of it, there are at least three such interfaces in development: Video for Linux (for video input), SANE [mostang.com] (for scanner input), and gPhoto [gphoto.org] (for input from digital cameras). The three of them have different foci, so a project merge is somewhat inadvisable. But there are also instances where it would be convenient to use the same interface to different devices.
I doubt that there is a simple solution to this, and I don't know if these projects are working together, but I do know that it would save a lot of work if you only had to write one driver to a common interface, instead of three.
Kinda curious myself about device ideologies (Score:1)
It shouldn't be too hard for them to adapt to that
Re:You can add a PCMCIA port to a desktop = $100 (Score:1)
One big caveat though is that the card is an IRQ hog... it requires a free IRQ between 9 and 12 per PCMCIA card hosted - something not advertized in their literature (I had to call tech support to find out). I don't know much about driver software but I imagine this is a hardware limitation and as such couldn't be overcome in a linux driver. I think overall USB support is a better way to go.
Should also mention that I got this to support image transfer from my Nikon CP950. I've been very happy with it, aside from minor software glitches which will theoretically be eliminated in a flash update, it kicks. If they put TTL in the next model, it'll kick even more.
What about those Hi Res cams (Score:1)
But this is a step in the right direction.
Good timing (Score:2)
A question for
time between two pictures (I would like to snap 8 to 10 shots rapidly like a high-end 35mm with autodrive)
manual override of all features (I need to do some specific things like long exposures or a specific focus waiting for an event)
If I have to go out and buy some professional quality camera it will put a big dent in my savings for the summer, so I'm looking at some off the shelf things like this, especially if I can control it from linux.
the AntiCypher
Re:With a laptop, the CoolPix 950 is very usable. (Score:1)
What about a nice PCMCIA controller on a card? Seems to me that they have 'em pretty cheap now.
I have a 950 that works under linux (Score:1)
The 950 works with gphoto if called a 900s (Score:1)
(P.S.- I 'verified' that it worked with www.gphoto.org, but they put me up as verifying a 900s, don't worry the 950 WORKS!!!)